• Military Menu                       

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Industry
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• WMD
• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

Groyper

The nonsense word “groyper” itself does not have a conventional dictionary meaning. The word “groyper” refers to a subcultural meme and political identity that emerged from online spaces connected to the far right. The groyper character itself is a variation of Pepe the Frog, a cartoon amphibian that became a widely recognized internet symbol during the 2010s. Unlike the more neutral or broadly humorous uses of Pepe, the groyper is drawn as a heavier, smug-looking frog resting its chin on folded hands. This image was adopted by a loose network of nationalist and ultraconservative activists who came to be known as the “Groyper Army.”

The groyper phenomenon is closely tied to Nick Fuentes, a far-right commentator who rose to prominence in the late 2010s. His followers began using the groyper meme as a banner to distinguish themselves from mainstream conservatives. They argued that organizations like Turning Point USA and other Republican-aligned groups were too moderate, too globalist, or too focused on corporate interests. To draw attention to their agenda, groypers staged what came to be called the “Groyper Wars” in 2019. During these events, Fuentes’ supporters disrupted conservative conferences and campus appearances, pressing speakers with hostile questions about immigration, foreign policy, and social issues.

The history of the alt-right is rooted in the convergence of internet culture, reactionary politics, and discontent with mainstream conservatism. The term “alternative right” was first popularized in 2010 by Richard Spencer, who envisioned it as a new ideological space for white nationalists, identitarians, and those who rejected what they saw as the failures of the conservative establishment. From the beginning, the alt-right distinguished itself by openly embracing racial identity, ethnonationalism, and opposition to liberal democracy, though it often cloaked these ideas in irony or online subcultural humor.

The movement’s early growth took place largely on online forums such as 4chan and Reddit, where memes and trolling created a shared identity among participants. Pepe the Frog, originally a harmless cartoon, became the mascot of this online subculture, its image repurposed to spread racist or antisemitic themes while retaining a veneer of plausible deniability. This blending of internet in-jokes with extremist ideology allowed the alt-right to recruit younger audiences and to insert itself into mainstream political conversations through viral content.

By the mid-2010s, the alt-right had gained visibility in American politics, especially during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. The movement saw Donald Trump’s candidacy as aligned with its anti-immigration and nationalist positions, even if Trump himself never endorsed them. Figures like Spencer, Milo Yiannopoulos, and others pushed alt-right ideas into the public sphere, using media provocations to blur the line between mainstream conservatism and extremist ideology. However, tensions soon emerged between different factions—some oriented toward outright white supremacy and others toward broader populist or libertarian goals.

The movement reached its high-water mark in 2017, when the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, brought together neo-Nazis, Klansmen, militias, and self-described alt-right activists. The rally culminated in violence, including the killing of counter-protester Heather Heyer. The backlash was immediate and severe, and the alt-right brand became toxic even among many who had previously flirted with its imagery. After Charlottesville, major platforms banned prominent figures, and the movement splintered into smaller, less cohesive groups.

Since then, the alt-right has declined as a unified force but left behind a legacy of meme-driven politics and radicalized online communities. Offshoots like the groypers, as well as newer iterations of white nationalist activism, continue to use the tactics pioneered by the alt-right—leveraging irony, subcultural aesthetics, and digital organizing to advance exclusionary ideologies. Even in decline, the alt-right’s history shows how internet culture can amplify fringe movements and momentarily push them into mainstream discourse.

While the groypers describe themselves as “America First” conservatives, their messaging has been widely criticized for its exclusionary, racialist, and antisemitic undertones. Analysts of extremist movements often classify them as a variant of the white nationalist milieu rather than a genuine expression of conservatism. Their tactics, which blend meme culture with coordinated harassment, reveal how internet-based activism can blur into real-world political agitation. In this way, the groyper serves not only as an internet meme but as a visual shorthand for a particular strain of American far-right politics.

To call oneself a “groyper” was to signal membership in the so-called “Groyper Army,” which defined itself against mainstream conservative groups and sought to promote an “America First” agenda. Thus, the word’s meaning shifted from an in-joke about a frog meme to a political brand tied to online nationalism. In its current usage, “groyper” refers simultaneously to the meme character, the followers of Fuentes’ movement, and the broader aesthetic of trollish, ironic far-right activism. The term retains a deliberately unserious and playful ring, which helps obscure the harder ideological edges of the movement that adopted it.

Nick Fuentes is a far-right political pundit notorious for his extremist views, including white supremacy, misogyny, and antisemitism. His YouTube channel was permanently banned in 2020 for violating hate speech policies, and he has been labeled a neo-Nazi by several sources. Fuentes caused outrage for posting "Your Body, My Choice" on X (formerly Twitter) following Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election. The question of whether Nick Fuentes is gay has been a topic of speculation and discussion across various platforms, often fueled by his own statements and behaviors, as well as commentary from others. Nick Fuentes has made numerous contradictory and controversial statements about sexuality. For instance, he has described himself as the "straightest guy" while simultaneously claiming that "having sex with women is gay," which suggests a complex or at least contradictory view on sexuality. Fuentes has also engaged with or been linked to events that have led to speculation about his sexual orientation, such as streaming gay pornography during a livestream, which he claimed was due to hacking. Nick Fuentes and his "America First" movement are explicitly anti-transgender and oppose LGBTQ+ rights. He and his followers promote rhetoric that disparages transgender people and other minority groups, often using conspiracy theories and offensive language. Fuentes and his followers have used derogatory and offensive language when referring to transgender people. In a video from April 2025, Fuentes posted on social media about his views on the origins of the "transgender movement," which aligns with his anti-trans stance. Fuentes and his followers scapegoat transgender people and other minority groups for societal problems. A September 2025 article on KTLA mentions how Fuentes appeals to followers by claiming that "everything is being stolen from us... by transgender people". One commentator noted " pretty well established that Nick is almost certainly gay. Considering that he makes his followers avoid women, kicks them out if they start dating a woman, has said sex with women is actually what's gay and he has not once dated any woman, it's the telltale signs that he's gay." Another sugested "his whole misogyny volcel thing does point to him being in the closet about his sexuality". However, without a clear, serious acknowledgment from Fuentes himself, this remains in the realm of speculation. It's also important to consider the context in which these discussions occur, often within a highly polarized and politically charged environment where personal attacks and speculation can be motivated by various agendas. Tucker Carlson talked to Candace Owens 01 August 2025 about the "weird little gay kid" Nick Fuentes attacking Joe Kent and being a controlled asset used to discredit people on the right. "Nick Fuentes...this child... this weird little gay kid in his basement in Chicago." The political beliefs of Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the 10 September 2025 Charlie Kirk shooting, may have been revealed through inscriptions found on his ammo casings. The analysis argues these inscriptions connect Robinson to the alt-right Groyper movement led by Nick Fuentes, rather than being random or left-leaning signals as initially claimed.

