List of Figures
Figure S-1 Current and Former Nuclear Weapons Complex Sites. S-2
Figure S-2 Tritium Supply and Recycling Alternatives. S-4
Figure 1.4-1 Current and Former Nuclear Weapons Complex Sites. 1-4
Figure 1.4.1-1 Nuclear Weapons Stockpile Memorandum Process. 1-5
Figure 1.4.2-1 Evolution of the Reconfiguration Program, 1991-1995. 1-6
Figure 1.7.2-1 Public Hearing Locations and Dates, 1995. 1-12
Figure 2.1-1 Estimated Tritium Inventory and Reserve Requirements. 2-2
Figure 3.2-1 Tritium Supply and Recycling Alternatives. 3-9
Figure 3.3.1-1 Site Selection Process. 3-12
Figure 3.4.1-1 Tritium Supply and Recycling Complex. 3-28
Figure 3.4.2.1-1 Heavy Water Reactor Facility (Typical). 3-32
Figure 3.4.2.2-1 Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Facility (Typical). 3-35
Figure 3.4.2.3-1 Advanced Light Water Reactor Facility (Typical). 3-38
Figure 3.4.2.4-1 Accelerator Production of Tritium Facility Site Layout (Typical). 3-42
Figure 3.4.3.1-1 New Tritium Recycling Facility (Typical). 3-47
Figure 3.4.3.2-1 Tritium Recycling Facilities Upgrades at Savannah River Site (Generalized). 3-50
Figure 4.2-1 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho, and Region. 4-18
Figure 4.2.1-1 Primary Facilities and Proposed Tritium Supply Site at Idaho National
Engineering Laboratory. 4-19
Figure 4.2.2.1-1 Generalized Land Use at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and Vicinity. 4-20
Figure 4.2.2.4-1 Surface Water Features at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. 4-25
Figure 4.2.2.4-2 Generalized Groundwater Flow and Groundwater Contamination in Idaho
National Engineering Laboratory Area. 4-27
Figure 4.2.2.5-1 Major Fault Systems and Historic Earthquakes in Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory Region. 4-30
Figure 4.2.2.5-2 Seismic Zone Map of the United States. 4-31
Figure 4.2.2.6-1 Distribution of Plant Communities at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. 4-34
Figure 4.2.2.8-1 Economy for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area. 4-38
Figure 4.2.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of
Influence [Page 1 of 2]. 4-39
Figure 4.2.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of
Influence [Page 2 of 2]. 4-40
Figure 4.2.2.8-3 1992 Local Government Public Finance for Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory Region of Influence. 4-41
Figure 4.2.3.8-1 Total Project-Related Employment (Direct and Indirect) and Percentage Increase
Over No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho
National Engineering Laboratory Regional Economic Area. 4-73
Figure 4.2.3.8-2 Unemployment Rate, Per Capita Income, and Percentage Increase from Tritium
Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
Regional Economic Area. 4-74
Figure 4.2.3.8-3 Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action During Peak
Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho
National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 2005. 4-78
Figure 4.2.3.8-4 Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action at Full Operation
from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory Region of Influence, 2010. 4-79
Figure 4.2.3.8-5 City and County Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 2005. 4-82
Figure 4.2.3.8-6 County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 2010. 4-83
Figure 4.2.3.8-7 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 2005. 4-84
Figure 4.2.3.8-8 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling
for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Region of Influence, 2010. 4-85
Figure 4.2.3.9-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for Tritium Supply and Recycling Severe Accidents for
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. 4-93
Figure 4.3-1 Nevada Test Site, Nevada, and Region. 4-108
Figure 4.3.1-1 Primary Facilities, Proposed Tritium Supply Site, and Testing Areas at Nevada
Test Site. 4-109
Figure 4.3.2.1-1 Generalized Land Use at Nevada Test Site and Vicinity. 4-110
Figure 4.3.2.4-1 Groundwater Hydrologic Units at Nevada Test Site and Vicinity. 4-115
Figure 4.3.2.5-1 Major Fault Systems and Historic Earthquakes in Nevada Test Site Region. 4-118
Figure 4.3.2.6-1 Distribution of Plant Communities at Nevada Test Site. 4-120
Figure 4.3.2.6-2 Distribution of Desert Tortoise at Nevada Test Site. 4-122
Figure 4.3.2.8-1 Economy for Nevada Test Site Regional Economic Area. 4-125
