UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)


EA-547; (FONSI) and Environmental Assessment For Install Calibration Laboratory Building 12-52b Pantex Plant Amarillo, Tx

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MEMORANDUM DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1991

DOE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BUILDING 12-42F MODIFICATION AND INSTALL CALIBRATION LABORATORY, BUILDING 12-52B PANTEX PLANT

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INSTALL CALIBRATION LABORATORY BUILDING 12-52B PANTEX PLANT

1.0 Need for Action

2.0 Description of Proposed Facility Action

3.0 Location of the Action

4.0 Alternatives to Proposed Action

5.0 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action

6.0 Summary

7.0 References

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 PANTEX VICINITY MAP

Figure 2 PANTEX PLANT MAP

Figure 3 CALIBRATION LAB BUILDING 12-53B


United States Government Department of Energy
MEMORANDUM

   DATE: December 20, 1991
REPLY TO
ATTN 0F:  EH-25
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Finding of No Significant
         Impact (FONSI) for Two Actions at Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas
     TO: Richard A. Claytor
         Assistant Secretary
           for Defense Programs
        This is in response to your request for approval to issue and
        distribute the Environmental Assessments for Building 12-42F
        Modification and Install Calibration Laboratory, Building 12-
        52B (DOE/EA-O546 and DOE/EA-0547, respectively). I understand
        that the State of Texas was provided an opportunity to comment
        on the EAs during the pre-approval review period, and offered no
        comments.
        Based on the findings of the EAs and after consultation with the
        Office of General Counsel, I have determined that the EAs are
        adequate for publication and distribution, subject to
        incorporation of the changes noted on the marked-up copies
        attached. The proposed actions will not have a significant
        effect on the human environment, within the meaning of the
        National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore, an
        Environmental Impact Statement is not required for either
        action. This determination is explained further in the attached
        FONSI. It is not necessary to have the FONSI published in the
        Federal Register, because the projects are not actions with
        effects of national concern. However, the local public should
        be notified of the availability of the EAs and FONSI in
        accordance with paragraph 1506.6 of the Council on Environmental
        Quality NEPA regulations. Please send five copies of the EAs to
        the Office of NEPA Oversight, along with a record of
        distribution of the EAs and FONSI.
                                          Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.
                                          Assistant Secretary
                                          Environment, Safety and Health
        Attachment
        cc: Timothy D. Pflaum, DP-9
            NEPA Compliance Officer
            Bruce G. Twining, Manager
            Albuquerque Field Office

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
BUILDING 12-42F MODIFICATION AND
INSTALL CALIBRATION LABORATORY, BUILDING 12-52B
Pantex Plant