• Groyper Movement Affiliation: The inscriptions are seen as evidence of Robinson's alignment with the Groyper movement, a faction within the alt-right that views mainstream Republicans like Charlie Kirk as "sellouts".
• "Notices bulges OWO": A reference to transphobic memes co-opted by right-wing trolls for bigoted purposes.
• "Oh Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao Ciao Ciao": An ironic appropriation of an anti-fascist WWII partisan song to ridicule leftists and criticize "fascist" establishment figures like Kirk.
• "Catch this fascist": A direct attack on Kirk, portraying the shooting as a purging of a "traitor" from the right.
• "If you are reading this you are gay, Imaoooo": A homophobic taunt, consistent with the Groyper movement's anti-LGBTQ+ stance.

This incident may reflect the "toxic underbelly of the MAGA ecosystem," where online radicalization can lead individuals to violence against perceived ideological impurities. It suggests Robinson, described as a young individual "steeped in gun culture and pandemic-era echo chambers," was motivated by this form of extremism. This analysis positions the Charlie Kirk shooting not as an isolated act, but as a tragic outcome of online radicalization within specific far-right subcultures and their internal conflicts.

MIller on 16 September 2025 said "The power of federal law enforcement that was used for the last four years to harass and attack conservatives... Christians, and law-abiding families... is going to be used to get ALL the criminals and vioIent offenders and domestic terrorists off our streets. Whether you are a domestic terrorist or a vioIent gang member or drug trafficker, a Tren de Aragua kiIIer, President Trump is saying he's going to use his FBI, his [DoW], his DEA to WIPE YOU OUT and put you behind bars." In August 2024, Nick Fuentes launched "Groyper War 2," a "digital war" against Trump's presidential campaign involving memes, trolls, and protests to push for more extreme right-wing positions the Groyper movement may have a vested interest in elevating Fuentes’ incendiary and divisive politics further into the mainstream space previously occupied by Kirk and Turning Point.Fuentes is also an integralist and a Christian nationalist. He has said, "You're either a Catholic or you're with the Jews," Fuentes, alongside rapper Kanye West, famously dined with private citizen Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort in 2022, two years prior to his eventual election to a second term in the White House. Fuentes has been deplatformed from various social media websites, payment processors, and other services. Following the deplatforming from major providers such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and DLive, Fuentes collaborated with Alex Jones to launch his own live-streaming platform, Cozy.tv, in October 2021. On May 2, 2024, Elon Musk said that he would reinstate Fuentes' X (formerly Twitter) account "provided he does not violate the law, and let him be crushed by the comments and Community Notes". Groypers would’ve been seen as members of a fringe ideology found mostly in small, tight-knit online communities like 4chan and Reddit. But now, in 2025, they are “hugely influential” in modern conservative politics. He’s been banned on several social media sites, participated in the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, and was present at the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol. Fuentes is also an integralist and a Christian nationalist. He has said, "You're either a Catholic or you're with the Jews," the slogans and messages found on the bullets are linked to white nationalist personality and influencer Nick Fuentes and his legion of dedicated followers known as “Groyper ATF Confused by 'Furry' Meme Culture | Ty the goal is to get to figure out how hardcore you can get in terms of putting positions out there that grab people’s attention and not lose people,” he said. “More extreme positions tend to just capture more attention … it’s sort of a rabbit hole of who can who can be more viral, who can be more provocative, who can grab more attention. And attention-seeking content, whether it’s true or not, or whether it’s kind or not, or polite or not, is what takes over the internet Political streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell II is facing intense backlash following controversial comments made in September 2025 regarding the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk. While he did not explicitly call for violence, his remarks have been widely interpreted as an endorsement of it. The Piers Morgan interview On the television show Piers Morgan Uncensored, Destiny was pressed to condemn Kirk's murder but repeatedly refused to do so unconditionally. He stated that his condemnation would be contingent upon former President Donald Trump first making a public plea for calm. He argued that conservative leaders had fueled a dangerous political environment and should face the consequences of escalating tensions. Critics, including other panelists, immediately condemned this position as a "profound failure of basic humanity". Subsequent comments on his stream Further outrage was ignited by comments Destiny made on his own livestream. He argued that for the political climate to de-escalate, conservative figures must feel "a tangible threat". He stated they needed to be "afraid of getting killed when they go to events" in order to pressure their leadership to lower the political temperature. Critics viewed these remarks not as political analysis but as a direct endorsement of using violence and intimidation as a political tool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcw02sEslog">Blackpill Aesthetics: A Crash Course in Meme Extremism Cy Canterel

