UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

SECTION II
TA. 4 Command and Control BOS, Part 8


Needs Emphasis

* (CSM trend) Unit discipline on the battlefield:

PROBLEMS:
  1. Small arms weapons are not properly maintained and cleaned.

  2. Sleep plans are not enforced; SGMs and NCO are biggest offenders.

  3. Noise and light discipline is not maintained:

    - white and chem lights used in tactical operating centers (TOCs)
    - hatches slamming

  4. Field sanitation standards not enforced:

    - wire left on roads
    - trash bags falling out of trucks
    - trash being burned or buried in the field

  5. No Pre-combat inspections (PCIs) at Home Station to ensure MOPP gear is packed:

    - soldiers without gloves, masks
    - soldiers without MOPP uniform

  6. Load plans not enforced.

  7. Unit discipline regarding soldier hygiene, uniforms, vehicles, and equipment not enforced.

  8. Speed limits in the Brigade Support Area (BSA) and along the main supply route (MSR) not enforced.

  9. Proper use of ground guides not enforced.

  10. Use of proper eye protection not enforced.

RESULTS: Lack of safety discipline and failure to properly use protective equipment constitutes the majority of accidents and injuries.

Techniques:

1. NCOs must ensure 100% accountability of soldiers at all times.
2. During convoy operations, reduce speeds to appropriate for conditions.
3. Maintain unit discipline in the above areas.

4.4.5 Synchronize Tactical Operations

* Integrating aviation planning into the scheme of maneuver: Aviation units properly manage their fighter management programs but fail to integrate aviation planning with supported maneuver units.

PROBLEM: Aviation fighting assets are a critical part of force protection designed to ensure both units and individuals can maximize their combat potential. Units too often fail to integrate aviation assets into their scheme of maneuver for critical periods which require massing of all combat power.

Technique: Units must identify critical events in the battle and integrate aviation planning, to ensure aviation is available to augment their scheme of maneuver.

Procedure: Include examples of integrating aviation planning cycles with supported unit's decision making process in FM-101-5 and other applicable FMs.

* Air Cavalry Troop (ACT) synchronization of fire and maneuver during reconnaissance operations: While performing reconnaissance tasks, Air Cavalry Troops (ACTs) do not use fire and maneuver to develop the situation, maintain freedom of action, or maintain the reconnaissance focus.

PROBLEMS:
  1. ACT commanders do not apply the basic fundamentals of reconnaissance and do not delineate the task and purpose of each scout weapons team (SWT) to focus reconnaissance efforts.

  2. Commander's intent fails to outline the critical reconnaissance tasks that must be accomplished.

  3. Upon contact with OPFOR elements, ACTs attempt to maintain contact with long range observation, but generally fail to further develop the situation and continue the reconnaissance effort. They make few attempts to use direct and indirect fires to suppress the enemy and allow the ACT to maneuver to a position of advantage.

  4. Generally, ACTs may attempt to call fires on the target, but do not synchronize this with the maneuver of SWTs. Once the call for fire is initiated, many times, ACTs will break contact, not observe the rounds, and bypass.

  5. When indirect fires are not available, ACTs use poor movement techniques to attempt close reconnaissance of the enemy force and generally become decisively engaged with the OPFOR element, losing reconnaissance focus.

  6. Troop level graphic control measures are seldom added to the squadron graphics to facilitate maneuver, resulting in loss of command and control during decisive portions of the reconnaissance.

  7. FM 1-116 and FM 1-114 are general and do not provide sufficient information on fire and maneuver with reconnaissance focus.

Techniques:

1. Air Cavalry Troops (ACTs) need to define and practice battle drills for fire and maneuver at Home Station.

2. Commander's must give a clear commander's intent and delineate the task and purpose (relative to the required critical reconnaissance tasks) in the operations order (OPORD).

Procedure: FM 1-116 and FM 1-114 should be revised to add examples of how to develop the situation at the Air Cavalry Troop (ACT) and scout weapons team (SWT) level.

* Planning for Tactical Operations Center (TOC) movement: TOCs are either reluctant to move or move too often during the course of a battle.

