The Boers in South Africa
The correct pronunciation of "boer" is "bore" in English, derived from the Dutch and Afrikaans pronunciation.The Boers, derived from the Dutch word for "farmer," constitute a distinct ethnic and cultural group within South Africa's white Afrikaner population. Their history spans over three centuries, beginning with Dutch colonization of the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. These early settlers, primarily from the Netherlands but also including French Huguenots and Germans, gradually developed a unique identity separate from their European origins. The isolation of frontier life, intermixing of various European groups, and adaptation to African conditions created a distinct culture characterized by Calvinist religious devotion, pastoral agricultural practices, and a fierce independence that would define Boer identity for generations to come.
The Great Trek of the 1830s represents the defining moment in Boer history and mythology. Between 1835 and 1846, approximately 15,000 Boers departed the British-controlled Cape Colony in wagon trains, seeking to escape British rule, cultural interference, and particularly the abolition of slavery in 1834. These Voortrekkers, as they became known, pushed into the interior of southern Africa, establishing independent republics beyond British jurisdiction. The trek involved numerous conflicts with indigenous African peoples, most notably the Zulu kingdom, culminating in the Battle of Blood River in 1838 where a small Boer force defeated a much larger Zulu army. This victory became central to Boer identity and was interpreted through a religious lens as divine validation of their mission to establish independent Christian republics in Africa.
The Boer republics of the Transvaal (South African Republic) and the Orange Free State flourished in the mid-19th century as independent states with their own governments, currencies, and constitutions. These republics were characterized by deeply conservative social structures, with franchise limited to white male citizens and indigenous Africans largely excluded from political participation. The discovery of diamonds in Kimberley in 1867 and gold on the Witwatersrand in 1886 fundamentally altered the trajectory of these republics. The sudden influx of foreign prospectors, particularly British uitlanders (foreigners), created economic boom conditions but also generated political tensions as the Boer governments struggled to maintain control while foreigners outnumbered citizens in key regions.
The First Boer War of 1880-1881 demonstrated the military capabilities of Boer commandos against professional British forces. Using superior knowledge of terrain, skilled marksmanship, and guerrilla tactics, Boer fighters inflicted embarrassing defeats on British forces at engagements such as Majuba Hill. The Pretoria Convention of 1881 restored independence to the Transvaal under British suzerainty, representing a significant victory for Boer autonomy. However, this independence would prove short-lived as British imperial ambitions, driven by mining magnates like Cecil Rhodes and politicians like Joseph Chamberlain, increasingly focused on bringing the wealthy gold-producing republics under British control.
The Second Boer War (1899-1902), also known as the South African War, represents one of the defining conflicts of the late Victorian era and remains deeply traumatic in Boer collective memory. The war began with early Boer victories as commandos besieged British garrisons at Ladysmith, Kimberley, and Mafeking. However, British reinforcements under generals such as Lord Roberts and Lord Kitchener gradually turned the tide. After capturing the Boer capitals of Pretoria and Bloemfontein in 1900, the British faced a protracted guerrilla campaign as Boer commandos, led by figures like Christiaan de Wet, Louis Botha, and Jan Smuts, conducted raids and avoided direct engagement with superior British forces.
The British response to Boer guerrilla warfare involved scorched earth tactics that devastated the countryside and profoundly shaped Boer historical consciousness. British forces systematically destroyed Boer farms, burned crops, slaughtered livestock, and poisoned wells to deny sustenance to guerrilla commandos. Most controversially, the British established concentration camps where Boer women, children, and elderly were interned under appalling conditions. Approximately 28,000 Boer civilians, primarily women and children, died in these camps from disease, malnutrition, and inadequate medical care. An additional 20,000 black Africans died in separate camps. The concentration camp experience became central to Boer identity, creating a narrative of suffering and persecution that influenced Afrikaner nationalism throughout the 20th century.
The Treaty of Vereeniging in 1902 ended the war with British victory but contained provisions that would significantly influence South Africa's future. The Boer republics were annexed into the British Empire, but Britain promised eventual self-government and agreed that the question of voting rights for non-whites would be decided only after the restoration of self-government. This provision effectively ensured that white minority rule would be entrenched in any future political settlement. Britain also provided £3 million for reconstruction and allowed the use of Dutch (later Afrikaans) in schools and courts, helping preserve Boer cultural identity despite military defeat.
