UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

For the most part these are paper planes that never went anywhere,
even though they seemed like a good idea at the time.
Like MacArthur's old soldier, they do not die, they just fade away.

Future US Military Aircraft

 

Links

Aircraft Equipment





Bomber
B-21
HyperSoar
Arsenal Plane

Patrol
CSA
MSA


UAV
MQ-25 Stingray
MQ-28 Loyal Wingman BATS
SR-72
UCAR
UCAV
UCLASS
XQ-58 Valkyrie


Tanker
KC-X
KC-30
KC-45
KC-767
MQ-25 Stingray

SAM
PAR
VH-71
VXX
VC-XX

CSAR / SOF
HH-60W CRH
CSAR-X
M-X
MC-X
MH-X



Attack
  • Armed Overwatch
  • A-X
  • LAP
  • LAS
  • OA-X
    AT-6
    YAL-1 ABL
    ARH
    ARH-70
    FB-22
    AC-X
    ERMP Warrior
    UCAR
    UCAV
    XQ-58 Valkyrie
    Kratos UTAP-22 Mako



    AEW
    E-2D
    E-767
    E-737
    E-310

    Special
    CSA
    E-10A MC2A
    MPA


    Civilian
    B797
    D8
    X-57
    X-58
    X-59
    X-59
    Small SST
  • Fighter
    F-23
    F/A-37
    F/A-XX
    F-X 1965
    F-X 1980
    F-X 2012
    F-47
    NGAD
    UCLASS


    Trainer
    Advanced Tactical Trainer (ATT)
    Tactical Surrogate Aircraft
    Scorpion


    Utility

    Glider

    Airship
    ULA
    Rotary
    eVTOL

    AAS
    AHTS
    AMT
    AVX JMR/FVL
    ARH
    ARH-70
    CRH
    CVLA
    FUR
    FARA
    FLRAA
    FVL
    H-69
    HLR
    HLVTOL
    HSVTOL
    HV-609
    JHL
    JMR
    JRA
    JTR
    MH-X
    MH-139
    PRV
    S-97 Raider
    SB>1 Defiant
    TH-XX
    UH-1N Rep
    UH-72
    V-22 Escort
    VH-71
    VXX
    V-247 Vigilant
    V-280 Valor
    VTOL X-Plane
    X2
    Cargo
    AMC-X
    AMT
    ATT
    C-XX(SR)
    C-XX(MR)
    CSA
    DP-2
    FCA
    FUA
    GRA

    JCA
    LCA
    Liberty Lifter
    LiMA
    M3T2

    MMTT
    NSA
    SSTOL
    ULTRA
    X-Planes
    X-61

    “History does not know the subjunctive mood” [istoriya ne imeyet soslagatelnogo naclonenia] - it is believed that Stalin said this in a conversation with the German writer Emil Ludwig. However, there is nothing like that in the text of this conversation. The statement of Karl Hampe (1869-1936), a Heidelberg professor: “Die Geschichte kennt kein Wenn” - “ History does not know the word “If”, meaning historians should write what actually happened, a positivist interpretation of history. In Leon Bloy’s book “ The Soul of Napoleon ” there is a version of this thought: “ Historical events bear the imprint of the Word of God, and it does not know the conditional mood .” This was written in 1912, so most likely this is the earliest version.

    The subjunctive exists to express information that is hypothetical, contrary to fact, recommended or suggested. The subjunctive is not a verb tense; it is a mood. The subjunctive mood expresses wishes, suggestions, demands, or desires in a sentence with usually two clauses. Grammatical mood can be understood as a set of forms of a verb that show what a sentence is up to—that is, whether it's making a statement, giving a command or suggestion, or expressing a wish or a possibility. English has three moods. The indicative mood is for stating facts and opinions. The imperative mood is for giving orders and instructions. The subjunctive mood is for expressing wishes, proposals, suggestions, or imagined situations. The subjunctive sometimes is applied to verbs of wishing and in contrary-to-fact conditional clauses.

    Some say Vietnamese people do not — and cannot, due to a grammatical gap in their language — think about “shoulda”, “coulda”, “woulda”. But French and Spanish use the subjunctive all the time. Germanic languages have only the present tense and the past tense, but many also have a full set of subjunctive moods. The reality is that most English speakers won’t be able to tell you what the subjunctive form is. Some believe the English subjunctive is old-fashioned and has no place in modern writing. As opposed to the future, past, or present, the subjunctive is not a tense used to indicate time, rather it’s a grammatical ‘mood’. Modern English writers usually replace the subjunctive with the indicative. The form of the subjunctive has merged either with the infinitive (present subjunctive) or the past tense (past subjunctive). This is probably abetted by the near invisibility of the subjunctive; it doesn't have any distinctive forms, and often the forms it takes are identical to the forms the indicative takes in similar contexts.

    It’s the verb form most closely aligned to uniquely human capacities — the capacity to wish, to recommend, to hypothesize, to dream up new ideas, to send them out into the world.



    NEWSLETTER
    Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list