During the AFPAC speech in which he praised Hitler, Fuentes said that the media had been comparing Vladimir Putin to Hitler "as if that wasn't a good thing".[52] Fuentes also asked the audience, "Can we get a round of applause for Russia?" which was followed by roaring applause and chants of "Putin! Putin!"[49] On March 10, 2022, Fuentes praised "czar Putin" for the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which he claimed was to "liberate Ukraine from the Great Satan and from the evil empire in the world, which is the United States". In July 2023, appearing on the Fresh and Fit Podcast, Fuentes stated that women were "baby machines" because "that's what their brains are about".[93] He has stated that the optimal age for a wife is 16, which he states is "right when the milk is good." On August 9, 2024, he posted on X that he had "declared a new Groyper War against the 2024 Trump campaign", as "his campaign has been hijacked by the same consultants, lobbyists, & donors that he defeated in 2016, and they're blowing it" Fuentes identifies as an incel (or "involuntary celibate"), although some of his supporters have criticized him for being a volcel (voluntarily celibate) after he admitted that he kissed a girl while he was in high school.[94][95] He has described himself as the "straightest guy" and attempted to defend himself as an incel by claiming that "the only really straight heterosexual position is to be an asexual incel", as "having sex with women is gay". to Blair White, Buck Angel and Caitlyn Jenner. All right wing trans people. the so-called "Groyper Army", which had been waging the "Groyper Wars" against mainstream Republicans, including specifically Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA And as an added bonus, here is Nick Fuentes on a date with his right wing catboy boyfriend CatboyKami (Tor Brookes) https://x.com/maddenifico/status/1967242984510074980 Jake Broe @RealJakeBroe · 22h Charlie Kirk's assassin was a Groyper and a follower of the white nationalist Nick Fuentes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4TSYhfyWnI&t=809s&pp=ygUMdW5pdGVkIGZyb250 Fuentes and the Groyper community has been hating and attacking Charlie Kirk for years. This language is what radicalized Tyler Robinson. The story of the 2019 "Groyper War” is instructive here. Followers of Fuentes would ambush mainstream conservative figures, most notably Charlie Kirk at Turning Point USA events, and pepper them with questions about topics like immigration and Israel. Kirk, who had once openly supported legal immigration and "stapling green cards to diplomas,” shifted toward a harder line, demonstrating how a fringe online movement could bully one of the GOP's most connected influencers into changing his tune. The Groyper War was in compressed form a demonstration of what has happened on the right more generally. Weird internet subcultures have shown that they can transfer their energy into real-world leverage over the broader conservative movement. Fuentes' followers lacked institutional power, but they could humiliate establishment conservatives online, generate viral moments, and move the conversation in their direction. Few Republican stances have seemed more solid than being pro-Israel, with the Trump administration deporting people for writing the wrong op-eds and refraining from putting pressure on the Netanyahu government over what is happening in Gaza. Yet support for Israel is dropping among young Republicans. Marjorie Taylor Greene now puts out long rants attacking Luigi Mangione President 0:04 Trump's order to fly flags at 0:07 half staff for Charlie Kirk met 0:09 with pushback. L.A. Mayor Karen 0:10 Bass instructing local fire 0:12 stations to not lower their 0:14 flags. USC law professor Jody Armor 2:12 argues that Charlie Kirk does 2:14 not meet the criteria for 2:14 lowering the American flag. "We don't have someone who is 2:00 a first responder, or a soldier, 2:03 or a federal official, or even 2:04 a local official or an elected 2:06 official. We have a a 2:08 influencer." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ7RWsbebp0 If this kid's girlfriend turns out to be 0:03 trans, that only strengthens the 0:06 argument that he is a groper because 0:08 there is a subculture in there that uh 0:12 loves fem and this is part of how they 0:16 deal with their homophobia, their 0:18 transphobia, 0:20 and um all the things they feel super 0:22 The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry (COI), which does not speak on behalf of the world body and has faced harsh Israeli criticism, found that "genocide is occurring in Gaza and is continuing to occur", commission chief Navi Pillay said. "The responsibility lies with the State of Israel." The United Nations rights chief said Tuesday evidence of a "genocide" unfolding in Gaza was mounting, as Israel scaled up its offensive in the Palestinian territory with a ground assault on Gaza City. "We see the piling up of war crime after war crime after war crime, of crime against humanity, and potentially even more," Volker Turk told AFP and Reuters, adding: "It's for the court to decide whether it's genocide or not, and we see the evidence mounting." Israel said it "categorically rejects" a report by the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry which determined that Israel has since October 2023 committed "genocide" in Gaza. "Israel categorically rejects this distorted and false report and calls for the immediate abolition of this Commission of Inquiry," a statement from the foreign ministry said. The Israeli ambassador to the United Nations on Tuesday called the findings a "libelous rant". The report, which also found that top Israeli officials including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu incited genocidal acts, is "scandalous" and "fake," Daniel Meron said in Geneva. Israel ordered residents to flee. So far, more than 140,000 have already fled south from Gaza City since August 14, U.N. data shows, of a population of around 1 million people. "It is inhumane to expect nearly half a million children, battered and traumatised by over 700 days of unrelenting conflict, to flee one hellscape and end up in another," Tess Ingram, a UNICEF spokesperson, told reporters by video link from the sprawling tent camp of Mawasi, Gaza. "People really do have no good option - stay in danger or flee to a place that they also know is dangerous," she said, adding that some children had been killed at the Mawasi camp while collecting water. A New York State judge on Tuesday agreed to dismiss two terrorism-related charges against Luigi Mangione, including one that had accused him of first-degree murder. He will still face trial for murder in the second degree of UnitedHealthcare executive Brian Thompson in December last year. New York law does not classify something as an act of terrorism just because it is driven by ideology. ashamed of by being in the MAGA cult This is the same culture of the Spartans of Ancient Greek. They viewed women as so beneath them, they saw them only as breeding machines. Relationships were with men only. They romanticized the love between men, like we do with the love between a man and a woman. An edgelord is an individual who is being deliberately outrageous in order to boost his own ego and stand out in a crowd. Israel unleashed a long-threatened ground assault on Gaza City on Tuesday, declaring "Gaza is burning" as Palestinians there described the most intense bombardment they had faced in two years of war. An Israel Defence Forces official said ground troops were moving deeper into the enclave's main city, and that the number of soldiers would rise in coming days to confront up to 3,000 Hamas combatants the IDF believes are still in the city. "Gaza is burning," Defence Minister Israel Katz posted on X. Tradwives are women who adopt traditional gender roles in their marriage, Norman Rockwell painting come to life courtesy of the internet. "The IDF strikes with an iron fist at the terrorist infrastructure and IDF soldiers are fighting bravely to create the conditions for the release of the hostages and the defeat of Hamas." the strongest most conservative men who in front of others they act macho and anti LGBTQ this incel/misogynist culture would go so far as to choose femboys/transgirls over cis girls even if it looks completely antithetical to their politics. Syria, Jordan and the United States have agreed on a plan to restore stability in the southern Syrian province of Sweida after it was rocked by deadly clashes between members of the Druze minority sect and Bedouin tribes in July, Syria's transitional government said Tuesday. The plan includes "launching a process of internal reconciliation" and prosecuting those involved in attacks on civilians. The clashes erupted on July 13 between Druze militias and local Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes in Sweida. Government forces then intervened, nominally to restore order, but ended up essentially siding with the Bedouins against the Druze. Atrocities were committed during the days of clashes. It’s just a Nihilism and Nietzscheism cult they don’t care about anything and joke about everything too. catboi Elon who used the Charlie Kirk murder to claim "The left is the party of murder"....is the guy who unbanned Nick Fuentes and thus possibly broadened his reach to maybe help cause this murder

,a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuq8PR3R6FM">Charlie Kirk's assassin LEFT CLUES about why he did it (was Tyler Robinson a groyper?)

