English Settlers in South Africa
The English-speaking white population of South Africa represents a distinct cultural and linguistic community whose history intertwines with British imperial expansion, economic development, and the complex racial dynamics that shaped southern Africa. British involvement in the Cape began with temporary occupations in 1795 and 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars, when Britain sought to secure the strategic sea route to India. The formal cession of the Cape Colony by the Netherlands to Britain in 1814 marked the beginning of sustained British settlement and governance. Unlike the Boers, whose identity centered on agricultural independence and republican ideals, English settlers brought with them British legal traditions, commercial capitalism, and connections to a global empire that profoundly influenced the region's development.
The 1820 Settlers represent the foundational moment in English South African identity and consciousness. In that year, approximately 4,000 British settlers arrived in the eastern Cape, sponsored by the British government as part of a scheme to establish a buffer between the Cape Colony and Xhosa kingdoms to the east. These settlers, drawn primarily from the English working and middle classes facing post-Napoleonic War economic hardship, were promised land and agricultural opportunity. The reality proved far more challenging, as settlers confronted unfamiliar climate, poor soil in many allocated areas, inadequate preparation, and conflict with indigenous populations. Many abandoned farming for trade and skilled occupations, establishing towns like Grahamstown and Port Elizabeth that became centers of English culture and commerce. The 1820 Settlers and their descendants developed a strong sense of pioneering achievement and cultural identity distinct from both British imperial administrators and the Dutch-descended Boer population.
British colonial expansion throughout the 19th century brought increasing numbers of English-speaking settlers and fundamentally reshaped southern Africa. The British annexation of Natal in 1843 opened new territories for settlement, attracting colonists interested in sugar cultivation and other agricultural enterprises. The British government's decision to import indentured laborers from India to work Natal's sugar plantations created the foundations of South Africa's substantial Indian population. English settlers established towns, built infrastructure including railways and ports, introduced British legal systems and educational institutions, and created commercial networks connecting South Africa to the broader British Empire. Anglican, Methodist, and other British Protestant churches established missions and schools that spread British cultural values, though these institutions sometimes came into tension with settler interests when missionaries advocated for indigenous rights.
The discovery of diamonds at Kimberley in 1867 and gold on the Witwatersrand in 1886 transformed South Africa and dramatically increased English-speaking immigration. These mineral discoveries attracted fortune-seekers, entrepreneurs, engineers, and laborers from Britain and other parts of the empire. Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Beit, Barney Barnato, and other mining magnates, most of British origin or orientation, amassed enormous fortunes and wielded considerable political influence. Johannesburg, founded in 1886, rapidly became a cosmopolitan mining town with a majority English-speaking population. The mining revolution created a modern capitalist economy requiring sophisticated financial systems, industrial infrastructure, and urban development. English-speaking capitalists came to dominate mining, finance, manufacturing, and commerce, establishing an economic preeminence that would persist well into the 20th century despite eventual Afrikaner political dominance.
Relations between English-speaking settlers and the Boer population ranged from cooperative coexistence to bitter conflict throughout the 19th century. The Great Trek of the 1830s was partly a response to British policies including the abolition of slavery, anglicization efforts, and the introduction of English common law. British annexation of the Transvaal in 1877 led to the First Boer War and restoration of Boer independence after British defeat. However, the Second Boer War (1899-1902) represented the most severe rupture. While the war was driven primarily by British imperial ambitions and mining interests seeking to control the gold-producing Transvaal, English-speaking South Africans were divided in their support. Many supported the British war effort, volunteering for imperial forces or providing logistical support, while others, particularly in the Cape, sympathized with Boer grievances or opposed the war on moral grounds.
The aftermath of the Boer War and the creation of the Union of South Africa in 1910 established patterns that would shape English-Afrikaner relations for decades. English-speaking South Africans initially dominated the civil service, judiciary, and commerce, while Afrikaners controlled much of the agriculture and increasingly mobilized politically. The compromise that created the Union protected English language rights and maintained English commercial interests while allowing for eventual Afrikaner political ascendancy as the larger white group. English-speaking South Africans largely supported the South Africa Party led by Louis Botha and Jan Smuts, which pursued reconciliation between the two white groups and maintained close ties with Britain and the Commonwealth. This political alignment reflected English South African identity as simultaneously rooted in South Africa while maintaining strong cultural and emotional connections to Britain and the broader English-speaking world.
The two World Wars highlighted both the British orientation of English-speaking South Africans and growing tensions within white society. In World War I, Smuts led South African forces supporting Britain, despite an Afrikaner rebellion opposing participation. English South Africans overwhelmingly supported the war effort, with thousands volunteering for service. World War II created even deeper divisions when Prime Minister Hertzog advocated neutrality while Smuts favored supporting Britain. Parliament narrowly voted to join the Allies, but many Afrikaners bitterly opposed participation, with some supporting Nazi Germany. English South Africans again strongly supported the war effort, serving in North African, Italian, and other campaigns. These wars reinforced English South African identity as part of the British Commonwealth and democratic tradition, creating cultural and political divisions with Afrikaners that would influence South African politics for decades.
