Mi-8 Helicopters / Counter-Drone Operations
Ukraine has extensively modified its fleet of Mi-8 Hip helicopters to serve as mobile anti-drone platforms, adapting these Soviet-era workhorses to carry NATO-standard weapons systems. The modifications allow the Mi-8 to deploy advanced 70-millimeter anti-drone rockets developed by the Belgian defense manufacturer Thales. These helicopters have been retrofitted with NATO-compatible launchers, creating a flexible and responsive aerial interception capability that can rapidly deploy to threatened areas. The conversion represents a significant technical achievement, bridging Soviet-designed airframes with Western weapon systems through careful integration engineering.
The Mi-8 helicopter fleet provides several distinct advantages for counter-drone operations compared to fixed-wing aircraft. Helicopters can hover, conduct vertical approaches, and maintain station over specific areas without requiring continuous forward motion. This capability allows them to loiter near high-value targets or along known drone ingress routes, providing persistent coverage without the fuel consumption required for fixed-wing patrol patterns. The ability to operate from dispersed locations, including small clearings and improvised forward operating bases, enhances survivability and reduces vulnerability to enemy targeting of established airfields.
The Thales FZ123 Weapon System
The primary weapon system employed by these modified Mi-8 helicopters is the Thales FZ123 laser-guided rocket with a specialized airburst warhead designed specifically for counter-drone operations. The FZ123 warhead contains approximately two pounds of high explosive material packed with thousands of tiny steel pellets densely arranged around the periphery of the warhead casing for maximum dispersion. Upon detonation near the target, triggered by a proximity fuse, the explosive disperses these pellets radially outward, creating a lethal fragmentation cloud approximately 80 feet, or 24 meters, in diameter. This shotgun-like effect dramatically increases the probability of successfully engaging small, maneuverable targets compared to rockets with conventional unitary warheads.
The weapon system can effectively engage NATO Class II drones, which include medium-sized tactical systems like the Shahed, as well as larger Class III platforms such as medium-altitude long-endurance and high-altitude long-endurance reconnaissance drones. According to Thales, the rocket can bring down these classes of drones at ranges up to 10,000 feet when properly cued and designated. The airburst warhead design increases lethality and also allows the system to potentially engage multiple drones in one shot if they are flying in a swarm or grouped close enough together, though this capability remains theoretical rather than extensively documented in actual combat.
The laser-guided variant requires continuous illumination of the target until the rocket reaches terminal approach, at which point the proximity fuse triggers warhead detonation. This guidance method presents some operational challenges, particularly when engaging targets in poor weather conditions or at night when laser designation becomes more difficult. Dust, humidity, and precipitation can degrade laser performance, complicating the targeting process. Russian forces have begun flying Shahed drones at higher altitudes and increasingly favor nighttime operations during poor weather specifically to complicate laser designation and visual acquisition, directly targeting the known vulnerabilities of optically-guided weapons systems.
If the laser designation beam is interrupted during flight, the rocket continues toward the last known target position for approximately five seconds before transitioning to a ballistic trajectory. This provides some margin for temporary loss of designation but emphasizes the importance of maintaining steady laser illumination throughout the engagement. The exact method Ukrainian forces use to provide laser designation from Mi-8 helicopters remains unclear from available sources, though some kind of turret-mounted designator represents a likely solution. Ukrainian forces may also employ buddy-lasing techniques, where one Mi-8 maintains laser designation while another conducts the actual attack, similar to tactics used with the American-made APKWS II rocket system in air-to-air applications, though this has not been explicitly confirmed in available reporting.
Integration and Compatibility
Beyond the Belgian Thales systems, Ukrainian Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters have also been equipped with American M261 Lightweight Launchers manufactured by Arnold Defense. These NATO-standard launchers provide compatibility with various types of 70-millimeter rockets, including the American Hydra 70 family of unguided rockets that have been extensively documented on Ukrainian rotorcraft through photographs and video evidence. The flexibility to employ different rocket types depending on the tactical situation enhances the versatility of the helicopter fleet, allowing crews to select appropriate munitions based on target characteristics, weather conditions, and engagement geometry.
