APPENDIX D: SOCIOECONOMICS D.1 Introduction This appendix includes the methodologies, models, assumptions, and supporting data used for assessing potential impacts in the socioeconomics sections of this Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). Section D.2 presents the methods and assumptions used to evaluate the potential socioeconomic effects of the proposed siting of tritium supply technologies and recycling facilities. The socioeconomic analysis involved two major steps: (1)the characterization and projection of existing social, economic, and infrastructure conditions surrounding each of the candidate sites (i.e., the affected environment); and (2)the evaluation of potential changes in socioeconomic conditions that could result from the construction and operation of tritium supply technologies and recycling facilities in the regions addressed (i.e., the environmental consequences). In addition, potential changes in socioeconomic conditions that could result from the construction and operation of a multipurpose reactor and a gas-fired power plant to support the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) are also analyzed. Supporting data for the affected environment and environmental consequences sections are presented in tables contained entirely at the end of the text in sectionD.3. D.2 Methodologies and Models D.2.1 Employment and Population The description of socioeconomic conditions includes indicators, such as population, civilian labor force, employment, unemployment rate, and income, that provide a basis for comparing regional socioeconomic conditions among the sites with No Action and with the various alternatives. The No Action alternative was considered equivalent to future baseline conditions without new activities. The baseline for the No Action alternative was established from the total employment projected for each of the sites at the end of fiscal year 1994. These proposed fiscal year 1994 budget and employment estimates were provided by each site and are believed to best reflect the staffing levels needed as a result of recent stockpile requirement reductions. Table D.2.1-1 presents historical employment and future employment projections for each site. Region of Influence and Regional Economic Area. For each site, socioeconomic impacts were estimated using two geographic areas. First, a region of influence (ROI) was identified based on the distribution of residences for current Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor personnel working at each of the proposed sites. The ROIs were determined to be those areas in which approximately 90 percent of the current DOE and contractor employees reside, and counties in which at least 5percent of the DOE workforce lives. This residential distribution reflects existing commuting patterns and attractiveness of area communities for people employed at each site, and was used to estimate the future distribution of direct workers associated with the proposed alternatives. Table D.2.1-1.-Historical and Projected Site Employment Site 1970 1990 1992 1994 2005 2010 INEL 6,755 11,100 11,600 10,100 10,100 10,100 NTS 6,840 8,019 7,696 6,850 6,850 6,850 ORR 14,257 15,273 16,238 15,000 15,000 15,000 Pantex Plant 1,630 2,394 2,681 3,400 1,790 1,790 SRS 5,737 22,290 21,823 20,300 16,900 16,900 Source: DOE1994e; INEL1991a:6; NTS 1990a:3; NTS 1991a:1; NTS 1992a:7; NTS1994a:1; ORR1991a:4; ORR1993a:8; ORR1994a:1; PX1991a:5; PX1993a:2; PX MH 1994a; PX MH 1994b; PXMH1994c; SRS1992a:9; SRS1993a:3; SRS 1994a:3. As an example, tableD.3-1 displays the residential distribution by city and county for all personnel employed at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). Data on residential location for a large portion of facility employees were obtained from INEL personnel offices. Similar data were provided by the other locations and are given in tables D.3-21, D.3-37, D.3-52, and D.3-72. A second geographical area, referred to as a regional economic area, was also identified for estimating socioeconomic impacts. The regional economic area is a 50-mile radius around each site that encompasses a broad market that involves trade among and between regional industrial and service sectors and which is characterized by strong economic linkages between the communities located in the region. These linkages determine the nature and magnitude of multiplier effects of economic activity at each candidate site. The regional economic area is used to analyze the primary economic impacts on employ- ment, spending, earnings, and personal income. Table D.2.1-2 displays the counties found in each site's regional economic area. As an example, later in this appendix table D.3-2 displays the employment, civilian labor force, unemployment rate, and personal and per capita incomes for the INEL regional economic area. Similar data were provided by other locations and are given in tables D.3-22, D.3-38, D.3-53, and D.3-73. Impacts on employ- ment from alternatives compared to No Action during construction and operation are given in tables D.3-3, D.3-4, D.3-23, D.3-24, D.3-39, D.3-40, D.3-54, D.3-55, and D.3-74. Table D.2.1-2.-Counties Representing the Candidate Sites' Regional Economic Areas INEL NTS ORR Pantex Plant SRS Idaho California Kentucky Tennessee Texas Georgia South Bannock Inyo Bell (continued) Armstrong Bulloch Carolina Bingham - McCreary Grainger Bricoe Burke Aiken Blaine Nevada Wayne Hamblen Carson Columbia Allendale Bonneville Clark Whitley Jefferson Castro Effingham Bamberg Butte Lincoln - Knox Deaf Smith Emanuel Barnwell Clark Nye North Carolina Loudon Donley Glascock Calhoun Custer Graham McMinn Gray Jefferson Colleton Fremont Swain Meigs Harley Jenkins Edgefield Jefferson - Monroe Hutchinson Lincoln Greenwood Lemhi Tennessee Morgan Moore McDuffie Hampton Madison Anderson Overton Oldham Richmond Jasper Minidoka Bledsoe Putnam Potter Screven Lexington Power Blount Rhea Randall Warren Orangeburg Campbell Roane Roberts Saluda Claiborne Scott Swisher Cumberland Sevier Fentress Union Source: McNalley 1985a; USGS 1972a. Existing and Future Baseline. Historical and existing population, labor force, employment, and income data were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Economic Information Systems. Historical personal income and per capita income values were converted to constant 1992 dollars using the current Department of Commerce National Income Deflator Index. Employment by place of work was converted to employment by place of residence on the basis of ratios derived from Bureau of Census, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Bureau of Economic Analysis data. Growth projections for population, labor force, employment, and income were based on Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Projections to 2040 for Bureau of Economic Analysis economic regions and metropolitan statistical areas. Bureau of Economic Analysis projections are for multi-county economic regions or whole metropolitan statistical areas; therefore, projections for individual counties were made by applying the appropriate growth rates for each Bureau of Economic Analysis data series (population, employment, etc.) to each county in the identified ROI for each site. Data series forecasts for counties within a metropolitan statistical area were based on the higher Bureau of Economic Analysis growth rates projected for metropolitan areas, while forecasts for other counties in the ROI were based on generally lower regional growth projections. Potential Project Effects. Total output multipliers for each region were obtained from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Inter-industry Multiplier System, and utilized in an economic model developed for evaluation of socioeconomic impacts of large-scale government programs. The model includes four major components for theanalysis: Regional inter-industry component that produced a regional input/output table and output multipliers for each specified sector of the economy for each regional economic area. Direct effects component that produced a matrix of final demands (estimated changes in industry and household spending due to project activities) on the basis of direct employment and procurement associated with the project. Employment impact component that calculated region-wide indirect output, earnings, and employment estimates. Macroeconomic impact component that calculated regional population impacts on the basis of assumptions concerning possible changes in unemployment, the share of the labor force with the necessary skills to take direct project jobs, and the portion of the direct employment that would in-migrate to the ROI. These inter-industry multipliers were estimated using the Bureau's input/output table for the United States in combination with the most recent region-specific information describing the relationship of the regional economy to the national economy. The same methodology was used to develop quantitative projections of economic activity for No Action conditions and the alternatives. Project-related changes in regional demand in each local industrial and household sector were first estimated as follows: Construction-phase demands were based on construction labor and cost data provided by Fluor-Daniel, Inc., engineers, and the DOE sites affected by the proposal from parameters developed in support of the description of alternatives development. Operation-phase demands were estimated from data provided by Fluor-Daniel, Inc. and DOE operations employment estimates and procurement requirements from existing DOE facilities that provide similar manufacturing activities. The direct effects component uses the construction and operations demand to determine the procurement in the specific industries and the personal consumption expenditures (household spending) due to the project activities, taking into consideration the dis- posable income of each type of direct employment category. These primary or direct effects were then multiplied, using Regional Inter-industry Multiplier System coefficients specific to the regional economy, to provide estimated total spending associated with the alternatives. Input-output sectors were selected to reflect the anticipated spending profile associated with the alternatives in order to capture the economic characteristics of each scenario within the regional economic area. The employment impact component thus estimates the indirect employment, earnings, and personal income due to the alternatives. Table D.2.1-3 presents the assumptions for direct and indirect employment that were used for the regional socioeconomic analysis. The macroeconomic impact component uses the information regarding the direct and indirect employment from the direct effects and employment impact components, as well as the baseline information, to estimate the direct and indirect employment that would in-migrate into the ROI. Numbers of inmigrant workers associated with each alternative were estimated according to a set of assumptions concerning the availability of required labor skill levels within each regional labor force and the recognition that competitive bidding for both construction and operations activities would bring in a certain number of workers regardless of available labor. For smaller demands of construction and operations activities as compared to regional labor availability, in-migrant workers were primarily associated with contract award relocation assumptions. In addition to analyzing the population changes due to in-migrant workers, population changes due to out-migrations of workers from sites that would have workforce reductions as a result of the phasing out missions were examined. These population projections are conservative because they are estimated under the assumption that all the jobs lost will occur in the single year2010. Table D.2.1-3.-Assumptions for Regional Economic Area Employment Category - PRDEP HHS FF NLOC Direct Construction Direct 0.238 3.11b 0.589 0.25 Support 0.238a 2.93b 0.618b 0.75 Operation DOE operations 0.247a 3.17c 0.708 0.50 Indirect Personal consumption - 3.17c 0.708c - Procurement - 3.17c 0.708c - Related investment - 3.17c 0.708c - Average household sizes for in-migrant workers were assumed to correspond, for most categories, with the average size of state-to-state migrating families between 1980 and 1990. The intra-regional allocation analysis accounts for the distribution of direct and indirect workers and their families among the various residential areas within each region. The direct effect portion of the allocation process accounts for the two main factors affecting the distribution of in-migrant direct workers: (1)the number of workers anticipated to be directly involved with each alternative and (2)the locations and relative attractiveness of residential opportunities within the region. Analytic methods are basically similar for assessing both population increases due to inmigration of direct and indirect workers and their families and population decreases due to out- migration of direct and indirect workers and their families. Population changes associated with the alternatives are an important determinant of other socioeconomic and environmental impacts. These population changes have three key components: (1)baseline growth; (2)relocation of workers and their dependents; and (3)natural increase of population (births minus deaths) over the long term. To evaluate anticipated population effects, potential future changes associated with the tritium supply technologies and recycling facilities were compared to projected baseline conditions. The computer output of the macroeconomic impact component for INEL is presented in table D.2.1-4. The first page of the table presents the employment and population parameter values used for this analysis and baseline and project information. The second page presents direct and indirect project impacts and a summary of effects for the year 2001. Similar output was created for all project years through 2010. Table D.3-2 is a summary of the employment and local economy results for INEL for selected years between 1970 and 2020. Population and economic data for all the sites are given in tables D.3-5, D.3-25, D.3-41, D.3-56, and D.3-75. Impacts on population from the alternatives compared to No Action during construction and operation are given in tables D.3-6, D.3-7, D.3-26, D.3-27, D.3-42, D.3-43, D.3-57, D.3-58, and D.3-76. Table D.2.1-4.-Parameters Used by the Model Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Example [Page 1 of 2] Parameters Used By the Model MSLF = .1000 FUR = .0428 Direct Employment Parameters Category DSHARE DUR PRDEP DURDEP HHS FF DCIV NLNOTR NLRLOC SHWCOM Construction-direct .082 .043 .238 .043 3.110 .589 1.000 .000 .250 .000 Construction-support .014 .043 .238 .043 2.930 .618 1.000 .000 .750 .000 DOE operations .089 .043 .247 .043 3.170 .708 1.000 .000 .500 .000 Indirect Employment Parameters Category IUR HHS FF Personal consumption .043 3.170 .708 Procurement .043 3.170 .708 Related investment .043 3.170 .708 Logistic Labor Force Response Parameters Proportion of population that is of working age = 0.643 Beta parameter of effect of project jobs on labor force participation (0 = no effect) = 0.0000 Year: 2001 Baseline Information Population 286,010 Civilian labor force 140,059 Labor force participation rate (w/o project.) .4897 Employed civilian labor force (w/o project.) 131,039 Unemployment rate .064 Total employment (w/o project.) 131,043 Earnings ($1,000) 3,351,102 Personal income ($1,000) 4,703,569 Per capita income (w/o project.) 16,445 Project Information Employment Category Direct Employment Earnings ($1,000) Personal Income ($1,000) Construction-direct 297.0 6,821 6,821 Construction-support 45.0 2,115 2,115 DOE operations 0.0 0.0 0.0 Subtotal 342.0 8,937 8,937 Indirect Employment Personal consumption 108.3 3,115 4,372 Procurement 516.2 18,864 26,477 Related investment 0.0 0.0 0.0 Subtotal 624.5 21,979 30,849 Total-place of work 966.5 30,915 39,786 Weekly commuting adjustment 0.0 Total-place of residence 39,786 Direct and Indirect Project Impacts Direct Employment Category Available Residential Labor Accompanying Labor Excess Force Population Weekly Labor Category Force Demand Increase Dependents Impacts Commuters Force Construction-direct 248.07 74.25 77.57 96.40 173.97 .00 22.94 Construction-support 42.35 33.75 35.26 42.05 77.31 .00 10.01 DOE operations 269.25 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Subtotal 559.68 108.00 112.83 138.46 251.29 .00 32.95 Indirect Employment Category Demand Share of Available Labor Residential Excess Force Population Labor Force Category Labor Force Demand Increase Dependents Impacts Share Personal consumption 427.57 .00 .00 .00 .00 .14 Procurement 2,038.03 .00 .00 .00 .00 .67 Related investment .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Subtotal 2,465.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .81 Total 3,025.28 108.00 112.83 138.46 251.29 33.76 Summary of Effects Employment: Direct employment (all categories) 342 Indirect employment (all categories) 624 Total project-related employment 966 Project-related civilian employment 966 Civilian labor force increase 146 Civilian labor force (w/project) 140,205 Employed civilian labor force (w/project) 132,006 Unemployment rate (w/project) .058 Total employment (w/project) 132,009 Adjusted baseline labor force participation rate (w/project) .4897 Labor force partic. rate (w/project) .4898 Maximum employment of accompanying labor force 32 Population: Total population impact 251 Total population (w/project) 286,261 Direct weekly commuters 0.00 Income: Direct project-related earnings ($1,000) 8,937 Direct project-related resident earnings ($1,000) 8,937 Indirect project-related earnings ($1,000) 21,979 Earnings (w/project $1,000) 3,382,017 Personal income impact of project ($1,000) 39,786 Personal income (w/project $1,000) 4,743,355 Per capita income (w/project) 16,570 Abbreviations DCIV - Fraction of direct employment which can be filled by civilians. DSHARE - Employable share of available resident labor force. DUR - Unemployment rate, in-migrant workers (Direct employment). DURDEP - Unemployment rate, dependents of in-migrant workers. FF - Fraction of workers accompanied by dependents. FUR - Floor value for minimum unemployment rate. HHS - Household size, workers accompanied by dependents. IUR - Unemployment rate, in-migrant workers (indirect employment). MSLF - Maximum share of baseline labor force employed with project - but unemployed without it. NLNOTR - Share of employment assumed to be non-local, and not relocating from out of region. NLRLOC - Share of employment assumed to be non-local, but relocating from out of region. PRDEP - Labor force participation rate, dependents of in-migrant workers. SHWCOM - Share of direct workers who are weekly commuters. Source: CEA 1992a; Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOC 1993a; OWRC 1975a; USCOE 1981a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a. D.2.2 Housing Baseline housing characteristics are presented in tables D.3-8, D.3-28, D.3-44, D.3-59, and D.3-77. Projected housing needs are based upon housing unit and population data obtained from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing for each ROI. Future housing units needed for cities and counties in each ROI were developed by estimating the household size from the current population and housing unit ratios. The household size-to-population ratios were then applied to the estimated future population trends to obtain the number of housing units needed to accommodate the projected population for a No Action alternative future baseline. Projected housing needs for the alternatives were developed in the same manner as the estimates for a No Action baseline. These estimates, however, include projected in-migrating workforces (and their families) from outside the ROI. Future housing needs for the in-migrating populations, resulting from employment created directly or indirectly by the project, were estimated from the national average household size from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing for each ROI. Conversely, estimates of additional housing unit vacancies created directly and indirectly by a project alternative as a result of out-migrations were developed from current population and household size ratios. Impacts on housing from the alternatives compared to No Action during construction and operation are given in tables D.3-9, D.3-10, D.3-29, D.3-30, D.3-45, D.3-46, D.3-60, D.3-61, and D.3-78. D.2.3 Public Finance Finances of ROI local jurisdictions were evaluated based on changes in historic revenue and expenditure levels, changes in fund balances, and reserve bonding capabilities. These historic fiscal characteristics were obtained from financial audits and budgets supplied by each jurisdiction. The analysis concentrated on each jurisdiction's governmental funds (general funds, special revenue funds, and, as applicable, capital projects, debt service, and expendable trust funds). Other funds, such as enterprise funds, which are funded principally through user charges without contributing to the general tax burden of area residents, were not included in the analyses. The analysis of local jurisdictions' public finances focused upon revenues and expenditures because no assumptions could be made for some projected fund balances (such as capital expenditures) so far into thefuture. The following parameters were used to project changes in total revenues and expenditures: gains (or losses) of jobs in the region; population increases (or decreases) in each jurisdiction, including school districts; earnings and income gains (or losses); and potential changes in each jurisdiction's property tax base. Public finance characteristics are presented in tables D.3-11, D.3-12, D.3-31, D.3-32, D.3-47, D.3-62, D.3-63, D.3-79, and D.3-80. Impacts on public finance from the alternatives compared to No Action during construction and operation are given in tables D.3-13 through D.3-20a, D.3-33 through D.3-36a, D.3-48 through D.3-51a, D.3-64 through D.3-71a, and D.3-81 through D.3-84a. D.2.4 Local Transportation Local transportation impacts are qualitatively assessed in terms of the changes to roadway traffic volumes and service levels associated with tritium supply technologies and recycling activities employment and area population changes. D.3 Supporting Data Data and analyses used to support the assessments made for the socioeconomics section are presented in the following tables. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-1.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1991 County/City Number of Employees Total Site Employment (percent) Bannock County 342 5.3 Pocatello 317 4.9 Bingham County 576 8.9 Blackfoot 460 7.1 Bonneville County 4,893 75.7 Idaho Falls 4,750 73.5 Butte County 123 1.9 Jefferson County 419 6.5 Rigby 320 4.9 Total ROI (County) 6,353 98.3 Note: Data on Westinghouse Electric Company employees were not available and is not included. Butte County was included in the ROI because more than one half of INEL is located within the county. Source: INEL 1991a:6. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-2.