PROBLEMS:
  1. There is often little or no deliberate planning for when and how the TOC moves to maintain its ability to coordinate and synchronize operations during execution.

  2. Split section TOC operations are not very well understood or executed in most TOCs.

RESULT: The TOC is often on the move or out of contact during critical points in the battle.

Techniques:

1. TOCs must consistently rehearse split TOC operations to ensure the ability to function fully while displacing on the battlefield.

2. TOC moves should be rehearsed until each person knows his function and can execute in the least amount of time possible.

3. TOCs must thoroughly plan, based on METT-T, when to move during a battle to ensure they can maintain contact and control at all critical junctures.

4. Unit SOPs must include procedures for split TOC operations which ensure all BOS remain covered and synchronization/coordination between sections is maintained.

Procedures: TOC operations manuals, or sections in FMs, must include TTP for moving TOCs, and planning TTP that will assist leaders in developing viable movement plans.

4.5 Employ Tactical C2W

* Electronic Warfare (EW) protection for reconnaissance/counterreconnaissance forces:

PROBLEM: Too often, the Analysis Control Team (ACT) does not plan any specific EW force protection missions to support the insertion of the scouts and COLTs during the recon/counterrecon phases of the battle. While brigade scouts/COLTs are conducting their mission or are being inserted, brigade electronic surveillance/electronic attack (ES/EA) Teams are the only assets that can provide early warning/protection. ES/EA teams do this by listening to and locating via radio direction finding, and consequently jamming enemy recon commo nets or Combat Security Observation Posts out forward on the battlefield. Once intercepted, these nets are exploited to see if any brigade scout assets have been compromised.

Techniques:

1. The ACT must plan detailed force protection missions in their EW execution matrix during the recon/counterrecon phases of the battle.

2. The ACT should work closely with the Fire Support Officer (FSO) to coordinate force protection missions during the insertion of the scouts/COLTs.

3. The FSO must provide specifics of where and when these scout/COLTs are being inserted. This information can then be given to the ES/EA teams listening to the targeted nets to see if the teams were compromised while being inserted. If so, the FSO can warn these teams and take appropriate action. Concurrently, per the EW execution matrix, the recon net(s) would be exploited to protect the rest of the force by reporting any compromised OPs, assembly areas, TOC sites, etc.

* Traffic analysis (TA) cell employment of jump nodes: Traffic analysis cells are often not planning for, nor adequately employing, jump nodes to ensure mission continuity.

PROBLEM: When forced to jump locations, TA cells tend to transfer control of the entire electronic surveillance/electronic attack (ES/EA) mission to outlying intercept sites rather than dispatch a jump node.

RESULT: Transferring control to an EW team that is not equipped with maps, situational templates, current situational awareness, dedicated comms links to higher, files, mission continuity logs etc., or possibly not even able to communicate with the ACT, degrades both the asset management and reporting of the entire ES/EA mission, as well as the EW team, which must then run both its own mission as well as that of the TA cell.

Techniques:

1. When the TA cell is forced to jump, either to maintain communications with deployed EW teams or prevent itself from being overrun, it should dispatch a jump vehicle with adequate files, maps, secure communications etc., to maintain control of the battle.

2. Once the jump vehicle is in position, with good comms to all outlying sites and the ACT, it should then assume control of the tasking and reporting net.

3. The main TA cell body then tears down and redeploys to the jump vehicle's location. Once reunited, and operational, the main TA cell body will resume control of the net and the jump vehicle will be absorbed back into the TA cell.

4. If the TA cell does not possess a jump vehicle or it gets destroyed, an EW team should be designated as the net control until the TA cell relocates or gets reconstituted. However, this is the least favorite option, because mission continuity is lost, and it deters from the EW team's mission.

* Electronic surveillance (ES) jamming effectiveness reports (JERs):

PROBLEM: Timely and accurate jamming effectiveness reports (JERs) are not reaching the traffic analysis (TA) cell during the conduct of an electronic attack (EA) mission to have the desired effect.