AGENCY:   U.S. Department of Energy
ACTION:   Finding of No Significant Impact
SUMMARY:  The Department of Energy has prepared two Environmental
Assessments (EAs) for two proposed actions at the Pantex Plant:
(1) design and construct a 4500 square foot addition to an
existing building (12-42F) to house office space, conference
rooms, and monitoring and testing equipment to support ongoing
activities with the centrifuge and associated equipment in the
adjacent Building 12-42A; and (2) install a self-contained
calibration laboratory in an existing building (12-52a). In both
cases, only small amounts of construction disturbance would
occur, and the operation of both facilities would yield no
increase in emissions or other environmental impacts above that
currently existing.
Based on the EAs, DOE has determined that the proposed actions do
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required for
either action.
PUBLIC AVAILABILITY    Copies of the EAs (DOE/EA-0546 for
Building 12-42F, and DOE/EA-0547 for Building 12-52B) are
available from:
     Kari Schneider-Hamrick
     Environmental, Safety and Health Management Branch
     Amarillo Area Office
     Albuquerque Field Office
     U.S. Department of Energy
     Amarillo, Texas 79120
          (806) 477-30578
For further information about the NEPA process, contact:
     Carol M. Borgstrom
     Director, Office of NEPA Oversight
     Office of Environment, Safety and Health
     U.S. Department of Energy
     1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20585
          (202) 586-4600 or (800) 472-2756
PROPOSED ACTION: The proposed action for Building 12-42F is to
construct a 4500 square foot pre-engineered metal building on a
concrete slab to match the adjoining Building 12-42A. Entry to
the centrifuge and related equipment in 12-42A would be through
the new addition. The addition would house office space, break
room and conference room space, and test and monitoring equipment
to support the operation of the 12-42A equipment.
For Building 12-52B, the proposed action is to construct a self-
contained laboratory, 12 x 16 x 10 feet high, completely inside
Building 12-52B. The calibration laboratory will house sensitive
gages for calibration of tools used in support of weapons
production operations; these calibration gages require close
control of both temperature and humidity, hence the completely
enclosed laboratory space within an existing building.
In neither case would impacts from construction or operation
impact cultural resources, critical habitats, wetlands,
floodplains, or other sensitive biological resources, including
threatened or endangered species. No additional air or water
emissions would occur.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:  The no-action alternative in both cases
would be not to construct the proposed facility. No
environmental consequences would be associated with the no-action
alternatives. Construction of the facilities at other sites
would entail either equivalent or greater environmental impacts,
without meeting mission requirements.
DETERMINATION: Based on the analyses in the EAs, the proposed
modification of Building 12-42F and the installation of a
calibration laboratory in Building 12-52B, both at the Pantex
Plant, Amarillo, Texas, do not constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. Therefore an Environmental Impact
Statement is not required for either action.
Issued this 20th day of December, 1991.
                                   Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.
                                   Assistant Secretary
                                   Environment, Safety and Health
                                                    DOE/EA-0547

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR INSTALL CALIBRATION LABORATORY BUILDING 12-52B

                                 PANTEX PLANT
                                 AMARILLO, TX
                                 OCTOBER, 1991
                                 Prepared For:
                             Department of Energy
                            Albuquerque Operations
                             Amarillo Area Office
                                P.O. Box 30030
                            Amarillo, Texas 79120
                        INSTALL CALIBRATION LABORATORY
                                BUILDING 12-52B

1.0 NEED FOR ACTION

This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared pursuant to
implementing regulations to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental
impacts of a proposed action to determine whether that action
requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
or if a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) can be issued. NEPA
requires that an EA provide an interdisciplinary review of the
proposed action in order to identify possible preferable alternatives
and to identify mitigative measures that will prevent environmental
impacts. If it is determined that the proposed action will have
unavoidable significant environmental impact, then an EIS shall be
prepared.
The proposed project is for design and installation of a
self-contained Modular Gage Calibration Laboratory in Building 12-52B
at Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas. The operating contractor of Pantex
Plant has been directed by the Sandia Laboratory at Albuquerque to
acquire facilities capable of close temperature and humidity control
for calibration of gages and tooling in support of production
operations for weapons programs.

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION

The proposed new Calibration Laboratory is to be fabricated and
installed by the manufacturer. Design and construction modifications
to Building 12-52B and utility services support will be provided by
task order contractors.
The Laboratory will be used for mass calibration of tooling and
instruments by means of various types of weights and balances. The
size of the Laboratory will be 12' x 16' x 1O' high. Up to six
personnel will conduct operations within the Laboratory. No
hazardous materials will be used in the operation of the Laboratory.
The building modification design for installation of the Laboratory
and supporting utility services will be accomplished by a task order
A-E firm. Design and installation of a wet pipe fire protection
sprinkler system will be accomplished by a local licensed fire
protection designer/installer in accordance with applicable codes and
requirements. All other construction will be performed by a task
order construction contractor in accordance with approved
construction documents.
The supporting utility services will be extended from the existing
building utilities and shall include potable water, fire protection
wet pipe sprinkler system, air, condensate drain, automated energy
management system (AEMS) and 480 Volt 3-phase 100 amp power.
                                  Page 1 of 8
The Calibration Laboratory will be shipped in components and
assembled in the building. The Laboratory comes complete with walls,
ceiling, floor, self-contained HVAC system for heating and cooling,
lighting and power receptacles, wired and plumbed by the manufacturer
on site. The Laboratory will have a local control panel with high
and low temperature and humidity alarms. A fire extinguisher
appropriate for the Laboratory will be installed inside the entrance.

