Nuclear Weapon Tests |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEST | DATE | Seismic mb | YIELD (KT) | DELIVERY | Altitude | LAT°N | LONG°E | GOAL | REMARKS |
CHIC 1 | 16 Oct 64 | 5 - 25 | Tower | 30 m | 42.350 | 88.300 | U235 Fission Design | Code 596,214 - 1,550 kg device | |
CHIC 2 | 14 Oct 65 | 25 - 35 | Airdrop Tu-4 | 150-350 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | 217 mission | CHIC 1 airdrop, 3200 kg | |
CHIC 3 | 09 May 66 | 100-250 | Airdrop H-6 | 1000-1500 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | TN Dev | 1st attempt to burn TN fuel | |
CHIC 4 | 27 Oct 66 | 5-12 | Missile DF-2 | 150-350 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | 1,290 kg device | ||
CHIC 5 | 28 Dec 66 | 100-300 | Tower | 100-150 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | TN Dev | Two-stage Li6 Trigger device | |
CHIC 6 | 17 Jun 67 | 4.70 | 400-3,300 | Airdrop H-6 | ?? m | 40.744 | 89.775 | TN Dev | NGB/DF-3 wh 1st full yield TN 2-stage / tower?? |
CHIC 7 | 24 Dec 67 | 5-25 | Airdrop H-6 | 30 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | TN Dev | Two-stage failure / tower?? | |
CHIC 8 | 27 Dec 68 | 2,770 | Airdrop H-6 | 6-8 km | 41.500 | 88.500 | TN Dev 524-23 | NGB/DF-3 wh 1st w/ plutonium, 2,000 kg | |
CHIC 9 | 22 Sep 69 | 5.20 | 20 | UGT | UGT | 41.376 | 88.318 | -- | 1st UGT, Purpose unknown |
CHIC 10 | 29 Sep 69 | 4.37 | 3,400 | Airdrop H-6 | 6-8 km | 40.722 | 89.515 | TN Dev | NGB/DF-3 wh |
CHIC 11 | 14 Oct 70 | 4.60 | 3,000 | Airdrop H-6 | ?? m | 40.520 | 89.779 | TN Dev 524-mod | NGB/DF-3 wh |
CHIC 12 | 18 Nov 71 | 15-20 | Surface | 100-150 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | Effects/Diagnostics | TN device | |
CHIC 13 | 07 Jan 72 | 8-20 | Airdrop Q-5 | 1.0-1.5 km | 41.500 | 88.500 | Weapons Proof | Fission device | |
CHIC 14 | 17 Mar 72 | 170 | Airdrop | 1.0-1.5 km | 41.500 | 88.500 | -- | Probable H-6 | |
CHIC 15 | 27 Jun 73 | 4.80 | 2-3 MT | Airdrop H-6 | 1.0-1.5 km | 40.798 | 89.809 | NGB/DF-3 wh | |
CHIC 16 | 17 Jun 74 | 4.50 | 200-1000 | Atmospheric | m | 40.518 | 89.619 | TN BM warhead ?? | |
CHIC xx | xx xxx 75 | n/a | Atmospheric | DF-5 related failure | |||||
CHIC 17 | 27 Oct 75 | 5.00 | 2-10 | UGT | UGT | 41.40 | 88.667 | fission device | |
CHIC 18 | 23 Jan 76 | 2-10 | tower ? | ?? m | 41.500 | 88.500 | miniaturization trigger, UGT vented ?? | ||
CHIC 19 | 26 Sep 76 | 10 | tower | 30 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | 1st DT/Li6 test | 93,000 troops in effects test | |
CHIC 20 | 17 Oct 76 | 4.9 | 10-20 | UGT | UGT | 41.65 | 88.66 | 1st in granite | |
CHIC 21 | 17 Nov 76 | 4.7 | 2000-4000 | Atmospheric | 1.0-1.5 km | 41.65 | 88.66 | new H-bomb test, DF-5 delivery? | |
CHIC 22 | 17 Sep 77 | 20 - 200 | tower | 30 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | "missile warhead miniaturization breakthrough" | ||
CHIC 23 | 15 Mar 78 | over 20 | tower | 30 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | Tower burst success | ||
CHIC 24 | 14 Oct 78 | 4.9 | 5-50 | Shaft | UGT | 41.45 | 88.63 | 1st in granite shaft | |
CHIC 25 | 14 Dec 78 | over 20 | tower | 30 m | 41.500 | 88.500 | TN trigger | "Bullet project" ERW test | |
CHIC 26 | 13 Sep 79 | 0 | Atmospheric | m | 41.500 | 88.500 | free-fall | parachute failure - Deng Jiaxian | |
CHIC 27 | 16 Oct 80 | 4.44 | 1000 | Atmospheric | 8 km | 40.719 | 89.651 | "new hydrogen bomb", missile warhead | |
CHIC 28 | 05 Oct 82 | 4.5 | 3-15 | UGT | UGT | 41.500 | 88.500 | ERW related | |
CHIC 29 | 04 May 83 | 4.4 | 20-100 | Tunnel | UGT | 41.679 | 88.368 | ERW related | |
CHIC 30 | 06 Oct 83 | 5.5 | 20-100 | UGT | UGT | 41.55 | 88.76 | ERW related | |
CHIC 31 | 03 Oct 84 | 5.2 | 15-70 | UGT | UGT | 41.571 | 88.721 | 2d generation, "gas burst" breakthrough | |
CHIC 32 | 19 Dec 84 | 4.7 | 5-50 | UGT | UGT | 41.737 | 88.425 | 1st neutron bomb principle | |
CHIC xx | xx Nov 85 | n/a | Atmospheric | CANCELLED | |||||
CHIC 33 | 05 Jun 87 | 6.3 | 250-400 | UGT | UGT | 41.518 | 88.713 | JL-1 warhead? | |
CHIC 34 | 29 Sep 88 | 4.7 | 1-20 | Tunnel | UGT | 41.75 | 88.46 | 1st neutron bomb experiment | |
CHIC 35 | 26 May 90 | 5.4 | 15-65 | Shaft | UGT | 41.56 | 88.68 | ||
