• Military

• WMD Menu                           

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

LIST OF TABLES

1-1 Planned Interim Stabilization for 200 West Area SSTs

1-2 Comparison of Alternatives by Actions

1-3 Comparison of Alternatives by Waste to be Transferred

3-1 Comparison of Alternatives

4-1 Peak Ground Acceleration Estimates for 200 East and West Areas

4-2 Number of Days With Fog by Season

4-3 Estimates of Extreme Winds at the Hanford Site

4-4 Frequency of Mixing-Layer Thickness by Season and Time of Day

4-5 Ambient Air Quality Standards

4-6 Emission Rates for Stationary Emission Sources Within the Hanford Site for 1992

4-7 Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations in the Hanford Environs for 1990

4-8 Results of PM10 Monitoring Near the Hanford Site in 1992

4-9 Near-Facility Sampling in 1992

4-10 Maximum Radionuclide Concentrations for 200 Area Samples in 1994

4-11 Dose to Hypothetical MEOSI From Hanford Site Operations During 1994

4-12 Monitored Levels of Noise From Outdoor Activities at the Hanford Site

4-13 Industry Employment Distribution in the Tri-Cities Area

4-14 Hanford Site Employment by City

4-15 Income in Benton and Franklin Counties

4-16 Total Units and Occupancy Rates (1993 Estimates)

5-1 Fugitive Dust Emissions from RCSTS Construction

5-2 Effects of the Preferred Alternative on Employment

5-3 Accident Frequency Descriptions and Categories

5-4 Volumes of Tank Waste Transferred from the 200 West Area under the Preferred Alternative

5-5 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Unmitigated Transfer Pipe Break under the Preferred Alternative

5-6 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Mitigated Transfer Pipe Break under the Preferred Alternative

5-7 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Mitigated Spray Release under the Preferred Alternative

5-8 Estimated Health Effects from ITRS Pipe Breaks under the Preferred Alternative

5-9 Estimated Health Effects from ITRS Spray Releases under the Preferred Alternative

5-10 Estimated Health Effects from PPSS Pipe Breaks under the Preferred Alternative

5-11 Estimated Health Effects from PPSS Spray Releases under the Preferred Alternative

5-12 Effects of Truck Transfer Supporting Actions on Employment

5-13 Estimated Worker Exposure during Vehicle Surveys under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-14 Volumes of Tank Waste Transferred from the 200 West Area under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-15 Estimated Health Effects from In-Transit Breach of a LR-56(H) Tanker under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-16 Estimated Health Effects from In-Transit Breach of a 19,000-L (5,000-Gal) Tanker under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-17 Estimated Health Effects from a HLW Spill in the Load and Unload Facilities under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-18 Estimated Health Effects from Seismic Breach of LR-56(H) at the Load and Unload Facilities under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-19 Estimated Health Effects from Seismic Breach of 19,000-L (5,000-Gal) Tanker at the Load and Unload Facilities under the Truck Transfer Alternative

5-20 Effects of Rail Transfer Supporting Actions on Employment

5-21 Estimated Worker Exposure during Vehicle Surveys under the Rail Transfer Alternative

5-22 Volumes of Tank Waste Transferred from the 200 West Area under the Rail Transfer Alternative

5-23 Estimated Health Effects from In-Transit Breach of a 38,000-L (10,000-Gal) Rail Tanker under the Rail Transfer Alternative

5-24 Estimated Health Effects from Seismic Breach of 38,000-L (10,000-Gal) Rail Tanker at the Load and Unload Facilities under the Rail Transfer Alternative

5-25 Air Concentrations from RCSTS and NTF Construction Dust Emissions

5-26 Maximum 24-Hour and Annual Ground Level Concentrations for Emissions from Two DSTs

5-27 Effects of New Storage Alternative on Employment

5-28 Radionuclide Emissions from the NTF

5-29 Estimated Annual Inhalation Dose from Airborne Emissions from the NTF

5-30 Chemical Emissions from the NTF

5-31 Volumes of Tank Waste Transferred Under the New Storage Alternative

5-32 Estimated Health Effects from a NTF Unmitigated Spray Releases under the New Storage Alternative