3.0 LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION

The Pantex Plant consists of approximately 16,000 acres, located in
Carson County, Texas, the northern part of the Texas Panhandle. The
adjacent area is entirely agricultural, with extremely low population
density (3 persons per square mile) and limited public visibility.
The Plant is approximately 17 miles northeast of the City of Amarillo
and 9 miles west of the City of Panhandle. (Figure 1)
The region is classified as "semi-arid", its continental climate
characterized by hot summers, relatively cold winters, with average
annual precipitation of 20 inches. The region is classified as
"windy" (wind speed of >7 mph more than 95 percent of the year). The
prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. The area is
subject to thunderstorms throughout the year, with associated hail
and the potential for tornados in the spring. There are occasional
snow storms in the winter.
The Pantex Plant site (Figure 2) is principally level, with few
elevation variations. The dominant soils are of the Pullman and
Randall series and are underlaid by sedimentary Permian, Triassic,
Tertiary and Quaternary formations. There are no natural rivers or
streams. Three natural "playa" lakes act as surface runoff
reservoirs. The shallowest significant water-bearing stratum
(Ogallala Formation of the Tertiary System) is approximately 400 feet
below grade. The area is Uniform Building Code Seismic Risk Zone I,
where some damage may occur as a result of distant earthquakes.
This portion of the High Plains plateau, in the transition zone
between the North Central Plains and the Llano Estacado (staked
plains), is essentially treeless. The Pantex Plant site is
characterized as "mixed prairie", on which indigenous native
vegetation consists of climax stands of bluestem, wildrye, and
bunchgrasses, primarily buffalo and blue grama.
The installation of the Calibration Laboratory will be inside
Building 12-52B (Figure 3), in the northern end of Zone 12, Pantex
Plant, Amarillo, Texas. The proposed construction site is located in
a developed area of the plant and will not involve the use of
undeveloped land. Service roads, utilities, and structures presently
exist in this area.
                                  Page 2 of 8
  Figure (Page 3 of 8 Figure 1 PANTEX VICINITY MAP) 
  Figure (Page 4 of 8 Figure 2 PANTEX PLANT MAP) 
  Figure (Page 5 of 8 Figure 3 CALIBRATION LAB BUILDING 12-53B) 

4.0 ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION

1.   No action: One alternative is not to install the Calibration
     Laboratory. This is not acceptable because the Metrology
     Department has been directed by the Sandia Laboratory at
     Albuquerque to acquire facilities capable of close temperature
     and humidity control for calibration of gages and tooling in
     support of production operations for weapons programs.
2.   Use Other Existing Space or Facility at Pantex Plant: Another
     alternative is to install the Calibration Laboratory in another
     location at the plant. This alternative is not acceptable due
     to the intended use of the Laboratory and the personnel required
     to man the Laboratory. No other facility exists that can
     provide the equipment for temperature and humidity control.
     Also production flow would be interrupted if another facility
     was used. No other location has been found acceptable to
     Metrology.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED ACTION