Figure 4.3.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence. 4-126
Figure 4.3.2.8-3 1992 Local Government Public Finance for Nevada Test Site Region of
Influence. 4-129
Figure 4.3.3.8-1 Total Project-Related Employment (Direct and Indirect) and Percentage Increase
over No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada
Test Site Regional Economic Area. 4-157
Figure 4.3.3.8-2 Unemployment Rate, Per Capita Income, and Percentage Increase over No Action
from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Regional
Economic Area. 4-158
Figure 4.3.3.8-3 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase over No Action During Peak
Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test
Site Region of Influence, 2005. 4-162
Figure 4.3.3.8-4 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase over No Action at Full
Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site
Region of Influence, 2010. 4-163
Figure 4.3.3.8-5 County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage
Increase over No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply
Technologies and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 2005. 4-166
Figure 4.3.3.8-6 County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage
Increase over No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies
and Recycling for Nevada Test Site Region of Influence, 2010. 4-167
Figure 4.3.3.9-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for Tritium Supply and Recycling Severe Accidents at
Nevada Test Site. 4-175
Figure 4.4-1 Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee, and Region. 4-189
Figure 4.4.1-1 Primary Facilities and Proposed Tritium Supply Site at Oak Ridge Reservation. 4-190
Figure 4.4.2.1-1 Generalized Land Use at Oak Ridge Reservation and Vicinity. 4-191
Figure 4.4.2.1-2 Future Land Use at Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 4-193
Figure 4.4.2.4-1 Surface Water Features at Oak Ridge Reservation. 4-197
Figure 4.4.2.6-1 Distribution of Plant Communities at Oak Ridge Reservation. 4-202
Figure 4.4.2.8-1 Economy for Oak Ridge Reservation Regional Economic Area. 4-207
Figure 4.4.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence. 4-208
Figure 4.4.2.8-3 1992 Local Government Public Finance for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of
Influence. 4-210
Figure 4.4.3.8-1 Total Project-Related Employment (Direct and Indirect) and Percentage Increase
Over No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge
Reservation Regional Economic Area. 4-250
Figure 4.4.3.8-2 Unemployment Rate, Per Capita Income, and Percentage Increase Over
No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge
Reservation Regional Economic Area. 4-251
Figure 4.4.3.8-3 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action During Peak
Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge
Reservation Region of Influence, 2005. 4-255
Figure 4.4.3.8-4 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action at Full
Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge
Reservation Region of Influence, 2010. 4-256
Figure 4.4.3.8-5 County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage
Increase Over No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply
Technologies and Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 2005. 4-259
Figure 4.4.3.8-6 County, City, and School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage
Increase Over No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling for Oak Ridge Reservation Region of Influence, 2010. 4-260
Figure 4.4.3.9-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for Tritium Supply and Recycling Severe Accidents at Oak
Ridge Reservation. 4-268
Figure 4.5-1 Pantex Plant, Texas, and Region. 4-283
Figure 4.5.1-1 Primary Facilities, Proposed Tritium Supply Sites, and Testing Areas at Pantex
Plant. 4-284
Figure 4.5.2.1-1 Generalized Land Use at Pantex Plant and Vicinity. 4-285
Figure 4.5.2.1-2 Future Land Use at Pantex Plant. 4-286
Figure 4.5.2.1-3 Designated Industrial Sites at Pantex Plant. 4-287
Figure 4.5.2.4-1 Potentiometric Surface of the Ogallala Aquifer at Pantex Plant. 4-295
Figure 4.5.2.8-1 Economy for Pantex Plant Regional Economic Area. 4-302
Figure 4.5.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Pantex Plant Region of Influence. 4-303
Figure 4.5.2.8-3 1992 Local Government Public Finance for Pantex Plant Region of Influence. 4-305
Figure 4.5.3.8-1 Total Project-Related Employment (Direct and Indirect) and Percentage Increase