The National Party's 1948 electoral victory and implementation of apartheid created a complex situation for English-speaking South Africans. While maintaining economic dominance through control of mining houses, banks, and major corporations, English South Africans found themselves politically marginalized as a minority within the white minority. The relationship between English business interests and Afrikaner political power became one of mutual accommodation, with English corporations accepting and ultimately profiting from apartheid policies while Afrikaner governments protected the capitalist system that served English economic interests. English-speaking South Africans were divided in their responses to apartheid, with the majority supporting or acquiescing to the system while benefiting from white privilege, even as some individuals became prominent in the anti-apartheid movement through organizations like the Black Sash, the Progressive Party, and various church groups.
The Progressive Party, later the Progressive Federal Party and eventually the Democratic Party, represented the primary political vehicle for English-speaking opposition to National Party rule. Founded in 1959 by Helen Suzman and others who broke from the United Party, the Progressives advocated for qualified franchise rather than universal suffrage, a position more liberal than the governing National Party but still fundamentally preserving white control. The party's limited electoral success, rarely winning more than a handful of parliamentary seats before the 1980s, reflected both Afrikaner dominance among white voters and the reality that most English-speaking whites, while sometimes uncomfortable with apartheid's crude manifestations, were unwilling to embrace genuine racial equality. Nevertheless, figures like Suzman, who served as the sole Progressive MP for thirteen years, provided important parliamentary opposition and international credibility for liberal white politics.
English South African cultural identity developed distinct characteristics while maintaining connections to broader British and Commonwealth traditions. Private English-medium schools modeled on British public schools, such as Michaelhouse, St. Andrew's, Hilton, and Roedean, became institutions where English South African identity was cultivated, emphasizing cricket, rugby, academic excellence, and connections to British cultural traditions. Universities like the University of Cape Town, Rhodes University, and the University of the Witwatersrand became centers of English-medium higher education, generally more liberal and cosmopolitan than Afrikaans universities. English-language newspapers including the Rand Daily Mail, Cape Times, and later the Sunday Times provided alternative perspectives to Afrikaans media and government propaganda. Anglican, Methodist, and Catholic churches, while complicit in many aspects of racial segregation, sometimes provided space for questioning apartheid's theological justifications.
The economic dominance of English-speaking South Africans during the apartheid era was embodied in the great mining houses and corporations that controlled much of South Africa's wealth. Anglo American Corporation, founded by Ernest Oppenheimer and later led by his son Harry Oppenheimer, became the largest corporation in Africa, controlling diamond production through De Beers, vast gold mining operations, and diverse industrial interests. Other major English-dominated groups included Barlow Rand, South African Breweries, and Old Mutual. These corporations operated within and profited from apartheid's migrant labor system, paying black workers minimal wages while generating enormous profits. Harry Oppenheimer's position was typical of English business leaders, opposing apartheid's political aspects while supporting gradual reform rather than radical transformation, and consistently prioritizing economic stability and property rights.
English South African attitudes toward apartheid and racial equality evolved gradually from the 1960s onward, influenced by international pressure, generational change, and growing recognition of apartheid's unsustainability. The Soweto Uprising of 1976, in which schoolchildren protesting the imposition of Afrikaans as a teaching medium were killed by police, shocked many English-speaking South Africans and highlighted apartheid's violence. The 1980s saw increased militancy in black townships, states of emergency, international sanctions, and capital flight, creating economic instability that concerned English business interests. By the late 1980s, prominent English business leaders including Gavin Relly of Anglo American were engaging in talks with the banned African National Congress in exile, recognizing that negotiated transition had become necessary. Nevertheless, this evolution represented pragmatic adaptation to changing realities rather than principled rejection of racial privilege.
The transition to democracy between 1990 and 1994 presented English-speaking South Africans with less dramatic adjustments than it did for Afrikaners who were losing explicit political control. English South Africans generally supported the negotiated transition and many voted for F.W. de Klerk's reforms in the 1992 referendum. The Democratic Party, representing primarily English-speaking urban voters, participated constructively in negotiations for a new constitution. English business interests worked to ensure that property rights would be protected and that the economic system would remain fundamentally capitalist. When the 1994 elections brought the ANC to power, most English South Africans voted for parties other than the ANC, but the transition was less threatening to English identity and interests than to Afrikaners because English South Africans had not held direct political power and because their economic position remained relatively secure.
Contemporary demographics of English-speaking white South Africans are difficult to determine precisely because census categories use language rather than ethnicity. The most recent reliable estimates suggest approximately 1.5 to 1.7 million English-speaking white South Africans, constituting about 2.5 percent of the total population and roughly 35 to 40 percent of the white population. This represents significant decline from peak numbers, with emigration being the primary factor. Since 1994, hundreds of thousands of English-speaking South Africans have emigrated, primarily to the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, drawn by economic opportunities, concerns about crime and political stability, and in some cases discomfort with majority rule. Those who remain are concentrated in major urban centers, particularly Cape Town, Johannesburg, Durban, and Port Elizabeth, with relatively few in rural areas compared to Afrikaners.