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 Regional Economic Area 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Civilian labor force 84,030 118,852 128,517 151,249 154,226 150,521 Total employment 79,028 110,805 120,242 141,510 144,295 140,829 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.0 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Personal income (thousand dollars) 682,703 2,176,049 4,175,612 5,458,323 5,850,853 6,488,596 Per capita income (dollars per person) 3,309 8,214 14,824 18,569 19,565 20,903 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-3.-Changes to Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 141,510 148,066 4.63 147,755 4.41 151,400 6.99 149,309 5.51 144,900 3.20 Unemployment 6.4 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4.2 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 18,569 18,923 1.91 18,929 1.94 18,860 1.57 18,899 1.78 18,615 2.36 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 144,295 146,787 1.73 146,733 1.69 146,519 1.54 145,967 1.16 145,967 1.16 Unemployment 6.4 5.4 NA 5.4 NA 5.5 NA 5.6 NA 5.6 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 19,565 19,804 1.22 19,800 1.20 19,784 1.12 19,742 0.91 19,742 0.91 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-3a.-Changes to Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 141,510 150,157 6.11 154,353 9.08 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.4 4.3 NA 4.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 18,569 18,934 1.97 18,806 1.28 Operation Total employment 144,295 146,168 1.3 149,774 3.8 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.4 5.6 NA 5.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,565 19,764 1.02 19,993 2.19 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-4.-Changes to Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 141,510 149,012 5.3 148,701 5.08 152,346 7.66 150,256 6.18 145,847 3.87 Unemployment 6.4 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4.5 NA 4 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 18,569 18,905 1.81 18,911 1.84 18,842 1.47 18,881 1.68 18,669 2.66 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 144,295 149,225 3.42 149,172 3.38 148,957 3.23 148,405 2.85 148,405 2.85 Unemployment 6.4 4.6 NA 4.6 NA 4.7 NA 4.9 NA 4.9 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 19,565 19,984 2.14 19,980 2.12 19,964 2.04 19,924 1.84 19,924 1.84 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-4a.-Changes to Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 141,510 151,104 6.78 155,299 9.74 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.4 4.3 NA 4.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 18,569 18,910 1.84 18,789 1.18 Operation Total employment 144,295 148,606 2.99 152,213 5.49 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.4 4.8 NA 5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,565 19,941 1.92 19,795 1.18 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-5.-Population for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Bannock County 52,200 65,421 66,026 69,515 70,721 73,409 Pocatello 40,036 43,340 46,080 48,515 49,357 51,232 Bingham County 29,167 36,489 37,583 39,449 40,133 41,658 Blackfoot 8,716 10,065 9,646 10,125 10,301 10,692 Bonneville County 52,457 65,980 72,207 74,420 75,711 78,588 Idaho Falls 35,776 39,590 43,929 45,275 46,061 47,811 Butte County 2,925 3,342 2,918 3,199 3,254 3,378 Jefferson County 11,740 15,304 16,543 17,166 17,463 18,127 Rigby 2,324 2,624 2,681 2,782 2,830 2,938 Total ROI 148,489 186,536 195,277 203,749 207,282 215,159 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-6.-Changes to Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 69,515 69,908 0.57 69,870 0.51 70,315 1.15 70,060 0.78 69,378 0.49 Pocatello 48,515 48,879 0.75 48,844 0.68 49,255 1.53 49,019 1.04 48,430 0.51 Bingham County 39,449 40,109 1.67 40,045 1.51 40,792 3.4 40,364 2.32 39,426 0.63 Blackfoot 10,125 10,652 5.2 10,601 4.7 11,197 10.59 10,855 7.21 10,164 1.08 Bonneville County 74,420 80,036 7.55 79,494 6.82 85,845 15.35 82,202 10.46 74,935 1.39 Idaho Falls 45,275 50,728 12.04 50,202 10.88 56,369 24.5 52,831 16.69 45,849 1.97 Butte County 3,199 3,339 4.38 3,326 3.97 3,485 8.94 3,394 6.11 3,208 1 Jefferson County 17,166 17,648 2.81 17,601 2.53 18,147 5.71 17,834 3.89 17,180 0.78 Rigby 2,782 3,145 13.05 3,110 11.79 3,521 26.56 3,286 18.12 2,821 2.1 Total ROI 203,749 211,040 3.58 210,336 3.23 218,584 7.28 213,854 4.96 204,127 0.88 Construction Operation Bannock County 70,721 70,812 0.13 70,809 0.12 70,797 0.11 70,768 0.07 70,768 0.07 Pocatello 49,357 49,441 0.17 49,438 0.16 49,427 0.14 49,400 0.09 49,400 0.09 Bingham County 40,133 40,285 0.38 40,280 0.37 40,261 0.32 40,212 0.2 40,212 0.2 Blackfoot 10,301 10,422 1.18 10,418 1.14 10,403 0.99 10,364 0.62 10,364 0.62 Bonneville County 75,711 77,004 1.71 76,963 1.65 76,800 1.44 76,379 0.88 76,379 0.88 Idaho Falls 46,061 47,316 2.73 47,277 2.64 47,118 2.3 46,710 1.41 46,710 1.41 Butte County 3,254 3,286 0.98 3,285 0.95 3,281 0.83 3,271 0.52 3,271 0.52 Jefferson County 17,463 17,574 0.63 17,571 0.62 17,556 0.53 17,520 0.32 17,520 0.32 Rigby 2,830 2,914 2.96 2,911 2.86 2,900 2.47 2,873 1.51 2,873 1.51 Total ROI Operation 207,282 208,961 0.81 208,908 0.78 208,695 0.68 208,150 0.42 208,150 0.42 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-6a.-Changes to Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 69,515 70,313 1.15 70,675 1.67 Pocatello 48,515 48,690 0.36 49,588 2.21 Bingham County 39,449 40,510 2.69 41,397 4.94 Blackfoot 10,125 10,894 7.6 11,679 15.35 Bonneville County 74,420 82,499 10.86 90,991 22.27 Idaho Falls 45,275 53,022 17.11 61,365 35.54 Butte County 3,199 3,406 6.49 3,614 12.99 Jefferson County 17,166 17,898 4.27 18,588 8.29 Rigby 2,782 3,298 18.55 3,855 38.57 Total ROI Construction 203,749 214,626 5.34 225,265 10.56 Operation Bannock County 70,721 71,024 0.43 70,995 0.39 Pocatello 49,357 49,535 0.36 49,610 0.51 Bingham County 40,133 40,357 0.56 40,593 1.15 Blackfoot 10,301 10,400 0.97 10,667 3.56 Bonneville County 75,711 76,655 1.25 79,618 5.16 Idaho Falls 46,061 46,879 1.78 49,854 8.24 Butte County 3,254 3,283 0.89 3,352 3.01 Jefferson County 17,463 17,584 0.69 17,799 1.92 Rigby 2,830 2,883 1.87 3,083 8.93 Total ROI Operation 207,282 208,903 0.78 212,357 2.45 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-7.-Changes to Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 69,515 70,024 0.73 69,986 0.68 70,431 1.32 70,175 0.95 69,480 0.64 Pocatello 48,515 48,986 0.97 48,950 0.9 49,362 1.75 49,126 1.26 48,512 0.68 Bingham County 39,449 40,303 2.16 40,239 2 40,986 3.9 40,558 2.81 39,531 0.9 Blackfoot 10,125 10,806 6.73 10,756 6.23 11,351 12.11 11,010 8.74 10,229 1.73 Bonneville County 74,420 81,685 9.76 81,142 9.03 87,495 17.57 83,852 12.67 75,588 2.27 Idaho Falls 45,275 52,329 15.58 51,803 14.42 57,971 28.04 54,433 20.23 46,459 3.32 Butte County 3,199 3,381 5.69 3,367 5.25 3,527 10.25 3,435 7.39 3,225 1.52 Jefferson County 17,166 17,789 3.63 17,743 3.36 18,288 6.54 17,975 4.72 17,246 1.16 Rigby 2,782 3,252 16.89 3,217 15.64 3,628 30.41 3,392 21.93 2,860 3.52 Total ROI Construction 203,749 213,182 4.63 212,477 4.28 220,727 8.33 215,995 6.01 205,070 1.34 Operation Bannock County 70,721 70,942 0.31 70,939 0.31 70,927 0.29 70,898 0.25 70,898 0.25 Pocatello 49,357 49,561 0.41 49,558 0.41 49,548 0.39 49,520 0.33 49,520 0.33 Bingham County 40,133 40,503 0.92 40,499 0.91 40,479 0.86 40,430 0.74 40,430 0.74 Blackfoot 10,301 10,596 2.87 10,593 2.84 10,577 2.68 10,538 2.31 10,538 2.31 Bonneville County 75,711 78,861 4.16 78,820 4.11 78,657 3.89 78,236 3.34 78,236 3.34 Idaho Falls 46,061 49,119 6.64 49,080 6.56 48,921 6.21 48,513 5.32 48,513 5.32 Butte County 3,254 3,333 2.43 3,332 2.4 3,328 2.27 3,317 1.93 3,317 1.93 Jefferson County 17,463 17,733 1.54 17,730 1.53 17,716 1.45 17,680 1.24 17,680 1.24 Rigby 2,830 3,034 7.2 3,031 7.1 3,021 6.74 2,993 5.75 2,993 5.75 Total ROI Operation 207,282 211,372 1.97 211,320 1.95 211,107 1.85 210,561 1.58 210,561 1.58 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-7a.-Changes to Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 69,515 70,480 1.39 70,791 1.84 Pocatello 48,515 48,726 0.43 49,694 2.43 Bingham County 39,449 40,734 3.26 41,591 5.43 Blackfoot 10,125 11,058 9.22 11,834 16.88 Bonneville County 74,420 84,216 13.16 92,641 24.48 Idaho Falls 45,275 54,670 20.75 62,967 39.08 Butte County 3,199 3,450 7.86 3,656 14.3 Jefferson County 17,166 18,053 5.17 18,730 9.11 Rigby 2,782 3,407 22.47 3,961 42.39 Total ROI Construction 203,749 216,933 6.47 227,409 11.61 Operation Bannock County 70,721 71,206 0.69 71,278 0.79 Pocatello 49,357 49,572 0.44 49,872 1.04 Bingham County 40,133 40,606 1.18 41,068 2.33 Blackfoot 10,301 10,583 2.74 11,046 7.24 Bonneville County 75,711 78,576 3.78 83,664 10.5 Idaho Falls 46,061 48,723 5.78 53,783 16.77 Butte County 3,254 3,331 2.37 3,454 6.14 Jefferson County 17,463 17,757 1.68 18,146 3.91 Rigby 2,830 3,007 6.25 3,345 18.19 Total ROI Operation 207,282 211,476 2.02 148,543 4.98 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-8.-Total Housing Units for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Bannock County 16,516 24,819 25,694 27,052 27,521 28,567 Pocatello 12,849 18,462 18,768 19,760 20,103 20,866 Bingham County 8,429 12,084 12,664 13,293 13,523 14,037 Blackfoot 2,703 3,707 3,617 3,797 3,862 4,009 Bonneville County 15,683 23,492 26,049 26,847 27,313 28,351 Idaho Falls 11,364 15,053 16,845 17,361 17,662 18,334 Butte County 1,021 1,280 1,265 1,387 1,411 1,464 Jefferson County 3,488 4,994 5,353 5,554 5,651 5,866 Rigby 748 962 969 1,005 1,023 1,062 Total ROI 45,137 66,669 71,025 74,133 75,419 78,285 Source: Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1982a; Census 1983a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-9.-Changes in Housing Demand During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 27,052 27,201 0.55 27,187 0.5 27,356 1.12 27,259 0.77 26,995 0.48 Pocatello 19,760 19,898 0.7 19,885 0.63 20,041 1.42 19,951 0.97 19,719 0.48 Bingham County 13,293 13,544 1.89 13,519 1.71 13,803 3.84 13,641 2.62 13,296 0.71 Blackfoot 3,797 3,997 5.28 3,978 4.77 4,204 10.74 4,074 7.31 3,812 1.1 Bonneville County 26,847 28,983 7.95 28,777 7.19 31,191 16.18 29,806 11.02 27,053 1.46 Idaho Falls 17,361 19,435 11.94 19,235 10.79 21,579 24.3 20,234 16.55 17,578 1.95 Butte County 1,387 1,440 3.85 1,435 3.49 1,496 7.85 1,461 5.36 1,389 0.88 Jefferson County 5,554 5,738 3.3 5,720 2.98 5,928 6.72 5,809 4.58 5,567 0.91 Rigby 1,005 1,144 13.73 1,130 12.41 1,286 27.95 1,197 19.06 1,021 2.21 Total ROI 74,133 76,906 3.74 76,638 3.38 79,774 7.61 77,975 5.18 74,300 0.92 Construction Operation Bannock County 27,521 27,556 0.13 27,555 0.12 27,550 0.1 27,539 0.06 27,539 0.06 Pocatello 20,103 20,135 0.16 20,133 0.15 20,129 0.13 20,119 0.08 20,119 0.08 Bingham County 13,523 13,581 0.43 13,579 0.41 13,572 0.36 13,553 0.22 13,553 0.22 Blackfoot 3,862 3,909 1.2 3,907 1.16 3,901 1.01 3,887 0.62 3,887 0.62 Bonneville County 27,313 27,805 1.8 27,789 1.74 27,727 1.52 27,567 0.93 27,567 0.93 Idaho Falls 17,662 18,140 2.7 18,125 2.62 18,064 2.28 17,909 1.4 17,909 1.4 Butte County 1,411 1,423 0.86 1,422 0.83 1,421 0.73 1,417 0.46 1,417 0.46 Jefferson County 5,651 5,693 0.74 5,692 0.72 5,686 0.62 5,672 0.38 5,672 0.38 Rigby 1,023 1,055 3.12 1,054 3.01 1,049 2.6 1,039 1.59 1,039 1.59 Total ROI Operation 75,419 76,057 0.85 76,037 0.82 75,956 0.71 75,749 0.44 75,749 0.44 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-9a.-Changes in Housing Demand During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 27,052 27,355 1.12 27,493 1.63 Pocatello 19,760 19,826 0.34 20,168 2.06 Bingham County 13,293 13,696 3.04 14,033 5.57 Blackfoot 3,797 4,089 7.7 4,387 15.56 Bonneville County 26,847 29,919 11.44 33,148 23.47 Idaho Falls 17,361 20,307 16.97 23,479 35.24 Butte County 1,387 1,466 5.69 1,545 11.39 Jefferson County 5,554 5,833 5.01 6,095 9.74 Rigby 1,005 1,202 19.52 1,413 40.58 Total ROI Construction 74,133 78,269 5.58 82,314 11.04 Operation Bannock County 27,521 27,636 0.42 27,625 0.38 Pocatello 20,103 20,170 0.34 20,199 0.48 Bingham County 13,523 13,608 0.63 13,698 1.29 Blackfoot 3,862 3,900 0.98 4,002 3.61 Bonneville County 27,313 27,672 1.31 28,799 5.44 Idaho Falls 17,662 17,974 1.76 19,105 8.17 Butte County 1,411 1,422 0.78 1,448 2.64 Jefferson County 5,651 5,697 0.81 5,778 2.26 Rigby 1,023 1,043 1.96 1,119 9.4 Total ROI Operation 75,419 76,035 0.82 77,348 2.56 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-10.-Changes in Housing Demand During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 27,052 27,245 0.72 27,231 0.66 27,400 1.29 27,303 0.93 27,034 0.62 Pocatello 19,760 19,939 0.91 19,925 0.84 20,082 1.63 19,992 1.18 19,750 0.64 Bingham County 13,293 13,617 2.44 13,593 2.26 13,877 4.4 13,714 3.17 13,336 1.02 Blackfoot 3,797 4,056 6.82 4,037 6.32 4,263 12.28 4,133 8.86 3,837 1.75 Bonneville County 26,847 29,610 10.29 29,403 9.52 31,819 18.52 30,434 13.36 27,301 2.39 Idaho Falls 17,361 20,043 15.45 19,843 14.3 22,189 27.81 20,843 20.06 17,810 3.3 Butte County 1,387 1,456 5 1,451 4.62 1,512 9.01 1,477 6.48 1,396 1.34 Jefferson County 5,554 5,791 4.27 5,774 3.95 5,981 7.68 5,862 5.54 5,592 1.37 Rigby 1,005 1,184 17.78 1,171 16.45 1,327 32 1,237 23.07 1,036 3.7 Total ROI 74,133 77,720 4.84 77,452 4.48 80,589 8.71 78,790 6.28 74,658 1.4 Construction Operation Bannock County 27,521 27,605 0.31 27,604 0.3 27,599 0.28 27,588 0.24 27,588 0.24 Pocatello 20,103 20,180 0.39 20,179 0.38 20,175 0.36 20,165 0.31 20,165 0.31 Bingham County 13,523 13,664 1.04 13,662 1.03 13,655 0.97 13,636 0.83 13,636 0.83 Blackfoot 3,862 3,975 2.91 3,974 2.88 3,968 2.72 3,953 2.34 3,953 2.34 Bonneville County 27,313 28,511 4.39 28,495 4.33 28,433 4.1 28,273 3.52 28,273 3.52 Idaho Falls 17,662 18,825 6.58 18,810 6.5 18,750 6.16 18,595 5.28 18,595 5.28 Butte County 1,411 1,441 2.13 1,440 2.1 1,439 1.99 1,435 1.7 1,435 1.7 Jefferson County 5,651 5,753 1.81 5,752 1.79 5,747 1.7 5,733 1.46 5,733 1.46 Rigby 1,023 1,100 7.58 1,099 7.47 1,095 7.09 1,085 6.05 1,085 6.05 Total ROI Operation 75,419 76,974 2.06 76,954 2.04 76,873 1.93 76,665 1.65 76,665 1.65 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-10a.-Changes in Housing Demand During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Bannock County 27,052 27,419 1.36 27,537 1.79 Pocatello 19,760 19,840 0.41 20,208 2.27 Bingham County 13,293 13,781 3.68 14,107 6.13 Blackfoot 3,797 4,151 9.35 4,446 17.12 Bonneville County 26,847 30,572 13.87 33,775 25.81 Idaho Falls 17,361 20,933 20.58 24,088 38.75 Butte County 1,387 1,482 6.9 1,561 12.54 Jefferson County 5,554 5,892 6.08 6,149 10.71 Rigby 1,005 1,243 23.64 1,454 44.59 Total ROI Construction 74,133 79,146 6.76 83,129 12.14 Operation Bannock County 27,521 27,705 0.67 27,733 0.77 Pocatello 20,103 20,184 0.41 20,299 0.97 Bingham County 13,523 13,703 1.33 13,879 2.63 Blackfoot 3,862 3,970 2.78 4,146 7.34 Bonneville County 27,313 28,402 3.99 30,337 11.07 Idaho Falls 17,662 18,675 5.73 20,599 16.62 Butte County 1,411 1,440 2.07 1,487 5.39 Jefferson County 5,651 5,762 1.98 5,910 4.59 Rigby 1,023 1,090 6.57 1,219 19.14 Total ROI Operation 75,419 77,013 2.11 79,346 5.21 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-11.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 1992 Revenues and Expenditures Bannock Pocatello Bingham Blackfoot Bonneville Idaho Falls Butte Jefferson Rigby County Countya Property tax (percent) 44 47 44 39 49 54 33 34 42 Intergovernmental (percent) 25 19 31 32 32 25 54 38 40 Permits, fees, fines, and 23 12 14 18 15 16 3 16 7 investment interest (percent) Other (percent) 8 22 11 11 4 5 10 12 12 Total Revenues 17,270,189 17,176,656 11,045,505 3,741,621 18,302,511 23,625,020 1,524,987 5,016,650 848,282 (dollars) General Government (percent) 39 15 28 14 40 9 35 29 23 Public safety, health, and 39 34 39 46 35 43 25 21 24 community service (percent) Public works, parks, culture, 21 27 25 24 25 40 37 39 32 and recreation (percent) Debt service (percent) 0 3 3 1 0 2 0 0 6 Other (percent) 0 21 5 15 0 5 4 11 16 Total Expenditures 17,808,705 17,282,164 15,064,797 3,870,197 17,557,221 23,226,057 1,365,238 4,660,790 774,503 (dollars) End-of-Year Fund 8,999,439 5,565,153 2,295,116 929,413 6,645,316 12,855,444 341,780 3,159,247 941,925 Balance (dollars) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-12.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 1992 - Bannock Bingham County Bonneville County Butte Jefferson County County County Revenues and Pocatello Blackfoot Shelley Snake Bonneville Idaho Arco Jefferson Ririe West Expenditures River Falls Jefferson Property tax (percent) 20 14 21 21 19 28 20 18 14 20 Intergovernmental 4 3 4 4 5 8 3 4 5 5 (percent) Permits, fees, fines, and 67 70 67 67 68 59 69 70 77 67 investment interest (percent) Other (percent) 9 13 8 8 7 6 7 8 4 8 Total Revenues 44,626,005 15,004,512 8,105,837 8,194,101 24,411,504 39,495,369 2,874,222 12,246,830 2,711,816 2,980,423 (dollars) Total expenditures per 3,276 3,387 3,793 3,206 4,360 4,257 3,598 3,3,15 3,827 3,811 pupil (dollars) Instruction (percent) 59 59 52 57 41 51 57 53 60 53 Support services (percent) 33 35 23 27 20 28 34 24 31 37 Food and community 5 5 6 5 3 4 3 5 6 5 services (percent) Capital assets (percent) 0 1 12 6 31 14 4 7 3 4 Debt service (percent) 2 0 7 5 5 3 2 11 0 4 Total Expenditures 45,291,238 15,584,405 8,977,931 7,648,387 32,257,927 41,966,174 2,790,568 12,811,473 2,512,575 2,957,294 (dollars) End-of-Year Fund 2,347,741 243,702 183,986 1,155,586 2,276,978 4,235,906 365,756 2,724,065 921,078 589,393 Balance (dollars) Source: IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-13.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,300,653 17,379,360 0.45 17,372,554 0.42 17,452,507 0.88 17,392,824 0.53 17,250,666 0.24 Pocatello 17,738,488 17,806,758 0.38 17,800,707 0.35 17,871,809 0.75 17,816,163 0.44 17,702,185 0.2 Bingham County 11,404,006 11,523,729 1.05 11,513,062 0.96 11,637,966 2.05 11,539,411 1.19 11,420,014 0.53 Blackfoot 3,855,503 3,913,851 1.51 3,909,816 1.41 3,956,944 2.63 3,939,517 2.18 3,880,578 1.05 Bonneville County 17,652,244 18,455,698 4.55 18,380,022 4.12 19,269,859 9.16 18,493,180 4.76 17,920,807 1.97 Idaho Falls 23,088,012 24,337,362 5.41 24,219,381 4.9 25,606,670 10.91 24,390,907 5.64 23,489,418 2.33 Butte County 1,488,215 1,544,878 3.81 1,539,617 3.45 1,604,375 7.81 1,544,814 3.8 1,502,905 1.58 Jefferson County 4,741,700 4,814,833 1.54 4,808,184 1.4 4,885,596 3.03 4,822,800 1.71 4,758,667 0.73 Rigby 822,765 839,930 2.09 838,256 1.88 857,735 4.25 840,086 2.11 825,060 0.85 Total ROI 98,091,586 100,616,399 2.57 100,381,600 2.33 103,143,459 5.15 100,779,703 2.74 98,750,299 1.15 Revenues Expenditures Bannock County 17,686,173 17,710,968 0.14 17,708,570 0.13 17,736,778 0.29 17,711,288 0.14 17,666,289 0.06 Pocatello 17,486,430 17,564,856 0.45 17,557,271 0.41 17,646,493 0.92 17,565,868 0.45 17,424,283 0.19 Bingham County 11,372,761 11,489,695 1.03 11,478,360 0.93 11,611,187 2.1 11,490,807 1.04 11,372,968 0.43 Blackfoot 3,793,678 3,840,687 1.24 3,836,131 1.12 3,889,529 2.53 3,841,134 1.25 3,789,972 0.51 Bonneville County 17,721,518 18,132,553 2.32 18,092,887 2.1 18,559,362 4.73 18,136,992 2.34 17,851,496 0.95 Idaho Falls 23,755,117 24,241,662 2.05 24,194,709 1.85 24,746,877 4.17 24,246,916 2.07 23,909,665 0.83 Butte County 1,443,508 1,485,278 2.89 1,481,400 2.62 1,529,136 5.93 1,485,230 2.89 1,454,337 1.2 Jefferson County 4,797,349 4,915,410 2.46 4,903,898 2.22 5,037,880 5.01 4,916,488 2.48 4,816,238 1 Rigby 842,701 847,953 0.62 847,441 0.56 853,401 1.27 848,001 0.63 845,574 0.25 Total ROI 98,899,235 100,229,062 1.34 100,100,667 1.21 101,610,643 2.74 100,242,724 1.36 99,130,821 0.55 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-13a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,300,653 17,399,797 0.57 17,520,671 1.27 Pocatello 17,738,488 17,822,040 0.47 17,928,880 1.07 Bingham County 11,404,006 11,549,656 1.28 11,737,718 2.93 Blackfoot 3,855,503 3,945,874 2.34 4,021,701 4.31 Bonneville County 17,652,244 18,556,803 5.12 19,879,244 12.62 Idaho Falls 23,088,012 24,489,482 6.07 26,550,003 14.99 Butte County 1,488,215 1,549,096 4.09 1,645,504 10.57 Jefferson County 4,741,700 4,828,936 1.84 4,945,142 4.29 Rigby 822,765 841,397 2.26 870,167 5.76 Total ROI County and City Revenues 98,091,586 100,983,080 2.95 105,099,028 7.14 Expenditures Bannock County 17,686,173 17,713,188 0.15 17,754,707 0.39 Pocatello 17,486,430 17,571,878 0.49 17,703,206 1.24 Bingham County 11,372,761 11,499,738 1.12 11,695,893 2.84 Blackfoot 3,793,678 3,844,725 1.35 3,923,582 3.42 Bonneville County 17,721,518 18,168,426 2.52 18,857,910 6.41 Idaho Falls 23,755,117 24,284,124 2.23 25,100,269 5.66 Butte County 1,443,508 1,488,387 3.11 1,559,455 8.03 Jefferson County 4,797,349 4,925,502 2.67 5,123,389 6.8 Rigby 842,701 848,402 0.68 857,205 1.72 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 98,899,235 100,344,370 1.46 102,575,616 3.72 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-14.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,495,800 17,516,300 0.12 17,515,695 0.11 17,510,984 0.09 17,507,324 0.07 17,507,324 0.07 Pocatello 17,917,798 17,935,160 0.1 17,934,636 0.09 17,930,569 0.07 17,927,404 0.05 17,927,404 0.05 Bingham County 11,515,415 11,545,737 0.26 11,544,819 0.26 11,537,628 0.19 11,532,254 0.15 11,532,254 0.15 Blackfoot 3,894,581 3,912,816 0.47 3,912,355 0.46 3,908,703 0.36 3,905,939 0.29 3,905,939 0.29 Bonneville County 17,836,074 18,026,992 1.07 18,021,095 1.04 17,973,552 0.77 17,936,995 0.57 17,936,995 0.57 Idaho Falls 23,374,411 23,670,313 1.27 23,661,149 1.23 23,587,276 0.91 23,530,467 0.67 23,530,467 0.67 Butte County 1,510,543 1,523,495 0.86 1,523,090 0.83 1,519,852 0.62 1,517,424 0.46 1,517,424 0.46 Jefferson County 4,784,517 4,802,793 0.38 4,802,319 0.37 4,797,863 0.28 4,794,468 0.21 4,794,468 0.21 Rigby 833,450 837,403 0.47 837,296 0.46 836,263 0.34 835,480 0.24 835,480 0.24 Total ROI 99,162,589 99,771,008 0.61 99,752,454 0.59 99,602,690 0.44 99,487,755 0.33 99,487,755 0.33 Revenues Expenditures Bannock County 17,762,280 17,768,014 0.03 17,767,825 0.03 17,766,374 0.02 17,765,238 0.02 17,765,238 0.02 Pocatello 17,727,414 17,745,551 0.1 17,744,952 0.1 17,740,361 0.07 17,736,768 0.05 17,736,768 0.05 Bingham County 11,494,117 11,521,009 0.23 11,520,123 0.23 11,513,216 0.17 11,508,080 0.12 11,508,080 0.12 Blackfoot 3,841,961 3,852,772 0.28 3,852,416 0.27 3,849,639 0.2 3,847,574 0.15 3,847,574 0.15 Bonneville County 17,815,897 17,910,549 0.53 17,907,548 0.51 17,883,397 0.38 17,864,809 0.27 17,864,809 0.27 Idaho Falls 23,864,119 23,976,158 0.47 23,972,606 0.45 23,944,019 0.33 23,922,015 0.24 23,922,015 0.24 Butte County 1,459,933 1,469,481 0.65 1,469,182 0.63 1,466,796 0.47 1,465,005 0.35 1,465,005 0.35 Jefferson County 4,870,096 4,897,285 0.56 4,896,550 0.54 4,889,446 0.4 4,884,058 0.29 4,884,058 0.29 Rigby 846,664 847,874 0.14 847,841 0.14 847,525 0.1 847,285 0.07 847,285 0.07 Total ROI 99,682,481 99,988,691 0.31 99,979,043 0.3 99,900,773 0.22 99,840,833 0.16 99,840,833 0.16 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-14a.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,495,800 17,511,688 0.09 17,560,459 0.37 Pocatello 17,917,798 17,930,994 0.07 17,972,522 0.31 Bingham County 11,515,415 11,538,394 0.2 11,610,979 0.83 Blackfoot 3,894,581 3,910,515 0.41 3,952,345 1.48 Bonneville County 17,836,074 17,973,860 0.77 18,437,393 3.37 Idaho Falls 23,374,411 23,587,369 0.91 24,306,310 3.99 Butte County 1,510,543 1,519,982 0.62 1,551,321 2.7 Jefferson County 4,784,517 4,798,344 0.29 4,842,374 1.21 Rigby 833,450 836,243 0.34 845,949 1.5 Total ROI County and City Revenues 99,162,589 99,607,389 0.45 101,079,652 1.93 Expenditures Bannock County 17,762,280 17,766,276 0.02 17,780,301 0.1 Pocatello 17,727,414 17,740,051 0.07 17,784,412 0.32 Bingham County 11,494,117 11,512,830 0.16 11,578,636 0.74 Blackfoot 3,841,961 3,849,484 0.2 3,875,939 0.88 Bonneville County 17,815,897 17,882,354 0.37 18,113,762 1.67 Idaho Falls 23,864,119 23,942,783 0.33 24,216,703 1.48 Butte County 1,459,933 1,466,891 0.48 1,489,993 2.06 Jefferson County 4,870,096 4,889,309 0.39 4,956,070 1.77 Rigby 846,664 847,519 0.1 850,489 0.45 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 99,682,481 99,897,497 0.22 100,646,304 0.97 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-15.-Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,005,283 3,053,956 1.62 3,049,880 1.48 3,099,741 3.14 3,057,763 1.75 3,042,657 0.25 Blackfoot 15,987,856 16,255,445 1.67 16,229,507 1.51 16,533,469 3.41 16,240,219 1.58 16,239,408 0.21 Bonneville 28,642,438 30,626,604 6.93 30,444,417 6.29 32,586,402 13.77 30,650,324 7.01 29,657,165 0.96 Idaho Falls 41,388,574 44,683,027 7.96 44,388,652 7.25 47,849,123 15.61 44,839,808 8.34 43,440,660 1.16 Jefferson 12,764,278 13,140,238 2.95 13,105,290 2.67 13,512,109 5.86 13,143,023 2.97 13,062,537 0.4 Pocatello 47,015,081 47,280,774 0.57 47,255,078 0.51 47,557,342 1.15 47,266,496 0.53 47,544,861 0.07 Ririe 2,546,424 2,570,450 0.94 2,568,615 0.87 2,589,999 1.71 2,576,284 1.17 2,570,694 0.18 Shelley 9,604,500 9,753,568 1.55 9,739,767 1.41 9,901,482 3.09 9,754,393 1.56 9,729,816 0.21 Snake River 8,385,061 8,440,562 0.66 8,435,908 0.61 8,490,432 1.26 8,447,819 0.75 8,451,831 0.11 West Jefferson 3,110,676 3,203,007 2.97 3,194,490 2.69 3,293,636 5.88 3,204,626 3.02 3,184,954 0.41 Total ROI 172,450,171 179,007,631 3.80 178,411,604 3.46 185,413,734 7.52 179,180,754 3.9 176,924,582 0.54 Revenues Expenditures Arco 2,942,204 3,066,443 4.22 3,054,906 3.83 3,196,893 8.66 3,058,136 3.94 3,018,885 0.53 Blackfoot 15,344,053 15,518,829 1.14 15,501,888 1.03 15,700,420 2.32 15,508,885 1.07 15,483,328 0.14 Bonneville 28,377,490 29,968,505 5.61 29,814,969 5.07 31,620,573 11.43 29,879,884 5.29 29,062,455 0.69 Idaho Falls 40,023,608 42,705,819 6.7 42,446,981 6.05 45,490,955 13.66 42,556,418 6.33 41,344,748 0.83 Jefferson 12,385,854 12,690,706 2.46 12,660,980 2.22 13,006,944 5.01 12,673,250 2.32 12,588,293 0.30 Pocatello 46,998,053 47,245,810 0.53 47,221,849 0.48 47,503,709 1.08 47,232,496 0.5 47,479,309 0.07 Ririe 2,614,477 2,685,319 2.71 2,678,411 2.45 2,758,806 5.52 2,681,263 2.55 2,677,386 0.33 Shelley 10,262,219 10,389,417 1.24 10,377,087 1.12 10,521,574 2.53 10,382,179 1.17 10,296,221 0.15 Snake River 8,088,610 8,207,597 1.47 8,196,064 1.33 8,331,224 3 8,200,827 1.39 8,187,012 0.18 West Jefferson 3,046,831 3,128,895 2.69 3,120,893 2.43 3,214,022 5.49 3,124,196 2.54 3,105,981 0.33 Total ROI 170,083,400 175,607,340 3.25 175,074,027 2.93 181,345,119 6.62 175,297,533 3.07 173,243,617 0.4 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-15a.-Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,005,283 3,065,709 2.01 3,141,750 4.54 Blackfoot 15,987,856 16,278,429 1.82 16,727,310 4.63 Bonneville 28,642,438 30,954,335 8.07 34,156,495 19.25 Idaho Falls 41,388,574 45,362,354 9.6 50,568,814 22.18 Jefferson 12,764,278 13,200,369 3.42 13,807,775 8.18 Pocatello 47,015,081 47,304,562 0.62 47,749,471 1.56 Ririe 2,546,424 2,580,805 1.35 2,614,330 2.67 Shelley 9,604,500 9,777,088 1.8 10,018,416 4.31 Snake River 8,385,061 8,457,321 0.86 8,540,651 1.86 West Jefferson 3,110,676 3,218,851 3.48 3,367,146 8.24 Total ROI Revenues 172,450,171 180,199,821 4.49 190,692,156 10.58 Expenditures Arco 2,942,204 3,075,690 4.54 3,287,072 11.72 Blackfoot 15,344,053 15,533,841 1.24 15,827,027 3.15 Bonneville 28,377,490 30,107,360 6.1 32,776,177 15.5 Idaho Falls 40,023,608 42,939,907 7.29 47,439,129 18.53 Jefferson 12,385,854 12,716,764 2.67 13,227,741 6.8 Pocatello 46,998,053 47,267,992 0.57 47,682,868 1.46 Ririe 2,614,477 2,691,374 2.94 2,810,115 7.48 Shelley 10,262,219 10,400,342 1.35 10,613,715 3.43 Snake River 8,088,610 8,217,817 1.6 8,417,417 4.07 West Jefferson 3,046,831 3,135,909 2.92 3,273,459 7.44 Total ROI Expenditures 170,083,400 176,086,996 3.53 185,354,720 8.98 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-16.-Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,029,757 3,042,880 0.43 3,042,510 0.42 3,039,545 0.32 3,037,320 0.25 3,037,320 0.25 Blackfoot 16,265,237 16,326,775 0.38 16,324,749 0.37 16,308,943 0.27 16,297,189 0.2 16,297,189 0.2 Bonneville 29,145,644 29,640,791 1.7 29,625,931 1.65 29,506,117 1.24 29,414,143 0.92 29,414,143 0.92 Idaho Falls 42,326,502 43,182,076 2.02 43,157,072 1.96 42,955,310 1.49 42,800,639 1.12 42,800,639 1.12 Jefferson 13,017,612 13,111,104 0.72 13,108,658 0.7 13,085,503 0.52 13,067,951 0.39 13,067,951 0.39 Pocatello 47,830,642 47,892,085 0.13 47,890,056 0.12 47,874,503 0.09 47,862,332 0.07 47,862,332 0.07 Ririe 2,566,733 2,574,315 0.3 2,574,135 0.29 2,572,530 0.23 2,571,317 0.18 2,571,317 0.18 Shelley 9,786,330 9,823,262 0.38 9,822,111 0.37 9,813,086 0.27 9,806,367 0.2 9,806,367 0.2 Snake River 8,459,527 8,475,257 0.19 8,474,812 0.18 8,471,288 0.14 8,468,657 0.11 8,468,657 0.11 West Jefferson 3,173,725 3,196,951 0.73 3,196,347 0.71 3,190,639 0.53 3,186,314 0.4 3,186,314 0.4 Total ROI 175,601,709 177,265,496 0.95 177,216,380 0.92 176,817,465 0.69 176,512,229 0.52 176,512,229 0.52 Revenues Expenditures Arco 2,990,995 3,019,393 0.95 3,018,505 0.92 3,011,406 0.68 3,006,082 0.5 3,006,082 0.5 Blackfoot 15,523,365 15,563,559 0.26 15,562,235 0.25 15,551,912 0.18 15,544,235 0.13 15,544,235 0.13 Bonneville 28,724,762 29,091,134 1.28 29,079,519 1.24 28,986,038 0.91 28,914,086 0.66 28,914,086 0.66 Idaho Falls 40,629,058 41,246,704 1.52 41,227,124 1.47 41,069,529 1.08 40,948,229 0.79 40,948,229 0.79 Jefferson 12,572,160 12,642,365 0.56 12,640,468 0.54 12,622,126 0.4 12,608,212 0.29 12,608,212 0.29 Pocatello 47,757,386 47,814,681 0.12 47,812,790 0.12 47,798,287 0.09 47,786,937 0.06 47,786,937 0.06 Ririe 2,658,277 2,674,591 0.61 2,674,150 0.6 2,669,888 0.44 2,666,655 0.32 2,666,655 0.32 Shelley 10,384,108 10,413,360 0.28 10,412,397 0.27 10,404,884 0.2 10,399,297 0.15 10,399,297 0.15 Snake River 8,210,458 8,237,821 0.33 8,236,920 0.32 8,229,892 0.24 8,224,666 0.17 8,224,666 0.17 West Jefferson 3,097,371 3,116,270 0.61 3,115,759 0.59 3,110,822 0.43 3,107,076 0.31 3,107,076 0.31 Total ROI 172,547,942 173,819,879 0.74 173,779,868 0.71 173,454,783 0.53 173,205,473 0.38 173,205,473 0.38 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-16a.-Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,029,757 3,040,290 0.35 3,071,204 1.37 Blackfoot 16,265,237 16,308,059 0.26 16,458,650 1.19 Bonneville 29,145,644 29,514,205 1.26 30,706,576 5.36 Idaho Falls 42,326,502 42,980,220 1.54 45,025,857 6.38 Jefferson 13,017,612 13,087,389 0.54 13,313,512 2.27 Pocatello 47,830,642 47,873,454 0.09 48,023,738 0.4 Ririe 2,566,733 2,573,191 0.25 2,590,788 0.94 Shelley 9,786,330 9,813,513 0.28 9,902,618 1.19 Snake River 8,459,527 8,472,133 0.15 8,509,202 0.59 West Jefferson 3,173,725 3,191,192 0.55 3,247,245 2.32 Total ROI Revenues 175,601,709 176,853,646 0.71 180,849,391 2.99 Expenditures Arco 2,990,995 3,011,690 0.69 3,080,403 2.99 Blackfoot 15,523,365 15,551,335 0.18 15,649,693 0.81 Bonneville 28,724,762 28,981,998 0.9 29,877,723 4.01 Idaho Falls 40,629,058 41,062,718 1.07 42,572,775 4.78 Jefferson 12,572,160 12,621,772 0.39 12,794,159 1.77 Pocatello 47,757,386 47,797,308 0.08 47,937,448 0.38 Ririe 2,658,277 2,669,806 0.43 2,709,865 1.94 Shelley 10,384,108 10,404,464 0.2 10,476,046 0.89 Snake River 8,210,458 8,229,499 0.23 8,296,461 1.05 West Jefferson 3,097,371 3,110,726 0.43 3,157,131 1.93 Total ROI Expenditures 172,547,942 173,441,315 0.52 176,551,703 2.32 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-17.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,300,653 17,400,105 0.57 17,393,310 0.54 17,472,946 1 17,412,872 0.65 17,270,557 0.35 Pocatello 17,738,488 17,825,207 0.49 17,819,164 0.45 17,889,975 0.85 17,833,401 0.54 17,719,165 0.29 Bingham County 11,404,006 11,556,033 1.33 11,545,386 1.24 11,669,813 2.33 11,569,960 1.46 11,450,665 0.8 Blackfoot 3,855,503 3,926,034 1.83 3,922,032 1.73 3,969,011 2.94 3,955,531 2.59 3,896,794 1.48 Bonneville County 17,652,244 18,685,917 5.86 18,610,115 5.43 19,497,079 10.45 18,693,776 5.90 18,121,320 3.11 Idaho Falls 23,088,012 24,696,279 6.97 24,578,101 6.45 25,960,901 12.44 24,702,544 6.99 23,800,897 3.69 Butte County 1,488,215 1,561,877 4.95 1,556,211 4.57 1,620,969 8.92 1,559,481 4.79 1,516,251 2.48 Jefferson County 4,741,700 4,834,781 1.96 4,828,263 1.83 4,905,432 3.45 4,841,243 2.1 4,777,245 1.12 Rigby 822,765 844,951 2.7 843,313 2.5 862,721 4.86 844,307 2.62 829,305 1.37 Total ROI 98,091,586 101,331,184 3.3 101,095,895 3.06 103,848,846 5.87 101,413,115 3.39 99,382,200 1.8 Revenues Expenditures Bannock County 17,686,173 17,718,288 0.18 17,715,890 0.17 17,743,972 0.33 17,717,342 0.18 17,672,263 0.09 Pocatello 17,486,430 17,588,010 0.58 17,580,425 0.54 17,669,248 1.05 17,585,017 0.56 17,443,099 0.3 Bingham County 11,372,761 11,524,053 1.33 11,512,718 1.23 11,645,014 2.39 11,519,758 1.29 11,402,021 0.68 Blackfoot 3,793,678 3,854,500 1.6 3,849,943 1.48 3,903,128 2.89 3,852,773 1.56 3,801,698 0.82 Bonneville County 17,721,518 18,253,233 3 18,213,495 2.78 18,678,432 5.4 18,238,728 2.92 17,953,098 1.52 Idaho Falls 23,755,117 24,384,511 2.65 24,337,472 2.45 24,887,820 4.77 24,367,341 2.58 24,029,931 1.34 Butte County 1,443,508 1,497,809 3.76 1,493,632 3.47 1,541,369 6.78 1,496,043 3.64 1,464,175 1.88 Jefferson County 4,797,349 4,949,947 3.18 4,938,679 2.95 5,072,172 5.73 4,945,518 3.09 4,845,437 1.61 Rigby 842,701 849,490 0.81 848,988 0.75 854,927 1.45 849,292 0.78 846,873 0.41 Total ROI 98,899,235 100,619,840 1.74 100,491,243 1.61 101,996,081 3.13 100,571,813 1.69 99,458,595 0.88 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-17a.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,300,653 17,419,589 0.69 17,571,212 1.56 Pocatello 17,738,488 17,839,082 0.57 17,974,062 1.33 Bingham County 11,404,006 11,579,894 1.54 11,816,834 3.62 Blackfoot 3,855,503 3,961,519 2.75 4,049,768 5.04 Bonneville County 17,652,244 18,756,121 6.25 20,449,228 15.84 Idaho Falls 23,088,012 24,799,189 7.41 27,439,073 18.85 Butte County 1,488,215 1,563,747 5.08 1,686,763 13.34 Jefferson County 4,741,700 4,847,201 2.22 4,994,466 5.33 Rigby 822,765 845,596 2.77 882,764 7.29 Total ROI Revenues 98,091,586 101,611,938 3.59 106,864,170 8.94 Expenditures Bannock County 17,686,173 17,719,207 0.19 17,772,947 0.49 Pocatello 17,486,430 17,590,919 0.6 17,760,897 1.57 Bingham County 11,372,761 11,528,557 1.37 11,781,435 3.59 Blackfoot 3,793,678 3,856,310 1.65 3,957,971 4.33 Bonneville County 17,721,518 18,269,688 3.09 19,158,090 8.11 Idaho Falls 23,755,117 24,403,989 2.73 25,455,595 7.16 Butte County 1,443,508 1,499,187 3.86 1,589,870 10.14 Jefferson County 4,797,349 4,954,387 3.27 5,210,034 8.6 Rigby 842,701 849,687 0.83 861,060 2.18 Total ROI Expenditures 98,899,235 100,671,932 1.79 103,547,897 4.7 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-18.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,495,800 17,542,876 0.27 17,542,271 0.27 17,539,842 0.25 17,533,890 0.22 17,533,890 0.22 Pocatello 17,917,798 17,958,114 0.23 17,957,591 0.22 17,955,488 0.21 17,950,351 0.18 17,950,351 0.18 Bingham County 11,515,415 11,585,975 0.61 11,585,210 0.61 11,581,538 0.57 11,572,492 0.5 11,572,492 0.50 Blackfoot 3,894,581 3,933,305 0.99 3,932,882 0.98 3,931,037 0.94 3,926,429 0.82 3,926,429 0.82 Bonneville County 17,836,074 18,294,419 2.57 18,288,523 2.54 18,265,040 2.41 18,204,422 2.07 18,204,422 2.07 Idaho Falls 23,374,411 24,085,863 3.04 24,076,699 3 24,040,212 2.85 23,946,017 2.45 23,946,017 2.45 Butte County 1,510,543 1,542,518 2.12 1,542,113 2.09 1,540,494 1.98 1,536,042 1.69 1,536,042 1.69 Jefferson County 4,784,517 4,827,315 0.89 4,826,841 0.88 4,824,679 0.84 4,819,122 0.72 4,819,122 0.72 Rigby 833,450 843,065 1.15 842,958 1.14 842,460 1.08 841,178 0.93 841,178 0.93 Total ROI 99,162,589 100,613,451 1.46 100,595,087 1.44 100,520,789 1.37 100,329,942 1.18 100,329,942 1.18 Revenues Expenditures Bannock County 17,762,280 17,776,218 0.08 17,776,029 0.08 17,775,271 0.07 17,773,441 0.06 17,773,441 0.06 Pocatello 17,727,414 17,771,499 0.25 17,770,900 0.25 17,768,505 0.23 17,762,717 0.2 17,762,717 0.2 Bingham County 11,494,117 11,559,617 0.57 11,558,909 0.56 11,555,367 0.53 11,546,688 0.46 11,546,688 0.46 Blackfoot 3,841,961 3,868,293 0.69 3,868,008 0.68 3,866,584 0.64 3,863,095 0.55 3,863,095 0.55 Bonneville County 17,815,897 18,046,451 1.29 18,043,451 1.28 18,031,522 1.21 18,000,711 1.04 18,000,711 1.04 Idaho Falls 23,864,119 24,137,026 1.14 24,133,474 1.13 24,119,354 1.07 24,082,884 0.92 24,082,884 0.92 Butte County 1,459,933 1,483,503 1.61 1,483,205 1.59 1,482,012 1.51 1,478,730 1.29 1,478,730 1.29 Jefferson County 4,870,096 4,936,230 1.36 4,935,495 1.34 4,932,066 1.27 4,923,248 1.09 4,923,248 1.09 Rigby 846,664 849,606 0.35 849,574 0.34 849,421 0.33 849,029 0.28 849,029 0.28 Total ROI 99,682,481 100,428,444 0.75 100,419,044 0.74 100,380,101 0.7 100,280,543 0.6 100,280,543 0.6 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-18a.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Bannock County 17,495,800 17,562,692 0.38 17,617,555 0.7 Pocatello 17,917,798 17,974,855 0.32 18,022,054 0.58 Bingham County 11,515,415 11,615,320 0.87 11,698,278 1.59 Blackfoot 3,894,581 3,951,240 1.45 3,994,931 2.58 Bonneville County 17,836,074 18,477,616 3.6 19,021,489 6.65 Idaho Falls 23,374,411 24,369,705 4.26 25,214,406 7.87 Butte County 1,510,543 1,555,162 2.95 1,593,255 5.48 Jefferson County 4,784,517 4,844,978 1.26 4,895,406 2.32 Rigby 833,450 846,857 1.61 858,361 2.99 Total ROI Revenues 99,162,589 101,198,424 2.05 102,915,735 3.78 Expenditures Bannock County 17,762,280 17,781,689 0.11 17,798,301 0.2 Pocatello 17,727,414 17,788,803 0.35 17,841,348 0.64 Bingham County 11,494,117 11,585,415 0.79 11,663,871 1.48 Blackfoot 3,841,961 3,878,664 0.96 3,910,204 1.78 Bonneville County 17,815,897 18,136,986 1.8 18,412,087 3.35 Idaho Falls 23,864,119 24,244,192 1.59 24,569,831 2.96 Butte County 1,459,933 1,492,824 2.25 1,520,905 4.18 Jefferson County 4,870,096 4,962,311 1.89 5,041,441 3.52 Rigby 846,664 850,767 0.48 854,287 0.9 Total ROI Expenditures 99,682,481 100,721,651 1.04 101,612,275 1.94 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN City 1992a; IN County 1992a; IN DOC 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-19.- Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,005,283 3,067,029 2.05 3,062,678 1.91 3,112,542 3.57 3,074,402 2.3 3,032,734 1.24 Blackfoot 15,987,856 16,334,070 2.17 16,308,132 2 16,610,877 3.9 16,324,242 2.1 16,053,571 1.10 Bonneville 28,642,438 31,180,853 8.86 30,998,372 8.23 33,133,702 15.68 31,291,608 9.25 29,849,774 4.93 Idaho Falls 41,388,574 45,578,535 10.12 45,283,723 9.41 48,733,811 17.75 45,920,522 10.95 43,446,756 5.9 Jefferson 12,764,278 13,245,139 3.77 13,210,905 3.5 13,616,314 6.68 13,263,783 3.91 12,928,666 2.09 Pocatello 47,015,081 47,359,214 0.73 47,333,518 0.68 47,634,430 1.32 47,349,074 0.71 46,866,027 0.37 Ririe 2,546,424 2,575,973 1.16 2,574,168 1.09 2,595,497 1.93 2,584,781 1.51 2,554,991 0.84 Shelley 9,604,500 9,795,406 1.99 9,781,606 1.84 9,942,708 3.52 9,802,461 2.06 9,676,163 1.1 Snake River 8,385,061 8,454,674 0.83 8,450,021 0.77 8,504,365 1.42 8,466,657 0.97 8,400,630 0.53 West Jefferson 3,110,676 3,228,574 3.79 3,220,230 3.52 3,319,035 6.7 3,234,412 3.98 3,151,480 2.13 Total ROI 172,450,171 180,819,466 4.85 180,223,352 4.51 187,203,281 8.55 181,311,941 5.14 175,960,792 2.75 Revenues Expenditures Arco 2,942,204 3,103,714 5.49 3,091,290 5.07 3,233,277 9.89 3,098,461 5.31 3,002,286 2.76 Blackfoot 15,344,053 15,570,183 1.47 15,553,242 1.36 15,750,979 2.65 15,563,764 1.43 15,374,048 0.75 Bonneville 28,377,490 30,435,628 7.25 30,281,809 6.71 32,081,464 13.05 30,379,482 7.05 29,179,074 3.7 Idaho Falls 40,023,608 43,493,317 8.67 43,234,001 8.02 46,267,947 15.6 43,398,664 8.43 41,474,061 4.42 Jefferson 12,385,854 12,779,885 3.18 12,750,792 2.95 13,095,490 5.73 12,768,450 3.09 12,496,111 1.62 Pocatello 46,998,053 47,318,955 0.68 47,294,994 0.63 47,575,593 1.23 47,309,500 0.66 46,854,164 0.35 Ririe 2,614,477 2,706,042 3.5 2,699,282 3.24 2,779,383 6.31 2,703,385 3.4 2,644,009 1.78 Shelley 10,262,219 10,426,790 1.6 10,414,461 1.48 10,558,370 2.89 10,422,119 1.56 10,291,863 0.82 Snake River 8,088,610 8,242,559 1.9 8,231,025 1.76 8,365,644 3.42 8,238,189 1.85 8,117,599 0.97 West Jefferson 3,046,831 3,152,901 3.48 3,145,069 3.22 3,237,858 6.27 3,149,822 3.38 3,080,139 1.77 Total ROI 170,083,400 177,229,974 4.2 176,695,963 3.89 182,946,005 7.56 177,031,835 4.09 172,513,353 2.14 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 192a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-19a.- Changes to School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,005,283 3,078,540 2.44 3,172,875 5.58 Blackfoot 15,987,856 16,344,378 2.23 16,923,063 5.85 Bonneville 28,642,438 31,450,185 9.8 35,521,766 24.02 Idaho Falls 41,388,574 46,191,801 11.61 52,762,409 27.48 Jefferson 12,764,278 13,293,683 4.15 14,068,428 10.22 Pocatello 47,015,081 47,369,066 0.75 47,944,916 1.98 Ririe 2,546,424 2,587,077 1.6 2,627,438 3.18 Shelley 9,604,500 9,814,310 2.18 10,121,649 5.38 Snake River 8,385,061 8,471,541 1.03 8,574,744 2.26 West Jefferson 3,110,676 3,241,818 4.22 3,430,571 10.28 Total ROI Revenues 172,450,171 181,842,399 5.45 195,147,858 13.16 Expenditures Arco 2,942,204 3,107,814 5.63 3,377,536 14.8 Blackfoot 15,344,053 15,576,916 1.52 15,954,883 3.98 Bonneville 28,377,490 30,499,320 7.48 33,938,102 19.6 Idaho Falls 40,023,608 43,600,691 8.94 49,397,957 23.42 Jefferson 12,385,854 12,791,352 3.27 13,451,472 8.6 Pocatello 46,998,053 47,328,143 0.7 47,865,119 1.84 Ririe 2,614,477 2,708,707 3.6 2,862,106 9.47 Shelley 10,262,219 10,431,690 1.65 10,706,765 4.33 Snake River 8,088,610 8,247,142 1.96 8,504,461 5.14 West Jefferson 3,046,831 3,155,987 3.58 3,333,685 9.41 Total ROI Expenditures 170,083,400 177,447,762 4.33 189,392,085 11.35 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 192a. D D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-20.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,029,757 3,060,074 1.00 3,059,704 0.99 3,058,229 0.94 3,054,236 0.81 3,054,236 0.81 Blackfoot 16,265,237 16,415,126 0.92 16,413,505 0.91 16,405,400 0.86 16,385,541 0.74 16,385,541 0.74 Bonneville 29,145,644 30,314,284 4.01 30,299,423 3.96 30,240,294 3.76 30,087,634 3.23 30,087,634 3.23 Idaho Falls 42,326,502 44,315,592 4.70 44,290,589 4.64 44,191,061 4.41 43,934,152 3.80 43,934,152 3.80 Jefferson 13,017,612 13,238,305 1.70 13,235,859 1.68 13,224,661 1.59 13,195,861 1.37 13,195,861 1.37 Pocatello 47,830,642 47,979,992 0.31 47,977,963 0.31 47,969,849 0.29 47,950,239 0.25 47,950,239 0.25 Ririe 2,566,733 2,583,185 0.64 2,583,004 0.63 2,582,223 0.60 2,580,215 0.53 2,580,215 0.53 Shelley 9,786,330 9,873,695 0.89 9,872,750 0.88 9,868,144 0.84 9,856,799 0.72 9,856,799 0.72 Snake River 8,459,527 8,494,941 0.42 8,494,558 0.41 8,492,775 0.39 8,488,341 0.34 8,488,341 0.34 West Jefferson 3,173,725 3,228,312 1.72 3,227,708 1.70 3,224,947 1.61 3,217,846 1.39 3,217,846 1.39 Total ROI 175,601,709 179,503,504 2.22 179,455,062 2.19 179,257,582 2.08 178,750,864 1.79 178,750,864 1.79 Revenues Expenditures Arco 2,990,995 3,061,101 2.34 3,060,214 2.31 3,056,664 2.20 3,046,903 1.87 3,046,903 1.87 Blackfoot 15,523,365 15,621,265 0.63 15,620,207 0.62 15,614,912 0.59 15,601,942 0.51 15,601,942 0.51 Bonneville 28,724,762 29,617,178 3.11 29,605,564 3.07 29,559,390 2.91 29,440,130 2.49 29,440,130 2.49 Idaho Falls 40,629,058 42,133,535 3.70 42,113,955 3.65 42,036,113 3.46 41,835,060 2.97 41,835,060 2.97 Jefferson 12,572,160 12,742,929 1.36 12,741,031 1.34 12,732,177 1.27 12,709,408 1.09 12,709,408 1.09 Pocatello 47,757,386 47,896,654 0.29 47,894,762 0.29 47,887,196 0.27 47,868,909 0.23 47,868,909 0.23 Ririe 2,658,277 2,697,960 1.49 2,697,519 1.48 2,695,462 1.40 2,690,171 1.20 2,690,171 1.20 Shelley 10,384,108 10,455,358 0.69 10,454,587 0.68 10,450,734 0.64 10,441,294 0.55 10,441,294 0.55 Snake River 8,210,458 8,277,108 0.81 8,276,387 0.80 8,272,783 0.76 8,263,952 0.65 8,263,952 0.65 West Jefferson 3,097,371 3,143,340 1.48 3,142,830 1.47 3,140,446 1.39 3,134,317 1.19 3,134,317 1.19 Total ROI 172,547,942 175,646,429 1.80 175,607,056 1.77 175,445,876 1.68 175,032,085 1.44 175,032,085 1.44 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-20a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Arco 3,029,757 3,072,967 1.43 3,108,217 2.59 Blackfoot 16,265,237 16,474,163 1.28 16,653,700 2.39 Bonneville 29,145,644 30,791,141 5.65 32,168,545 10.37 Idaho Falls 42,326,502 45,142,183 6.65 47,472,410 12.16 Jefferson 13,017,612 13,328,533 2.39 13,589,420 4.39 Pocatello 47,830,642 48,038,614 0.43 48,216,623 0.81 Ririe 2,566,733 2,590,619 0.93 2,609,362 1.66 Shelley 9,786,330 9,909,334 1.26 10,012,750 2.31 Snake River 8,459,527 8,510,265 0.6 8,551,307 1.08 West Jefferson 3,173,725 3,250,747 2.43 3,315,159 4.46 Total ROI Revenues 175,601,709 181,108,566 3.14 185,697,493 5.75 Expenditures Arco 2,990,995 3,088,824 3.27 3,172,348 6.06 Blackfoot 15,523,365 15,659,825 0.88 15,777,089 1.63 Bonneville 28,724,762 29,967,614 4.33 31,032,462 8.03 Idaho Falls 40,629,058 42,724,318 5.16 44,519,490 9.58 Jefferson 12,572,160 12,810,275 1.89 13,014,602 3.52 Pocatello 47,757,386 47,951,319 0.41 48,117,312 0.75 Ririe 2,658,277 2,713,610 2.08 2,761,092 3.87 Shelley 10,384,108 10,483,420 0.96 10,568,762 1.78 Snake River 8,210,458 8,303,359 1.13 8,383,192 2.1 West Jefferson 3,097,371 3,161,469 2.07 3,216,472 3.85 Total ROI Expenditures 172,547,942 176,864,034 2.5 180,562,821 4.65 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; IN Census 1991a; IN DOC 1991a; IN School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-21.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Nevada Test Site, 1991 County/City Number of Employees Total Site Employment (percent) Clark County 6,270 81.7 Henderson 357 4.7 Las Vegas 5,352 69.7 North Las Vegas 505 6.6 Nye County 1,173 15.3 Total ROI County 7,443 97 Source: NTS 1991a:1. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-22.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 Regional Economic Area 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Civilian labor force 125,772 250,392 402,960 511,330 542,466 553,345 Total employment 118,081 233,281 382,980 485,977 515,568 525,909 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.1 6.8 5 5 5 5 Personal income (thousand dollars) 1,433,059 5,431,787 14,753,586 22,346,743 24,809,815 28,415,457 Per capita income (dollars per person) 4,825 11,001 18,883 22,778 23,638 25,062 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; NT ESD 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-23.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 485,977 494,261 1.7 493,868 1.62 498,474 2.57 495,832 2.03 480,295 1.2 Unemployment 5 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 4 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 22,778 23,013 1.03 23,017 1.05 22,975 0.86 22,999 0.97 22,679 1.05 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 515,568 518,362 0.54 518,302 0.53 518,061 0.48 517,442 0.36 517,442 0.36 Unemployment 5 4.7 NA 4.6 NA 4.6 NA 4.7 NA 4.7 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 23,638 23,713 0.32 23,712 0.31 23,707 0.29 23,694 0.24 23,694 0.24 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT ESD 1991d. