UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

 
DATE=  10/02/97
      TYPE=U-S OPINION ROUNDUP
    NUMBER=6-10375
     TITLE=THE FRENCH NATURAL GAS DEAL WITH IRAN
    BYLINE=ANDREW N. GUTHRIE
 TELEPHONE=619-3335
  DATELINE=WASHINGTON
    EDITOR=ASSIGNMENTS
CONTENT=
INTRO:   A HUGE NATURAL GAS EXPLOITATION DEAL BETWEEN A FRENCH 
         ENERGY COMPANY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF IRAN HAS EMBROILED 
         THE UNITED STATES IN YET ANOTHER TRADE DISAGREEMENT.
         THE TWO-BILLION-DOLLAR DEAL, ANNOUNCED MONDAY BY THE 
         FRENCH OIL COMPANY TOTAL, COULD ACTIVATE A 1996 U-S LAW 
         THAT CALLS FOR PUNISHING ANY FOREIGN COMPANY THAT SPENDS
         MORE THAN 40-MILLION DOLLARS IN THE IRANIAN OIL AND GAS 
         INDUSTRY.
         U-S NEWSPAPERS GENERALLY SUGGEST THAT THIS IS  NOT  THE 
         TIME TO INVOKE SANCTIONS AGAINST BASICALLY FRIENDLY 
         COUNTRIES, INCLUDING FRANCE, WHO DO  NOT  AGREE WITH THE
         U-S POSITION.
         WE GET A SAMPLING OF EDITORIAL COMMENT NOW FROM 
         __________________ IN TODAY'S U-S OPINION ROUNDUP.
TEXT:    THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS IT WILL TAKE SEVERAL WEEKS TO STUDY
         THE CONTRACT SIGNED BY THE FRENCH COMPANY WITH THE OIL 
         AND GAS MINISTRY OF IRAN.  IN THE MEANTIME, FRENCH PRIME
         MINISTER LIONEL JOSPIN DEFENDED THE DEAL, AND THE 
         EUROPEAN UNION IS SAYING U-S SANCTIONS COULD RESULT IN 
         TRADE RETALIATION.
         A 1996 U-S ANTI-TERRORISM LAW MANDATES SANCTIONS AGAINST
         ANY FOREIGN COMPANY THAT MAKES OTHER THAN SMALL 
         INVESTMENTS IN THE OIL INDUSTRIES OF IRAN OR LIBYA, TWO 
         NATIONS THAT THE U-S GOVERNMENT SAYS SPONSOR 
         INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM.
         THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SAYS IT WILL RENEW ITS 
         EFFORTS TO PERSUADE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES TO JOIN THE U-S 
         BID TO ISOLATE IRAN BECAUSE OF THE THREAT THAT NATION 
         POSES TO REGIONAL PEACE.  HOWEVER, IN THE EDITORIALS, 
         SEVERAL PAPERS NOTE THAT WITH THE RECENT ELECTION OF 
         MOHAMMAD KHATAMI, A SOMEWHAT REFORMIST PRESIDENT, THE 
         SITUATION IN IRAN IS IN FLUX, AND THIS IS NOT A TIME TO 
         USE A HEAVY DIPLOMATIC HAND.
         WE BEGIN OUR SAMPLING WITH THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, WHICH 
         SAYS IN PART:
VOICE:   "THE UNITED STATES MAY BE HEADING TOWARD A NASTY 
         CONFRONTATION WITH ITS EUROPEAN ALLIES [OVER THE DEAL] 
         THAT WILL BENEFIT NO ONE.  ..... WHAT'S NEEDED IS  NOT  
         A FEUD AMONG PARTNERS OVER AN ISSUE OF SECONDARY 
         IMPORTANCE [,] BUT A COMMITTED EFFORT TO DEVISE A MORE 
         COOPERATIVE POLICY FOR DEALING WITH IRAN, A COUNTRY 
         THAT, WHOEVER GOVERNS IT, IS SIMPLY TOO IMPORTANT TO 
         IGNORE OR TRY TO ISOLATE.  THE SANCTIONS POLICY LONG 
         PURSUED BY WASHINGTON HAS  NOT  BEEN NOTABLY SUCCESSFUL 
         IN ENCOURAGING CHANGES IN IRANIAN BEHAVIOR.  NEITHER HAS
         THE CONCILIATORY 'CRITICAL DIALOGUE' MORE RECENTLY TRIED
         BY THE EUROPEANS.  ..... AS THE TOTAL CASE SHOWS, THE 
         THREAT OF SANCTIONS TURNS OUT TO BE ESSENTIALLY 
         IMPRACTICAL WHEN LARGER ISSUES OF POLITICAL AND 
         STRATEGIC COMPLEXITY ARE AT STAKE."
TEXT:    ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COUNTRY, THE BOSTON GLOBE 
         AGREES.