Over No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex
Plant Regional Economic Area. 4-339
Figure 4.5.3.8-2 Unemployment Rate, Per Capita Income, and Percentage Increase Over
No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant
Regional Economic Area. 4-340
Figure 4.5.3.8-3 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase over No Action During Peak
Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant
Region of Influence, 2005. 4-344
Figure 4.5.3.8-4 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase over No Action at Full
Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for Pantex Plant
Region of Influence, 2010. 4-345
Figure 4.5.3.8-5 County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase over
No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling for Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 2005. 4-348
Figure 4.5.3.8-6 County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase over
No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling for
Pantex Plant Region of Influence, 2010. 4-349
Figure 4.5.3.8-7 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase over
No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling for Pantex Plant, 2005. 4-350
Figure 4.5.3.8-8 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase over
No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling at
Pantex Plant, 2010. 4-351
Figure 4.5.3.9-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for Tritium Supply and Recycling Severe Accidents at
Pantex Plant. 4-359
Figure 4.6-1 Savannah River Site, South Carolina, and Region. 4-373
Figure 4.6.1-1 Primary Facilities and Proposed Tritium Supply Site at Savannah River Site. 4-374
Figure 4.6.2.1-1 Generalized Land Use at Savannah River Site and Vicinity. 4-375
Figure 4.6.2.4-1 Surface Water Features and Groundwater Contamination Areas at Savannah
River Site. 4-379
Figure 4.6.2.6-1 Distribution of Plant Communities at Savannah River Site. 4-384
Figure 4.6.2.8-1 Economy for Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area. 4-389
Figure 4.6.2.8-2 Population and Housing for Savannah River Site Region of Influence. 4-391
Figure 4.6.2.8-3 1992 Local Government Public Finance for Savannah River Site Region of
Influence. 4-393
Figure 4.6.3.8-1 Total Project-Related Employment (Direct and Indirect) and Percentage Increase
Over No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies with Recycling Upgrade for
Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area. 4-432
Figure 4.6.3.8-2 Unemployment Rate, Per Capita Income, and Percentage Increase Over
No Action from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for
Savannah River Site Regional Economic Area. 4-433
Figure 4.6.3.8-3 Total Employment, Unemployment Rate, and Per Capita Income for No Action
and Tritium Recycling Phaseout for Savannah River Site Regional Economic
Area, 2010. 4-435
Figure 4.6.3.8-4 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action During Peak
Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for
Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2005. 4-437
Figure 4.6.3.8-5 Total Population and Housing Percentage Increase Over No Action at Full
Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for
Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2010. 4-438
Figure 4.6.3.8-6 Total Population and Housing Percentage Decrease Under No Action from
Tritium Recycling Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2010. 4-440
Figure 4.6.3.8-7 County and City Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Decrease from
No Action for the Tritium Recycling Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region
of Influence, 2010. 4-441
Figure 4.6.3.8-8 County and City Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over No Action
During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling
Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2005. 4-442
Figure 4.6.3.8-9 County and City Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over No Action
at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling Upgrade for
Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2010. 4-443
Figure 4.6.3.8-10 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action During Peak Construction from Tritium Supply Technologies and
Recycling Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2005. 4-444
Figure 4.6.3.8-11 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Increase Over