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-23a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 485,977 496,903 2.25 502,206 3.34 Unemployment rate (percent) 5 3.8 NA 3.9 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 22,778 23,022 1.07 22,948 0.75 Operation Total employment 515,568 517,667 0.41 521,711 1.19 Unemployment rate (percent) 5 4.7 NA 4.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 23,638 23,701 0.26 23,778 0.59 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT ESD 1991d. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-24.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 485,977 495,457 1.95 495,064 1.87 499,670 2.82 497,028 2.27 481,491 1.45 Unemployment 5.0 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 3.8 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 22,778 23,002 0.98 23,006 1 22,963 0.81 22,988 0.92 22,721 1.24 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 515,568 521,095 1.07 521,035 1.06 520,795 1.01 520,176 0.89 520,176 0.89 Unemployment 5.0 4.3 NA 4.3 NA 4.4 NA 4.4 NA 4.4 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 23,638 23,767 0.55 23,766 0.54 23,761 0.52 23,749 0.47 23,749 0.47 (dollars per person) Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT ESD 1991d. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-24a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 485,977 498,090 2.49 503,402 3.59 Unemployment rate (percent) 5 3.8 NA 3.9 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 22,778 23,008 1.01 22,937 0.7 Operation Total employment 515,568 520,401 0.94 524,444 1.72 Unemployment rate (percent) 5 4.4 NA 4.3 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 23,638 23,755 0.49 23,808 0.72 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT ESD 1991d. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-25.-Population for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Clark County 273,288 463,087 741,459 930,909 996,551 1,077,272 Henderson 16,395 24,363 64,942 81,535 87,285 94,355 Las Vegas 125,787 164,674 258,295 324,292 347,159 375,279 North Las Vegas 36,216 42,739 47,707 59,897 64, 120 69,314 Nye County 5,599 9,048 17,781 22,765 24,328 26,250 Total ROI 278,887 472,135 759,240 953,674 1,020,879 1,103,522 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; NT Census 1991a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-26.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 930,909 935,918 0.54 935,151 0.46 944,156 1.42 938,986 0.87 906,927 0.12 Henderson 81,535 81,824 0.35 81,780 0.3 82,298 0.94 82,000 0.57 79,423 0.1 Las Vegas 324,292 328,565 1.32 327,911 1.12 335,593 3.48 331,183 2.12 316,150 0.18 North Las Vegas 59,897 60,301 0.67 60,239 0.57 60,967 1.79 60,549 1.09 58,360 0.13 Nye County 22,765 23,703 4.12 23,560 3.49 25,246 10.9 24,278 0.66 22,263 0.43 Total ROI 953,674 959,621 0.62 958,711 0.53 969,402 1.65 963,264 0.1 929,190 0.12 Construction Operation Clark County 996,551 997,935 0.14 997,890 0.13 997,712 0.12 997,255 0.07 997,255 0.07 Henderson 87,285 87,365 0.09 87,362 0.09 87,352 0.08 87,326 0.05 87,326 0.05 Las Vegas 347,159 348,340 0.34 348,302 0.33 348,150 0.29 347,760 0.17 347,760 0.17 North Las Vegas 64,120 64,232 0.17 64,228 0.17 64,214 0.15 64,177 0.09 64,177 0.09 Nye County 24,328 24,587 1.06 24,579 1.03 24,546 0.9 24,460 0.54 24,460 0.54 Total ROI 1,020,879 1,022,522 0.16 1,022,469 0.16 1,022,258 0.14 1,021,715 0.08 1,021,715 0.08 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-26a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-26a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 930,909 939,974 0.97 951,217 2.18 Henderson 81,535 82,086 0.68 82,704 1.43 Las Vegas 324,292 331,531 2.23 341,617 5.34 North Las Vegas 59,897 60,613 1.2 61,537 2.74 Nye County 22,765 24,304 6.76 26,568 16.7 Total ROI Construction 953,674 964,278 1.11 977,785 2.53 Operation Clark County 996,551 997,350 0.08 1,000,474 0.39 Henderson 87,285 87,333 0.06 87,510 0.26 Las Vegas 347,159 347,793 0.18 350,506 0.96 North Las Vegas 64,120 64,183 0.1 64,437 0.49 Nye County 24,328 24,462 0.55 25,063 3.02 Total ROI Operation 1,020,879 1,021,812 0.09 1,025,537 0.46 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-27.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-27.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Changes Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 930,909 938,255 0.79 937,487 0.71 946,507 1.68 941,323 1.12 907,415 0.17 Henderson 81,535 81,958 0.52 81,914 0.46 82,433 1.1 82,134 0.73 79,455 0.14 Las Vegas 324,292 330,558 1.93 329,904 1.73 337,599 4.1 333,176 2.74 316,497 0.29 North Las Vegas 59,897 60,490 0.99 60,428 0.89 61,156 2.1 60,738 1.4 58,397 0.19 Nye County 22,765 24,141 6.04 23,997 5.41 25,686 12.83 24,716 8.57 22,332 0.74 Total ROI 953,674 962,396 0.91 961,484 0.82 972,193 1.94 966,039 1.3 929,747 0.18 Construction Operation Clark County 996,551 999,957 0.34 999,912 0.34 999,735 0.32 999,277 0.27 999,277 0.27 Henderson 87,285 87,481 0.22 87,478 0.22 87,468 0.21 87,442 0.18 87,442 0.18 Las Vegas 347,159 350,065 0.84 350,027 0.83 349,875 0.78 349,484 0.67 349,484 0.67 North Las Vegas 64,120 64,395 0.43 64,392 0.42 64,377 0.4 64,340 0.34 64,340 0.34 Nye County 24,328 24,966 2.62 24,958 2.59 24,924 2.45 24,838 2.1 24,838 2.1 Total ROI 1,020,879 1,024,923 0.4 1,024,870 0.39 1,024,659 0.37 1,024,115 0.32 1,024,115 0.32 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-27a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-27a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 930,909 942,458 1.24 953,568 2.43 Henderson 81,535 82,233 0.86 82,839 1.6 Las Vegas 324,292 333,578 2.86 343,627 5.96 North Las Vegas 59,897 60,811 1.53 61,727 3.06 Nye County 22,765 24,746 8.7 27,000 18.6 Total ROI Construction 953,674 967,204 1.42 980,568 2.82 Operation Clark County 996,551 999,398 0.29 1,003,380 0.69 Henderson 87,285 87,452 0.19 87,678 0.45 Las Vegas 347,159 349,526 0.68 352,945 1.67 North Las Vegas 64,120 64,348 0.36 64,672 0.86 Nye County 24,328 24,841 2.11 25,607 5.26 Total ROI Operation 1,020,879 1,024,239 0.33 1,028,987 0.79 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-28.-Total Housing Units for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-28.-Total Housing Units for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Clark County 93,047 190,607 317,188 398,233 426,314 460,845 Henderson 4,915 8,889 25,400 31,890 34,139 36,904 Las Vegas 43,054 67,133 109,670 137,692 147,401 159,340 North Las Vegas 10,416 14,123 15,837 19,884 21,285 23,010 Nye County 2,098 4,292 8,073 10,336 11,045 11,918 Total ROI 95,145 194,899 325,261 408,569 437,359 472,763 Source: Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1982a; Census 1983a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-29.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-29.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 398,233 400,137 0.48 399,846 0.41 403,270 1.26 401,304 0.77 387,924 0.1 Henderson 31,890 32,000 0.34 31,983 0.29 32,180 0.91 32,067 0.55 31,063 0.1 Las Vegas 137,692 139,317 1.18 139,068 1 141,989 3.12 140,312 1.9 134,209 0.16 North Las Vegas 19,884 20,037 0.77 20,014 0.65 20,291 2.05 20,132 1.25 19,377 0.15 Nye County 10,336 10,693 3.45 10,638 2.92 11,279 9.13 10,911 5.56 10,101 0.36 Total ROI 408,569 410,830 0.55 410,484 0.47 414,549 1.46 412,215 0.89 398,025 0.11 Construction Operation Clark County 426,314 426,840 0.12 426,823 0.12 426,755 0.1 426,581 0.06 426,581 0.06 Henderson 34,139 34,169 0.09 34,168 0.09 34,164 0.07 34,154 0.05 34,154 0.05 Las Vegas 147,401 147,850 0.3 147,836 0.29 147,778 0.26 147,629 0.16 147,629 0.16 North Las Vegas 21,286 21,328 0.2 21,327 0.19 21,321 0.17 21,307 0.1 21,307 0.1 Nye County 11,046 11,144 0.89 11,141 0.86 11,128 0.75 11,096 0.45 11,096 0.45 Total ROI Operation 437,359 437,984 0.14 437,964 0.14 437,883 0.12 437,677 0.07 437,677 0.07 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-29a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-29a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 398,233 401,679 0.87 405,954 1.94 Henderson 31,890 32,099 0.66 32,334 1.39 Las Vegas 137,692 140,444 2 144,279 4.78 North Las Vegas 19,884 20,156 1.37 20,507 3.14 Nye County 10,336 10,921 5.66 11,782 13.99 Total ROI Construction 408,569 412,600 0.99 417,736 2.24 Operation Clark County 426,314 426,617 0.07 427,805 0.35 Henderson 34,139 34,157 0.05 34,224 0.25 Las Vegas 147,401 147,642 0.16 148,674 0.86 North Las Vegas 21,286 21,309 0.11 21,406 0.57 Nye County 11,046 11,096 0.46 11,325 2.53 Total ROI Operation 437,359 437,714 0.08 439,130 0.4 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-30.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-30.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 398,233 401,026 0.7 400,734 0.63 404,163 1.49 402,192 0.99 388,109 0.15 Henderson 31,890 32,051 0.5 32,034 0.45 32,231 1.07 32,118 0.71 31,075 0.14 Las Vegas 137,692 140,074 1.73 139,826 1.55 142,751 3.67 141,070 2.45 134,341 0.26 North Las Vegas 19,884 20,109 1.13 20,086 1.02 20,362 2.41 20,203 1.61 19,391 0.22 Nye County 10,336 10,859 5.06 10,804 4.53 11,447 10.74 11,078 7.18 10,127 0.62 Total ROI 408,569 411,885 0.81 411,538 0.73 415,610 1.72 413,270 1.15 398,236 0.16 Construction Operation Clark County 426,314 427,609 0.3 427,591 0.3 427,524 0.28 427,350 0.24 427,350 0.24 Henderson 34,139 34,213 0.22 34,212 0.22 34,208 0.2 34,198 0.18 34,198 0.18 Las Vegas 147,401 148,506 0.75 148,491 0.74 148,434 0.7 148,285 0.6 148,285 0.6 North Las Vegas 21,286 21,390 0.49 21,389 0.49 21,383 0.46 21,369 0.39 21,369 0.39 Nye County 11,046 11,288 2.2 11,285 2.17 11,272 2.05 11,239 1.76 11,239 1.76 Total ROI Operation 437,359 438,897 0.35 438,877 0.35 438,796 0.33 438,589 0.28 438,589 0.28 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-30a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-30a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Clark County 398,233 402,624 1.1 406,848 2.16 Henderson 31,890 32,155 0.83 32,386 1.55 Las Vegas 137,692 141,223 2.56 145,044 5.34 North Las Vegas 19,884 20,231 1.75 20,579 3.50 Nye County 10,336 11,089 7.29 11,946 15.58 Total ROI Construction 408,569 413,713 1.26 418,794 2.5 Operation Clark County 426,314 427,396 0.25 428,910 0.61 Henderson 34,139 34,202 0.19 34,288 0.44 Las Vegas 147,401 148,301 0.61 149,601 1.49 North Las Vegas 21,286 21,372 0.41 21,495 0.99 Nye County 11,046 11,241 1.77 11,532 4.4 Total ROI Operation 437,359 438,637 0.29 440,442 0.7 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-31.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-31.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence 1992 Revenues and Expenditures Clark County Henderson Las Vegas North Nye County Las Vegas Ad valorem taxes and special assessment (percent) 25 21 22 17 18 Intergovernmental (percent) 39 51 51 55 66 Permits, fees, fines, and investment interest (percent) 34 24 24 22 10 Other 2 4 4 6 5 Total Revenues (dollars) 527,235,584 38,301,218 165,653,374 32,129,650 22,214,620 General Government (percent) 30 24 24 17 46 Public safety, health, and community service (percent) 48 43 51 68 36 Public works, parks, culture, and recreation (percent) 12 18 17 10 17 Debt service (percent) 10 15 7 5 1 Other (percent) 0 1 2 0 1 Total Expenditures (dollars) 440,571,167 37,804,113 156,464,143 35,936,420 19,819,986 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 292,589,218 11,785,009 52,674,187 2,802,631 9,504,516 Source: NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-32.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-32.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 1992 Revenues and Expenditures Clark County Nye County School District School District Local sources (percent) 56 55 State sources (percent) 41 42 Federal sources (percent) 3 3 Total Revenues (dollars) 612,625,040 20,964,283 Total expenditures per pupil (dollars) 4,999 6,244 Instructional programs (percent) 59 52 School administration, services, and transportation (percent) 32 18 Maintenance, operation, and facilities acquisition (percent) 0 13 Debt service (percent) 9 17 Total Expenditures (dollars) 625,721,294 21,206,033 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 61,326,714 2,671,943 Source: NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-33.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-33.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Clark County 470,864,564 472,986,283 0.45 472,764,202 0.4 475,370,516 0.96 473,538,762 0.57 465,032,813 0.27 Henderson 36,172,899 36,265,990 0.26 36,251,736 0.22 36,419,094 0.68 36,250,130 0.21 35,725,782 0.07 Las Vegas 171,479,001 171,909,837 0.25 171,843,865 0.21 172,618,411 0.66 171,836,434 0.21 169,435,559 0.07 North Las Vegas 31,988,776 32,056,742 0.21 32,046,334 0.18 32,168,522 0.56 32,045,162 0.18 31,666,195 0.06 Nye County 20,643,251 21,063,855 2.04 21,013,375 1.79 21,608,293 4.67 21,114,202 2.28 20,611,648 1.02 Total ROI County 731,148,491 734,282,706 0.43 733,919,512 0.38 738,184,836 0.96 734,784,689 0.5 722,471,996 0.23 and City Revenues Clark County School 574,221,722 577,311,451 0.54 576,838,335 0.46 582,392,977 1.42 576,785,046 0.45 559,646,031 0.15 District Nye County School 23,117,186 24,069,356 4.12 23,924,146 3.49 25,636,205 10.9 23,906,457 3.41 22,778,642 1.19 District Total ROI 597,338,909 601,380,807 0.68 600,762,481 0.57 608,029,182 1.79 600,691,504 0.56 582,424,674 0.19 School District Revenues Expenditures Clark County 467,347,399 469,649,651 0.49 469,297,118 0.42 473,436,052 1.3 469,257,410 0.41 456,408,681 0.14 Henderson 39,472,155 39,651,393 0.45 39,623,947 0.38 39,946,177 1.2 39,620,855 0.38 38,628,457 0.13 Las Vegas 173,001,945 173,881,793 0.51 173,747,066 0.43 175,328,836 1.35 173,731,891 0.42 168,850,040 0.15 North Las Vegas 34,411,539 34,589,971 0.52 34,562,648 0.44 34,883,428 1.37 34,559,571 0.43 33,572,543 0.15 Nye County 21,325,240 22,186,044 4.04 22,054,768 3.42 23,602,546 10.68 22,038,776 3.35 21,021,570 1.16 Total ROI 735,558,279 739,958,852 0.6 739,285,547 0.51 747,197,038 1.58 739,208,504 0.5 718,481,291 0.17 County and City Expenditures Clark County 560,778,199 562,590,699 0.32 562,313,159 0.27 565,571,629 0.85 562,281,898 0.27 552,306,136 0.09 School District Nye County 21,718,565 22,476,933 3.49 22,361,279 2.96 23,724,872 9.24 22,347,190 2.89 21,450,051 1 School District Total ROI 582,496,763 585,067,632 0.44 584,674,438 0.37 589,296,501 1.17 584,629,089 0.37 573,756,187 0.13 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-33a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-33a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Clark County 470,864,564 473,741,086 0.61 476,677,456 1.23 Henderson 36,172,899 36,255,973 0.23 36,414,140 0.67 Las Vegas 171,479,001 171,863,477 0.22 172,595,485 0.65 North Las Vegas 31,988,776 32,049,428 0.19 32,164,905 0.55 Nye County 20,643,251 21,149,833 2.45 21,775,830 5.49 Total ROI County and City Revenues 731,148,491 735,059,796 0.53 739,627,816 1.16 Clark County School District 574,221,722 576,978,982 0.48 582,228,558 1.39 Nye County School District 23,117,186 23,966,172 3.67 25,586,482 10.68 Total ROI School District Revenues 597,338,909 600,945,154 0.6 607,815,040 1.75 Expenditures Clark County 467,347,399 469,401,918 0.44 473,313,538 1.28 Henderson 39,472,155 39,632,106 0.41 39,936,638 1.18 Las Vegas 173,001,945 173,787,117 0.45 175,282,015 1.32 North Las Vegas 34,411,539 34,570,771 0.46 34,873,933 1.34 Nye County 21,325,240 22,092,761 3.6 23,557,594 10.47 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 735,558,279 739,484,673 0.53 746,963,719 1.55 Clark County School District 560,778,199 562,395,665 0.29 565,475,177 0.84 Nye County School District 21,718,565 22,394,751 3.11 23,685,270 9.06 Total ROI School District Expenditures 582,496,763 584,790,416 0.39 589,160,447 1.14 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-34.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-34.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Clark County 489,301,418 489,944,322 0.13 489,927,120 0.13 489,858,145 0.11 489,681,265 0.08 489,681,265 0.08 Henderson 37,391,611 37,417,332 0.07 37,416,495 0.07 37,413,187 0.06 37,404,694 0.03 37,404,694 0.03 Las Vegas 177,124,019 177,243,056 0.07 177,239,185 0.07 177,223,875 0.06 177,184,567 0.03 177,184,567 0.03 North Las Vegas 32,880,105 32,898,883 0.06 32,898,273 0.06 32,895,858 0.05 32,889,657 0.03 32,889,657 0.03 Nye County 21,352,697 21,482,163 0.61 21,478,404 0.59 21,464,080 0.52 21,426,419 0.35 21,426,419 0.35 Total ROI 758,049,849 758,985,756 0.12 758,959,477 0.12 758,855,145 0.11 758,586,601 0.07 758,586,601 0.07 County and City Revenues Clark County 614,712,333 615,566,004 0.14 615,538,246 0.13 615,428,449 0.12 615,146,553 0.07 615,146,553 0.07 School District Nye County 24,704,043 24,967,019 1.06 24,958,896 1.03 24,925,386 0.9 24,838,056 0.54 24,838,056 0.54 School District Total ROI 639,416,375 640,533,023 0.17 640,497,142 0.17 640,353,834 0.15 639,984,609 0.09 639,984,609 0.09 School District Revenues Expenditures Clark County 497,476,660 498,112,757 0.13 498,092,074 0.12 498,010,260 0.11 497,800,211 0.07 497,800,211 0.07 Henderson 41,821,383 41,870,905 0.12 41,869,295 0.11 41,862,926 0.1 41,846,573 0.06 41,846,573 0.06 Las Vegas 184,529,136 184,772,232 0.13 184,764,327 0.13 184,733,061 0.11 184,652,786 0.07 184,652,786 0.07 North Las Vegas 36,749,765 36,799,065 0.13 36,797,462 0.13 36,791,121 0.11 36,774,841 0.07 36,774,841 0.07 Nye County 22,760,331 22,998,074 1.04 22,990,730 1.01 22,960,435 0.88 22,881,486 0.53 22,881,486 0.53 Total ROI 783,337,276 784,553,033 0.16 784,513,888 0.15 784,357,803 0.13 783,955,897 0.08 783,955,897 0.08 County and City Expenditures Clark County 584,491,173 584,991,954 0.09 584,975,671 0.08 584,911,261 0.07 584,745,895 0.04 584,745,895 0.04 School District Nye County 22,981,958 23,191,409 0.91 23,184,939 0.88 23,158,249 0.77 23,088,695 0.46 23,088,695 0.46 School District Total ROI 607,473,131 608,183,363 0.12 608,160,610 0.11 608,069,511 0.1 607,834,590 0.06 607,834,590 0.06 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-34a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-34a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Clark County 489,301,418 489,840,270 0.11 491,334,951 0.42 Henderson 37,391,611 37,410,009 0.05 37,472,485 0.22 Las Vegas 177,124,019 177,209,165 0.05 177,498,310 0.21 North Las Vegas 32,880,105 32,893,537 0.04 32,939,151 0.18 Nye County 21,352,697 21,456,640 0.49 21,761,245 1.91 Total ROI County and City Revenues 758,049,849 758,809,620 0.1 761,006,141 0.39 Clark County School District 614,712,333 615,322,954 0.10 617,396,551 0.44 Nye County School District 24,704,043 24,891,277 0.76 25,532,315 3.35 Total ROI School District Revenues 639,416,375 640,214,232 0.12 642,928,866 0.55 Expenditures Clark County 497,476,660 497,931,654 0.09 499,476,754 0.4 Henderson 41,821,383 41,856,806 0.08 41,977,097 0.37 Las Vegas 184,529,136 184,703,019 0.09 185,293,508 0.41 North Las Vegas 36,749,765 36,785,029 0.1 36,904,778 0.42 Nye County 22,760,331 22,929,600 0.74 23,509,127 3.29 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 783,337,276 784,206,107 0.11 787,161,265 0.49 Clark County School District 584,491,173 584,849,376 0.06 586,065,792 0.27 Nye County School District 22,981,958 23,131,083 0.65 23,641,647 2.87 Total ROI School District Expenditures 607,473,131 607,980,460 0.08 609,707,439 0.37 Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-35.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-35.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Clark County 470,864,564 473,662,783 0.59 473,440,473 0.55 476,050,228 1.1 474,175,471 0.7 465,503,352 0.38 Henderson 36,172,899 36,309,424 0.38 36,295,150 0.34 36,462,787 0.8 36,278,565 0.29 35,741,049 0.12 Las Vegas 171,479,001 172,110,849 0.37 172,044,791 0.33 172,820,628 0.78 171,968,034 0.29 169,506,217 0.11 North Las Vegas 31,988,776 32,088,452 0.31 32,078,031 0.28 32,200,422 0.66 32,065,923 0.24 31,677,341 0.1 Nye County 20,643,251 21,218,340 2.79 21,167,550 2.54 21,763,399 5.43 21,241,022 2.9 20,697,574 1.44 Total ROI 731,148,491 735,389,848 0.58 735,025,996 0.53 739,297,463 1.11 735,729,015 0.63 723,125,533 0.32 County and City Revenues Clark County 574,221,722 578,753,006 0.79 578,279,273 0.71 583,843,168 1.68 577,728,815 0.61 560,152,757 0.25 School District Nye County 23,117,186 24,514,126 6.04 24,367,900 5.41 26,083,006 12.83 24,197,715 4.67 22,934,778 1.88 School District Total ROI 597,338,909 603,267,132 0.99 602,647,173 0.89 609,926,173 2.11 601,926,530 0.77 583,087,535 0.31 School District Revenues Expenditures Clark County 467,347,399 470,723,798 0.72 470,370,805 0.65 474,516,634 1.53 469,960,642 0.56 456,786,258 0.22 Henderson 39,472,155 39,735,019 0.67 39,707,537 0.60 40,030,303 1.41 39,675,604 0.52 38,657,852 0.21 Las Vegas 173,001,945 174,292,298 0.75 174,157,395 0.67 175,741,800 1.58 174,000,644 0.58 168,994,338 0.23 North Las Vegas 34,411,539 34,673,220 0.76 34,645,862 0.68 34,967,176 1.61 34,614,073 0.59 33,601,807 0.24 Nye County 21,325,240 22,588,136 5.92 22,455,941 5.3 24,006,473 12.57 22,302,087 4.58 21,162,723 1.84 Total ROI 735,558,279 742,012,471 0.88 741,337,541 0.79 749,262,387 1.86 740,553,050 0.68 719,202,978 0.27 County and City Expenditures Clark County 560,778,199 563,436,345 0.47 563,158,443 0.42 566,422,341 1.01 562,835,533 0.37 552,603,392 0.15 School District Nye County 21,718,565 22,831,176 5.12 22,714,713 4.59 24,080,732 10.88 22,579,167 3.96 21,574,407 1.59 School District Total ROI 582,496,763 586,267,521 0.65 585,873,156 0.58 590,503,073 1.37 585,414,700 0.5 574,177,799 0.2 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-35a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-35a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Clark County 470,864,564 474,373,659 0.75 478,386,218 1.6 Henderson 36,172,899 36,284,890 0.31 36,529,874 0.99 Las Vegas 171,479,001 171,997,307 0.3 173,131,108 0.96 North Las Vegas 31,988,776 32,070,540 0.26 32,249,401 0.81 Nye County 20,643,251 21,276,804 3.07 22,174,204 7.42 Total ROI County and City Revenues 731,148,491 736,003,201 0.66 742,470,806 1.55 Clark County School District 574,221,722 577,938,747 0.65 586,069,770 2.06 Nye County School District 23,117,186 24,262,395 4.95 26,769,271 15.8 Total ROI School District Revenues 597,338,909 602,201,142 0.81 612,839,041 2.59 Expenditures Clark County 467,347,399 470,117,068 0.59 476,175,744 1.89 Henderson 39,472,155 39,687,783 0.55 40,159,471 1.74 Las Vegas 173,001,945 174,060,425 0.61 176,375,859 1.95 North Las Vegas 34,411,539 34,626,197 0.62 35,095,762 1.99 Nye County 21,325,240 22,360,560 4.85 24,626,888 15.48 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 735,558,279 740,852,033 0.72 752,433,724 2.29 Clark County School District 560,778,199 562,958,684 0.39 567,728,513 1.24 Nye County School District 21,718,565 22,630,682 4.2 24,627,318 13.39 Total ROI School District Expenditures 582,496,763 585,589,365 0.53 592,355,831 1.69 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-36.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-36.