The integration of Western weapons systems onto Soviet-designed helicopters required substantial engineering effort to ensure reliable interface between NATO-standard munitions and Soviet-era avionics and electrical systems. Ensuring adequate electrical power, compatible data bus protocols, proper physical mounting interfaces, and integrated fire control systems all demanded careful attention. While Ukraine has demonstrated impressive capability in adapting these diverse systems, each new platform or weapon type requires additional integration work that consumes scarce engineering resources and time. The successful fielding of these hybrid systems speaks to Ukrainian technical ingenuity and the support provided by international partners in facilitating such adaptations.
Production Scale and Supply
The scale of rocket production reflects the intensity of Ukraine's counter-drone requirements and the manufacturing capacity being developed to meet this demand. Thales Belgium plans to produce approximately 3,500 FZ123-equipped rockets by the end of 2025, with an ambitious target of reaching an annual production capacity of 10,000 units by 2026. This represents a dramatic increase from the 700 rockets manufactured in 2024, demonstrating how rapidly European defense manufacturers are scaling up production in response to the evolving threat environment.
The company's broader manufacturing capacity for 70-millimeter rockets extends well beyond the specialized anti-drone variants. Thales Belgium currently produces approximately 30,000 unguided 70-millimeter rockets annually, with the potential to double this output to 60,000 units if the Herstal factory operates double shifts and suppliers can maintain the necessary pace. Not all of these rockets carry the FZ123 anti-drone warhead, as Thales also manufactures air-to-ground and ground-to-ground variants for various customers and applications.
Ukrainian officials have indicated that demand for these weapons already exceeds current production capacity. Thomas Colinet, Thales Belgium's domain director for vehicles and tactical systems, confirmed that orders from Ukraine outstrip existing manufacturing capability. He noted that continued requests for additional rockets indicate Ukrainian satisfaction with the system's performance in combat operations. The company has declined to disclose specific unit prices or detailed shipment volumes, though officials characterize the cost as equivalent to a low-cost missile, significantly less expensive than traditional air-to-air weapons.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
To provide context for the economics of drone defense, the cost structure reveals stark disparities between different interceptor options. Conventional air-to-air missiles like the AIM-9X Sidewinder carry a price tag just under $420,000 per unit for current Block II subvariants, while the AIM-120 AMRAAM exceeds $1 million each. Even a current-generation APKWS II guidance and control section costs approximately $15,000, with several thousand dollars more required for the warhead and motor assembly. By comparison, Ukrainian interceptor drones typically cost between $500 and $5,000 each, while the Thales 70-millimeter rockets fall somewhere in the middle of this spectrum.
Even the most advanced laser-guided variants produced by Thales typically cost no more than 20 percent of a standard surface-to-air missile, making them an economically rational choice for countering relatively inexpensive drone targets. This cost advantage becomes particularly significant when facing mass drone attacks involving dozens or hundreds of individual platforms. The ability to engage multiple targets with relatively affordable munitions prevents the unsustainable cost-exchange ratio that would result from using high-end missiles against cheap drones. The Thales rockets are far costlier than interceptor drones but much cheaper and easier to manufacture than missiles, occupying a useful middle ground in the spectrum of counter-drone capabilities.
Tactical Employment
Modified Mi-8 helicopters probably employ tactics that emphasize rapid response to emerging threats combined with area coverage over high-value targets. The helicopters can rapidly reposition to address emerging threats, operate from dispersed locations that complicate enemy targeting, and provide coverage over terrain where fixed-wing operations might be constrained. The combination of laser-guided and unguided 70-millimeter rockets offers tactical flexibility, with the former providing precision engagement of individual high-value targets and the latter potentially enabling area saturation against drone swarms or targets in known corridors, though the latter application remains largely theoretical.