No Action at Full Operation from Tritium Supply Technologies and Recycling
Upgrade for Savannah River Site Region of Influence, 2010. 4-445
Figure 4.6.3.8-12 School District Total Revenues and Expenditures Percentage Decrease Under
No Action from the Tritium Recycling Phaseout for Savannah River Site Region
of Influence, 2010. 4-446
Figure 4.6.3.9-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for Tritium Supply and Recycling Severe Accidents at
Savannah River Site. 4-454
Figure 4.8.3.1-1 Pit Disassembly/Conversion/Mixed-Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility Plot Plan. 4-483
Figure 4.8.3.1-2 Manufacturing Building Layout Plan. 4-484
Figure 4.10-1 Commercial Nuclear Power Plants Within Eleven Energy-Demand Regions of the
United States. 4-503
Figure 4.10-2 Commercial Nuclear Power Plants with Design Electrical Rating Greater than
1,100 Megawatts Electric Within Eleven Energy-Demand Regions of the United
States. 4-504
Figure 4.16-1 Minority Population Distribution for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and
Surrounding Area. 4-534
Figure 4.16-2 Low-Income Distribution by Poverty Status for Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory and Surrounding Area. 4-535
Figure 4.16-3 Minority Population Distribution for Nevada Test Site and Surrounding Area. 4-536
Figure 4.16-4 Low-Income Distribution by Poverty Status for Nevada Test Site and Surrounding
Area. 4-537
Figure 4.16-5 Minority Population Distribution for Oak Ridge Reservation and Surrounding
Area. 4-538
Figure 4.16-6 Low-Income Distribution by Poverty Status for Oak Ridge Reservation and
Surrounding Area. 4-539
Figure 4.16-7 Minority Population Distribution for Pantex Plant and Surrounding Area. 4-540
Figure 4.16-8 Low-Income Distribution by Poverty Status for Pantex Plant and Surrounding
Area. 4-541
Figure 4.16-9 Minority Population Distribution for Savannah River Site and Surrounding Area. 4-542
Figure 4.16-10 Low-Income Distribution by Poverty Status for Savannah River Site and
Surrounding Area. 4-543
Figure A.2.1.1-1 Heavy Water Reactor Tritium Production Process. A-35
Figure A.2.1.1-2 Heavy Water Reactor Facility (Typical). A-36
Figure A.2.1.1-3 Heavy Water Reactor Waste Management System (Dry Site). A-37
Figure A.2.1.1-4 Heavy Water Reactor Waste Management System (Wet Site). A-38
Figure A.2.1.2-1 Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Tritium Production Process. A-45
Figure A.2.1.2-2 Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Facility (Typical). A-46
Figure A.2.1.2-3 Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Waste Management System
(Dry Site). A-47
Figure A.2.1.2-4 Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Waste Management System
(Wet Site). A-48
Figure A.2.1.3-1 Advanced Light Water Reactor Tritium Production Process. A-55
Figure A.2.1.3-2 Advanced Light Water Reactor Facility (Typical). A-56
Figure A.2.1.3-3 Advanced Light Water Reactor Waste Management System (Dry Site). A-57
Figure A.2.1.3-4 Advanced Light Water Reactor Waste Management System (Wet Site). A-58
Figure A.2.1.4-1 Accelerator Production of Tritium Facility Functional Layout. A-67
Figure A.2.1.4-2 Accelerator Production of Tritium Facility Site Layout (Typical). A-68
Figure A.2.1.4-3 Accelerator Production of Tritium/Helium-3 Target System. A-69
Figure A.2.1.4-4 Accelerator Production of Tritium/Spallation-Induced Lithium Conversion
Target System (Exploded). A-70
Figure A.2.1.4-5 Flow Diagram for Accelerator Production of Tritium/Helium-3 Target. A-71
Figure A.2.1.4-6 Flow Diagram for Accelerator Production of Tritium/Spallation-Induced
Lithium Conversion Target. A-72
Figure A.2.2.1-1 New Tritium Recycling Facility (Typical). A-81
Figure A.2.2.1-2 New Tritium Recycling Facility Processes. A-82
Figure A.2.2.1-3 New Tritium Recycling Waste Management System Process (Dry Site). A-83
Figure A.2.2.1-4 New Tritium Recycling Waste Management System Process (Wet Site). A-84
Figure A.2.2.2-1 Tritium Recycling Facilities Upgrades at Savannah River Site
(Generalized). A-91
Figure A.2.2.2-2 Upgraded Tritium Recycling Facilities Processes. A-92
Figure A.2.2.2-3 Upgraded Tritium Recycling Facilities Waste Management System. A-93
Figure B.1.3.2-1 Wind Distribution at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1986
(33-foot level). B-5
Figure B.1.3.2-2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network at Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory. B-6