,a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ7RWsbebp0&t=70s">TRANS PARTNERS ARE COMMON IN GROYPER SUBCULTURES/ALT RIGHT

The Druze religious sect began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam. Over half of the roughly 1 million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast War and annexed in 1981. Max Kuhn https://www.youtube.com/@MaxKuhn1 Intro 0:00 Everybody who is waiting for a concrete 0:02 motive if the reports about him being a 0:04 chronically online groper are true. 0:06 There will be no motive. Everyone, 0:09 including liberals and conservatives, 0:10 will be disappointed with the results of 0:12 the investigation. Here's why. We're 0:15 going to get into info about the shooter 0:16 and who he is. And if you heard in the 0:18 little intro there, I said groper. Um, 0:21 I'm sure most of you have no clue what 0:22 that means. I know you have no clue. 0:24 I have no clue what a grip. 0:25 So, we're going to get to that shortly. 0:27 Yeah, I think it's important that we get 0:28 to what do we know about this kid? 0:30 Okay, so what do we know about this kid 0:32 that's important and relevant to him 0:34 being a groper? 0:35 Yeah, what we do know, they're a family 0:38 in Utah, Mormons, pretty welloff, 0:40 Republican 0:41 Republican. He's a smart kid. He got a 0:43 um 0:44 4.0 GPA. 0:45 4.0 GPA. He scholarship uh engineering 0:47 and then he left that and he was three 0:50 years into an electrical like a 0:52 electrician uh program at a trade 0:53 school. So, he seemed to be a quiet kid 0:55 in real life. kind of a lot of people 0:57 reporting. No affiliation with any kind 0:59 of political party, 1:00 not Democrat or Republican, no 1:02 affiliation there, no military 1:04 affiliation. I know some people were 1:05 wondering if he's had any kind of 1:06 training. Nothing there. And reported by 1:09 a lot of people and his family included, 1:11 was vocal when he was vocal about how Tyler Robinson Did Not Like Charlie Kirk 1:13 much he did not like Charlie Kirk. It 1:15 was one of the few things that they were 1:17 like that was he was vocal about. Also, 1:20 I noticed that he had an upbringing 1:22 where guns and military stuff was very 1:26 much a part of his 1:27 very much guns were around constantly. 1:29 So, he's 1:30 there's a picture of him at an M50 1:33 machine gun. 1:34 So, he's very comfortable with guns. 1:36 He's very acclimated to them. 1:37 Yeah. Even a picture I saw with him with 1:39 like a missile launcher on his shoulder. 1:41 Sure. I didn't see that picture, but I 1:42 believe it. 1:42 A comfortability around 1:44 He's a comfortability around weapons. 1:46 Yes. 1:46 Yep. That not everybody has. 1:48 Yeah. I want to start with the bullet 1:49 casings, 1:51 the engravings on them that seem to, 1:53 and this is true, by the way, because 1:54 we've heard about these cases. 1:55 I thought it wasn't real at first 1:57 because what I what I heard originally, 1:59 everyone heard was that there was 2:00 transgender engravings, 2:01 right? That was the first report 2:03 was a manufacturer stamp 2:05 on the bottom of the casing. 2:07 Oh, 2:07 so that's not true. 2:08 Okay. So, that's where that came from. 2:09 Yeah. 2:09 So, but this is about the 2:11 engravings on the shells on the casing. 2:14 So, not like the bullet itself, but the 2:16 casing. 2:17 What's left over after you shoot? 2:18 Yeah. When it what pops out of the gun 2:19 when you shoot. Okay. So, there's four. 2:22 Four. 2:22 Four. Okay. 2:23 This is about him being a griper. Yes. 2:26 So, this this is where this evidence 2:28 comes from. And it's going to sound like 2:29 nonsense to a lot of you and 2:31 individually they're nonsensical. 2:34 Combined 2:35 is what makes it a good piece of 2:37 evidence, right? So, separate they're 2:38 meaningless. 2:39 Okay. 2:39 Together, it's something. So, first The Bullet Casing That Killed Charlie Kirk 2:41 casing. This is the one that actually he 2:44 shot Charlie with. 2:45 Oh, 2:47 spent casing. 2:48 This was on scene. I guess they found 2:49 this. 2:50 This is the spent casing. So, it it 2:52 reads, "Notice bulge." 2:55 Oo. Woo. What's this? 2:57 What? 3:00 Really? 3:00 Yeah. That's the one that he shot 3:02 Charlie with. 3:04 All right. So, that's some 3:06 like inside joke. That's it. That's 3:08 That's as best as I can say. Decades old 3:10 dig at people concealing the fact that 3:13 they're a man. 3:15 Oh, 3:16 right. 3:16 Okay. 3:17 Decade. This is now that kind of joke is 3:20 old. 3:20 Okay. 3:21 It's not mainstream anymore. 3:22 Like that's an 80s joke. 3:24 Like it's early 2000s internet stuff. 3:26 It's like 3:26 oh early 2000s internet joke, right? So 3:29 people who still use that joke in their 3:31 life very very far right. 3:34 Oh, okay. The only people who still say 3:35 that kind of stuff are like 3:37 in these 3:38 way on the fringe. 3:39 It is not on the internet really anymore 3:41 like that. 3:41 Not mainstream internet mainstream 3:44 Facebook main. 3:45 You'll never see it there. You'll have 3:46 to go to like 4chan and like the dark 3:48 web to see stuff like that. 2nd Bullet Casing 3:50 Okay. 3:50 Okay. 3:50 This is helpful. 3:51 Second one. Hey fascist catch. 3:55 Mhm. And then the arrows upright down 3:57 down 3:59 which is a reference to the video game 4:01 Hell Divers which if anybody in our 4:03 audience has seen the movie Star 4:05 Starship Troopers 4:07 you'll be intimately familiar familiar 4:09 with how the game works. 4:10 There's a game 4:11 there's a game called Hell Divers 2. You 4:13 dress very similar to how they do in 4:15 Hell in uh Starship Troopers 4:17 and you fight giant bugs. 4:18 Oh okay. Interestingly. Yeah. Okay. So, 4:21 the game just like in Starship Troopers 4:24 is making fun of fascism 4:26 by you being the fascist. It's it's 4:29 making fun of it. 4:30 It's a video game version of making fun 4:32 of fascism. 