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Clark County 489,301,418 490,726,614 0.29 490,709,287 0.29 490,640,791 0.27 490,463,557 0.24 490,463,557 0.24 Henderson 37,391,611 37,454,910 0.17 37,454,074 0.17 37,450,785 0.16 37,442,273 0.14 37,442,273 0.14 Las Vegas 177,124,019 177,416,974 0.17 177,413,103 0.16 177,397,879 0.15 177,358,485 0.13 177,358,485 0.13 North Las Vegas 32,880,105 32,926,320 0.14 32,925,709 0.14 32,923,307 0.13 32,917,093 0.11 32,917,093 0.11 Nye County 21,352,697 21,647,498 1.38 21,643,995 1.36 21,629,105 1.29 21,591,699 1.12 21,591,699 1.12 Total ROI 758,049,849 760,172,316 0.28 760,146,168 0.28 760,041,867 0.26 759,773,106 0.23 759,773,106 0.23 County and City Revenues Clark County 614,712,333 616,813,254 0.34 616,785,496 0.34 616,676,316 0.32 616,393,803 0.27 616,393,803 0.27 School District Nye County 24,704,043 25,351,877 2.62 25,343,753 2.59 25,309,228 2.45 25,221,899 2.1 25,221,899 2.1 School District Total ROI 639,416,375 642,165,131 0.43 642,129,250 0.42 641,985,543 0.4 641,615,702 0.34 641,615,702 0.34 School District Revenues Expenditures Clark County 497,476,660 499,042,121 0.31 499,021,438 0.31 498,940,084 0.29 498,729,576 0.25 498,729,576 0.25 Henderson 41,821,383 41,943,259 0.29 41,941,649 0.29 41,935,315 0.27 41,918,927 0.23 41,918,927 0.23 Las Vegas 184,529,136 185,127,405 0.32 185,119,501 0.32 185,088,410 0.3 185,007,960 0.26 185,007,960 0.26 North Las Vegas 36,749,765 36,871,093 0.33 36,869,490 0.33 36,863,185 0.31 36,846,870 0.26 36,846,870 0.26 Nye County 22,760,331 23,346,003 2.57 23,338,659 2.54 23,307,446 2.4 23,228,497 2.06 23,228,497 2.06 Total ROI 783,337,276 786,329,882 0.38 786,290,737 0.38 786,134,441 0.36 785,731,829 0.31 785,731,829 0.31 County and City Expenditures Clark County School 584,491,173 585,723,617 0.21 585,707,334 0.21 585,643,286 0.2 585,477,559 0.17 585,477,559 0.17 District Nye County School 22,981,958 23,497,935 2.25 23,491,464 2.22 23,463,966 2.1 23,394,411 1.79 23,394,411 1.79 District Total ROI 607,473,131 609,221,552 0.29 609,198,798 0.28 609,107,253 0.27 608,871,970 0.23 608,871,970 0.23 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a . -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-36a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-36a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Clark County 489,301,418 491,353,489 0.42 492,990,035 0.75 Henderson 37,391,611 37,479,437 0.23 37,555,265 0.44 Las Vegas 177,124,019 177,530,485 0.23 177,881,421 0.43 North Las Vegas 32,880,105 32,944,226 0.2 32,999,587 0.36 Nye County 21,352,697 21,773,307 1.97 22,115,897 3.57 Total ROI County and City Revenues 758,049,849 761,080,944 0.4 763,542,204 0.72 Clark County School District 614,712,333 617,627,297 0.47 620,144,021 0.88 Nye County School District 24,704,043 25,603,763 3.64 26,380,085 6.78 Total ROI School District Revenues 639,416,375 643,231,060 0.6 646,524,106 1.11 Expenditures Clark County 497,476,660 499,648,690 0.44 501,523,978 0.81 Henderson 41,821,383 41,990,483 0.4 42,136,480 0.75 Las Vegas 184,529,136 185,359,216 0.45 186,075,892 0.84 North Las Vegas 36,749,765 36,918,104 0.46 37,063,444 0.85 Nye County 22,760,331 23,573,719 3.57 24,275,549 6.66 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 783,337,276 787,490,212 0.53 791,075,344 0.99 Clark County School District 584,491,173 586,201,152 0.29 620,144,021 0.55 Nye County School District 22,981,958 23,698,553 3.12 26,380,085 5.81 Total ROI School District Expenditures 607,473,131 609,899,705 0.4 646,524,106 0.74 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; NT City 1992a; NT County 1992b; NT ESD 1991a; NT School 1992a . -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-37.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Oak Ridge Reservation, 1990 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-37.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Oak Ridge Reservation, 1990 County/City Number of Employees Total Site Employment (percent) Anderson County 5,053 33.1 Clinton 1,035 6.8 Oak Ridge 3,292 21.6 Knox County 5,490 36 Knoxville 4,835 31.7 Loudon County 848 5.6 Lenoir City 638 4.2 Roane County 2,537 16.6 Harriman 802 5.3 Kingston 1,033 6.8 Total ROI (County) 13,928 91.3 Source: ORR 1991a:4. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-38.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-38.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 Regional Economic Area 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Civilian labor force 349,630 460,364 525,461 597,924 611,220 602,822 Total employment 331,160 420,732 492,634 560,570 573,036 565,162 Unemployment rate (percent) 5.3 8.6 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Personal income (thousand dollars) 2,461,301 7,971,913 16,196,884 23,562,265 25,332,874 28,160,468 Per capita income (dollars per person) 2,782 7,398 14,325 18,574 19,414 20,678 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-39.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-39.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 560,570 567,828 1.29 567,484 1.23 571,520 1.95 569,220 1.54 560,640 0.9 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.2 5.3 NA 5.3 NA 4.9 NA 5.1 NA 5.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 18,574 18,744 0.92 18,738 0.88 18,812 1.28 18,770 1.06 18,378 Total employment 573,036 575,658 0.46 575,602 0.45 575,376 0.41 574,801 0.31 574,801 0.31 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.2 5.9 NA 5.9 NA 6 NA 6 NA 6 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,414 19,473 0.3 19,472 0.3 19,467 0.27 19,454 0.21 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-39a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-39a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) Plant (percent) Construction Total employment 560,570 570,160 1.71 574,815 2.54 Unemploymentrate (percent) 6.2 5 NA 4.6 NA Per capita income(dollars per person) 18,574 18,791 1.17 18,873 1.61 Operation Total employment 573,036 575,013 0.35 578,821 1.01 Unemployment rate (percent) 6.2 6 NA 5.5 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,414 19,459 0.23 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-40.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-40.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 560,570 568,891 1.48 568,547 1.42 572,590 2.14 570,271 1.73 561,690 1.09 Unemployment 6.2 5.2 NA 5.2 NA 4.8 NA 5 NA 5.4 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 18,574 18,764 1.02 18,757 0.99 18,832 1.39 18,789 1.16 18,405 0.85 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 573,036 578,241 0.91 578,184 0.9 577,958 0.86 577,375 0.76 577,375 0.76 Unemployment 6.2 5.6 NA 5.6 NA 5.6 NA 5.7 NA 5.7 NA rate (percent) Per capita income 19,414 19,532 0.61 19,531 0.6 19,526 0.58 19,512 0.51 19,512 0.51 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995b; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-40a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-40a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change Plant (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 560,570 571,211 1.9 575,865 2.73 Unemploymentrate (percent) 6.2 4.9 NA 4.5 NA Per capita income(dollars per person) 18,574 18,810 1.27 18,892 1.71 Operation Total employment 573,036 577,587 0.79 581,419 1.46 Unemploymentrate (percent) 6.2 5.7 NA 5.2 NA Per capita income(dollars per person) 19,414 19,517 0.53 19,604 0.98 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995b; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-41.-Population for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-41.-Population for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Anderson County 60,300 67,346 68,250 77,346 79,708 83,295 Clinton 4,794 5,245 8,972 10,168 10,478 10,950 Oak Ridge 28,319 27,662 27,310 30,950 31,895 33,330 Knox County 276,293 319,694 335,749 380,343 391,956 409,594 Knoxville 174,587 175,030 165,121 187,052 192,764 201,438 Loudon County 24,266 28,553 31,255 34,276 35,156 36,632 Lenoir City 5,324 5,446 6,147 6,741 6,914 7,205 Roane County 38,881 48,425 47,227 52,860 54,217 56,495 Harriman 8,734 8,303 7,119 7,968 8,173 8,516 Kingston 4,142 4,441 4,552 5,095 5,226 5,445 Total ROI (County) 399,740 464,018 482,481 544,825 561,037 586,016 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-42.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-42.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 77,346 78,370 1.32 78,280 1.21 79,341 2.58 78,731 1.79 76,644 0.29 Clinton 10,168 10,395 2.23 10,375 2.04 10,611 4.36 10,475 3.02 10,092 0.46 Oak Ridge 30,950 31,583 2.05 31,528 1.87 32,184 3.99 31,806 2.77 30,708 0.42 Knox County 380,343 381,447 0.29 381,350 0.26 382,493 0.57 381,836 0.39 376,188 0.1 Knoxville 187,052 188,024 0.52 187,938 0.47 188,945 1.01 188,366 0.7 185,085 0.15 Loudon County 34,276 34,448 0.5 34,433 0.46 34,611 0.98 34,509 0.68 33,979 0.14 Lenoir City 6,741 6,870 1.91 6,859 1.75 6,992 3.72 6,916 2.59 6,700 0.4 Roane County 52,860 53,368 0.96 53,323 0.88 53,849 1.87 53,547 1.3 52,446 0.23 Harriman 7,968 8,131 2.05 8,117 1.87 8,286 3.99 8,189 2.77 7,921 0.42 Kingston 5,095 5,298 3.98 5,280 3.63 5,490 7.75 5,369 5.38 5,082 0.76 Total ROI 544,825 547,633 0.52 547,386 0.47 550,294 1 548,623 0.7 539,257 0.15 Construction Operation Anderson County 79,708 80,154 0.56 80,145 0.55 80,107 0.5 80,007 0.38 80,007 0.38 Clinton 10,478 10,577 0.94 10,575 0.92 10,567 0.85 10,545 0.64 10,545 0.64 Oak Ridge 31,895 32,171 0.87 32,165 0.85 32,142 0.77 32,080 0.58 32,080 0.58 Knox County 391,956 392,437 0.12 392,427 0.12 392,386 0.11 392,279 0.08 392,279 0.08 Knoxville 192,764 193,188 0.22 193,179 0.22 193,142 0.2 193,048 0.15 193,048 0.15 Loudon County 35,156 35,231 0.21 35,229 0.21 35,223 0.19 35,206 0.14 35,206 0.14 Lenoir City 6,914 6,970 0.81 6,969 0.79 6,964 0.72 6,952 0.55 6,952 0.55 Roane County 54,217 54,438 0.41 54,434 0.4 54,415 0.36 54,365 0.27 54,365 0.27 Harriman 8,173 8,244 0.87 8,243 0.86 8,236 0.77 8,221 0.59 8,221 0.59 Kingston 5,226 5,314 1.69 5,313 1.67 5,305 1.52 5,285 1.13 5,285 1.13 Total ROI 561,038 562,260 0.22 562,235 0.21 562,131 0.19 561,857 0.15 561,857 0.15 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-42a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-42a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change Plant (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 77,346 78,757 1.82 80,186 3.67 Clinton 10,168 10,478 3.05 10,799 6.21 Oak Ridge 30,950 31,816 2.8 32,707 5.68 Knox County 380,343 381,960 0.43 383,405 0.81 Knoxville 187,052 188,427 0.73 189,747 1.44 Loudon County 34,276 34,520 0.71 34,753 1.39 Lenoir City 6,741 6,918 2.62 7,099 5.31 Roane County 52,860 53,564 1.33 54,268 2.66 Harriman 7,968 8,192 2.81 8,420 5.67 Kingston 5,095 5,371 5.42 5,658 11.05 Total ROI Construction 544,825 548,801 0.73 552,612 1.43 Operation Anderson County 79,708 80,013 0.38 80,690 1.23 Clinton 10,478 10,546 0.65 10,696 2.08 Oak Ridge 31,895 32,082 0.59 32,502 1.9 Knox County 391,956 392,309 0.09 393,015 0.27 Knoxville 192,764 193,063 0.16 193,695 0.48 Loudon County 35,156 35,209 0.15 35,321 0.47 Lenoir City 6,914 6,953 0.56 7,038 1.79 Roane County 54,217 54,370 0.28 54,704 0.9 Harriman 8,173 8,221 0.59 8,329 1.91 Kingston 5,226 5,285 1.13 5,420 3.72 Total ROI Operation 561,038 561,901 0.15 563,730 0.48 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-43.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-43.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 77,346 78,645 1.68 78,555 1.56 79,612 2.93 79,005 2.14 76,733 0.41 Clinton 10,168 10,456 2.83 10,436 2.64 10,671 4.95 10,536 3.62 10,112 0.66 Oak Ridge 30,950 31,753 2.59 31,698 2.42 32,352 4.53 31,976 3.32 30,764 0.6 Knox County 380,343 381,743 0.37 381,646 0.34 382,786 0.64 382,132 0.47 376,284 0.13 Knoxville 187,052 188,285 0.66 188,199 0.61 189,202 1.15 188,627 0.84 185,170 0.19 Loudon County 34,276 34,494 0.64 34,479 0.59 34,657 1.11 34,555 0.81 33,994 0.19 Lenoir City 6,741 6,905 2.43 6,893 2.25 7,027 4.24 6,950 3.1 6,711 0.57 Roane County 52,860 53,504 1.22 53,459 1.13 53,983 2.12 53,683 1.56 52,490 0.31 Harriman 7,968 8,175 2.6 8,161 2.42 8,329 4.53 8,232 3.31 7,935 0.6 Kingston 5,095 5,352 5.04 5,334 4.69 5,544 8.81 5,424 6.46 5,100 1.12 Total ROI 544,825 548,386 0.65 548,139 0.61 551,038 1.14 549,375 0.84 539,501 0.19 Construction Operation Anderson County 79,708 80,591 1.11 80,582 1.1 80,544 1.05 80,445 0.92 80,445 0.92 Clinton 10,478 10,674 1.87 10,672 1.85 10,664 1.77 10,642 1.56 10,642 1.56 Oak Ridge 31,895 32,441 1.71 32,436 1.70 32,412 1.62 32,351 1.43 32,351 1.43 Knox County 391,956 392,908 0.24 392,898 0.24 392,857 0.23 392,750 0.2 392,750 0.2 Knoxville 192,764 193,602 0.43 193,593 0.43 193,557 0.41 193,463 0.36 193,463 0.36 Loudon County 35,156 35,305 0.42 35,303 0.42 35,297 0.4 35,280 0.35 35,280 0.35 Lenoir City 6,914 7,025 1.6 7,024 1.59 7,019 1.52 7,007 1.34 7,007 1.34 Roane County 54,217 54,655 0.81 54,650 0.8 54,631 0.76 54,582 0.67 54,582 0.67 Harriman 8,173 8,314 1.73 8,312 1.7 8,306 1.63 8,290 1.43 8,290 1.43 Kingston 5,226 5,401 3.35 5,399 3.31 5,392 3.18 5,372 2.8 5,372 2.8 Total ROI 561,038 563,459 0.43 563,433 0.43 563,329 0.41 563,057 0.36 563,057 0.36 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-43a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-43a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change Plant (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 77,346 79,032 2.18 80,460 4.03 Clinton 1,168 10,540 3.66 10,860 6.81 Oak Ridge 30,950 31,987 3.35 32,876 6.22 Knox County 380,343 382,264 0.51 383,700 0.88 Knoxville 187,052 188,692 0.88 190,007 1.58 Loudon County 34,276 34,567 0.85 34,800 1.53 Lenoir City 6,741 6,952 3.13 7,134 5.83 Roane County 52,860 53,702 1.59 54,404 2.92 Harriman 7,968 8,235 3.35 8,464 6.22 Kingston 5,095 5,426 6.5 5,712 12.11 Total ROI Construction 544,825 549,565 0.87 553,364 1.57 Operation Anderson County 79,708 80,451 0.93 81,146 1.8 Clinton 10,478 10,643 1.57 10,798 3.05 Oak Ridge 31,895 32,353 1.44 32,785 2.79 Knox County 391,956 392,781 0.21 393,507 0.4 Knoxville 192,764 193,478 0.37 194,128 0.71 Loudon County 35,156 35,283 0.36 35,398 0.69 Lenoir City 6,914 7,008 1.36 7,096 2.63 Roane County 54,217 54,587 0.68 54,930 1.31 Harriman 8,173 8,291 1.45 8,402 2.81 Kingston 5,226 5,372 2.8 5,511 5.46 Total ROI Operation 561,038 563,102 0.37 564,981 0.7 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-44.-Total Housing Units for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-44.-Total Housing Units for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Region of Influence 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Anderson County 20,451 25,849 29,323 33,231 34,246 35,787 Clinton 1,702 2,073 4,006 4,540 4,678 4,889 Oak Ridge 9,972 11,487 12,694 15,878 16,363 17,099 Knox County 93,011 125,883 143,582 162,653 167,619 175,162 Knoxville 61,042 73,263 76,453 86,607 89,252 93,268 Loudon County 8,439 10,835 12,995 14,251 14,617 15,231 Lenoir City 1,982 2,342 2,734 2,998 3,075 3,205 Roane County 13,189 18,732 20,334 22,760 23,344 24,324 Harriman 3,132 3,355 3,234 3,620 3,173 3,869 Kingston 1,366 1,813 2,071 2,318 2,378 2,477 Total ROI (County) 135,090 181,299 206,234 232,895 239,826 250,504 Source: Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1982a; Census 1983a; OR Census 1991a. D -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-45.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-45.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 33,231 33,620 1.17 33,586 1.07 33,990 2.28 33,758 1.58 32,918 0.26 Clinton 4,540 4,626 1.90 4,619 1.73 4,708 3.71 4,657 2.57 4,503 0.39 Oak Ridge 15,878 16,119 1.52 16,098 1.38 16,348 2.96 15,963 0.53 15,731 0.27 Knox County 162,653 163,072 0.26 163,035 0.24 163,470 0.50 163,220 0.35 160,857 0.09 Knoxville 86,607 86,977 0.43 86,944 0.39 87,327 0.83 87,107 0.58 85,674 0.12 Loudon County 14,251 14,316 0.46 14,311 0.42 14,378 0.89 14,340 0.62 14,126 0.13 Lenoir City 2,998 3,047 1.64 3,043 1.50 3,094 3.19 3,065 2.22 2,978 0.34 Roane County 22,760 22,953 0.85 22,935 0.77 23,135 1.65 23,021 1.15 22,575 0.20 Harriman 3,620 3,682 1.70 3,676 1.56 3,741 3.33 3,704 2.32 3,596 0.35 Kingston 2,318 2,395 3.33 2,388 3.04 2,468 6.48 2,422 4.49 2,309 0.64 Total ROI 232,895 233,962 0.46 233,868 0.42 234,973 0.89 234,338 0.62 230,476 0.13 Construction Operation Anderson County 34,246 34,415 0.50 34,412 0.49 34,398 0.44 34,360 0.33 34,360 0.33 Clinton 4,679 4,716 0.80 4,715 0.79 4,712 0.72 4,704 0.54 4,704 0.54 Oak Ridge 16,363 16,468 0.46 16,466 0.63 16,457 0.57 16,434 0.43 16,434 0.43 Knox County 167,619 167,802 0.11 167,798 0.11 167,782 0.10 167,742 0.07 167,742 0.07 Knoxville 89,252 89,413 0.18 89,410 0.18 89,396 0.16 89,360 0.12 89,360 0.12 Loudon County 14,617 14,645 0.20 14,645 0.19 14,642 0.17 14,636 0.13 14,636 0.13 Lenoir City 3,075 3,096 0.69 3,096 0.68 3,094 0.62 3,090 0.47 3,090 0.47 Roane County 23,344 23,428 0.36 23,426 0.35 23,419 0.32 23,400 0.24 23,400 0.24 Harriman 3,713 3,740 0.73 3,739 0.72 3,737 0.65 3,731 0.49 3,731 0.49 Kingston 2,378 2,411 1.41 2,411 1.39 2,408 1.27 2,400 0.95 2,400 0.95 Total ROI 239,825 240,290 0.19 240,281 0.19 240,241 0.17 240,137 0.13 240,137 0.13 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-45a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-45a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change Plant (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 33,231 33,768 1.61 34,311 3.25 Clinton 4,540 4,658 2.60 4,780 5.29 Oak Ridge 13,219 13,548 2.49 13,887 5.05 Knox County 162,653 163,267 0.38 163,817 0.72 Knoxville 86,607 87,130 0.60 87,632 1.18 Loudon County 14,251 14,344 0.65 14,432 1.27 Lenoir City 2,998 3,066 2.24 3,134 4.54 Roane County 22,760 23,027 1.18 23,295 2.35 Harriman 3,620 3,705 2.35 3,792 4.75 Kingston 2,318 2,423 4.53 2,532 9.24 Total ROI Construction 232,895 234,406 0.65 235,855 1.27 Operation Anderson County 34,246 34,362 0.34 34,619 1.09 Clinton 4,679 4,704 0.55 4,761 1.77 Oak Ridge 13,622 13,693 0.52 13,853 1.69 Knox County 167,619 167,753 0.08 168,021 0.24 Knoxville 89,252 89,366 0.13 89,606 0.40 Loudon County 14,617 14,637 0.14 14,680 0.43 Lenoir City 3,075 3,090 0.48 3,122 1.53 Roane County 23,344 23,402 0.25 23,529 0.79 Harriman 3,713 3,731 0.49 3,772 1.60 Kingston 2,378 2,400 0.95 2,451 3.11 Total ROI Operation 239,825 240,154 0.14 240,849 0.43 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-46.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-46.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 33,231 33,725 1.49 33,691 1.38 34,093 2.59 33,862 1.90 32,952 0.41 Clinton 4,540 4,650 2.41 4,642 2.24 4,731 4.21 4,680 3.08 4,511 0.66 Oak Ridge 15,878 16,184 1.92 16,163 1.79 16,411 3.36 15,997 0.75 15,752 0.41 Knox County 162,653 163,185 0.33 163,148 0.30 163,581 0.57 163,333 0.42 160,893 0.13 Knoxville 86,607 87,076 0.54 87,043 0.50 87,425 0.94 87,206 0.69 85,707 0.19 Loudon County 14,251 14,334 0.58 14,328 0.54 14,396 1.02 14,357 0.74 14,132 0.19 Lenoir City 2,998 3,061 2.09 3,056 1.93 3,107 3.63 3,078 2.65 2,982 0.57 Roane County 22,760 23,004 1.07 22,987 1.00 23,186 1.87 23,072 1.37 22,592 0.31 Harriman 3,620 3,698 2.17 3,693 2.02 3,757 3.78 3,720 2.77 3,601 0.60 Kingston 2,318 2,416 4.22 2,409 3.92 2,489 7.37 2,443 5.40 2,316 1.12 Total ROI 232,895 234,248 0.58 234,154 0.54 235,256 1.01 234,624 0.74 230,569 0.19 Construction Operation Anderson County 34,246 34,582 0.98 34,578 0.97 34,564 0.93 34,526 0.82 34,526 0.82 Clinton 4,679 4,753 1.59 4,752 1.57 4,749 1.51 4,741 1.33 4,741 1.33 Oak Ridge 16,363 16,571 1.27 16,569 1.26 16,560 1.2 16,537 1.06 16,537 1.06 Knox County 167,619 167,981 0.22 167,977 0.21 167,961 0.2 167,921 0.18 167,921 0.18 Knoxville 89,252 89,571 0.36 89,567 0.35 89,554 0.34 89,518 0.3 89,518 0.3 Loudon County 14,617 14,674 0.39 14,673 0.38 14,671 0.37 14,664 0.32 14,664 0.32 Lenoir City 3,075 3,117 1.37 3,117 1.36 3,115 1.3 3,111 1.15 3,111 1.15 Roane County 23,344 23,510 0.71 23,508 0.7 23,501 0.67 23,482 0.59 23,482 0.59 Harriman 3,713 3,766 1.45 3,766 1.43 3,763 1.36 3,757 1.20 3,757 1.20 Kingston 2,378 2,444 2.80 2,443 2.77 2,441 2.66 2,433 2.34 2,433 2.34 Total ROI 239,825 240,746 0.38 240,736 0.38 240,697 0.36 240,593 0.32 240,593 0.32 Operation Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-46a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-46a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change Plant (percent) (percent) Construction Anderson County 33,231 33,872 1.93 34,415 3.56 Clinton 4,540 4,681 3.12 4,803 5.80 Oak Ridge 13,219 13,613 2.98 13,951 5.54 Knox County 162,653 163,383 0.45 163,929 0.78 Knoxville 86,607 87,231 0.72 87,731 1.30 Loudon County 14,251 14,362 0.78 14,450 1.40 Lenoir City 2,998 3,078 2.67 3,148 4.98 Roane County 22,760 23,080 1.41 23,346 2.58 Harriman 3,620 3,721 2.80 3,808 5.21 Kingston 2,318 2,444 5.43 2,553 10.12 Total ROI Construction 232,895 234,696 0.77 236,141 1.39 Operation Anderson County 34,246 34,528 0.82 34,793 1.60 Clinton 4,679 4,741 1.34 4,800 2.60 Oak Ridge 13,622 13,796 1.28 13,961 2.48 Knox County 167,619 167,932 0.19 168,208 0.35 Knoxville 89,252 89,524 0.30 89,771 0.58 Loudon County 14,617 14,665 0.33 14,709 0.63 Lenoir City 3,075 3,111 1.16 3,144 2.25 Roane County 23,344 23,484 0.60 23,615 1.16 Harriman 3,713 3,758 1.21 3,800 2.35 Kingston 2,378 2,433 2.34 2,486 4.56 Total ROI Operation 239,825 240,610 0.33 241,325 0.63 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-47.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-47.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 1992 Revenues and Anderson Clinton Oak Ridge Knox Knoxville Loudon Lenoir City Roane Harriman Kingston Expenditures County County County County Property tax (percent) 39 61 22 29 70 45 32 44 18 52 Intergovernmental 48 20 66 33 17 47 56 45 74 24 (percent) Permits, fees, fines, and 12 10 11 13 3 7 9 11 5 4 investment interest (percent) Other (percent) 1 8 1 25 9 1 4 0 3 20 Total Revenues (dollars) 41,134,071 4,731,541 34,657,938 311,946,751 111,859,759 19,807,853 8,800,080 28,691,069 8,956,445 1,915,214 General government 21 27 3 5 5 22 11 20 10 28 (percent) Public safety, health, and 0 18 21 9 32 0 10 0 10 25 community service (percent) Public works, parks, 5 25 5 3 26 6 10 6 7 45 culture, and recreation (public) Debt service (percent) 8 19 6 5 26 13 7 6 4 2 Education (percent) 53 0 61 42 0 56 62 67 67 0 Other (percent) 13 12 4 36 12 2 0 1 3 0 Total Expenditures 44,923,778 4,844,783 38,742,383 437,684,259 126,182,092 21,695,020 8,518,830 29,054,426 9,571,068 1,634,203 (dollars) End-of-Year Fund 7,885,051 5,149,098 26,401,105 109,551,335 31,917,343 2,323,795 1,959,558 16,222,017 3,443,762 413,930 Balance (dollars) Source: OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-48.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-48.