CHIC 36 | 16 Aug 90 | 6.2 | 50-200 | Shaft | UGT | 41.56 | 81.56 | ||
CHIC 37 | 21 May 92 | 6.5 | 700-1800 | UGT | UGT | 41.513 | 88.774 | ICBM warhead | |
CHIC 38 | 25 Sep 92 | 5.4 | 1-2 | UGT | UGT | 41.716 | 88.336 | boosted non-spherical primary | |
CHIC 39 | 05 Oct 93 | 5.8 | 90 | UGT | UGT | 41.7 | 88.6 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead | |
CHIC 40 | 10 Jun 94 | 5.7 | 90 | UGT | UGT | 41.64 | 88.86 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead ? | |
CHIC 41 | 07 Oct 94 | 6.0 | 90 | UGT | UGT | 41.55 | 89.07 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead ? | |
CHIC 42 | 15 May 95 | 5.7 | 60-80 | UGT | UGT | 41.63 | 88.87 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead ? | |
CHIC 43 | 17 Aug 95 | 5.5 | 20-80 | UGT | UGT | 41.60 | 88.86 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead ? | |
CHIC 44 | 08 Jun 96 | 5.7 | ? | UGT | UGT | 41.65 | 88.76 | DF-31 ICBM MIRV warhead ? | |
CHIC 45 | 29 Jul 96 | 4.7 | 1-5 | UGT | UGT | 41.69 | 88.35 |
Nuclear testing is a necessary step to verify the performance of nuclear weapons and conduct research on new nuclear weapons, but conducting nuclear tests can easily lead to condemnation from public opinion at home and abroad.
In June 1959 the Soviet uNion stopped technical aid to China. In order to arouse the nationalistic spirit, China's first atom bomb was named the "June 59" mission. On 15 August 1958, a small special train from Henan's Shangqiu, carrying a prospecting team of 120 military personnel and various equipment, pulled up at Xiadong station near Dunhuang and starting the prospecting work in the nuclear testing field. At that time, those carrying out the mission were told "not to disclose it to their parents, nor pass it down to their children." The publication "Contemporary China's national defense science and technology" said that there were three nuclear tests did not reach their intended purpose. The first failure was on 24 December 1967, the hydrogen bomb test only achieved fission and did not achieve fusion. This failure was identified by Western intelligence. Chinse sources report a that at the end of 1970, a hydrogen bomb exploded in a Lop Nur experiment, but the expected thermonuclear reaction did not happen. The hydrogen bomb had failed and the problem had to be investigated. In 1975, as part of the effort to accelerate the DF-5 ICBM warhead test, the first of three tests failed. It was later identified that the test technology was wrong. In 1975 a later test was conducted which was a success.
The third failed 13 September 1979, because the parachute did not open, nuclear bomb material scattered on impact. Ren Wande: "Giant nuclear science shield", first disclosed the second defeat, March 18, 1972. According to the description, an advanced gas-assist [ie booster] nuclear bomb only fissioned and did not achieve fusion. Leading designer Deng Jia was the first to find the nuclear bomb, and held pieces of debris. He suffered serious radiation illness. Initially this event was not included in the lists of tests published internationally, because there was no nuclear reaction, and strictly speaking, could only be counted as a nuclear accident. But this time in accordance with the nuclear test preparations, indeed a nuclear test failed, and the nuclear industry department has strict historical data.
The last atmospheric hydrogen bomb test was originally scheduled for 1983 years and was postponed until November 1985, when it was accurately readied but was canceled due to political reasons.
References
- Database of nuclear tests, China-PRC by Wm. Robert Johnston
- Biography of Nuclear Teeth - Previous Nuclear Tests
- Nuclear Explosions by China @ Center for Monitoring Research
- Cancer Mortality in Populations in Kazakhstan Subjected to Irradiation from Nuclear Weapons Testing in China [test list has major discrepancies]
- CATALOG OF KNOWN AND PUTATIVE NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS FROM UNCLASSIFIED SOURCES Compiled by James E. Lawson Jr.
- PRC Nuclear Weapons Employment Policy and Strategy - March 1972
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|