4:33 It's pretty much video game version of 4:35 Starship Troopers. It's very similar. 4:37 Okay. That's not the same thing as to 4:40 say something like Antifa. 4:42 Not the same thing. Okay. Not the same 4:43 thing. So, third one was 3rd Bullet Casing 4:46 third bullet casing. Third bullet casing 4:47 was the O Bell Chow Bellachow Bella Chow 4:50 Chow Chow, which famously is an Italian 4:53 partisan song from World War II. 4:55 World War II. 4:56 Yep. So, if you go to Spotify and you 4:59 look up Groper Wars, 5:01 Groper Wars, 5:02 it's on your screen. 5:04 Okay. Uh, 5:05 Bellachow. 5:06 Oh, it's it's literally on the playlist. 5:08 So, they have despite its origins, it's 5:12 not really used by any anti-fascists 5:14 like that. It's mused much more of like 5:16 a, oh, we're the fascists, but we're 5:18 going to do something silly here. We're 5:20 going to take their song, 5:21 okay? 5:21 And now look at us. 5:22 So, there's like an irony anti-ironyy 5:25 thing happening. 5:26 Yeah. Kind of like how the Nazis took 5:28 the swastika, which was a Hindu symbol, 5:30 and they're like, I know what we're 5:31 going to do. 5:32 Okay. 5:32 We're going to take the symbol of peace. 5:34 Interesting 5:34 kind of a thing. Okay. So, this is the 5:35 thing that happens. Okay. 4th Bullet Casing 5:36 Yeah. 5:37 Last one. If you read this, you are gay. 5:39 The fourth bullet. 5:40 Fourth one. If you read this, you are 5:42 gay. Not a lot of analysis happening 5:44 there. Pretty old troll tactic. It's 5:48 also not really used by the mainstream 5:51 anymore. So again, that's more of a 5:52 right-wing troll thing now. Maybe in 5:55 2008. 5:56 It might have been more mainstream, but 5:58 not in 2025. That's a right-wing thing. 6:01 Okay. 6:02 So that's the that's the big piece of 6:04 evidence that I have. Right. 6:05 Interesting. 6:06 So you think 6:07 So those are 6:08 those are all nonsensical and insane. 6:10 And you're right. Those are four. I 6:12 mean, I'm on the internet a lot. 6:14 Yeah. 6:14 I'm on social media. Yeah. 6:16 Some. 6:17 Yeah. 6:18 On Reddit a lot. 6:19 Yes. 6:19 I don't see stuff like that. I've got a 6:22 16-year-old kid. I see a little bit of 6:24 his stuff. 6:24 He won't see any of that. 6:25 He's He's not going to recognize any of 6:26 this. 6:27 I'm barely old enough to even understand 6:29 any of it. I'm 23. 6:31 But you don't see any of that stuff in 6:33 the circles that you move in. 6:34 Nope. Hell Divers 2. Maybe it's a big 6:36 video game, but like not in the context 6:39 this is being used in. 6:40 Okay. Interesting. So, this is happening 6:42 again, evidence that it's happening in 6:43 the little 6:45 edges in the niches of the internet in 6:47 the dark corners of the internet. 6:48 In the dark corners of the internet with 6:49 spiderw webs and you really got to be 6:51 tapped in for years, like a decade to 6:54 even begin to understand. 6:56 By the way, where do these people 6:59 digitally congregate? Are they on 7:02 Discord? Are they on They're on a 7:04 website called 4chan, 7:05 which people probably have heard from 7:07 the Hillary campaign. 7:08 All right. uh 4chan. 7:10 That's like a discussion board thing. 7:12 Yeah. It's kind of like an old school 7:13 message board. Okay. There's a few other 7:14 of these like anonymous posting sites, 7:17 but it's not happening on Facebook. 7:19 No. 7:20 It used to happen on Reddit some, but it 7:21 doesn't happen on Reddit anymore. 7:22 Doesn't even happen on Reddit. 7:24 Nope. 7:24 It's not happening like that you could 7:26 see on Twitter. 7:27 You'd have to you'd have to kind of find 7:29 it. 7:29 You'd have to be looking for it. 7:30 Yeah. You'd have to know where to look. 7:32 And you even then you'd barely see it. 7:33 This is in the dark corners of the 7:34 internet. So that so that kind of starts 7:36 the investigation and the news doesn't 7:38 know what to do with this information. 7:39 Well, there you go. That's what you do 7:41 with the information. Now we understand 7:43 the references. Proof Tyler Robinson Was A Groyper? 7:44 So there's one more piece of evidence 7:46 that this guy is a groper. 7:48 I'm going to put a photo up on your 7:49 screen. 7:50 It's going to be what are we looking at? 7:51 Why is this important? It's a post from 7:53 his mother in 2018 reading, "Happy 7:57 Halloween handing out candy alone since 7:59 the weirdos ditched me. Tyler is some 8:01 guy from a meme." You'll see he's 8:04 wearing an Adidas tracksuit and he's 8:06 squatting. 8:06 Mhm. 8:08 Innocent if you know nothing. 8:11 Yeah. 8:11 Next picture. 8:13 Very famous Griper meme. 8:16 Oh, 8:16 so this frog people might recognize from 8:18 the Hillary campaign. This is Pepe the 8:20 frog. 8:21 H. 8:21 Anybody recognize this little frog 8:23 picture? Should be familiar with a lot 8:24 of people. This meme is Groper written 8:29 all over it. 8:30 Okay. So, this is something you 8:32 definitely see in the 8:33 No. Yes. 8:34 In the Groper world. 8:35 Yeah. You see this all the time. 8:36 Okay. 8:36 It's their favorite meme. 8:37 All right. 8:38 And so, 8:38 and and that doesn't even necessarily 8:41 mean anything. 8:41 That's the point. 8:42 Even if it only means that only me and 8:45 you as gropers know what that that that 8:48 doesn't mean anything other than just to 8:50 help us identify each other. 8:51 Exactly. So, 8:52 but it doesn't even really mean 8:53 anything. 8:53 The thing that pulls it together is a 8:54 guy from a meme. This is a a specific 8:57 meme that people have pulled. There's 8:59 not really there's other ways to 9:01 interpret it. That's probably the 9:02 strongest evidence 9:03 that Well, no, that's super interesting. 9:05 Yeah. 9:05 And that was from 2018. 9:06 2018, which was a year after. 