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 43,442,049 43,741,978 0.69 43,715,919 0.63 44,023,089 1.34 43,766,935 0.75 43,348,099 0.39 Clinton 5,036,437 5,083,775 0.94 5,079,668 0.86 5,128,076 1.82 5,087,822 1.02 5,021,892 0.57 Oak Ridge 39,066,506 39,551,576 1.24 39,509,274 1.13 40,007,924 2.41 39,589,199 1.34 38,942,320 0.75 Knox County 356,268,754 358,115,082 0.52 358,011,859 0.49 359,223,133 0.83 359,263,655 0.84 353,090,533 0.44 Knoxville 119,477,318 119,766,635 0.24 119,742,247 0.22 120,029,556 0.46 119,803,544 0.27 118,535,979 0.15 Loudon County 20,887,662 20,938,254 0.24 20,933,907 0.22 20,985,511 0.47 20,942,446 0.26 20,821,575 0.14 Lenoir City 9,006,611 9,025,235 0.21 9,023,620 0.19 9,042,793 0.40 9,026,516 0.22 8,979,874 0.12 Roane County 30,573,213 30,712,177 0.45 30,699,930 0.41 30,843,105 0.88 30,722,226 0.49 30,479,487 0.26 Harriman 9,003,994 9,020,993 0.19 9,019,491 0.17 9,037,051 0.37 9,022,155 0.20 8,992,869 0.11 Kingston 1,846,471 1,858,990 0.68 1,857,952 0.62 1,870,096 1.28 1,861,005 0.79 1,839,825 0.44 Total ROI County, 634,609,015 637,814,695 0.51 637,593,867 0.47 640,190,335 0.88 639,085,503 0.71 630,052,453 0.37 City, School District Revenues Expenditures Anderson County 46,106,174 46,378,827 0.59 46,354,856 0.54 46,637,445 1.15 46,396,602 0.63 45,992,281 0.33 Clinton 5,682,146 5,698,695 0.29 5,697,240 0.27 5,714,392 0.57 5,699,774 0.31 5,695,404 0.17 Oak Ridge 41,746,005 42,176,482 1.03 42,138,636 0.94 42,584,801 2.01 42,204,546 1.10 41,605,835 0.62 Knox County 485,281,724 486,544,702 0.26 486,433,729 0.24 487,741,372 0.51 486,627,526 0.28 480,847,408 0.15 Knoxville 125,439,503 125,622,129 0.15 125,606,082 0.13 125,795,167 0.28 125,634,105 0.16 124,714,075 0.09 Loudon County 22,480,305 22,527,668 0.21 22,523,541 0.19 22,572,515 0.41 22,530,610 0.22 22,415,688 0.12 Lenoir City 9,339,916 9,358,429 0.20 9,356,815 0.18 9,375,958 0.39 9,359,578 0.21 9,321,428 0.12 Roane County 30,397,924 30,533,497 0.45 30,521,476 0.41 30,661,990 0.87 30,542,075 0.47 30,322,410 0.25 Harriman 9,893,397 9,940,114 0.47 9,935,972 0.43 9,984,391 0.92 9,943,070 0.50 9,869,524 0.28 Kingston 1,809,609 1,822,245 0.70 1,821,125 0.64 1,834,222 1.36 1,823,045 0.74 1,804,509 0.42 Total ROI County, 778,176,702 780,602,788 0.31 780,389,473 0.28 782,902,254 0.61 780,760,932 0.33 772,588,562 0.18 City, School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-48a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-48a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) Plant (percent) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 43,442,049 43,791,515 0.80 44,280,091 1.93 Clinton 5,036,437 5,091,710 1.10 5,168,726 2.63 Oak Ridge 39,066,506 39,628,745 1.44 40,421,375 3.47 Knox County 356,268,754 359,490,243 0.90 361,602,656 1.50 Knoxville 119,477,318 119,828,226 0.29 120,288,002 0.68 Loudon County 20,887,662 20,946,591 0.28 21,029,171 0.68 Lenoir City 9,006,611 9,028,022 0.24 9,058,657 0.58 Roane County 30,573,213 30,733,500 0.52 30,960,966 1.27 Harriman 9,003,994 9,023,529 0.22 9,051,415 0.53 Kingston 1,846,471 1,862,104 0.85 1,881,602 1.90 Total ROI County, City, School District Revenues 634,609,015 639,424,185 0.76 643,742,660 1.44 Expenditures Anderson County 46,106,174 46,418,575 0.68 46,867,142 1.65 Clinton 5,682,146 5,701,108 0.33 5,728,334 0.81 Oak Ridge 41,746,005 42,239,238 1.18 42,947,456 2.88 Knox County 485,281,724 486,729,346 0.30 488,806,860 0.73 Knoxville 125,439,503 125,648,829 0.17 125,949,237 0.41 Loudon County 22,480,305 22,534,416 0.24 22,612,606 0.59 Lenoir City 9,339,916 9,361,066 0.23 9,391,629 0.55 Roane County 30,397,924 30,552,982 0.51 30,775,993 1.24 Harriman 9,893,397 9,946,828 0.54 10,023,675 1.32 Kingston 1,809,609 1,824,062 0.80 1,844,849 1.95 Total ROI County, City, School District Expenditures 778,176,702 780,956,449 0.36 784,947,781 0.87 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-49.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-49.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 44,120,170 44,250,377 0.30 44,247,747 0.29 44,236,650 0.26 44,207,092 0.20 44,207,092 0.20 Clinton 5,142,635 5,163,176 0.40 5,162,761 0.39 5,161,011 0.36 5,156,340 0.27 5,156,340 0.27 Oak Ridge 40,172,946 40,383,766 0.52 40,379,509 0.51 40,361,543 0.47 40,313,871 0.35 40,313,871 0.35 Knox County 368,580,846 369,300,475 0.20 369,285,137 0.19 369,223,339 0.17 369,061,881 0.13 369,061,881 0.13 Knoxville 122,273,105 122,397,015 0.10 122,394,432 0.10 122,383,854 0.09 122,355,833 0.07 122,355,833 0.07 Loudon County 21,139,450 21,161,458 0.10 21,160,877 0.10 21,159,117 0.09 21,154,108 0.07 21,154,108 0.07 Lenoir City 9,101,214 9,109,343 0.09 9,109,128 0.09 9,108,479 0.08 9,106,638 0.06 9,106,638 0.06 Roane County 30,936,687 30,996,962 0.19 30,995,866 0.19 30,990,674 0.17 30,976,945 0.13 30,976,945 0.13 Harriman 9,047,999 9,055,378 0.08 9,055,244 0.08 9,054,609 0.07 9,052,931 0.05 9,052,931 0.05 Kingston 1,876,300 1,881,627 0.28 1,881,527 0.28 1,881,070 0.25 1,879,799 0.19 1,879,799 0.19 Total ROI County, 652,391,351 653,699,577 0.20 653,672,227 0.20 653,560,345 0.18 653,265,440 0.13 653,265,440 0.13 City, School District Revenues Expenditures Anderson County 46,731,808 46,850,601 0.25 46,848,204 0.25 46,838,083 0.23 46,811,448 0.17 46,811,448 0.17 Clinton 5,726,309 5,733,519 0.13 5,733,373 0.12 5,732,759 0.11 5,731,142 0.08 5,731,142 0.08 Oak Ridge 42,737,749 42,925,305 0.44 42,921,520 0.43 42,905,540 0.39 42,863,489 0.29 42,863,489 0.29 Knox County 498,577,349 499,127,204 0.11 499,115,764 0.11 499,068,858 0.10 498,946,445 0.07 498,946,445 0.07 Knoxville 127,372,659 127,452,168 0.06 127,450,513 0.06 127,443,731 0.06 127,426,030 0.04 127,426,030 0.04 Loudon County 22,724,592 22,745,300 0.09 22,744,750 0.09 22,743,099 0.08 22,738,422 0.06 22,738,422 0.06 Lenoir City 9,434,520 9,442,614 0.09 9,442,399 0.08 9,441,753 0.08 9,439,925 0.06 9,439,925 0.06 Roane County 30,758,558 30,817,475 0.19 30,816,407 0.19 30,811,331 0.17 30,797,974 0.13 30,797,974 0.13 Harriman 10,017,982 10,038,283 0.20 10,037,915 0.20 10,036,166 0.18 10,031,564 0.14 10,031,564 0.14 Kingston 1,843,302 1,848,793 0.30 1,848,694 0.29 1,848,221 0.27 1,846,976 0.20 1,846,976 0.20 Total ROI County, 795,924,827 796,981,262 0.13 796,959,539 0.13 796,869,542 0.12 796,633,416 0.09 796,633,416 0.09 City, School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-49a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-49a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) Plant (percent) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 44,120,170 44,245,190 0.28 44,534,797 0.94 Clinton 5,142,635 5,162,358 0.38 5,208,046 1.27 Oak Ridge 40,172,946 40,375,371 0.50 40,844,275 1.67 Knox County 368,580,846 369,269,521 0.19 370,869,791 0.62 Knoxville 122,273,105 122,391,518 0.10 122,667,417 0.32 Loudon County 21,139,450 21,160,688 0.10 21,209,086 0.33 Lenoir City 9,101,214 9,109,059 0.09 9,126,934 0.28 Roane County 30,936,687 30,994,366 0.19 31,129,017 0.62 Harriman 9,047,999 9,055,061 0.08 9,071,547 0.26 Kingston 1,876,300 1,881,399 0.27 1,893,289 0.91 Total ROI County, City, School District Revenues 652,391,351 653,644,531 0.19 656,554,200 0.64 Expenditures Anderson County 46,731,808 46,845,875 0.24 47,110,093 0.81 Clinton 5,726,309 5,733,232 0.12 5,749,269 0.40 Oak Ridge 42,737,749 42,917,843 0.42 43,335,004 1.40 Knox County 498,577,349 499,102,744 0.11 500,327,198 0.35 Knoxville 127,372,659 127,448,631 0.06 127,625,686 0.20 Loudon County 22,724,592 22,744,578 0.09 22,790,104 0.29 Lenoir City 9,434,520 9,442,332 0.08 9,460,127 0.27 Roane County 30,758,558 30,814,937 0.18 30,946,566 0.61 Harriman 10,017,982 10,037,409 0.19 10,082,766 0.65 Kingston 1,843,302 1,848,557 0.29 1,860,826 0.95 Total ROI County, City, School District Expenditures 795,924,827 796,936,136 0.13 799,287,639 0.42 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-50.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-50.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 43,442,049 43,821,602 0.87 43,795,548 0.81 44,101,577 1.52 43,866,293 0.98 43,402,878 0.52 Clinton 5,036,437 5,096,324 1.19 5,092,218 1.11 5,140,446 2.07 5,103,499 1.33 5,030,313 0.74 Oak Ridge 39,066,506 39,680,830 1.57 39,638,534 1.46 40,135,323 2.74 39,750,029 1.75 39,027,974 0.97 Knox County 356,268,754 358,431,164 0.61 358,328,028 0.58 359,539,056 0.92 359,824,054 1.00 353,594,722 0.58 Knoxville 119,477,318 119,841,109 0.30 119,816,722 0.28 120,103,343 0.52 119,898,533 0.35 118,589,521 0.20 Loudon County 20,887,662 20,951,595 0.31 20,947,248 0.29 20,998,852 0.53 20,959,715 0.34 20,830,843 0.18 Lenoir City 9,006,611 9,030,191 0.26 9,028,575 0.24 9,047,749 0.46 9,032,889 0.29 8,983,147 0.16 Roane County 30,573,213 30,749,201 0.58 30,736,952 0.54 30,879,588 1.00 30,768,433 0.64 30,504,540 0.34 Harriman 9,003,994 9,025,534 0.24 9,024,031 0.22 9,041,526 0.42 9,027,811 0.26 8,995,836 0.15 Kingston 1,846,471 1,862,135 0.85 1,861,095 0.79 1,873,198 1.45 1,865,112 1.01 1,842,202 0.57 Total ROI County, 634,609,015 638,489,685 0.61 638,268,952 0.58 640,860,658 0.99 640,096,366 0.86 630,801,976 0.49 City, School District Revenues Expenditures Anderson County 46,106,174 46,452,071 0.75 46,428,100 0.70 46,709,624 1.31 46,487,175 0.83 46,041,245 0.44 Clinton 5,682,146 5,703,141 0.37 5,701,686 0.34 5,718,773 0.64 5,705,271 0.41 5,698,292 0.22 Oak Ridge 41,746,005 42,292,123 1.31 42,254,277 1.22 42,698,760 2.28 42,347,546 1.44 41,680,967 0.80 Knox County 485,281,724 486,883,339 0.33 486,772,366 0.31 488,076,577 0.58 487,045,844 0.36 481,074,534 0.19 Knoxville 125,439,503 125,671,096 0.18 125,655,049 0.17 125,843,638 0.32 125,694,594 0.20 124,746,003 0.11 Loudon County 22,480,305 22,540,324 0.27 22,536,197 0.25 22,585,171 0.47 22,546,835 0.30 22,424,199 0.16 Lenoir City 9,339,916 9,363,376 0.25 9,361,762 0.23 9,380,905 0.44 9,365,920 0.28 9,324,661 0.15 Roane County 30,397,924 30,569,828 0.57 30,557,806 0.53 30,697,786 0.99 30,587,216 0.62 30,346,642 0.33 Harriman 9,893,397 9,952,633 0.60 9,948,491 0.56 9,996,726 1.04 9,958,625 0.66 9,877,638 0.36 Kingston 1,809,609 1,825,632 0.89 1,824,511 0.82 1,837,559 1.54 1,827,253 0.98 1,806,704 0.54 Total ROI County, 778,176,702 781,253,562 0.40 781,040,247 0.37 783,545,519 0.69 781,566,278 0.44 773,020,885 0.23 City, School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-50a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-50a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) Plant (percent) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 43,442,049 43,891,688 1.04 44,474,266 2.38 Clinton 5,036,437 5,107,513 1.41 5,199,317 3.23 Oak Ridge 39,066,506 39,790,944 1.85 40,736,828 4.28 Knox County 356,268,754 360,036,871 1.06 362,281,835 1.69 Knoxville 119,477,318 119,923,746 0.37 120,468,377 0.83 Loudon County 20,887,662 20,964,028 0.37 21,061,652 0.83 Lenoir City 9,006,611 9,034,462 0.31 9,070,746 0.71 Roane County 30,573,213 30,780,118 0.68 31,051,331 1.56 Harriman 9,003,994 9,029,236 0.28 9,062,504 0.65 Kingston 1,846,471 1,866,227 1.07 1,889,173 2.31 Total ROI County, City, School District Revenues 634,609,015 640,424,834 0.92 645,296,031 1.68 Expenditures Anderson County 46,106,174 46,509,981 0.88 47,046,199 2.04 Clinton 5,682,146 5,706,656 0.43 5,739,202 1.00 Oak Ridge 41,746,005 42,383,554 1.53 43,230,160 3.56 Knox County 485,281,724 487,151,442 0.39 489,634,399 0.90 Knoxville 125,439,503 125,709,864 0.22 126,068,899 0.50 Loudon County 22,480,305 22,550,817 0.31 22,643,510 0.73 Lenoir City 9,339,916 9,367,477 0.30 9,403,709 0.68 Roane County 30,397,924 30,598,547 0.66 30,864,781 1.54 Harriman 9,893,397 9,962,529 0.70 10,054,270 1.63 Kingston 1,809,609 1,828,309 1.03 1,853,125 2.40 Total ROI County, City, School District Expenditures 778,176,702 781,769,175 0.46 786,538,254 1.07 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-51.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-51.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 44,120,170 44,377,960 0.58 44,375,329 0.58 44,364,232 0.55 44,335,330 0.49 44,335,330 0.49 Clinton 5,142,635 5,183,304 0.79 5,182,889 0.78 5,181,138 0.75 5,176,578 0.66 5,176,578 0.66 Oak Ridge 40,172,946 40,590,332 1.04 40,586,075 1.03 40,568,109 0.98 40,521,314 0.87 40,521,314 0.87 Knox County 368,580,846 370,006,998 0.39 369,991,635 0.38 369,929,774 0.37 369,769,912 0.32 369,769,912 0.32 Knoxville 122,273,105 122,518,495 0.20 122,515,912 0.20 122,505,334 0.19 122,477,747 0.17 122,477,747 0.17 Loudon County 21,139,450 21,183,096 0.21 21,182,515 0.20 21,180,756 0.20 21,175,787 0.17 21,175,787 0.17 Lenoir City 9,101,214 9,117,336 0.18 9,117,121 0.17 9,116,472 0.17 9,114,636 0.15 9,114,636 0.15 Roane County 30,936,687 31,056,264 0.39 31,054,900 0.38 31,049,706 0.37 31,036,315 0.32 31,036,315 0.32 Harriman 9,047,999 9,062,639 0.16 9,062,472 0.16 9,061,836 0.15 9,060,197 0.13 9,060,197 0.13 Kingston 1,876,300 1,886,867 0.56 1,886,748 0.56 1,886,288 0.53 1,885,104 0.47 1,885,104 0.47 Total ROI County, 652,391,351 654,983,292 0.40 654,955,595 0.39 654,843,647 0.38 654,552,920 0.33 654,552,920 0.33 City, School District Revenues Expenditures Anderson County 46,731,808 46,966,992 0.50 46,964,595 0.50 46,954,474 0.48 46,928,106 0.42 46,928,106 0.42 Clinton 5,726,309 5,740,583 0.25 5,740,438 0.25 5,739,824 0.24 5,738,223 0.21 5,738,223 0.21 Oak Ridge 42,737,749 43,109,069 0.87 43,105,284 0.86 43,089,305 0.82 43,047,674 0.73 43,047,674 0.73 Knox County 498,577,349 499,666,049 0.22 499,654,609 0.22 499,607,703 0.21 499,485,290 0.18 499,485,290 0.18 Knoxville 127,372,659 127,530,084 0.12 127,528,430 0.12 127,521,648 0.12 127,503,947 0.10 127,503,947 0.10 Loudon County 22,724,592 22,765,660 0.18 22,765,110 0.18 22,763,459 0.17 22,758,782 0.15 22,758,782 0.15 Lenoir City 9,434,520 9,450,572 0.17 9,450,357 0.17 9,449,712 0.16 9,447,883 0.14 9,447,883 0.14 Roane County 30,758,558 30,875,444 0.38 30,874,108 0.38 30,869,033 0.36 30,855,943 0.32 30,855,943 0.32 Harriman 10,017,982 10,058,259 0.40 10,057,798 0.40 10,056,049 0.38 10,051,539 0.33 10,051,539 0.33 Kingston 1,843,302 1,854,197 0.59 1,854,072 0.58 1,853,599 0.56 1,852,379 0.49 1,852,379 0.49 Total ROI County, 795,924,827 798,016,910 0.26 797,994,802 0.26 797,904,805 0.25 797,669,766 0.22 797,669,766 0.22 City, School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-51a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-51a.-Changes in County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Power Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) Plant (percent) (percent) Revenues Anderson County 44,120,170 44,508,202 0.88 44,788,689 1.52 Clinton 5,142,635 5,203,851 1.19 5,248,101 2.05 Oak Ridge 40,172,946 40,801,209 1.56 41,255,344 2.69 Knox County 368,580,846 370,725,577 0.58 372,277,113 1.00 Knoxville 122,273,105 122,642,423 0.30 122,909,260 0.52 Loudon County 21,139,450 21,204,702 0.31 21,252,280 0.53 Lenoir City 9,101,214 9,125,314 0.26 9,142,890 0.46 Roane County 30,936,687 31,116,065 0.58 31,246,404 1.00 Harriman 9,047,999 9,069,960 0.24 9,085,919 0.42 Kingston 1,876,300 1,892,158 0.85 1,903,673 1.46 Total ROI County, City, School District Revenues 652,391,351 656,289,461 0.60 659,109,672 1.03 Expenditures Anderson County 46,731,808 47,085,817 0.76 47,341,710 1.31 Clinton 5,726,309 5,747,796 0.38 5,763,327 0.65 Oak Ridge 42,737,749 43,296,675 1.31 43,700,691 2.25 Knox County 498,577,349 500,216,007 0.33 501,399,769 0.57 Knoxville 127,372,659 127,609,608 0.19 127,780,780 0.32 Loudon County 22,724,592 22,785,978 0.27 22,830,748 0.47 Lenoir City 9,434,520 9,458,514 0.25 9,476,014 0.44 Roane County 30,758,558 30,933,892 0.57 31,061,299 0.98 Harriman 10,017,982 10,078,399 0.60 10,122,302 1.04 Kingston 1,843,302 1,859,645 0.89 1,871,520 1.53 Total ROI County, City, School District Expenditures 795,924,827 799,072,330 0.40 801,348,161 0.68 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; OR City 1992a; OR County 1992a; OR DES 1991a. D -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-52.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Pantex Plant, 1991 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-52.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Pantex Plant, 1991 County/City Number of Employees Total Site Employment (percent) Carson County 143 5.5 Potter/Randall Counties 2,203 84.9 Amarillo 2,145 82.7 Total ROI (County) 2,346 90.4 -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-53.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-53.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 Regional Economic Area 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Civilian labor force 110,508 138,326 158,111 174,336 176,176 169,690 Total employment 106,774 132,545 150,911 166,398 168,153 161,962 Unemployment rate (percent) 3.4 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Personal income (thousand dollars) 1,105,838 2,956,763 5,485,191 7,569,413 7,980,631 8,620,287 Per capita income (dollars per person) 4,091 9,625 17,546 23,127 24,200 25,703 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-54.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-54.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 166,398 173,008 3.97 172,694 3.78 176,370 5.99 174,261 4.73 170,226 2.73 Unemployment rate 4.6 2.2 NA 2.3 NA 2.2 NA 2.2 NA 2.5 NA (percent) Per capita income 23,127 23,535 1.76 23,529 1.74 23,378 1.09 23,475 1.51 23,126 1.83 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 168,153 170,842 1.60 170,784 1.56 170,553 1.43 169,957 1.07 169,957 1.07 Unemployment rate 4.6 3.4 NA 3.6 NA 3.9 NA 3.8 NA 3.8 NA (percent) Per capita income 24,200 24,436 0.98 24,431 0.95 24,410 0.69 24,358 0.65 24,358 0.65 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-54a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-54a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 166,398 175,116 5.24 179,347 7.78 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.6 2 NA 2.2 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 23,127 23,512 1.66 23,238 0.48 Operation Total employment 168,153 170,174 1.2 174,066 3.52 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.6 3.7 NA 2.9 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 24,200 24,377 0.73 24,622 1.74 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-55.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-55.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 166,398 173,962 4.55 173,649 4.36 177,324 6.57 175,216 5.3 171,182 3.31 Unemployment rate 4.6 2.2 NA 2.2 NA 2.2 NA 2.2 NA 2.3 NA (percent) Per capita income 23,127 23,490 1.56 23,504 1.63 23,325 0.86 23,431 1.31 23,126 1.83 (dollars per person) Operation Total employment 168,153 173,473 3.16 173,416 3.13 173,184 2.99 172,589 2.64 172,589 2.64 Unemployment rate 4.6 2.5 NA 2.5 NA 2.7 NA 2.8 NA 2.8 NA (percent) Per capita income 24,200 24,594 1.62 24,591 1.62 24,555 1.47 24,546 1.43 24,546 1.43 (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-55a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-55a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 166,398 176,071 5.81 180,302 8.36 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.6 2.0 NA 2.2 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 23,127 23,460 1.44 23,196 0.3 Operation Total employment 168,153 172,806 2.77 176,726 5.1 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.6 2.7 NA 2.4 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 24,200 24,563 1.48 24,564 1.5 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-56.-Population for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-56.-Population for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Carson County 6,358 6,672 6,576 6,766 6,793 6,888 Potter County 90,511 98,637 97,874 104,820 105,863 107,875 Amarillo 127,010 149,230 157,615 165,050 166,692 169,859 Randall County 53,885 75,062 89,673 91,573 92,485 94,242 ROI Total 150,754 180,371 194,123 203,159 205,141 209,005 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-57.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-57.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 6,766 7,041 4.06 7,016 3.7 7,493 10.74 7,209 6.56 6,809 0.8 Potter County 104,820 107,327 2.39 107,096 2.17 111,453 6.33 108,845 3.84 104,972 0.54 Amarillo 165,050 169,183 2.5 168,802 2.27 175,983 6.62 171,719 4.04 165,319 0.56 Randall County 91,573 93,308 1.89 93,148 1.72 96,162 5.01 94,395 3.08 91,633 0.46 Total ROI 203,159 207,676 2.22 207,260 2.02 215,108 5.88 210,449 3.59 203,414 0.51 Construction Operation Carson County 6,793 6,866 1.08 6,865 1.07 6,858 0.96 6,842 0.73 6,842 0.73 Potter County 105,863 106,530 0.63 106,516 0.62 106,459 0.56 106,311 0.42 106,311 0.42 Amarillo 166,692 167,792 0.66 167,768 0.65 167,674 0.59 167,430 0.44 167,430 0.44 Randall County 92,485 92,947 0.5 92,937 0.49 92,897 0.45 92,795 0.34 92,795 0.34 Total ROI Operation 205,141 206,343 0.59 206,318 0.57 206,214 0.52 205,948 0.39 205,948 0.39 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-57a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-57a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 6,766 7,226 6.81 7,891 16.64 Potter County 104,820 105,068 0.24 115,029 9.74 Amarillo 165,050 165,441 0.24 181,968 10.25 Randall County 91,573 99,097 8.22 98,730 7.82 Total ROI Construction 203,159 211,391 4.05 221,650 9.1 Operation Carson County 6,793 6,844 0.76 7,029 3.48 Potter County 105,863 105,894 0.03 108,009 2.03 Amarillo 166,692 166,741 0.03 170,248 2.13 Randall County 92,485 93,319 0.9 93,989 1.63 Total ROI Operation 205,141 206,057 0.45 209,027 1.89 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-58.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-58.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 6,766 7,169 5.96 7,127 5.34 7,621 12.64 7,337 8.45 6,870 1.71 Potter County 104,820 108,498 3.51 108,114 3.14 112,624 7.45 110,009 4.95 105,625 1.17 Amarillo 165,050 171,112 3.67 170,479 3.29 177,913 7.79 173,649 5.21 166,377 1.2 Randall County 91,573 94,118 2.78 93,852 2.49 96,972 5.90 95,211 3.97 92,129 1.01 Total ROI 203,159 209,785 3.26 209,093 2.92 217,217 6.92 212,557 4.63 204,624 1.11 Construction Operation Carson County 6,793 6,996 3 6,993 2.95 6,980 2.76 6,943 2.22 6,943 2.22 Potter County 105,863 107,713 1.75 107,684 1.72 107,569 1.61 107,274 1.33 107,274 1.33 Amarillo 166,692 169,741 1.83 169,694 1.8 169,504 1.69 169,017 1.39 169,017 1.39 Randall County 92,485 93,765 1.38 93,745 1.36 93,665 1.28 93,461 1.06 93,461 1.06 Total ROI Operation 205,141 208,474 1.62 208,422 1.6 208,214 1.5 207,678 1.24 207,678 1.24 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-58a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-58a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 6,766 7,357 8.74 8,019 18.53 Potter County 104,820 105,104 0.27 116,193 10.85 Amarillo 165,050 165,497 0.27 183,897 11.42 Randall County 91,573 101,246 10.56 99,546 8.71 Total ROI Construction 203,159 213,707 5.19 223,758 10.14 Operation Carson County 6,793 6,950 2.32 7,343 8.1 Potter County 105,863 105,903 0.04 110,859 4.72 Amarillo 166,692 166,754 0.04 174,971 4.97 Randall County 92,485 95,062 2.79 95,987 3.79 Total ROI Operation 205,141 207,915 1.35 214,189 4.41 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-59.-Total Housing Units for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-59.-Total Housing Units for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Jurisdiction 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Carson County 2,333 2,635 2,856 2,938 2,950 2,992 Potter County 36,589 41,042 42,927 45,974 46,431 47,313 Amarillo 48,383 60,280 68,592 71,828 72,542 73,920 Randall County 17,346 28,544 37,807 38,608 38,992 39,733 Total ROI (County) 56,268 72,221 83,590 87,520 88,374 90,038 Source: Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1982a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-60.-Changes to Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-60.-Changes to Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 2,938 3,043 3.58 3,034 3.24 3,215 9.43 3,107 5.74 2,954 0.7 Potter County 45,974 46,927 2.07 46,839 1.88 48,496 5.48 47,504 3.33 46,007 0.47 Amarillo 71,828 73,399 2.19 73,254 1.99 75,985 5.79 74,363 3.53 71,894 0.49 Randall County 38,608 39,268 1.71 39,207 1.55 40,353 4.52 39,681 2.78 38,616 0.42 Total ROI 87,520 89,238 1.96 89,079 1.78 92,063 5.19 90,292 3.17 87,577 0.45 Operation Carson County 2,950 2,978 0.95 2,978 0.93 2,975 0.84 2,969 0.64 2,969 0.64 Potter County 46,431 46,685 0.55 46,679 0.53 46,658 0.49 46,601 0.37 46,601 0.37 Amarillo 72,542 72,960 0.58 72,951 0.56 72,916 0.51 72,823 0.39 72,823 0.39 Randall County 38,992 39,168 0.45 39,164 0.44 39,149 0.4 39,110 0.3 39,110 0.3 Total ROI 88,374 88,831 0.52 88,821 0.51 88,782 0.46 88,681 0.35 88,681 0.35 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-60a.-Changes to Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-60a.