5-33 Estimated Health Effects from a NTF Mitigated Spray Releases under the New Storage Alternative

5-34 Estimated Health Effects from a NTF Beyond Design Basis Tank Leak under the New Storage Alternative

5-35 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Unmitigated Transfer Pipe Break under the New Storage Alternative

5-36 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Mitigated Transfer Pipe Break under the New Storage Alternative

5-37 Estimated Health Effects from a RCSTS Mitigated Spray Release under the New Storage Alternative

5-38 Estimated Health Effects from ITRS Unmitigated Pipe Breaks under the New Storage Alternative

5-39 Estimated Health Effects from ITRS Mitigated Pipe Breaks under the New Storage Alternative

5-40 Estimated Health Effects from an ITRS Unmitigated Spray Release under the New Storage Alternative

5-41 Estimated Health Effects from an ITRS Mitigated Spray Release under the New Storage Alternative

5-42 Estimated Annual Doses (mrem) for 1993 Airborne Emissions from the 200 Areas

5-43 Airborne Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in the Vicinity of the S, SX, and SY Tank

5-44 Volumes of Tank Waste Transferred from the 200 West Area under the No Action Alternative

5-45 Estimated Health Effects from an ECSTS Unmitigated Transfer Pipe Break under the No Action Alternative

5-46 Estimated Health Effects from an ECSTS Unmitigated Spray Release under the No Action Alternative

5-47 Estimated Health Effects from an ECSTS Mitigated Spray Release under the No Action Alternative

5-48 Comparison of Alternatives

5-49 Summary of Actions by Alternative

5-50 Comparison of Potential Impacts

5-51 Comparison of Health Effects from Accidentsa Analyzed for Each Alternative

7-1 Summary of Potential Permits and Approvals for the Alternatives

7-2 Single-Shell Tank Interim Stabilization Schedule

8-1 List of Preparers

A-1 Double-Shell Tanks Space Need Projections in Millions of Gallons

C-1 Minority Composition of Counties in Socioeconomic Region of Influence in Washington

C-2 Minority Composition of Cities and Towns with Populations Greater than 2,500 in Benton, Franklin, and Yakima Counties

C-3 Low-Income Persons in the Region of Influence, 1989

E-1 Release Points Used to Determine Distances to Receptor Locations

E-2 Distance to Receptor Locations Along the Existing Boundary

E-3 Distance to Receptor Locations Along the Potential New Boundary

E-4 Atmospheric Dispersion Factors for Accidental Releases From the 200 West Area

E-5 Atmospheric Dispersion Factors for Accidental Releases From the 200 East Area

E-6 Distribution of Off-Site Population Within 80 Kilometers (50 Miles) of the Hanford Site

E-7 Radionuclide Emissions from the NTF

E-8 Chemical Emissions from the NTF

E-9 Maximum 24-Hour and Annual Ground Level Concentrations for Emissions from Two DSTs

E-10 Radionuclide Concentrations in SWL

E-11 Radionuclide Concentrations in 102-SY Slurry and West Area Facility Waste

E-12 Radionuclide Concentrations in Tank 101-SY Slurry

E-13 Radionuclide Concentrations in Bounding Slurry Waste

E-14 Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in Tank Wastes

E-15 Intake Parameters and Values

E-16 Toxicological Health Effects from NTF Emissions

F-1 Accident Frequency Categories

F-2 Summary of ITRS Accident Releases

F-3 Summary of NTF Accident Releases

F-4 Summary of PPSS Accident Releases

F-5 Estimated Frequencies and Maximum Volumes for Salt Well Transfer Line Leaks

F-6 Summary of Accident Releases During Pumping and Transfer of SWL

F-7 Summary of ECSTS Accident Releases

F-8 Summary of RCSTS Accident Releases

F-9 Accident Frequencies for Trucks at the Hanford Site

F-10 Fractional Release Frequencies for Rail Accidents

F-11 Summary of Maximum Accident Releases from Transport Vehicles During Cross-Site Transfers

F-12 Summary of Accident Releases for the HLW Load and Unload Facilities