9:09 So, he was in the groper world 9:12 when it was really blowing up 9:13 at the beginning in 2018. 7 years ago. 9:16 Yeah. When it was really taking off. 9:17 So, he would have been 15 years old. 9:19 That's the target audience age. So, that 9:21 tracks, right? 9:23 So, the gripers move in dog whistles. 9:25 Nothing said out loud. It's all dog 9:27 whistles. famously, you can't hear a dog 9:30 whistle, but a dog can. So, it's 9:32 messages that are only understandable to 9:35 the target audience. So, these grippers, 9:36 you know, a little more about them, at 9:38 least what they're the context of this 9:40 evidence, right? 9:41 Mhm. 9:42 This got to start from somewhere. So, 9:43 who's in charge? There's a man called Who Is The Leader Of The Groypers? 9:46 Nick Fuentes. 9:47 He's in charge of the 9:49 He is the Gropers. 9:50 Really? 9:51 Yes. 9:52 No kidding. 9:53 He started it. 9:54 No kidding. He start because he's been 9:56 on for over a decade 9:58 since 2017. 9:59 He started his his show America First 10:02 in 2017 and he explicitly claims that 10:06 Donald Trump was his inspiration to 10:07 starting his show. 10:09 Okay. Wow. There's a video I want to 10:12 show everybody. 10:12 Feel when you're totally not pressed. 10:14 The feel when we control your bodies. 10:17 Hey [ __ ] we control your bodies. Guess 10:20 what? Guys win again. Okay, men win 10:24 again. And yes, we control your bodies. 10:27 Hi, 10:29 I'm your Republican congressman. Hi, I'm 10:33 your Republican congressman. It's your 10:36 body, my choice. And men, women again. 10:41 I can't tell if he's making fun of 10:43 No, he's being serious. 10:44 Republican. 10:44 He's being very earnest. He's laughing 10:46 like true joy. 10:47 Like he believes what he's saying. 10:49 Yes. 10:49 Okay. 10:50 Men win again. There will never ever be 10:54 a female president. Never. There will 10:57 never be a female president ever. It's 11:00 over. Glass ceiling. Dude, it's a 11:03 ceiling made of [ __ ] bricks. You will 11:05 never break it. Your stupid face keeps 11:07 hitting the brick ceiling. We will keep 11:10 you down forever. You will never 11:14 control. 11:15 So that is Nick Fuentes summed up 11:17 beautifully. 11:18 So he's like a podcaster. He's like on 11:20 YouTube. Uh 11:21 no, he's banned on YouTube. 11:22 Oh, he's banned on YouTube. Interesting. 11:24 So, where can a kid see his video? 11:26 Uh you'll have to Well, he's on Twitter 11:28 thanks to Elon. He was banned on on 11:30 Twitter. 11:30 He was banned on Twitter also. 11:32 But Elon unbanned him. 11:34 Personally went into the files and 11:36 unbanned him uh on Rumble. 11:39 Rumble, 11:40 the right-wing YouTube channel or 11:41 YouTube uh site. 11:43 Rumble. 11:44 Mhm. Okay. 11:45 So, who is this Nick Fuentes? If you 11:48 don't know, you might know, but you 11:50 might not know. 11:51 Tell me. 11:52 So he promotes nationalism, 11:55 specifically Catholic theocracy. So 11:58 Christian theocracy, but specifically 12:00 Catholic. Okay. Anti-semitism, racism, 12:04 sexism, and just across the board, queer 12:06 phobia. So he began his, like I said, 12:10 his political commentary show America 12:11 First 2017 cites Trump's victories as 12:14 inspiration. So Trump made this guy 12:16 indirectly. He has one of the most Groypers Are A Political Cult 12:19 active and aggressive political cults. 12:22 It is a cult through and through. They 12:26 are hyperaggressive and hyperactive. 12:29 So for the size of his following, you 12:32 can I just say that my image is maybe 12:35 people that have a lot of hate in them 12:37 for some reason. 12:38 Yeah. Like 16 to 26 kind of age range. A 12:40 lot of hate, 12:41 pain, rage. 12:42 Yep. Resentment towards the world for 12:44 some reason. And Nick fosters that hate 12:47 and rage and he targets it towards 12:49 people Nick doesn't like 12:51 and they punch way above their weight 12:53 class in terms of the size of his 12:55 audience. You would think he has 15 20 12:57 million followers, 12:58 but he only has 12:59 like a few like 200,000 at most. 300,000 13:02 maybe. 13:02 Wow. 13:03 At most. 13:04 But they're serious. 13:05 But you would think he moves weight. 13:08 Like he's the kind of person people on 13:10 the right don't like irritating. 13:12 So they ignore him. But they try to 13:15 actively not piss him off because he 13:17 will send them to their events, disrupt 13:19 their events. He'll disrupt their 13:21 videos, disrupt their live streams, 13:22 disrupt them at their house. Like he 13:25 bombards these people with his audience. 13:27 Like he wields Nick will say in his 13:29 videos, "We're targeting these people 13:32 and they're called Groper Wars." 13:35 What? 13:36 Yeah, 13:36 this is a thing. 13:37 Yep. We're gonna get to it. Hold on. 13:38 Wow, I've never 13:40 Last thing about Nick Fuentes, this is a 13:41 this is okay. So, everything I told you 13:43 about, you know, nationalism, 13:45 ethnostate, white supremacy, you know, 13:47 racism, sexism, this is the most 13:50 important detail. So, please pay 13:52 attention. Rewind if you need to. 13:53 Mhm. 13:55 Nick Fuentes 13:56 has all but said himself that he's gay 14:00 and uh attracted to trans people 14:02 sexually. 14:05 That's a little bit contradictory, 14:07 right? contradictory to the 14:08 So if you pay attention to rewind about 14:10 a minute ago, 14:11 queer phobia 14:12 100% he hates gay people. 14:14 He's gay. 14:15 But he is. 14:15 Yep. 14:17 So the reason I I point this out so like 14:21 I'm making such a big point of it. It's 14:24 utterly incoherent. 14:26 The ideology is for the sake of hate, 14:31 okay, 14:31 and division and pain and suffering. 14:34 That's the only reason the ideology 14:35 exists. It's like a conduit, like an 14:37 outlet for that pain and frustration. I 14:40 can now do something with it. 14:43 Yes. 14:43 Who cares what it is? 14:45 Doesn't care. No care in the world. 