The Union of South Africa, established in 1910, brought together the former Boer republics with the British Cape Colony and Natal under a unified government. Former Boer generals like Louis Botha and Jan Smuts became prominent political leaders, pursuing policies of reconciliation between British and Boer populations while maintaining white supremacy over the black majority. However, many Boers remained embittered by the war and British rule, leading to the development of a more militant Afrikaner nationalism. The National Party, founded in 1914 by J.B.M. Hertzog, championed Boer/Afrikaner interests and promoted the Afrikaans language and culture against perceived British cultural domination.
The evolution of Afrikaner nationalism in the early 20th century drew heavily on Boer historical experiences to construct a powerful political ideology. The Afrikaner Broederbond, a secret society founded in 1918, worked systematically to advance Afrikaner interests in business, education, and politics. Cultural organizations promoted Afrikaans literature, music, and history, while the language itself was standardized and promoted as distinct from Dutch. The 1938 centenary commemoration of the Great Trek, featuring a symbolic ox-wagon journey reenacting the Voortrekker migration, mobilized massive popular support and strengthened ethnic consciousness. This cultural mobilization laid the groundwork for the National Party's electoral victory in 1948 on a platform of apartheid, or separate development.
The apartheid system, implemented after 1948, represented the most systematic attempt to legislate racial separation in modern history and became inextricably linked with Afrikaner political power. While apartheid policies were supported by both English and Afrikaans-speaking whites, the system was primarily designed and implemented by successive National Party governments dominated by Afrikaners. Legislation such as the Population Registration Act, Group Areas Act, and Bantu Education Act created a comprehensive framework of racial segregation that touched every aspect of South African life. The government justified these policies through a combination of pseudo-scientific racism, appeals to cultural preservation, and religious interpretations suggesting divine sanction for racial separation.
The Boer/Afrikaner community benefited enormously from apartheid policies that reserved skilled employment, quality education, and political power for whites. Government programs deliberately promoted Afrikaner economic advancement, creating state-owned enterprises that employed Afrikaners and helping develop an Afrikaner business class to compete with English-dominated mining and commercial interests. By the 1970s, Afrikaners had achieved rough economic parity with English-speaking whites, while maintaining overwhelming political dominance. However, this prosperity was built on systematic exploitation of black labor and denial of basic rights to the non-white majority, creating conditions that would prove unsustainable in the face of growing domestic resistance and international pressure.
The collapse of apartheid between 1990 and 1994 marked a fundamental transformation in South African society and created profound challenges for the Boer/Afrikaner community. President F.W. de Klerk's decision to unban liberation movements, release Nelson Mandela, and negotiate a transition to majority rule represented a recognition that white minority government could not be maintained indefinitely. The transition process was marked by significant violence, particularly between supporters of the African National Congress and the Inkatha Freedom Party, while right-wing Afrikaner groups threatened armed resistance. The failed Bophuthatswana invasion in 1994, where extremist Afrikaner paramilitaries were humiliated by Bophuthatswana defense forces, demonstrated the futility of armed resistance to the transition.
Contemporary Boer/Afrikaner demographics present a complex picture of a minority community adapting to majority rule. The most recent census data indicates approximately 2.7 to 3 million Afrikaners in South Africa out of a total population of roughly 60 million, constituting about 5 percent of the population. This represents a significant demographic decline from apartheid-era figures due to emigration, declining birth rates, and reclassification as other groups. Emigration has been particularly significant, with hundreds of thousands of Afrikaners leaving South Africa since 1994, primarily for destinations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Those who remain are concentrated in traditional strongholds including Pretoria, parts of the Free State, and smaller towns across the country.
The Afrikaner community exhibits significant internal diversity often obscured by external perceptions. Socioeconomic stratification has created distinct class divisions, with some Afrikaners maintaining considerable wealth and privilege while others, particularly in rural areas, have experienced downward mobility. Educational levels vary considerably, with urban, professional-class Afrikaners often holding advanced degrees while some rural communities struggle with limited economic opportunities. Politically, the community ranges from progressive individuals who embrace the new South Africa and support multiracial democracy to conservative groups advocating for various forms of self-determination or separate development. This diversity makes it problematic to speak of a unified Boer or Afrikaner position on most contemporary issues.