Ukrainian forces likely integrate the Mi-8 platforms into the broader air defense network, receiving cueing from ground-based radar systems, acoustic sensors, and visual observers about incoming drone threats. The helicopters can sprint to intercept positions, employ their weapons, and then return to holding areas or forward operating locations. This mobile interceptor role complements the more persistent patrol patterns flown by fixed-wing light aircraft, with helicopters providing surge capacity to address concentrated threats or defend specific high-value targets during critical periods.
The ability to conduct buddy-lasing operations, if implemented, would significantly enhance effectiveness by allowing one helicopter to maintain steady laser illumination while another maneuvers for optimal weapons employment. This tactic reduces the workload on individual crews and increases the probability of successful engagement, though it requires careful coordination and clear communication protocols. The use of multiple helicopters working in concert also provides redundancy, ensuring that if one platform experiences equipment malfunctions or must break off engagement, others can continue the mission.
Operational Challenges
Despite their capabilities, Mi-8 helicopters face significant operational challenges in the counter-drone role. The platforms remain vulnerable to ground fire when operating at altitudes and speeds necessary for effective drone engagement. Russian forces deploy extensive air defense systems, including man-portable systems, that can threaten helicopters conducting counter-drone missions. This vulnerability constrains operations to areas where Ukrainian forces maintain local air superiority or where terrain masking and careful route planning can minimize exposure.
The requirement for continuous laser designation in degraded weather conditions presents a persistent technical challenge. Moscow's forces have adapted their drone employment tactics specifically to exploit this vulnerability, favoring operations during poor weather when laser-guided weapons face the greatest difficulties. Ukrainian crews must balance the need to engage threats against the reduced probability of successful intercept in sub-optimal conditions, making tactical decisions about when to commit resources against targets that may be difficult to engage effectively.
Maintenance and sustainment of the mixed Soviet-Western systems aboard the helicopters requires specialized expertise and access to parts from multiple supply chains. Soviet-era components for the Mi-8 airframe and basic systems must be sourced through different channels than NATO-standard weapons and launchers. This dual supply chain complicates logistics and potentially creates vulnerabilities if either source experiences disruptions. The aging Mi-8 fleet also faces normal service life limitations, with airframes and dynamic components requiring regular inspection, maintenance, and eventual replacement.
Integration with Ground-Based Systems
The Thales 70-millimeter rockets with FZ123 warheads are not exclusive to aerial platforms. Ukrainian forces also employ these weapons from ground-based launchers, including the American-supplied VAMPIRE counter-drone system mounted on Humvee vehicles. A batch of 14 VAMPIRE systems has been delivered to the Ukrainian military, each featuring a four-round 70-millimeter turret married to an electro-optical and infrared sensor mast for target cueing. This ground-based employment provides fixed-site protection for critical infrastructure without consuming scarce aircraft for persistent coverage.
Thales is also prototyping its own ground-based launcher with five tubes for 70-millimeter rockets, which has reached the prototype stage. This system could provide a purely European alternative to American launcher platforms, potentially simplifying supply chains and reducing dependence on transatlantic procurement. The availability of both airborne and ground-based launch options creates a layered defensive architecture where each platform type can be employed according to its comparative advantages.
Comparative Analysis with Fixed-Wing Platforms
The Mi-8 rotary-wing platforms complement rather than duplicate the capabilities of fixed-wing light aircraft in Ukraine's counter-drone architecture. While fixed-wing platforms like the Z-137 and SHARK excel at extended patrol missions over large areas, helicopters provide more flexibility in rapid response to emerging threats and the ability to maintain station over specific high-value targets. The fixed-wing platforms typically offer greater endurance and fuel efficiency for area coverage, while helicopters sacrifice some efficiency for increased tactical flexibility and the ability to operate from more austere locations.
The weapons employment differs significantly between the two platform types. Fixed-wing aircraft armed with R-73 missiles engage targets with infrared-guided weapons requiring visual or infrared acquisition, while helicopters primarily employ laser-guided rockets requiring active designation. Electronic warfare aircraft like the SHARK use non-kinetic methods entirely, jamming rather than destroying targets. Each approach has distinct advantages and limitations, and the combination provides Ukrainian forces with multiple options for addressing diverse threat scenarios.