VOICE:   "AS A PRACTICAL MATTER .... TOTAL AND ITS RUSSIAN AND 
         MALAYSIAN PARTNERS HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE U-S LAW 
         HAS NO DETERRENT EFFECT.  TOTAL SOLD OFF ITS ONE 
         VULNERABLE U-S HOLDING JUST BEFORE CLOSING ITS 
         LONG-PREPARED DEAL WITH IRAN.   HENCE, IT IS IMPERVIOUS 
         TO POSSIBLE SANCTIONS ..... THE PERILS EMANATING FROM 
         TEHRAN'S CLERICAL DESPOTISM ARE QUITE REAL.  THE 
         LEADERS' PURSUIT OF NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL 
         WEAPONS ULTIMATELY THREATENS FRENCH INTERESTS NO LESS 
         THAN U-S INTERESTS.  THEIR MANY ACTS OF TERRORISM ON 
         EUROPEAN SOIL OUGHT TO HAVE MADE [PRIME MINISTER LIONEL]
         JOSPIN LESS GLEEFUL ABOUT DOING BUSINESS WITH THEM.  
         NONETHELESS, RESENTMENT OVER U-S MEDDLING IN FOREIGN 
         TRADE IS MORE APT TO ENCOURAGE THAN TO DISCOURAGE 
         EUROPEAN DEALINGS WITH TEHRAN.  THE UNITED STATES HAS A 
         BETTER CHANCE OF AFFECTING THE BEHAVIOR OF IRRESPONSIBLE
         ALLIES IF IT TRIES THE CARROTS AND STICKS OF TRADITIONAL
         STATECRAFT."
TEXT:    THE NEW YORK TIMES SAYS THE DEAL IS "DOUBLY 
         UNFORTUNATE," BUT SUGGESTS AIMING THE SANCTIONS AT IRAN,
         NOT  FRANCE.
VOICE:   "IT [THE DEAL] WILL PROVIDE NEW FUNDS TO A GOVERNMENT 
         THAT IS EXPORTING TERRORISM, DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
         AND DISRUPTING PEACE EFFORTS BETWEEN ISRAEL AND THE ARAB
         WORLD.  THE CONTRACT COULD ALSO TRIGGER THE FIRST 
         APPLICATION OF THE IRAN-LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT, AN 
         ILL-ADVISED LAW THAT ATTEMPTS TO IMPOSE AMERICAN 
         PENALTIES ON FOREIGN COMPANIES DOING ENERGY BUSINESS 
         WITH IRAN OF LIBYA.  ..... FRANCE HAS ... UNHELPFULLY 
         APPOINTED ITSELF THE WORLD'S LEADING CHALLENGER OF 
         AMERICAN DIPLOMACY AND ECONOMIC IDEAS."
                              [OPT]
TEXT:     ON LONG ISLAND, NEWSDAY, WARNS THAT IN THIS INSTANCE, 
         U-S POLICY IS "JUST NOT REALISTIC."
VOICE:   "A FRENCH AGREEMENT WITH IRAN TO EXPLORE IRANIAN NATURAL
         GAS FIELDS IS  NOT  THE RIGHT SUBJECT, NOR IS THIS THE 
         RIGHT TIME, FOR INVOKING AMERICAN LAWS AIMED AT 
         ISOLATING IRAN....  THE FRENCH ARE BEING THEIR USUAL 
         OBSTINATE, DIFFICULT SELVES....  BUT MANY MIDEAST 
         EXPERTS BELIEVE THE SITUATION MAY BE CHANGING SO 
         FUNDAMENTALLY IN IRAN THAT NOW IS NOT THE TIME FOR A 
         MAJOR CONFRONTATION, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT WOULD DAMAGE 
         THE [WESTERN] ALLIANCE."
                            [END OPT]
TEXT:    THE WASHINGTON POST SAYS PRESIDENT CLINTON'S HAND IS 
         BEING FORCED TO INVOKE THE PENALTY, BUT IF HE DOES, IT 
         WILL BE NO VICTORY.
VOICE:   "IT WAS EITHER THAT OR, BY PULLING BACK, TO INVITE A 
         PAINFUL BLOW TO [U-S] INTEREST AND PRIDE.  TO MOVE 
         AHEAD, THOUGH, MAY TURN OUT TO BE NO LESS STRESSFUL, 
         SINCE IT INVOLVES INVOKING PUNITIVE SANCTIONS  NOT 
         AGAINST ADVERSARIES BUT AGAINST SOME OF WASHINGTON'S 
         CLOSEST ALLIES. ....... THE DETERIORATION OF THIS 
         DISPUTE INTO OPEN POLITICAL CONFLICT AMONG ALLIES IS A 
         MAJOR MARK AGAINST AMERICAN DIPLOMACY."
TEXT:    ON THAT UNIFORMLY DISMAL FORECAST REGARDING THIS LATEST 
         TRADE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE U-S AND -- BY PROXY -- IRAN, 
         WE CONCLUDE THIS U-S OPINION ROUNDUP.
NEB/ANG/RRM 
02-Oct-97 1:28 PM EDT (1728 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list