• Military Menu                       

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Industry
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• WMD
• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

NATO AWACS Replacement E-7 Wedgetail

The replacement of NATO's aging Boeing E-3 Sentry AWACS fleet was one of the most consequential defense procurement challenges facing the Alliance. Following the surprise cancellation of the Boeing E-7 Wedgetail program by both the United States (Jun 2025) and NATO's European partners (Nov 2025), the Alliance faces a strategic crossroads as it seeks alternatives to maintain critical airborne early warning and control capabilities before the mandatory 2035 retirement of its current E-3A fleet. The leading contender is now the Swedish Saab GlobalEye, representing a fundamental shift toward European defense autonomy and a departure from decades of American-dominated AWACS capabilities.

The Rise and Fall of the E-7 Wedgetail

By Nov 2023, NATO appeared to have reached consensus on its AWACS replacement: the Boeing E-7 Wedgetail. This decision reflected multiple strategic considerations. The E-7, based on the modern and widely-operated Boeing 737 Next Generation airframe, offered significant advantages over the aging E-3 platform. Its Northrop Grumman Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) radar—a fixed L-band AESA system mounted in a distinctive dorsal "top hat"—represented a generational leap in capability, providing 360-degree coverage without mechanical rotation while offering superior detection range, tracking capacity, and resistance to electronic countermeasures.

The E-7 had proven itself operationally with the Royal Australian Air Force, which pioneered the platform, as well as with South Korea and Turkey. Its large airframe accommodates 10-12 operator consoles (expandable to 19 in augmented configuration), enabling sophisticated onboard battle management and command and control functions. The platform's in-flight refueling capability allows extended missions over vast geographic areas—a critical requirement for Arctic surveillance and trans-Atlantic operations. For nations already operating Boeing 737 variants such as the P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, the E-7 promised significant logistics commonality and reduced maintenance costs.

The United Kingdom, recognizing the urgency of replacing its own E-3 fleet, had already committed to acquiring three E-7 Wedgetails by mid-2025, with the first aircraft in advanced testing phases. This British commitment appeared to validate the E-7 as the logical NATO standard, ensuring interoperability and shared logistics across the Alliance.

The American Cancellation: June 2025

In Jun 2025, the Pentagon delivered a strategic shock by announcing cancellation of the U.S. Air Force's E-7 program. The USAF had planned to acquire 26 E-7s to replace portions of its E-3 fleet, with initial operational capability targeted for 2027. The cancellation decision cited three primary factors: escalating costs that exceeded budget projections, continuing delays in development and testing, and most critically, concerns about platform survivability in contested environments against advanced Russian and Chinese A2/AD systems.

Pentagon officials argued that large, relatively slow aircraft like the E-7—despite their impressive capabilities—represent vulnerable targets for modern long-range surface-to-air missiles and fighter aircraft operating from heavily defended airspace. The decision reflected broader strategic thinking about future warfare scenarios, particularly potential conflicts with near-peer adversaries where traditional AWACS platforms might be unable to operate safely within effective sensor range of contested areas. Instead, U.S. strategy would pivot toward a combination of space-based surveillance assets—which offer persistence and invulnerability to conventional air defenses—and the Navy's smaller E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft for tactical missions.

The E-2D, while far smaller than the E-7 and lacking its endurance and onboard battle management capacity, offers the advantage of operating from aircraft carriers and austere forward airfields where larger platforms cannot deploy. However, the E-2D's limited crew capacity (typically 5 personnel versus 10-19 for the E-7), lower operational speed, and reduced endurance make it poorly suited for the broad-area surveillance and extended-duration missions that NATO AWACS platforms routinely perform.

Congressional response to the E-7 cancellation proved mixed. While some defense committees included continued funding for E-7 rapid prototyping activities in subsequent resolutions, the fundamental strategic decision appeared irreversible. The U.S. withdrawal from the E-7 program would have immediate and profound consequences for NATO's parallel acquisition efforts.

NATO's Cancellation: November 2025

Following the U.S. decision to abandon the E-7 in Jul 2025, the remaining European NATO partners faced an untenable situation. The original NATO acquisition plan had envisioned purchasing six E-7 aircraft to replace the Alliance's collective E-3A fleet. This relatively modest number reflected significant cost-sharing among participating nations, with American participation essential to achieving economies of scale and managing program risk.

The U.S. withdrawal fundamentally altered the program's "strategic and financial basis," as the Dutch Ministry of Defence later explained. Without American participation, the per-unit cost of E-7 aircraft would increase substantially. More significantly, the absence of U.S. operational support, training infrastructure, and long-term sustainment commitments raised questions about the wisdom of NATO adopting a platform that the United States itself had deemed unsuitable for future warfare. If the Pentagon believed the E-7 too vulnerable for contested operations against Russian or Chinese forces, could European partners justify investing billions in the same platform to defend against the very threats that had motivated American cancellation?

In Nov 2025, the remaining European NATO partners officially canceled their E-7 acquisition, leaving the Alliance without a defined path forward for replacing its E-3A fleet. The six participating nations reaffirmed their commitment to fielding alternative "quieter" aircraft before the 2035 deadline, but the specifics remained undefined. This decision marked the end of what had appeared to be a settled procurement program and opened a new phase of urgent capability development under severe time pressure.