International Context and Technology Transfer
The successful integration of Thales rockets onto Ukrainian helicopters has attracted significant international attention. Following Russia's drone incursions into Poland and Romania, European nations are examining similar solutions for their own air defense requirements. Alain Quevrin, Thales' country director for Belgium, reported that all European countries are showing interest in the FZ123-equipped rockets and actively raising questions about procurement and integration. The company has already expanded its workforce at the Herstal facility in anticipation of new orders from multiple customers beyond Ukraine.
The operational experience gained by Ukrainian forces provides invaluable real-world data about effectiveness, limitations, and optimal employment methods that can inform acquisition decisions by partner nations. NATO countries facing similar threats from drone proliferation are closely studying Ukrainian tactics and equipment choices. The participation of Belgian and American companies in providing weapons and launchers creates pathways for broader European adoption of similar systems, potentially leading to standardization of counter-drone capabilities across the alliance.
For Ukraine specifically, Thales Belgium has expressed interest in exploring assembly and repair work with Ukrainian partners to further increase production capacity and responsiveness. Such collaboration could reduce dependence on imported systems, build domestic industrial capacity, and ensure more sustainable long-term supply of critical munitions. The transfer of manufacturing knowledge and capability represents a strategic benefit beyond the immediate tactical value of the weapons themselves.
Future Developments
The Mi-8 counter-drone program appears likely to expand as production of FZ123 rockets increases and additional helicopters receive the necessary modifications. The growing availability of munitions will enable more sustained operations and potentially allow expansion of the helicopter fleet dedicated to counter-drone missions. Integration of additional sensor systems, improved targeting pods, and enhanced communication equipment could further increase effectiveness and reduce the challenges associated with laser designation in degraded conditions.
Development of unguided variants of the FZ123 warhead may provide an alternative employment option for situations where laser guidance is impractical but the airburst fragmentation effect remains valuable. Thales can fit the FZ123 warhead onto unguided 70-millimeter rockets, potentially allowing area saturation fire against drone swarms or employment in conditions where precision guidance is unavailable. This would sacrifice accuracy but retain the enhanced lethality of the fragmentation warhead design.
As Russian forces continue adapting their drone tactics to counter Ukrainian defenses, the helicopter platforms will likely require corresponding upgrades to maintain effectiveness. This could include infrared targeting systems for night operations, improved radar for all-weather cueing, and integration with artificial intelligence-enabled target recognition systems. The ongoing technological competition between offensive drone capabilities and defensive counter-measures will drive continuous evolution of both the platforms and their weapons systems.
Conclusion
The adaptation of Mi-8 helicopters for counter-drone operations represents a pragmatic and effective response to the mass drone threat facing Ukraine. By integrating NATO-standard 70-millimeter rockets with specialized airburst warheads onto Soviet-era helicopter platforms, Ukrainian forces have created a flexible and relatively cost-effective intercept capability. The system provides a valuable middle layer in Ukraine's air defense architecture, bridging the gap between inexpensive interceptor drones and sophisticated surface-to-air missile systems.
The success of the program demonstrates the value of creative adaptation and international cooperation in addressing emerging threats. The combination of Belgian weapon technology, American launchers, Ukrainian integration engineering, and operational experience from sustained combat employment has produced a capability that is attracting interest far beyond Ukraine's borders. As drone threats proliferate globally, the lessons learned from Ukraine's Mi-8 counter-drone operations will likely influence military procurement and tactical development for years to come.
The program's effectiveness ultimately depends on continued supply of munitions, sustained maintenance of the helicopter fleet, proper training of crews, and effective integration with the broader air defense network. When these elements align, the Mi-8 platforms provide a valuable and economically sustainable tool for countering the persistent drone threat that characterizes modern conflict.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