Language remains a crucial marker of Boer/Afrikaner identity, though its status has evolved considerably since 1994. Afrikaans, which developed from 17th-century Dutch spoken at the Cape with influences from Malay, Khoi, and other languages, achieved official status in 1925 and was promoted extensively during apartheid. The post-1994 constitution recognizes eleven official languages, including Afrikaans, but the practical dominance of English in government, business, and higher education has created concerns about language preservation. Many Afrikaans schools and universities have transitioned to English or dual-medium instruction, while Afrikaans media outlets face financial pressures. Nevertheless, Afrikaans remains widely spoken, with approximately 7 million speakers of all races, including substantial Coloured communities for whom it is a first language.
Political representation of Boer/Afrikaner interests has fragmented significantly since the end of National Party dominance. The African National Congress has consistently won overwhelming majorities in national elections, while parties explicitly appealing to Afrikaner interests have struggled to gain traction. The Freedom Front Plus, which promotes Afrikaner self-determination and minority rights, typically receives 1-2 percent of the national vote. The Democratic Alliance, South Africa's official opposition party, draws significant Afrikaner support but positions itself as non-racial and does not specifically advocate for Afrikaner interests. This political marginalization has generated frustration among some Afrikaners who feel their concerns about language rights, farm security, and employment equity are inadequately addressed in the political system.
Farm attacks and farm murders have become highly contentious issues that particularly affect rural Boer communities. Statistics indicate that South African farmers face significantly elevated risks of violent crime compared to urban populations, though precise figures are disputed and politicized. Right-wing groups both domestically and internationally have characterized these attacks as genocide or ethnic cleansing, claims that mainstream organizations and the South African government reject as exaggerated and politically motivated. The government contends that farmers are targeted due to their isolation and perceived wealth rather than ethnicity, and that crime affects all racial groups in South Africa's high-crime environment. Nevertheless, the issue has generated significant anxiety within farming communities and has been used to mobilize both domestic political support and international sympathy.
Employment equity legislation and broad-based black economic empowerment policies represent significant concerns for many Afrikaners regarding economic opportunity. These policies, designed to redress historical discrimination and promote black advancement, have created perceptions among some whites, including Afrikaners, that they face discrimination in hiring and promotion. Professional-class Afrikaners debate whether to remain in South Africa, adapt to new realities by developing scarce skills, or emigrate to countries offering greater economic certainty. The reality is complex, with many Afrikaners maintaining successful careers while others, particularly less-skilled workers and recent graduates, face genuine difficulties in a highly competitive labor market where race-based considerations play some role in hiring decisions.
Cultural institutions serve as important mechanisms for preserving and promoting Boer/Afrikaner heritage in contemporary South Africa. Organizations such as the Afrikaanse Taal en Kultuurvereniging (ATKV) support Afrikaans language and culture, while institutions like the Voortrekker Monument in Pretoria serve as heritage sites commemorating Boer history. Afrikaans literature, music, and film continue to thrive, with artists exploring both traditional themes and contemporary experiences of identity, belonging, and change. The annual Klein Karoo National Arts Festival (KKNK) and similar events celebrate Afrikaans cultural production. However, these institutions must navigate the complex challenge of honoring heritage while acknowledging the problematic aspects of apartheid-era history and engaging constructively with broader South African society.
The concept of Boer identity specifically, as distinct from broader Afrikaner identity, has experienced something of a revival in recent years among certain constituencies. Some conservative groups emphasize historical Boer identity as more authentic than Afrikaner nationalism, which they view as a 20th-century political construction. These groups often romanticize the independent Boer republics and Voortrekker pioneer spirit while advocating for forms of self-determination ranging from cultural autonomy to separate territorial entities. Small communities like Orania, an Afrikaner-only town in the Northern Cape, represent attempts to create spaces where Afrikaner/Boer culture can be preserved independently. While such initiatives remain marginal in terms of numbers, they reflect deeper anxieties about cultural survival and belonging in a country where Afrikaners no longer hold political power.
The question of how Boer/Afrikaner communities will adapt to and find their place in South Africa's evolving democracy remains open and contested. Younger generations of Afrikaners often display more comfort with multiracial democracy and less attachment to ethnic nationalism than their parents and grandparents, though significant diversity exists within generational cohorts. The development of a post-apartheid Afrikaner identity that acknowledges historical injustices while asserting the right to cultural preservation represents an ongoing negotiation. Some Afrikaners actively embrace transformation and seek to build bridges with other communities, while others maintain more defensive postures focused on group survival. The trajectory of this community will likely depend on broader South African developments including economic growth, effective governance, crime rates, and the successful integration of all communities into a genuinely inclusive national project that respects diversity while building common citizenship.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