14:47 Give me somebody or something to hate. 14:48 I want to point that out because it's 14:50 not like this is some coherent ideology 14:52 that's going to have a book and it's 14:54 going to be a Nope. It's just anger and 14:56 hate 14:56 and it makes it a cult because these 14:58 people 14:58 follow him. 14:59 Follow him 15:00 and do what he says 15:01 and they believe everything like it's 15:04 gospel. 15:04 Yeah. And so I just said Groper war and What Are Groyper Wars? 15:07 your mind was blown. 15:09 Yeah. So he like the image that he would 15:11 say on Rumble or he would say on Twitter 15:14 or something like I want everybody to go 15:16 to this guy's event and 15:19 disrupt it in some way. 15:20 So 15:21 and that's called Groper Wars. I'm like 15:23 what this this is a thing. How have I 15:26 never heard of this? 15:26 So this is if you have to be rolling 15:28 around in the mud and on politics online 15:32 and it's a very well-known thing. 15:33 Twitter is where that 15:35 muddy. Well, yeah, it's on Twitter, but 15:36 it's like the like niche areas. It's the 15:39 mud. 15:40 Are you in that mud? 15:41 I'm tangential to it. I I I watch it. 15:44 I'm I'm in the stands. 15:45 You're in the stands. 15:46 I'm not so much in the mud. 15:48 Oh, interesting. 15:48 But I got a bucket of popcorn. 15:49 I mean, I'm glad you are cuz we're all 15:51 learning from this. 15:53 So, 15:53 what's a groper war? 15:55 Well, Nick has declared two on Charlie Charlie Kirk Was A Victim Of TWO Groyper Wars 15:58 Kirk. 15:59 Oh, really? And Charlie Kirk is the 16:02 person he hates most in politics. 16:05 Really? 16:05 There's not a single other individual 16:07 that he dislikes more. 16:10 Oh, really? 16:11 Not a single person. It is he is like 16:13 his sworn enemy. He has gone out of his 16:16 way to leave left-wing figures alone and 16:18 liberals alone to attack Charlie Kirk 16:20 for nearly a decade. 16:24 Is there really a question behind the 16:26 motive? So, let me let me like I don't 16:29 know how to explain this. Nick Fentes 16:31 and you might say to yourself, well, 16:32 they're both, you know, Nick Fentes is 16:34 wearing a Trump hat. He wears Trump hats 16:36 if you've looked them up by now. He 16:37 wears Trump hats and also wrong. He 16:40 declared a gripper war on Trump this 16:42 year. 16:42 Mhm. 16:43 This calendar year. 16:44 I feel like I sort of heard something 16:46 about that. 16:47 You did. And they did. They didn't work 16:49 the way he might have wanted to, but it 16:51 irritated a lot of people. 16:52 Yeah. Something happened. 16:54 Yeah. 16:54 Okay. So he has declared two gripper 16:58 wars. 16:58 What? 16:59 On Charlie Kirk. 17:00 What were they? Do we know what they 17:01 were? Can you describe what they were? 17:02 There was one this year. There was one 17:05 I 2019 and it consists of Charlie Kirk 17:08 hosts those events, right? Great 17:10 debates. 17:10 So there'll be like 50 gropers lined up 17:14 in a line 17:15 one after the other. They know they're 17:16 all gropers and they'll ask step by step 17:20 as each one of them goes up more and 17:21 more and more and more extreme questions 17:24 backing Charlie into a worse and worse 17:26 and worse corner 17:27 and making the event go off the rails. 17:30 Okay. 17:30 Every event they'll show up. 17:33 Wow. 17:33 Even if there's no debate, they'll be in 17:34 the crowd screaming, making noise, 17:36 asking questions. 17:37 Any video bombarding the comments, 17:40 bombarding the live stream, disliking, 17:43 reporting everything. They're trying to 17:45 like systematically destroy his online 17:48 presence and figure and image. 17:50 What? 17:50 And they're good at it. 17:52 Whoa. 17:52 They they've succeeded several times. 17:54 They are good at it. 17:56 Wow. All right. And for some reason, 17:58 they'll dox your address, your house, 17:59 your phone number. Like they get 18:01 everything. 18:02 Whoa. Hacker level. 18:03 They have plenty of people to do that. 18:05 Yes. They will try to basically they 18:07 won't hurt you physically, but it'll be 18:09 like a 18:11 Yeah. 18:11 You have to live with this or you're 18:12 going to have to quit politics. Jesus. 18:15 Whoa. 18:15 So, Charlie Kirk famously came up right 18:17 at the same time as Trump in 2016. Nick Did Charlie Kirk Protect Young People From Nick Fuentes? 18:20 was 2017. So, he viewed Charlie as like 18:22 a you're getting in the way of me 18:25 radicalizing more people. I could be 18:27 radicalizing more young people. It was 18:29 Charlie's audience. 18:30 If Charlie wasn't doing what he was 18:32 doing, 18:32 then Nick could have radicalized more 18:34 young people. 18:34 Radicalize them worse. 18:37 Gotcha. Bingo. 18:40 Whoa. 18:41 Yeah. That paints a totally different 18:44 picture of Charlie Kirk. Also, if you 18:46 look at it just like that, what the 18:49 heck? All right, I'm following. 18:52 Yes. So, this is cool. By the way, 18:55 thank you. Yeah. All the evidence we 18:57 have. 18:58 Mhm. If you're trying to build a story, 19:01 there is only one story that even makes 19:03 a little bit of sense and it's the 19:05 grober motive 19:07 that when he was young, he either, you 19:11 know, didn't get attention from girls, 19:13 head was made fun of in school, just all 19:15 alone, any normal feeling a kid has. 19:19 Yeah. 19:20 Fell into the wrong pipeline on YouTube 19:23 or on Reddit. Got into the wrong area. 19:26 Mhm. 19:27 He was angry. Someone gave him a reason 19:29 to be angry. He was happy, but he was 19:31 still angry. So, he wanted more. And you 19:33 do that for years and years and years. 19:35 Almost like an addiction. 