1.   Cultural Resources - There are no historical or cultural
     resources listed on the National Register of Historical Places
     for the locations involved in this project (DOE, 1983).
2.   Floodplain/Wetlands - The project site is not located in either
     a floodplain or wetland as described by federal Regulations (10
     CFR 1022) and will in no way result in destruction, loss, or
     degradation of plant wetlands.
3.   Threatened and Endangered Species and Critical Habitats - The
     building site does not contain any unique, unusual or critical
     habitats for known threatened or endangered species, nor does it
     adversely restrict known or established migratory corridors used
     by wildlife.
4.   Air Quality - There are no expected air emissions from this
     facility. The proposed addition will comply with the Texas Air
     Control Board requirements in regard to the Texas Clean Air Act.
5.   Water Resources - There are no hazardous materials or hazardous
     wastes associated with this proposed modification. Therefore no
     impacts to groundwater resources are expected from this proposed
     addition.
6.   Surrounding Land Use - Land use surrounding the Pantex Plant is
     dominated by agricultural uses (livestock grazing, dry and
     irrigated cultivation). The population density of the area
     adjacent to and surrounding the Pantex Plant is approximately 3
     persons per square mile. Farms/ranches average 1280 acres in
     size. The nearest development is the Texas Tech University
     Agriculture Research Station, one mile south. The nearest
     sensitive activity is the Highland Park School, approximately
     4.5 miles to the southwest. No change in offsite land use is
     expected.
                                  Page 6 of 8
7.   Construction - Construction and installation of the Calibration
     Laboratory will generate airborne dirt typical of any
     construction project, but no worse than that experienced from
     the adjacent cultivated fields during wind/dust storms that
     frequent this region. Solid wastes typical of construction
     projects will be generated, which will be inspected by the
     environmental protection personnel of M&H and, if acceptable,
     will be placed in the construction landfill. No other
     environmental impacts of construction and installation are
     anticipated.
     The operation of the Calibration Laboratory will not involve
     hazardous materials or wastes, so no environmental impact is
     anticipated. No storage of flammable liquids is anticipated
     within the Laboratory, but small amounts of alcohol may be used
     for cleaning at times.
8.   Facility Operations - Operations in this facility will require a
     nominal supply of air, water, and electricity. These utilities
     will be provided by existing service lines located at the site.
     This usage will not overextend the existing distribution
     systems.
     To minimize risks and possible accidents, all construction work
     will be strictly governed by applicable plant and OSHA
     standards. As a consequence of adherence to these standards,
     personnel safety and security will be held in strictest
     compliance. Sanitary wastes will be handled through the Pantex
     sanitary sewage system. Solid wastes will be transported and
     disposed of at a state regulated facility.

6.0 SUMMARY

The preferred action will be to design and install a self-contained
modular Gage Calibration Laboratory in the southeast corner of
existing Building 12-52B. The Metrology Department of Pantex Plant
has been directed by the Sandia Laboratory at Albuquerque to acquire
facilities capable of close temperature and humidity control for
calibration of gages and tooling in support of production operations
for weapons programs. The installation of this Laboratory will cause
minimal disruption to personnel in adjacent areas, and will have no
adverse impacts on the public, or the flora and fauna of the area.

7.0 REFERENCES

     DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) 1983. Final Environmental
        Impact Statement, Pantex Plant, DOE/EIS-0098, October 1983.
     DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) 1989. DOE Order 6430.1A,
        General Design Criteria for DOE Facilities, April 6, 1989.
     DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) 1990. DOE Explosives Safety
        Manual, DOE/EV/06294, Revision 5, May, 1990.
                                  Page 7 of 8
     M&H (Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc.) 1989. Pantex Plant
        Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1988. Prepared
        for the U.S. Department of Energy, May, 1989.
     NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) 1969. 42 USC 4321 et
        seq., as amended.
     Title 10 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 1022.
        Compliance with Floodplain/Wetlands Environmental Review
        Requirements, March, 1979.
        UBC (Uniform Building Code) 1988. Seismic Zone Map of the
        United States, Section 23-1: International Conference of
        Building Officials, Whittier, California.
     UCRL (UCRL - 15910) 1989. Design and Evaluation Guidelines for
        Department of Energy Facilities Subjected to Natural
        Phenomena Hazards. Prepared for the Office of the Assistant
        Secretary for Environmental, Safety and Health, Office of
        Safety Appraisals, U.S. Department of Energy.
                                  Page 8 of 8



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list