The socioeconomic profile of English-speaking South Africans shows continued economic advantage despite political changes. English South Africans remain disproportionately represented in business leadership, professional occupations, and wealth ownership. Major corporations, while increasingly transformed by black economic empowerment requirements, often retain English-speaking executives and significant English business culture. Private English-medium schools continue to serve as elite educational institutions, increasingly multiracial in composition but maintaining high fees that effectively limit access. English South Africans are more likely than other groups to hold tertiary qualifications and work in skilled professional occupations. However, economic inequality exists within the community, with some families experiencing downward mobility while others have prospered in the new South Africa by adapting successfully to transformation requirements.
Political alignments of English-speaking South Africans have shifted significantly since 1994. The Democratic Party, which became the Democratic Alliance after mergers with other parties, has become the primary political home for most English-speaking white voters. Under leaders including Tony Leon and Helen Zille, the DA positioned itself as a non-racial opposition to the ANC, supporting liberal democracy, property rights, and efficient governance while criticizing corruption and poor service delivery. The DA's success in governing the Western Cape province and Cape Town, where it has built multiracial electoral coalitions, appeals to English South Africans' self-perception as more liberal and cosmopolitan than Afrikaners. A minority of English South Africans support the ANC, particularly among younger generations and those strongly committed to transformation, while some older voters nostalgically supported the dissolved New National Party before its absorption into the ANC.
Language dynamics present less existential concern for English South Africans than for Afrikaners, given English's status as global lingua franca and its dominance in South African business, higher education, and government. English is one of eleven official languages but enjoys de facto primacy in most formal institutional contexts. English-medium schools, both public and private, remain in high demand among all racial groups as parents seek to provide their children with access to global opportunities. This linguistic advantage allows English South Africans to maintain cultural continuity while engaging successfully with transformed institutions. However, this dominance is sometimes resented by speakers of other languages who perceive English hegemony as continuing colonial patterns and marginalizing African languages in economic and educational advancement.
English South African identity has become more complex and contested in post-apartheid South Africa. The community must navigate between maintaining distinctive cultural traditions and avoiding perceptions of colonial nostalgia or white supremacy. Pride in British heritage, Commonwealth connections, and English cultural achievements must be balanced against recognition of colonialism's oppressive legacies. Some English South Africans embrace a more inclusive South African identity, deemphasizing British connections and actively participating in building a multicultural nation. Others maintain stronger ties to British cultural traditions, sending children to schools emphasizing British educational models, following British sports teams, and sometimes maintaining British citizenship as insurance against future instability. Younger generations often display more complex, hybridized identities, combining English South African heritage with influences from global popular culture and greater comfort with multiracial social contexts.
Cultural institutions serving English South African communities continue to function but must adapt to changed circumstances. Organizations like the 1820 Settlers Monument in Grahamstown (now Makhanda) commemorate settler history while increasingly acknowledging indigenous perspectives and colonial impacts. The National Arts Festival, long associated with English culture, has become more diverse and inclusive. Private schools maintain traditions while transforming student and staff demographics. Churches navigate between preserving liturgical traditions and addressing social justice issues. Museums and heritage sites reinterpret colonial history through more critical and inclusive lenses. These adaptations reflect broader negotiations about how settler communities maintain identity and cultural continuity while acknowledging historical injustices and participating constructively in multicultural democracy.
Relations between English-speaking and Afrikaans-speaking white South Africans have evolved significantly in post-apartheid South Africa. Historical tensions rooted in the Boer Wars, language disputes, and competing nationalisms have diminished as both communities face similar challenges adapting to majority rule. Intermarriage between English and Afrikaans speakers, always present but once discouraged by Afrikaner nationalism, has become more common and less controversial. Residential patterns show increased mixing in suburbs previously dominated by one group or the other. Political differences persist, with English speakers more likely to support the DA and Afrikaners more divided in their political affiliations, but these differences are less fundamental than during the apartheid era. Both communities share concerns about crime, economic opportunity, language rights, and cultural preservation, creating potential for cooperation even as they maintain distinct identities.
The question of belonging and future trajectory occupies English South African consciousness in various ways. Unlike Afrikaners, who have no other homeland and whose identity is fundamentally rooted in South Africa despite the Voortrekker myth, many English South Africans maintain some sense of connection to Britain or the Commonwealth, creating what has been termed "dual identity" or "portable identity." This creates both advantages and challenges. The option to emigrate provides a safety valve and sense of security but can also inhibit full commitment to South African society. Younger English South Africans increasingly identify primarily as South African rather than British, particularly those with limited direct connection to Britain. The development of a post-colonial English South African identity that acknowledges settler privilege and colonial history while asserting legitimate belonging in Africa represents an ongoing negotiation that varies considerably among individuals and families based on political views, economic circumstances, and generational perspectives.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