-Changes to Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 2,938 3,113 5.96 3,366 14.56 Potter County 45,974 46,068 0.2 49,855 8.44 Amarillo 71,828 71,976 0.21 78,260 8.96 Randall County 38,608 41,469 7.41 41,329 7.05 Total ROI 87,520 90,650 3.58 94,551 8.03 Operation Carson County 2,950 2,970 0.66 3,040 3.05 Potter County 46,431 46,443 0.03 47,247 1.76 Amarillo 72,542 72,561 0.03 73,894 1.86 Randall County 38,992 39,310 0.81 39,564 1.47 Total ROI 88,374 88,722 0.39 89,851 1.67 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-61.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-61.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 2,938 3,092 5.2 3,076 4.65 3,264 11.04 3,156 7.4 2,977 1.49 Potter County 45,974 47,372 3.04 47,226 2.72 48,941 6.46 47,947 4.29 46,255 1.01 Amarillo 71,828 74,133 3.21 73,892 2.87 76,718 6.81 75,097 4.55 72,296 1.05 Randall County 38,608 39,576 2.51 39,475 2.24 40,661 5.32 39,991 3.58 38,804 0.91 Total ROI Construction 87,520 90,039 2.88 89,776 2.58 92,865 6.11 91,093 4.08 88,037 0.98 Operation Carson County 2,950 3,027 2.62 3,026 2.58 3,021 2.42 3,007 1.94 3,007 1.94 Potter County 46,431 47,134 1.51 47,123 1.49 47,080 1.4 46,967 1.16 46,967 1.16 Amarillo 72,542 73,702 1.60 73,684 1.57 73,611 1.47 73,426 1.22 73,426 1.22 Randall County 38,992 39,479 1.25 39,472 1.23 39,441 1.15 39,364 0.95 39,364 0.95 Total ROI Operation 88,374 89,641 1.43 89,621 1.41 89,542 1.32 89,338 1.09 89,338 1.09 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-61a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-61a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Carson County 2,938 3,163 7.65 3,415 16.22 Potter County 45,974 46,081 0.23 50,298 9.41 Amarillo 71,828 71,998 0.24 78,994 9.98 Randall County 38,608 42,286 9.53 41,640 7.85 Total ROI Construction 87,520 91,531 4.58 95,352 8.95 Operation Carson County 2,950 3,010 2.03 3,159 7.1 Potter County 46,431 46,446 0.03 48,331 4.09 Amarillo 72,542 72,566 0.03 75,690 4.34 Randall County 38,992 39,972 2.51 40,324 3.42 Total ROI Operation 88,374 89,428 1.19 91,814 3.89 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX Census 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-62.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-62.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1992 Revenues and Expenditures Carson County Potter County Amarillo Randall County Local sources (percent) 73 69 59 63 State revenues (percent) 1 4 12 2 Federal revenues (percent) 20 20 19 31 Other (percent) 5 7 9 4 Total Revenues (dollars) 1,604,751 16,561,508 65,950,257 10,515,627 General Government (percent) 69 35 8 40 Public safety, health, and community service (percent) 18 39 45 34 Public works, parks, culture, and recreation (percent) 0 7 44 15 Debt service (percent) 0 7 2 6 Other (percent) 13 12 2 5 Total Expenditures (dollars) 2,343,195 19,967,949 59,656,411 10,426,496 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 17,988 396,766 19,822,447 1,8838,147 -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-63.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-63.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 1992 - Carson County Potter County Randall County Revenues and Expenditures Groom Panhandle White Deer Amarillo Canyon Independent School Independent School Independent School Independent School Independent School District District District District District Local sources (percent) 56 85 92 46 47 State revenues (percent) 40 12 5 47 49 Federal revenues (percent) 5 3 3 7 4 Total Revenues (dollars) 1,341,890 4,240,134 2,809,639 112,974,576 23,512,715 Total expenditures per pupil (dollars) 6,208 5,717 5,542 3,950 3,953 Total instruction (percent) 55 57 52 59 57 School administration, services, and transportation 32 25 29 23 23 (percent) Maintenance, operation, and facilities acquisition 13 13 19 11 10 (percent) Other (percent) 0 5 0 7 11 Total Expenditures (dollars) 1,334,657 3,984,495 2,687,654 107,836,850 23,205,181 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 635,058 1,718,148 995,296 20,591,936 4,701,437 Source: PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-64.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-64.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,629,404 1,696,223 4.1 1,690,624 3.76 1,793,232 10.05 1,730,505 6.2 1,666,376 2.45 Potter County 17,920,786 18,425,873 2.82 18,388,038 2.61 19,036,023 6.22 18,719,729 4.46 18,207,997 1.98 Amarillo 64,794,434 66,327,796 2.37 66,214,407 2.19 68,141,189 5.17 67,229,866 3.76 65,698,813 1.68 Randall County 9,857,208 10,127,355 2.74 10,108,601 2.55 10,415,161 5.66 10,294,751 4.44 10,022,876 2.08 Total ROI 94,201,832 96,577,247 2.52 96,401,670 2.34 99,385,604 5.50 97,974,851 4.01 95,596,062 1.79 County and City Revenues Expenditures Carson County 2,356,950 2,444,251 3.7 2,436,329 3.37 2,587,484 9.78 2,484,591 5.42 2,399,652 1.93 Potter County 19,039,510 19,440,077 2.1 19,403,161 1.91 20,099,440 5.57 19,626,160 3.08 19,183,249 1.1 Amarillo 56,736,350 57,843,984 1.95 57,741,969 1.77 59,666,525 5.16 58,358,353 2.86 57,119,479 1.02 Randall County 9,370,063 9,527,130 1.68 9,512,643 1.52 9,785,547 4.43 9,600,090 2.45 9,416,666 0.88 Total ROI 87,502,873 89,255,442 2 89,094,102 1.82 92,138,996 5.3 90,069,193 2.93 88,119,046 1.05 County and City Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-64a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-64a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influencee Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,629,404 1,738,154 6.67 1,816,737 11.5 Potter County 17,920,786 18,780,175 4.8 19,350,578 7.98 Amarillo 64,794,434 67,414,126 4.04 69,139,551 6.71 Randall County 9,857,208 10,327,854 4.77 10,626,470 7.8 Total ROI County and City Revenues 94,201,832 98,260,309 4.31 100,933,336 7.15 Expenditures Carson County 2,356,950 2,494,248 5.83 2,599,851 10.31 Potter County 19,039,510 19,670,545 3.31 20,152,282 5.84 Amarillo 56,736,350 58,481,070 3.08 59,813,544 5.42 Randall County 9,370,063 9,617,493 2.64 9,806,357 4.66 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 87,502,873 90,263,356 3.15 92,372,035 5.56 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-65.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-65.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,634,445 1,653,811 1.18 1,653,500 1.17 1,651,721 1.06 1,647,468 0.8 1,647,468 0.8 Potter County 18,086,368 18,248,061 0.89 18,244,661 0.88 18,230,769 0.8 18,194,887 0.6 18,194,887 0.6 Amarillo 65,293,540 65,789,530 0.76 65,980,314 1.05 65,736,273 0.68 65,626,448 0.51 65,626,448 0.51 Randall County 9,952,042 10,043,439 0.92 10,117,758 1.67 10,033,572 0.82 10,013,389 0.62 10,013,389 0.62 Total ROI County 94,966,395 95,734,841 0.81 95,996,233 1.08 95,652,335 0.72 95,482,193 0.54 95,482,193 0.54 and City Revenues Expenditures Carson County 2,363,542 2,386,830 0.99 2,386,513 0.97 2,384,295 0.88 2,379,225 0.66 2,379,225 0.66 Potter County 19,205,843 19,312,362 0.55 19,310,124 0.54 19,301,015 0.5 19,277,364 0.37 19,277,364 0.37 Amarillo 57,220,243 57,515,135 0.52 57,754,233 0.93 57,483,500 0.46 57,418,269 0.35 57,418,269 0.35 Randall County 9,454,965 9,496,841 0.44 9,586,481 1.39 9,492,313 0.4 9,483,078 0.3 9,483,078 0.3 Total ROI County 88,244,593 88,711,167 0.53 89,037,351 0.9 88,661,124 0.47 88,557,935 0.36 88,557,935 0.36 and City Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-65a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-65a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,634,445 1,653,116 1.14 1,696,372 3.79 Potter County 18,086,368 18,240,973 0.85 18,600,822 2.84 Amarillo 65,293,540 65,768,332 0.73 67,525,556 3.42 Randall County 9,952,042 10,039,578 0.88 10,490,618 5.41 Total ROI County and City Revenues 94,966,395 95,701,999 0.77 98,313,368 3.52 Expenditures Carson County 2,363,542 2,386,041 0.95 2,438,199 3.16 Potter County 19,205,843 19,307,665 0.53 19,544,757 1.76 Amarillo 57,220,243 57,502,809 0.49 58,955,709 3.03 Randall County 9,454,965 9,495,176 0.43 9,882,390 4.52 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 88,244,593 88,691,691 0.51 90,821,055 2.92 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-66.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-66.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 105,624,268 108,150,051 2.39 107,917,279 2.17 112,307,691 6.33 109,323,405 3.50 106,527,836 1.26 Canyon 20,628,469 21,018,206 1.89 20,983,716 1.72 21,663,169 5.02 21,205,142 2.80 20,751,805 1 Groom 1,187,445 1,235,799 4.07 1,231,411 3.7 1,315,132 10.75 1,258,142 5.95 1,210,770 2.13 Panhandle 4,172,331 4,342,234 4.07 4,326,816 3.7 4,620,985 10.75 4,420,740 5.95 4,254,286 2.13 White Deer 2,780,218 2,892,098 4.02 2,880,910 3.62 3,076,700 10.66 2,950,276 6.12 2,830,340 2.01 Total ROI 134,392,731 137,638,388 2.42 137,340,133 2.19 142,983,678 6.39 139,157,704 3.55 135,575,038 1.27 School District Revenues Expenditures Amarillo 98,658,883 100,550,299 1.92 100,375,989 1.74 103,663,720 5.07 101,428,957 2.81 99,309,097 1.01 Canyon 20,399,581 20,739,259 1.67 20,709,199 1.52 21,301,381 4.42 20,902,184 2.46 20,505,679 0.88 Groom 1,146,607 1,193,299 4.07 1,189,062 3.7 1,269,903 10.75 1,214,873 5.95 1,169,130 2.13 Panhandle 3,832,845 3,988,924 4.07 3,974,760 3.7 4,244,994 10.75 4,061,042 5.95 3,908,132 2.13 White Deer 2,644,040 2,750,440 4.02 2,739,800 3.62 2,926,000 10.66 2,805,768 6.12 2,691,707 2.01 Total ROI 126,681,957 129,222,220 2.01 128,988,810 1.82 133,405,998 5.31 130,412,824 2.95 127,583,745 1.05 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-66a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-66a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 105,624,268 109,603,274 3.77 112,640,883 6.64 Canyon 20,628,469 21,248,772 3.01 21,715,525 5.27 Groom 1,187,445 1,263,491 6.4 1,321,982 11.33 Panhandle 4,172,331 4,439,534 6.4 4,645,054 11.33 White Deer 2,780,218 2,963,142 6.58 3,088,336 11.08 Total ROI School District Revenues 134,392,731 139,518,212 3.81 143,411,780 6.71 Expenditures Amarillo 98,658,883 101,638,535 3.02 103,913,228 5.33 Canyon 20,399,581 20,940,210 2.65 21,347,012 4.64 Groom 1,146,607 1,220,038 6.4 1,276,517 11.33 Panhandle 3,832,845 4,078,307 6.4 4,267,105 11.33 White Deer 2,644,040 2,818,004 6.58 2,937,066 11.08 Total ROI School District Expenditures 126,681,957 130,695,094 3.17 133,740,928 5.57 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-67.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-67.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 106,675,281 107,346,939 0.63 107,332,831 0.62 107,275,394 0.56 107,126,259 0.42 107,126,259 0.42 Canyon 20,835,409 20,938,879 0.5 21,163,064 0.50 20,928,532 0.45 20,904,389 0.33 20,904,389 0.33 Groom 1,192,185 1,205,084 1.08 1,204,909 1.07 1,203,680 0.96 1,200,872 0.73 1,200,872 0.73 Panhandle 4,188,987 4,234,310 1.08 4,233,693 1.07 4,229,376 0.96 4,219,509 0.73 4,219,509 0.73 White Deer 2,791,406 2,819,376 1 2,819,376 1 2,819,376 1 2,813,782 0.8 2,813,782 0.8 Total ROI 135,683,269 136,544,588 0.63 136,753,873 0.79 136,456,359 0.57 136,264,811 0.43 136,264,811 0.43 School District Revenues Expenditures Amarillo 99,442,090 99,945,057 0.51 99,934,492 0.5 99,891,481 0.45 99,779,802 0.34 99,779,802 0.34 Canyon 20,579,729 20,669,909 0.44 20,865,299 1.39 20,660,891 0.39 20,639,849 0.29 20,639,849 0.29 Groom 1,151,185 1,163,640 1.08 1,163,470 1.07 1,162,284 0.96 1,159,572 0.73 1,159,572 0.73 Panhandle 3,848,146 3,889,781 1.08 3,889,215 1.07 3,885,249 0.96 3,876,184 0.73 3,876,184 0.73 White Deer 2,654,680 2,681,280 1 2,681,280 1 2,681,280 1 2,675,960 0.8 2,675,960 0.8 Total ROI 127,675,830 128,349,666 0.53 128,533,756 0.67 128,281,185 0.47 128,131,368 0.36 128,131,368 0.36 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-67a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-67a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 106,675,281 107,317,325 0.6 108,812,319 2 Canyon 20,835,409 20,930,463 0.46 21,900,288 5.11 Groom 1,192,185 1,204,647 1.05 1,233,536 3.47 Panhandle 4,188,987 4,232,775 1.05 4,334,281 3.47 White Deer 2,791,406 2,815,125 0.85 2,882,309 3.26 Total ROI School District Revenues 135,683,269 136,500,335 0.6 139,162,733 2.56 Expenditures Amarillo 99,442,090 99,922,880 0.48 101,042,397 1.61 Canyon 20,579,729 20,662,574 0.4 21,507,832 4.51 Groom 1,151,185 1,163,218 1.05 1,191,113 3.47 Panhandle 3,848,146 3,888,371 1.05 3,981,618 3.47 White Deer 2,654,680 2,677,237 0.85 2,741,130 3.26 Total ROI School District Expenditures 127,675,830 128,314,280 0.5 130,464,090 2.18 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. D -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-68.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-68.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,629,404 1,723,698 5.79 1,714,662 5.23 1,820,707 11.74 1,754,232 7.66 1,692,120 4.04 Potter County 17,920,786 18,599,205 3.79 18,542,249 3.47 19,209,132 7.19 18,891,217 5.42 18,390,634 3.00 Amarillo 64,794,434 66,842,410 3.16 66,673,464 2.90 68,655,804 5.96 67,747,381 4.56 66,249,797 2.53 Randall County 9,857,208 10,209,044 3.57 10,182,202 3.30 10,496,900 6.49 10,383,749 5.34 10,116,887 3.04 Total ROI 94,201,832 97,374,191 3.37 97,112,577 3.09 100,182,542 6.35 98,776,579 4.86 96,449,438 2.70 County and City Revenues Expenditures Carson County 2,356,950 2,484,813 5.42 2,471,504 4.86 2,628,045 11.50 2,516,691 6.78 2,434,966 3.43 Potter County 19,039,510 19,627,211 3.09 19,565,845 2.76 20,286,575 6.55 19,773,644 3.86 19,345,931 1.96 Amarillo 56,736,350 58,361,172 2.86 58,191,473 2.56 60,183,712 6.08 58,765,622 3.58 57,569,682 1.82 Randall County 9,370,063 9,600,472 2.46 9,576,387 2.20 9,858,889 5.22 9,657,730 3.07 9,480,629 1.56 Total ROI 87,502,873 90,073,667 2.94 89,805,208 2.63 92,957,221 6.23 90,713,687 3.67 88,831,208 1.87 County and City Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-68a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-68a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,629,404 1,761,704 8.12 1,878,359 15.28 Potter County 17,920,786 18,949,306 5.74 19,735,458 10.13 Amarillo 64,794,434 67,924,142 4.83 70,281,202 8.47 Randall County 9,857,208 10,415,267 5.66 10,806,188 9.63 Total ROI County and City Revenues 94,201,832 99,050,419 5.15 102,701,208 9.02 Expenditures Carson County 2,356,950 2,526,253 7.18 2,691,447 14.19 Potter County 19,039,510 19,817,588 4.09 20,576,407 8.07 Amarillo 56,736,350 58,887,093 3.79 60,985,311 7.49 Randall County 9,370,063 9,674,949 3.25 9,972,529 6.43 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 87,502,873 90,905,884 3.89 94,225,693 7.68 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-69.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-69.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,634,445 1,684,491 3.06 1,683,812 3.02 1,680,784 2.84 1,673,297 2.38 1,673,297 2.38 Potter County 18,086,368 18,472,081 2.13 18,466,823 2.10 18,445,746 1.99 18,391,652 1.69 18,391,652 1.69 Amarillo 65,293,540 66,466,932 1.80 66,451,082 1.77 66,387,305 1.68 66,224,138 1.43 66,224,138 1.43 Randall County 9,952,042 10,160,720 2.10 10,157,964 2.07 10,147,038 1.96 10,119,071 1.68 10,119,071 1.68 Total ROI 94,966,395 96,784,224 1.91 96,759,680 1.89 96,660,872 1.78 96,408,158 1.52 96,408,158 1.52 County and City Revenues Expenditures Carson County 2,363,542 2,428,025 2.73 2,427,075 2.69 2,422,955 2.51 2,412,815 2.08 2,412,815 2.08 Potter County 19,205,843 19,501,413 1.54 19,496,779 1.51 19,478,401 1.42 19,431,258 1.17 19,431,258 1.17 Amarillo 57,220,243 58,037,717 1.43 58,024,965 1.41 57,973,958 1.32 57,843,741 1.09 57,843,741 1.09 Randall County 9,454,965 9,570,907 1.23 9,569,096 1.21 9,561,852 1.13 9,543,381 0.94 9,543,381 0.94 Total ROI 88,244,593 89,538,062 1.47 89,517,915 1.44 89,437,166 1.35 89,231,195 1.12 89,231,195 1.12 County and City Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-69a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-69a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Carson County 1,634,445 1,699,758 4.00 1,763,785 7.91 Potter County 18,086,368 18,609,823 2.89 19,083,160 5.51 Amarillo 65,293,540 66,892,427 2.45 68,326,301 4.64 Randall County 9,952,042 10,241,657 2.91 10,491,557 5.42 Total ROI County and City Revenues 94,966,395 97,443,666 2.61 99,664,803 4.95 Expenditures Carson County 2,363,542 2,444,938 3.44 2,529,998 7.04 Potter County 19,205,843 19,577,314 1.93 19,968,095 3.97 Amarillo 57,220,243 58,247,799 1.80 59,328,615 3.68 Randall County 9,454,965 9,600,638 1.54 9,753,987 3.16 Total ROI County and City Expenditures 88,244,593 89,870,688 1.84 91,580,695 3.78 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; PX City 1992a; PX County 1992a; PX DOC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-70.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-70.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 105,624,268 109,330,030 3.51 108,943,086 3.14 113,487,671 7.44 110,253,370 4.38 107,553,633 2.23 Canyon 20,628,469 21,201,003 2.78 21,142,370 2.49 21,845,966 5.90 21,343,516 3.47 20,914,495 1.80 Groom 1,187,445 1,258,265 5.96 1,250,894 5.34 1,337,598 12.65 1,275,922 7.45 1,230,329 3.78 Panhandle 4,172,331 4,421,172 5.96 4,395,271 5.34 4,699,924 12.65 4,483,212 7.45 4,323,014 3.78 White Deer 2,780,218 2,948,038 6.04 2,925,662 5.23 3,132,640 12.68 2,986,748 7.43 2,887,791 4.08 Total ROI 134,392,731 139,158,509 3.55 138,657,282 3.17 144,503,799 7.52 140,342,768 4.43 136,909,261 2.26 School District Revenues Expenditures Amarillo 98,658,883 101,433,919 2.81 101,144,158 2.52 104,547,340 5.97 102,125,355 3.51 100,077,258 1.79 Canyon 20,399,581 20,898,577 2.45 20,847,475 2.20 21,460,699 5.20 21,022,785 3.05 20,647,472 1.58 Groom 1,146,607 1,214,992 5.96 1,207,874 5.34 1,291,596 12.65 1,232,041 7.45 1,188,017 3.78 Panhandle 3,832,845 4,061,439 5.96 4,037,645 5.34 4,317,510 12.65 4,118,431 7.45 3,971,268 3.78 White Deer 2,644,040 2,803,640 6.04 2,782,360 5.23 2,979,200 12.68 2,840,454 7.43 2,746,344 4.08 Total ROI 126,681,957 130,412,567 2.94 130,019,511 2.63 134,596,345 6.25 131,339,067 3.68 128,630,357 1.88 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-70a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-70a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 105,624,268 110,530,464 4.64 115,315,217 9.17 Canyon 20,628,469 21,386,318 3.67 22,129,060 7.27 Groom 1,187,445 1,281,218 7.90 1,372,715 15.60 Panhandle 4,172,331 4,501,821 7.90 4,823,314 15.60 White Deer 2,780,218 2,999,111 7.87 3,204,914 15.28 Total ROI School District Revenues 134,392,731 140,698,932 4.69 146,845,219 9.27 Expenditures Amarillo 98,658,883 102,332,855 3.72 105,915,885 7.36 Canyon 20,399,581 21,060,089 3.24 21,707,431 6.41 Groom 1,146,607 1,237,155 7.90 1,325,505 15.60 Panhandle 3,832,845 4,135,526 7.90 4,430,860 15.60 White Deer 2,644,040 2,852,212 7.87 3,047,934 15.28 Total ROI School District Expenditures 126,681,957 131,617,837 3.90 136,427,616 7.69 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-71.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-71.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 106,675,281 108,539,011 1.75 108,509,788 1.72 108,393,906 1.61 108,096,644 1.33 108,096,644 1.33 Canyon 20,835,409 21,121,676 1.37 21,118,227 1.36 21,100,982 1.27 21,052,696 1.04 21,052,696 1.04 Groom 1,192,185 1,227,901 3.00 1,227,375 2.95 1,225,093 2.76 1,219,476 2.29 1,219,476 2.29 Panhandle 4,188,987 4,314,482 3.00 4,312,632 2.95 4,304,615 2.76 4,284,880 2.29 4,284,880 2.29 White Deer 2,791,406 2,875,316 3.01 2,875,316 3.01 2,869,722 2.81 2,852,940 2.20 2,852,940 2.20 Total ROI School 135,683,269 138,078,386 1.77 138,043,338 1.74 137,894,318 1.63 137,506,637 1.34 137,506,637 1.34 District Revenues Expenditures Amarillo 99,442,090 100,837,732 1.40 100,815,849 1.38 100,729,071 1.29 100,506,468 1.07 100,506,468 1.07 Canyon 20,579,729 20,829,227 1.21 20,826,221 1.20 20,811,191 1.12 20,769,107 0.92 20,769,107 0.92 Groom 1,151,185 1,185,672 3.00 1,185,164 2.95 1,182,960 2.76 1,177,537 2.29 1,177,537 2.29 Panhandle 3,848,146 3,963,430 3.00 3,961,730 2.95 3,954,365 2.76 3,936,236 2.29 3,936,236 2.29 White Deer 2,654,680 2,734,480 3.01 2,734,480 3.01 2,729,160 2.81 2,713,200 2.20 2,713,200 2.20 Total ROI School 127,675,830 129,550,540 1.47 129,523,443 1.45 129,406,748 1.36 129,102,549 1.12 129,102,549 1.12 District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-71a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-71a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor for Pantex Plant Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Amarillo 106,675,281 109,017,602 2.20 111,481,690 4.51 Canyon 20,835,409 21,194,105 1.72 21,576,392 3.56 Groom 1,192,185 1,237,269 3.78 1,284,381 7.73 Panhandle 4,188,987 4,347,396 3.78 4,512,936 7.73 White Deer 2,791,406 2,896,126 3.75 3,011,250 7.88 Total ROI School District Revenues 135,683,269 138,692,498 2.22 141,866,649 4.56 Expenditures Amarillo 99,442,090 101,196,122 1.76 103,041,337 3.62 Canyon 20,579,729 20,892,353 1.52 21,225,538 3.14 Groom 1,151,185 1,194,717 3.78 1,240,209 7.73 Panhandle 3,848,146 3,993,666 3.78 4,145,736 7.73 White Deer 2,654,680 2,754,270 3.75 2,863,756 7.88 Total ROI School District Expenditures 127,675,830 130,031,128 1.84 132,516,576 3.79 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; DOE 1995g; SNL 1995a; PX DOC 1991a; PX School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-72.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Savannah River Site, 1991 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-72.-Distribution of Employees by Place of Residence for Savannah River Site, 1991 County/City Number of Employees Total Site Employment (percent) Aiken County 9,978 51.9 Aiken 4,928 25.7 North Augusta 2,666 13.9 Barnwell County 1,401 7.3 Columbia County 2,036 10.6 Richmond County 3,358 17.5 Augusta 2,780 14.5 Total ROI (County) 16,773 87.3 Source: SRS 1991a:3. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-73.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Savannah River Site Regional Peak Construction (2005 (2003 Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-73.-Employment and Local Economy Statistics for Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area, 1970-2020 Regional Economic Area 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Civilian labor force 276,846 397,236 514,763 588,416 603,918 593,201 Total employment 263,975 369,004 489,855 559,944 574,696 564,498 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.6 7.1 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 Personal income (thousand dollars) 2,161,380 6,713,182 15,843,875 22,031,409 23,674,107 26,221,085 Per capita income (dollars per person) 2,873 7,210 15,012 19,049 19,978 21,335 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; SR ESC 1991a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-74.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-74.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area Regional No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change Tritium Change Economic (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Recycle (percent) Area Phaseout Construction Total 559,944 567,143 1.29 566,807 1.23 570,739 1.93 568,488 1.53 559,114 0.90 - - employment Unemployment 4.8 3.9 NA 4.0 NA 3.9 NA 3.9 NA 4.1 NA NA NA rate (percent) Per capita 19,049 19,222 0.91 19,215 0.87 19,218 0.89 19,230 0.95 18,832 0.76 - - income (dollars per person) Operation Total 574,696 577,079 0.41 577,028 0.41 576,823 0.37 576,295 0.28 576,295 0.28 573,889 -0.14 employment Unemployment 4.8 4.5 NA 4.6 NA 4.6 NA 4.6 NA 4.6 NA 4.9 NA rate (percent) Per capita 19,978 20,033 0.27 20,032 0.27 20,027 0.24 20,015 0.18 20,015 0.18 19,960 -0.09 income (dollars per person) Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-74a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-74a.