Techniques:

1. The electronic support (ES) system tasked with monitoring the enemy frequency to determine the effectiveness of the jamming mission against it must be sitting on that frequency during the conduct of the EA mission, and must provide timely and accurate jamming effectiveness reports (JERs) to the TA cell. Provide JERs frequently to the TA cell, especially if:

a. The jamming is not effective. The TA cell must then direct the subordinate EA team to take immediate action to correct the problem. Among the steps to be taken are:

(1) increase the jammer's power output,

(2) reorient its antenna, or

(3) switch this particular EA mission over to another EA system, if available.

b. The jamming is effective. If the targeted net jumps frequencies, the TA cell can then direct re-acquisition efforts as quickly as possible.

2. Place an EW system with hearability to the target area, not colocated with the EA system or between it and the target area. Task it to monitor the target net to determine the effectiveness of the mission. The monitoring system should assign an approximate effectiveness rating to provide timely and well understood input to the TA cell. One method follows:

EFFORTJAMMING EFFECTIVENESS
RATING
No interference heard on net.0
Weak interference, no garbled or repeated traffic.1
Interference, garbled or repeated traffic being worked through.2
Interference, garbled or repeated traffic not being heard by some stations/callsigns.3
Strong interference, no ability to work through.4

3. Standardize the issuing of JERs. A two to three minutes interval during a jamming mission would help enforce the timeliness and importance of these reports, and ultimately lead to a more effective EA mission.

* Traffic Analysis (TA) cell functions: Traffic analysis (TA) cells generally do not set the proper tone for the rest of the deployed ES/EA assets under their purview.

PROBLEMS:
  1. Frequently, the TA cells will put out taskings and then passively wait for the ES/EA teams to report, rather than being pro-active by providing feedback to the teams, showing an interest in the mission, and reminding the teams, periodically, of the current tasking.

  2. TA cells are displaying a "check the block" mindset and are not following-up to ensure taskings are understood or being followed.

Techniques:

1. The EW platoon leader and sergeant must take a more active role and interest in what the traffic analysis cell is or is not accomplishing

2. Hold the cell accountable for what it does or does not accomplish, ensuring that at least the basic standards expected of an electronic warfare signals intelligence cell are being executed.

NOTE: A motivated TA cell that shows an active interest in the mission will be reflected by the ES/EA teams. Likewise, an apathetic TA cell will be reflected in kind by the ES/EA teams.

* TRQ-32A(V)2 team operation of the Recorder, Reproducer Set, Sound (RRSS):

PROBLEM: TRQ-32A(V)2 teams are not well trained in the operation of the Recorder, Reproducer Set, Sound (RRSS). They are rarely able to enhance their mission capabilities by digitally recording voice intercept radio traffic for further exploitation. These systems are equipped with the RRSS to digitally record traffic, but operators are not well trained in the operation of this item of equipment.

RESULT: Loss of intelligence exploitation capabilities.

Procedures:

  1. Develop a TTP pamphlet for the RRSS and distribute it to all TRQ-32A(V)2 teams.
  2. Evaluate the RRSS for a possible upgrade to make it more "user friendly."

* TRQ-32A(V)2 team radio operation:

PROBLEM: TRQ-32A(V)2 teams are transmitting on their guard radios. The TRQ-32A(V)2 is equipped with two SINCGARS radios. The bottom radio is designed as a normal receiver/transmitter. The top radio is designed as a guard radio, which means it is supposed to be a "receive only" radio. It is physically possible for this radio to transmit, but there is no VHF bandpass filter connected to this radio circuit to protect the electronic support receivers. These electronic support receivers are the "guts" of the TRQ-32A(V)2 system. Most teams deploying to the NTC are transmitting on these guard radios. This action could cause irreparable damage to the unprotected electronic support receivers.

Procedures:

  1. Develop an addendum to the technical manual for the TRQ-32A(V)2 to warn operators against the practice of transmitting on their guard radios.

  2. Explore the possibility of adding a VHF bandpass filter to the guard radio circuit to make it into a receiver/transmitter.

btn_tabl.gifTable of Contents
btn_prev.gifSection II: TA. 4, Part 7
btn_next.gifSection II: TA. 5 Intelligence BOS



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list