SECTION
I
TA.5 INTELLIGENCE BOS
Positive Performance
* 5.1 GSR Team Equipment proficiency (II-1)
* 5.2.2 Aviation Battalion/Squadron S2 Terrain Analysis (II-1)
* 5.2.4 Platoon leader(s) role playing the enemy during Co/Tm planning and rehearsals (II-1)
* 5.3 Task Force S2 Knowledge of the Krasnovian Threat (II-1)
* 5.3 GSR Team timely, accurate reporting positively impacting R & S plans (II-1)
Need Emphasis
* 5. Too many Artillery Battalion S2s with less than 90 days in the slot prior to the rotation (II-2)
* 5. Too many Artillery Battalion S2 sections with obsolete doctrinal references, or no doctrinal references at all (II-2)
* 5.1 EW Platoons dependent on data links and computers cannot "manually" perform basic direction-finding missions (II-2)
* 5.1 GSR Team weaknesses: 1) weapon system PMCS 2) PCI map reading 3) night land navigation 4)local security 5) weak, vague SOPs (II-2)
* 5.1.1 Poor battle tracking by Battalion S2s hinders predictive analysis (II-2)
* 5.1.2 Brigade S2s not identifying all High Value Targets (HVT), which leads to problems nominating High Payoff Targets (HPT) (II-3)
* 5.1.2 SOP (high power) jamming inappropriately used, too often with negative friendly effects and minimal enemy effect. (II-3)
* 5.3 Brigade rear area IPB never fully developed by S2s. (II-3)
* 5.3 Brigade S2 sections not producing Modified Combined Obstacle Overlay (MCOO) for terrain analysis. (II-3)
* 5.3 Brigade S2 produced Situation Templates (SITEMPS) are not timely; not in sufficient quantity and lack detail. (II-3)
* 5.3 Brigade S2s rarely prepare Event Templates or an Event Matrix focused on critical enemy events. (II-3,4)
Table
of Contents
TA.4
Command and Control BOS
TA.6
Mobility/Countermobility/Survivability BOS
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