Figure B.1.3.3-1 Wind Distribution at Nevada Test Site, 1990 (33-foot level). B-10
Figure B.1.3.4-1 Wind Distribution at Oak Ridge Reservation, 1990 (98-foot level). B-13
Figure B.1.3.4-2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network at Oak Ridge Reservation,
Y-12 Plant. B-14
Figure B.1.3.5-1 Wind Distribution at Pantex Plant, 1989 (33-foot level). B-18
Figure B.1.3.6-1 Wind Distribution at Savannah River Site, 1985 (200-foot level). B-22
Figure B.1.3.6-2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Meteorological Stations at Savannah
River Site. B-23
Figure E.2.4-1 Location of Maximum Receptors at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. E-25
Figure E.2.5-1 Location of Maximum Receptors at Nevada Test Site. E-33
Figure E.2.6-1 Location of Maximum Receptors at Oak Ridge Reservation. E-43
Figure E.2.7-1 Location of Maximum Receptors at Pantex Plant. E-56
Figure E.2.8-1 Location of Maximum Receptors at Savannah River Site. E-63
Figure F.2.1.1-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Heavy Water Reactor. F-5
Figure F.2.1.2-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor F-17
Figure F.2.1.3.1-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor. F-27
Figure F.2.1.3.2-1 AP600 Advanced Light Water Reactor High Consequence Accident-Cancer
Fatalities Complementary Cumulative Distribution Functions. F-33
Figure F.2.1.3.2-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the CE System 80+ Reactor. F-33
Figure F.2.1.3.3-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the AP600 Reactor. F-41
Figure F.2.1.3.4-1 Simplified Boiling Water Reactor Cancer Fatalities Complementary
Cumulative Distribution Functions for High Consequence Accidents. F-49
Figure F.2.1.4.2-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Full Size Accelerator Production of Tritium with Helium-3 Target. F-58
Figure F.2.1.4.3-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Full APT with Spallation-Induced Lithium Conversion Target System. F-67
Figure F.2.1.5.2-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for the Multipurpose Reactor Fuel Fabrication Facility. F-76
Figure F.2.1.5.3-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distributions Functions
for the Disassembly and Conversion Facility. F-85
Figure F.2.1.6-1 High Consequence Accident-Cancer Fatality Frequency Distribution Functions
for Tritium Extraction. F-93
Figure F.2.3-1 Tritium Recycling Facility Cancer Fatalities Complementary Cumulative
Distribution Functions for High Consequence Accident. F-145
Figure F.3.1-1 Design-Basis Accident for Typical Reactor at Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory (ground surface exposure-113 mrem per year). F-150
Figure F.3.2-1 Design-Basis Accident for Typical Reactor at Nevada Test Site
(ground surface exposure-78 mrem per year). F-151
Figure F.3.3-1 Design-Basis Accident for Typical Reactor at Oak Ridge Reservation
(ground surface exposure-67 mrem per year). F-152
Figure F.3.4-1 Design-Basis Accident for Typical Reactor at Pantex Plant, Texas
(ground surface exposure-107 mrem per year). F-153
Figure F.3.5-1 Design-Basis Accident for Typical Reactor at Savannah River Site
(ground surface exposure-76 mrem per year). F-154
Figure H.2.1-1 Spent Nuclear Fuel Management at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. H-14
Figure H.2.1-2 High-Level Waste Management at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. H-15
Figure H.2.1-3 Transuranic Waste Management at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. H-16
Figure H.2.1-4 Low-Level Waste Management at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. H-17
Figure H.2.1-5 Mixed Waste Management at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. H-18
Figure H.2.5-1 High-Level Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-78
Figure H.2.5-2 Transuranic Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-79
Figure H.2.5-3 F- and H-Areas Effluent Treatment Facility Waste Management Plan at
Savannah River Site. H-80
Figure H.2.5-4 Saltstone (Low-Level Waste) Disposal Plan at Savannah River Site. H-81
Figure H.2.5-5 Low-Level Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-82
Figure H.2.5-6 Mixed Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-83
Figure H.2.5-7 Hazardous Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-84
Figure H.2.5-8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Plan at Savannah River Site. H-85
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