-Changes in Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area Regional Economic Area No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Total employment 559,944 569,405 1.69 573,943 2.50 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.8 3.8 NA 3.9 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,049 19,250 1.06 19,200 0.79 Operation Total employment 574,696 576,487 0.31 579,943 0.91 Unemployment rate (percent) 4.8 4.6 NA 4.2 NA Per capita income (dollars per person) 19,978 20,019 0.21 20,098 0.60 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOC 1990a; DOC 1990b; DOC 1991a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-75.-Population for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-75.-Population for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Region of Influence 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Aiken County 91,023 105,625 120,940 131,773 134,898 139,620 Aiken 13,436 14,978 19,872 21,652 22,166 22,941 North Augusta 12,883 13,593 15,351 16,726 17,123 17,722 Barnwell County 17,176 19,868 20,293 22,520 23,054 23,861 Columbia County 22,327 40,118 66,031 70,494 72,612 75,589 Richmond County 162,437 181,629 189,719 217,776 224,320 233,517 Augusta 59,864 47,532 44,639 51,241 52,780 54,944 Total ROI (County) 292,963 347,240 396,983 442,563 454,884 472,587 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-76.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-76.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Region of No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change Tritium Change Influence (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Recycle (percent) Phaseout Construction Aiken County 131,773 133,873 1.59 133,726 1.48 138,192 4.87 135,154 2.57 130,955 0.32 - - Aiken 21,652 22,692 4.80 22,619 4.47 24,831 14.68 23,326 7.73 21,621 0.80 - - North Augusta 16,726 17,288 3.36 17,249 3.13 18,445 10.28 17,632 5.42 16,666 0.58 - - Barnwell County 22,520 22,815 1.31 22,795 1.22 23,423 4.01 22,995 2.11 22,371 0.28 NA NA Columbia 70,494 70,923 0.61 70,893 0.57 71,805 1.86 71,185 0.98 69,781 0.17 - - County Richmond 217,776 218,484 0.33 218,435 0.30 219,941 0.99 218,916 0.52 215,482 0.13 - - County Augusta 51,241 51,827 1.14 51,786 1.06 53,034 3.50 52,185 1.84 50,764 0.25 - - Total ROI 442,563 446,095 0.80 445,849 0.74 453,361 2.44 448,250 1.29 438,589 0.20 - - Construction Operation Aiken County 134,898 135,625 0.54 135,610 0.53 135,547 0.48 135,386 0.36 135,386 0.36 134,652 -0.18 Aiken 22,166 22,526 1.63 22,518 1.59 22,487 1.45 22,408 1.09 22,408 1.09 22,044 -0.55 North Augusta 17,123 17,318 1.14 17,314 1.12 17,297 1.02 17,254 0.77 17,254 0.77 17,057 -0.38 Barnwell County 23,054 23,156 0.44 23,154 0.44 23,145 0.40 23,123 0.30 23,123 0.30 23,019 -0.15 Columbia 72,612 72,760 0.20 72,757 0.20 72,745 0.18 72,712 0.14 72,712 0.14 72,562 -0.07 County Richmond 224,320 224,565 0.11 224,560 0.11 224,539 0.10 224,485 0.07 224,485 0.07 224,237 -0.04 County Augusta 52,780 52,983 0.38 52,979 0.38 52,961 0.34 52,916 0.26 52,916 0.26 52,711 -0.13 Total ROI 454,884 456,106 0.27 456,081 0.26 455,976 0.24 455,706 0.18 455,706 0.18 454,470 -0.09 Operation Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-76a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-76a.-Changes in Population During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Aiken County 131,773 135,585 2.89 142,495 8.14 Aiken 21,652 23,338 7.79 26,962 24.52 North Augusta 16,726 17,641 5.47 19,598 17.17 Barnwell County 22,520 23,007 2.16 24,028 6.7 Columbia County 70,494 71,222 1.03 72,684 3.11 Richmond County 217,776 219,031 0.58 221,392 1.66 Augusta 51,241 52,212 1.9 54,236 5.85 Total ROI Construction 442,563 448,845 1.42 460,599 4.08 Operation Aiken County 134,898 135,397 0.37 136,498 1.19 Aiken 22,166 22,409 1.1 22,957 3.57 North Augusta 17,123 17,254 0.77 17,551 2.5 Barnwell County 23,054 23,124 0.3 23,279 0.98 Columbia County 72,612 72,718 0.15 72,939 0.45 Richmond County 224,320 224,504 0.08 224,859 0.24 Augusta 52,780 52,921 0.27 53,227 0.85 Total ROI Operation 454,884 455,743 0.19 457,575 0.59 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-77.-Total Housing Units for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-77.-Total Housing Units for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1970-2020 Region of Influence 1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 2020 Aiken County 29,400 39,791 49,266 53,679 54,942 56,875 Aiken 4,759 6,173 8,543 9,308 9,529 9,862 North Augusta 4,342 5,470 6,810 7,420 7,596 7,862 Barnwell County 5,384 7,282 7,854 8,716 8,922 9,235 Columbia County 6,740 14,099 23,745 25,350 26,112 27,182 Richmond County 47,751 64,846 77,288 88,718 91,384 95,130 Augusta 21,159 20,825 21,588 24,781 25,525 26,572 Total ROI (County) 89,275 126,018 158,153 176,463 181,370 188,423 Source: Census 1972a; Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1982a; Census 1983a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-78.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-78.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Region of No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change Tritium Change Influence (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Recycle (percent) Phaseout Construction Aiken County 53,679 54,477 1.49 54,422 1.38 56,120 4.55 54,964 2.39 53,335 0.29 - - Aiken 9,308 9,704 4.25 9,676 3.95 10,517 12.99 9,945 6.84 9,286 0.71 - - North Augusta 7,420 7,637 2.88 7,622 2.68 8,077 8.8 7,505 4.64 7,386 0.5 - - Barnwell 8,716 8,828 1.29 8,820 1.20 9,059 3.94 8,897 2.07 8,658 0.27 NA NA County Columbia 25,350 25,513 0.64 25,502 0.60 25,848 1.97 25,613 1.04 25,096 0.18 - - County Richmond 88,718 88,987 0.30 88,968 0.28 89,541 0.93 89,151 0.49 87,776 0.12 - - County Augusta 24,781 25,004 0.90 24,988 0.84 25,463 2.75 25,140 1.45 24,537 0.20 - - Total ROI 176,463 177,806 0.76 177,712 0.71 180,568 2.33 178,625 1.23 174,864 0.19 - - Construction Operation Aiken County 54,952 55,228 0.50 55,223 0.49 55,199 0.45 55,137 0.34 55,137 0.34 54,852 -0.18 Aiken 9,529 9,666 1.44 9,663 1.41 9,651 1.28 9,621 0.97 9,621 0.97 9,477 -0.55 North Augusta 7,596 7,674 0.98 7,672 0.96 7,666 0.87 7,649 0.66 7,649 0.66 7,570 -0.38 Barnwell 8,922 8,961 0.44 8,961 0.43 8,957 0.39 8,949 0.30 8,949 0.30 8,909 -0.15 County Columbia 26,112 26,168 0.22 26,167 0.21 26,162 0.19 26,150 0.15 26,150 0.15 26,094 -0.07 County Richmond 91,384 91,477 0.10 91,475 0.10 91,467 0.09 91,447 0.07 91,447 0.07 91,350 -0.04 County Augusta 25,525 25,602 0.30 25,601 0.30 25,594 0.27 25,577 0.20 25,577 0.20 25,492 -0.13 Total ROI 181,370 181,835 0.26 181,825 0.25 181,785 0.23 181,682 0.17 181,682 0.17 181,204 -0.09 Operation Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-78a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-78a.-Changes in Housing Demands During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) and Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Region of Influence No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change (percent) (percent) Construction Aiken County 53,679 55,128 2.70 57,756 7.59 Aiken 9,308 9,949 6.89 11,327 21.69 North Augusta 7,429 7,777 4.68 8,521 14.70 Barnwell County 8,716 8,901 2.13 9,289 6.58 Columbia County 25,350 25,627 1.09 26,183 3.28 Richmond County 88,718 89,195 0.54 90,093 1.55 Augusta 24,781 25,150 1.49 25,920 4.60 Total ROI Construction 176,463 178,851 1.35 183,320 3.89 Operation Aiken County 54,952 55,142 0.35 55,560 1.11 Aiken 9,529 9,622 0.97 9,830 3.16 North Augusta 7,605 7,655 0.66 7,768 2.14 Barnwell County 8,922 8,949 0.30 9,008 0.96 Columbia County 26,112 26,152 0.15 26,236 0.48 Richmond County 91,384 91,454 0.08 91,589 0.22 Augusta 25,525 25,579 0.21 25,695 0.67 Total ROI Operation 181,370 181,696 0.18 182,393 0.56 Note: NA - not applicable. Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a; Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR Census 1991a; SR Census 1991b; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-79.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-79.-County and City Revenues and Expenditures for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1992 Revenues and Expenditures Aiken Aiken North Barnwell Columbia Richmond Augusta County Augusta County County County Property tax (percent) 59 43 50 25 74 74 58 State shared and intergovernmental (percent) 23 8 10 73 7 0 21 Permits, fees, fines, and investment interest (percent) 17 49 36 0 10 15 14 Other (percent) 1 1 4 3 9 11 7 Total Revenues (dollars) 26,055,374 11,504,145 5,679,679 7,390,553 25,758,888 87,230,497 33,282,930 General Government (percent) 22 8 10 37 12 28 23 Public safety, health, 26 31 26 38 36 35 31 and welfare (percent) Public works, fees, fines, and investment interest (perfect) 20 30 18 17 17 11 19 Debt service (percent) 16 3 4 0 1 3 5 Capital project (percent) 11 12 42 0 10 23 22 Other (percent) 5 16 0 8 24 0 0 Total Expenditures (dollars) 30,782,399 11,639,638 9,029,817 5,065,164 23,474,763 87,079,716 39,603,007 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 464,670 8,327,903 2,714,492 5,472,719 5,060,786 38,041,195 8,024,752 -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-80.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1992 D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-80.-School District Revenues and Expenditures for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 1992 - School District Revenues and Expenditures Aiken County Barnwell Barnwell Barnwell Columbia Richmond County County County #45 County County #19 #29 Local sources (percent) 39 19 21 25 33 33 Intermediate sources (percent) 0 0 4 1 0 0 State sources (percent) 55 64 67 58 64 58 Federal source (percent) 6 17 8 16 3 9 Total Revenues (dollars) 97,408,101 5,830,056 8,105,837 10,928,093 51,511,933 144,200,546 Total expenditures per pupil (dollars) 4,409 4,016 2,569 4,700 4,322 4,608 Total instructions (percent) 51 59 19 52 54 55 Support services (percent) 29 38 4 23 26 31 Food, community, and other services (percent) 1 1 67 20 4 5 Capital assets (percent) 7 0 8 0 12 7 Debt service (percent) 11 2 0 6 4 2 Total Expenditures (dollars) 107,031,526 5,187,885 8,105,837 12,075,596 57,292,094 149,113,505 End-of-Year Fund Balance (dollars) 14,249,675 710,596 789,567 72,937 21,629,630 18,290,485 -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-81.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-81.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 27,054,664 27,375,525 1.19 27,353,256 1.1 28,011,815 3.54 27,435,210 1.41 27,027,887 0.58 Aiken 12,212,286 12,445,274 1.91 12,430,629 1.79 12,768,647 4.56 12,561,177 2.86 12,271,201 1.26 North Augusta 6,026,503 6,144,024 1.95 6,136,724 1.83 6,299,204 4.53 6,206,637 2.99 6,060,150 1.33 Barnwell County 4,380,812 4,409,653 0.66 4,407,700 0.61 4,468,419 2 4,414,255 0.76 4,371,385 0.31 Columbia County 24,730,949 24,854,572 0.5 24,845,926 0.46 25,106,458 1.52 24,874,515 0.58 24,545,596 0.23 Richmond County 94,851,377 95,226,892 0.4 95,203,372 0.37 95,801,958 1 95,370,534 0.55 94,097,580 0.24 Augusta 36,080,288 36,194,320 0.32 36,187,167 0.3 36,369,793 0.8 36,237,562 0.44 35,856,337 0.19 Total ROI 205,336,878 206,650,259 0.64 206,564,774 0.6 208,826,293 1.7 207,099,891 0.86 204,230,136 0.37 Revenues Expenditures Aiken County 31,113,945 31,209,753 0.31 31,203,047 0.29 31,404,916 0.94 31,224,870 0.36 31,122,287 0.14 Aiken 12,146,828 12,248,029 0.83 12,240,945 0.77 12,454,175 2.53 12,263,997 0.96 12,122,004 0.38 North Augusta 7,640,305 7,706,586 0.87 7,701,947 0.81 7,841,600 2.63 7,717,044 1 7,603,258 0.4 Barnwell County 4,824,019 4,840,531 0.34 4,839,413 0.32 4,874,176 1.04 4,843,166 0.4 4,808,847 0.16 Columbia County 21,999,236 22,113,180 0.52 22,105,211 0.48 22,345,344 1.57 22,131,562 0.6 21,822,025 0.24 Richmond County 93,276,562 93,464,763 0.2 93,451,733 0.19 93,848,485 0.61 93,493,985 0.23 92,689,605 0.09 Augusta 40,061,036 40,144,914 0.21 40,139,107 0.19 40,315,933 0.64 40,157,938 0.24 39,757,409 0.1 Total ROI 211,061,931 211,727,756 0.32 211,681,402 0.29 213,084,629 0.96 211,832,561 0.37 209,925,436 0.14 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR City 1992a; SR County 1992a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-81a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-81a.-Changes in County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 27,054,664 27,461,672 1.5 27,962,386 3.36 Aiken 12,212,286 12,585,437 3.06 12,876,047 5.44 North Augusta 6,026,503 6,219,163 3.2 6,361,574 5.56 Barnwell County 4,380,812 4,416,581 0.82 4,462,552 1.87 Columbia County 24,730,949 24,884,498 0.62 25,080,479 1.41 Richmond County 94,851,377 95,406,635 0.59 95,921,444 1.13 Augusta 36,080,288 36,248,499 0.47 36,405,201 0.9 Total ROI Revenues 205,336,878 207,222,485 0.92 209,069,683 1.82 Expenditures Aiken County 31,113,945 31,232,583 0.38 31,384,815 0.87 Aiken 12,146,828 12,272,144 1.03 12,432,943 2.36 North Augusta 7,640,305 7,722,380 1.07 7,827,695 2.45 Barnwell County 4,824,019 4,844,497 0.42 4,870,817 0.97 Columbia County 21,999,236 22,140,763 0.64 22,321,399 1.46 Richmond County 93,276,562 93,509,104 0.25 93,809,083 0.57 Augusta 40,061,036 40,164,676 0.26 40,298,372 0.59 Total ROI Expenditures 211,061,931 211,886,148 0.39 212,945,123 0.89 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR City 1992a; SR County 1992a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-82.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-82.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change APT Change APT Change Tritium Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Full (percent) Phased (percent) Recycle (percent) ($) ($) Phaseout ($) Revenues Aiken County 27,519,712 27,630,704 0.4 27,628,660 0.4 27,618,790 0.36 27,594,198 0.27 27,594,198 0.27 27,481,977 -0.14 Aiken 12,456,386 12,536,766 0.65 12,537,271 0.65 12,528,139 0.58 12,510,332 0.43 12,510,332 0.43 12,428,209 -0.23 North 6,143,551 6,184,083 0.66 6,184,451 0.67 6,179,733 0.59 6,170,753 0.44 6,170,753 0.44 6,129,293 -0.23 Augusta Barnwell 4,431,083 4,441,070 0.23 4,440,875 0.22 4,439,996 0.2 4,437,848 0.15 4,437,848 0.15 4,427,696 -0.08 County Columbia 25,338,535 25,381,104 0.17 25,380,239 0.16 25,376,781 0.15 25,367,270 0.11 25,367,270 0.11 25,324,041 -0.06 County Richmond 97,287,668 97,413,903 0.13 97,412,306 0.13 97,400,458 0.12 97,372,586 0.09 97,372,586 0.09 97,242,990 -0.05 County Augusta 36,824,758 36,863,108 0.1 36,862,619 0.1 36,859,024 0.09 36,850,557 0.07 36,850,557 0.07 36,811,193 -0.04 Total ROI 210,001,693 210,450,738 0.21 210,446,421 0.21 210,402,921 0.19 210,303,545 0.14 210,303,545 0.14 209,845,399 -0.07 Revenues Expenditures Aiken County 31,271,127 31,304,277 0.11 31,303,593 0.1 31,300,719 0.09 31,293,374 0.07 31,293,374 0.07 31,259,889 -0.04 Aiken 12,295,264 12,330,279 0.28 12,329,557 0.28 12,326,521 0.25 12,318,763 0.19 12,318,763 0.19 12,283,393 -0.1 North Augusta 7,733,322 7,756,255 0.30 7,755,782 0.29 7,753,793 0.26 7,748,712 0.2 7,748,712 0.2 7,725,547 -0.1 Barnwell 4,849,991 4,855,709 0.12 4,855,597 0.12 4,855,094 0.11 4,853,864 0.08 4,853,864 0.08 4,848,052 -0.04 County Columbia 22,551,729 22,590,965 0.17 22,590,168 0.17 22,586,981 0.16 22,578,215 0.12 22,578,215 0.12 22,538,370 -0.06 County Richmond 95,025,304 95,090,422 0.07 95,089,092 0.07 95,083,508 0.06 95,069,148 0.05 95,069,148 0.05 95,003,200 -0.02 County Augusta 40,834,768 40,863,790 0.07 40,863,197 0.07 40,860,708 0.06 40,854,308 0.05 40,854,308 0.05 40,824,916 -0.02 Total ROI 214,561,504 214,791,696 0.11 214,786,985 0.11 214,767,323 0.1 214,716,384 0.07 214,716,384 0.07 214,483,366 -0.04 Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR City 1992a; SR County 1992a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-82a.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-82a.-Changes to County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 27,519,712 27,626,129 0.39 27,873,794 1.29 Aiken 12,456,386 12,533,413 0.62 12,719,261 2.11 North Augusta 6,143,551 6,182,389 0.63 6,276,476 2.16 Barnwell County 4,431,083 4,440,666 0.22 4,462,906 0.72 Columbia County 25,338,535 25,379,292 0.16 25,474,074 0.53 Richmond County 97,287,668 97,408,798 0.12 97,692,743 0.42 Augusta 36,824,758 36,861,557 0.1 36,947,805 0.33 Total ROI Revenues 210,001,693 210,432,244 0.21 211,447,059 0.69 Expenditures Aiken County 31,271,127 31,302,912 0.1 31,376,640 0.34 Aiken 12,295,264 12,328,838 0.27 12,406,715 0.91 North Augusta 7,733,322 7,755,311 0.28 7,806,316 0.94 Barnwell County 4,849,991 4,855,477 0.11 4,868,210 0.38 Columbia County 22,551,729 22,589,295 0.17 22,676,656 0.55 Richmond County 95,025,304 95,087,811 0.07 95,232,616 0.22 Augusta 40,834,768 40,862,626 0.07 40,927,163 0.23 Total ROI Expenditures 214,561,504 214,782,271 0.1 215,294,317 0.34 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR City 1992a; SR County 1992a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-83.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-83.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 104,818,039 106,488,579 1.59 106,371,648 1.48 109,891,491 4.84 106,752,163 1.85 104,595,705 0.73 Barnwell 5,534,346 5,587,394 0.96 5,583,803 0.89 5,695,485 2.91 5,595,860 1.11 5,518,295 0.45 County #19 Barnwell 4,481,168 4,506,901 0.57 4,505,159 0.54 4,559,337 1.74 4,511,008 0.67 4,472,403 0.27 County #29 Barnwell 11,931,968 12,087,450 1.3 12,076,924 1.21 12,404,264 3.96 12,112,263 1.51 11,895,436 0.63 County #45 Columbia 54,178,029 54,401,160 0.41 54,385,555 0.38 54,855,799 1.25 54,437,156 0.48 53,842,465 0.19 County Richmond 156,300,012 156,651,709 0.23 156,627,359 0.21 157,368,781 0.68 156,706,317 0.26 155,193,871 0.11 County Total 337,243,562 339,723,193 0.74 339,550,449 0.68 344,775,157 2.23 340,114,767 0.85 335,518,176 0.34 School District Revenues Expenditures Aiken County 110,683,758 112,163,651 1.34 112,060,065 1.24 115,178,215 4.06 112,397,154 1.55 110,479,007 0.61 Barnwell 5,634,645 5,706,512 1.28 5,701,647 1.19 5,852,950 3.87 5,717,981 1.48 5,616,665 0.59 County #19 Barnwell 4,524,924 4,582,917 1.28 4,578,992 1.19 4,701,088 3.89 4,592,173 1.49 4,510,182 0.6 County #29 Barnwell 12,819,287 12,948,398 1.01 12,939,658 0.94 13,211,479 3.06 12,969,003 1.17 12,789,777 0.48 County #45 Columbia 60,449,018 60,758,215 0.51 60,736,590 0.48 61,388,213 1.55 60,808,095 0.59 59,970,644 0.24 County Richmond 156,897,416 157,064,087 0.11 157,052,548 0.1 157,403,911 0.32 157,089,967 0.12 156,352,305 0.05 County Total 351,009,048 353,223,781 0.63 353,069,499 0.59 357,735,857 1.92 353,574,373 0.73 349,718,579 0.29 School District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a; SR School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-83a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-83a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action During Peak Construction (2005 (2003 for Phased APT)) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 104,818,039 106,886,655 1.97 109,541,010 4.51 Barnwell County #19 5,534,346 5,600,137 1.19 5,684,694 2.72 Barnwell County #29 4,481,168 4,513,083 0.71 4,554,102 1.63 Barnwell County #45 11,931,968 12,124,800 1.62 12,372,634 3.69 Columbia County 54,178,029 54,455,175 0.51 54,808,908 1.16 Richmond County 156,300,012 156,734,570 0.28 157,295,148 0.64 Total School District Revenues 337,243,562 340,314,421 0.91 344,256,497 2.08 Expenditures Aiken County 110,683,758 112,516,298 1.66 114,867,732 3.78 Barnwell County #19 5,634,645 5,723,776 1.58 5,838,330 3.61 Barnwell County #29 4,524,924 4,596,849 1.59 4,689,290 3.63 Barnwell County #45 12,819,287 12,979,414 1.25 13,185,214 2.85 Columbia County 60,449,018 60,833,064 0.64 61,323,237 1.45 Richmond County 156,897,416 157,103,356 0.13 157,369,017 0.3 Total School District Expenditures 351,009,048 353,752,756 0.78 357,272,820 1.78 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a; SR School 1992a. -TSAR_DOE_SECTION- Table D.3-84.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) (Table title too long-See text) D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-84.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action HWR Change MHTGR Change ALWR Change Full APT Change Phased APT Change Tritium Change ($) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) ($) (percent) Recycle (percent) Phaseout ($) Revenues Aiken County 107,304,188 107,882,198 0.54 107,870,266 0.53 107,820,153 0.48 107,692,086 0.36 107,692,086 0.36 107,108,230 -0.18 Barnwell 5,627,386 5,645,755 0.33 5,645,396 0.32 5,643,780 0.29 5,639,830 0.22 5,639,830 0.22 5,621,156 -0.11 County #19 Barnwell 4,526,886 4,535,797 0.2 4,535,622 0.19 4,534,839 0.18 4,532,922 0.13 4,532,922 0.13 4,523,864 -0.07 County #29 Barnwell 12,213,030 12,266,871 0.44 12,265,818 0.43 12,261,082 0.39 12,249,504 0.3 12,249,504 0.3 12,194,772 -0.15 County #45 Columbia County 55,269,463 55,346,297 0.14 55,344,736 0.14 55,338,494 0.12 55,321,328 0.09 55,321,328 0.09 55,243,301 -0.05 Richmond County 159,553,179 159,674,867 0.08 159,672,382 0.07 159,661,947 0.07 159,635,112 0.05 159,635,112 0.05 159,511,873 -0.03 Total School 344,494,131 345,351,784 0.25 345,334,221 0.24 345,260,294 0.22 345,070,783 0.17 345,070,783 0.17 344,203,196 -0.08 District Revenues Expenditures Aiken County 112,875,249 113,387,295 0.45 113,376,725 0.44 113,332,331 0.4 113,218,880 0.3 113,218,880 0.3 112,701,654 -0.15 Barnwell 5,764,535 5,789,421 0.43 5,788,935 0.42 5,786,746 0.39 5,781,394 0.29 5,781,394 0.29 5,756,096 -0.15 County #19 Barnwell 4,629,708 4,649,790 0.43 4,649,398 0.43 4,647,631 0.39 4,643,313 0.29 4,643,313 0.29 4,622,898 -0.15 County #29 Barnwell 13,053,960 13,098,669 0.34 13,097,794 0.34 13,093,861 0.31 13,084,247 0.23 13,084,247 0.23 13,038,798 -0.12 County #45 Columbia County 61,956,151 62,062,621 0.17 62,060,458 0.17 62,051,808 0.15 62,028,021 0.12 62,028,021 0.12 61,919,898 -0.06 Richmond County 158,434,499 158,492,168 0.04 158,490,990 0.04 158,486,045 0.03 158,473,328 0.02 158,473,328 0.02 158,414,924 -0.01 Total School 356,714,103 357,479,964 0.21 357,464,301 0.21 357,398,423 0.19 357,229,183 0.14 357,229,183 0.14 356,454,268 -0.07 District Expenditures Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a; SR School 1992a. D.3 Supporting Data Table D.3-84a.-Changes in School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Over/Under No Action at Full Operation (2010) from Accelerator Production of Tritium Power Plant and Multipurpose Reactor Upgrade and Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence Jurisdiction No Action APT with Gas Plant Change Triple Play MHTGR Change ($) (percent) (percent) Revenues Aiken County 107,304,188 107,858,404 0.24 109,143,941 1.71 Barnwell County #19 5,627,386 5,645,012 0.29 5,685,919 0.29 Barnwell County #29 4,526,886 4,535,436 0.09 4,555,280 0.63 Barnwell County #45 12,213,030 12,264,693 0.20 12,384,591 1.4 Columbia County 55,269,463 55,343,025 0.06 55,514,102 0.44 Richmond County 159,553,179 159,669,989 0.03 159,940,589 0.24 Total School District Revenues 344,494,131 345,316,560 0.11 347,224,423 0.79 Expenditures Aiken County 112,875,249 113,366,217 0.21 114,505,046 1.44 Barnwell County #19 5,764,535 5,788,415 0.2 5,843,834 1.38 Barnwell County #29 4,629,708 4,648,978 0.2 4,693,699 1.38 Barnwell County #45 13,053,960 13,096,860 0.16 13,196,423 1.09 Columbia County 61,956,151 62,058,088 0.08 62,295,150 0.55 Richmond County 158,434,499 158,489,856 0.02 158,618,095 0.12 Total School District Expenditures 356,714,103 357,448,414 0.1 359,152,247 0.68 Source: Census 1973a; Census 1977a, Census 1983a; DOE 1995d; DOE 1995e; DOE 1995f; SNL 1995a; SR ESC 1991a; SR DOE 1995a; SR School 1992a.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