19:36 Almost like an addiction. And 19:37 And Nick Fuentes is a magnet for those 19:40 people. He's very good at pulling those 19:42 people in. What Nick will do is he'll 19:44 have those kids and they'll eventually 19:45 come across him cuz he's big 19:46 and he's magnetic to those kind of kids. 19:49 And so he sits there and he watches his 19:50 stuff, gets angry, gets hateful, and if 19:53 your sworn enemy is Charlie Kirk, 19:56 right? What do you do? 19:57 Right. 19:57 Another piece of evidence. Not evidence, 19:59 but another narrative piece here that 20:01 ties the bow in. There's one more thing. 20:04 Yep. 20:04 That makes this act make sense. Cuz if 20:08 you're a reasonable viewer, like all of 20:09 our subscribers who are brilliant, 20:11 intelligent, beautiful people. 20:13 Yes, you. Yes, you are. What Made Tyler Robinson A Killer? 20:14 You might be thinking to yourself, okay, 20:16 that's great, but that doesn't mean 20:17 you're going to go shoot somebody. And I 20:19 say to you, correct? But there's a piece 20:22 of this if you are not uh if you're 20:24 older than like 24. 20:26 Yeah. 20:26 That you're missing. And the news will 20:28 never cover this part. Is this idea 20:31 called postirony? 20:33 We had a little discussion before and 20:34 you were like what? 20:35 So this is like the groper ideology. 20:38 This is this is kind of the philosophy 20:40 philosophy 20:41 if you will of 20:42 thinking. 20:43 Yeah. Of the groper, right? It is I'll 20:45 read it. 20:46 Okay. a state in which earnest and 20:48 ironic interest become muddled. So 20:52 meaning there is nothing serious anymore 20:55 and nothing wholly ironic. It is always 20:58 a blend. So you could never simply say, 21:01 "Oh, I really liked that movie. I really 21:02 felt touched by that movie. I liked it. 21:04 I was moved." 21:05 Mhm. 21:05 You'll never hear one of them say that 21:07 because that would be taking too much of 21:09 a committed 21:09 Yeah. too much emotion, too serious, too 21:11 formal, in a limbo of never commitment 21:14 to a feeling or emotion or a position or 21:16 in anything. So 21:18 unserious, 21:19 unserious. And so if you do that from 21:20 the age of 15, 2018, at least 2018, 21:24 if you do that for 7 years, 21:26 yeah, 21:27 very formidable years, might I add, 21:30 eventually 21:31 there is nothing off the table to you 21:33 anymore 21:35 because nothing is serious. Death isn't 21:39 serious. Prison isn't serious. 21:41 Assassinations aren't serious. 21:43 Nope. Nope. I guarantee you when Shinszo 21:45 AB was assassinated, they were making 21:47 jokes. 21:49 This is funny cuz who cares? It's 21:50 postirony. Nothing matters. That 21:52 philosophy, 21:53 it's almost like nihilism. 21:55 Yeah. But like a weird internet 21:58 perverted distorted version in a sense. 22:01 H. 22:02 So that philosophy of thinking where 22:05 nothing's serious and everything's 22:06 ironic will permanently leave the door 22:10 to assassination open. 22:13 It permanently it'll that door will 22:15 never ever ever ever ever be shut all 22:18 the way. That's why he was able to take 22:24 that final step. a rational viewer. You 22:27 might hate certain people, but you never 22:28 like killed them. Yeah. Like a rational 22:30 person, right? Like all our subscribers. 22:32 Yeah. And then even up to the moment of 22:34 squeeze actually squeezing. 22:36 Even if you somehow got yourself up onto 22:37 that rooftop, 22:38 you're like, I can't do this. 22:40 Right. Exactly. 22:41 The postirony 22:43 rotted mind does not finish that 22:46 thought. 22:49 He's too busy in the memes and the jokes 22:51 and the silliness and nothing serious of 22:53 it to even have that thought. So you 22:57 have all this foundation laid, all this 22:59 hate, all this anger, all this bigotry, 23:02 and if he's really truly a viewer of 23:03 Nick, hate for Charlie Kirk, which his 23:05 family even pointed out, as I noted in 23:08 the beginning of the video, all of that 23:10 groundwork and the door is opened 23:13 because nothing is serious. So the door 23:14 to assassination is open. So, 23:17 wow. 23:17 To tie the bow, 23:20 there's no motive. 23:22 There's nothing. There's no manifesto 23:25 other than just Charlie Kirk has been 23:28 identified as enemy number one. 23:30 Why? Not even really a good reason 23:32 there. He was on the internet with his 23:34 friends taking nothing serious. 23:36 Everything's a joke. Everything's a 23:38 meme. You know what' be really funny? If 23:41 someone shot Charlie Kirk was what 23:43 they're thinking. And then he goes, "I 23:45 know what's even funnier. 23:47 I'll do it." 23:48 Yeah. 23:48 And then all the friends are like, 23:49 "Dude, no way. You'll never do that." 23:52 Then he does it. 23:53 And because he's so comfortable around 23:55 guns 23:56 and he's so comfortable around guns and 23:57 his mind is rotted by nothing serious. 23:59 The door is wide open for him to do 24:03 that. Explains the the ability of the 24:05 shot. It explains the supposed composure 24:08 cuz people are thinking this has to be 24:10 an assassin. 24:11 Nope. It just has to be a person who 24:13 doesn't care. 24:13 A person who doesn't care because 24:14 nothing's serious. Person who been 24:17 around guns their whole life, right? And 24:19 a person who was egged on likely just by 24:21 the internet culture he existed in. And 24:24 so the question is, will a person kill 24:26 someone over jokes and memes? The answer 24:29 is absolutely. 24:31 Wow. 24:31 Absolutely. So, if you're waiting for 24:34 the FBI, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, I don't 24:38 care who you get your news from, if 24:39 you're waiting for them to drop the 24:40 manifesto, it doesn't exist. 24:44 And even if it does, which I don't think 24:46 it does, when you read it, you'll be 24:49 more confused about what's going on than 24:52 before. Before you had read it, you'll 24:54 be more confused. Under this definition, 24:56 the only reason that there would be 24:58 something like a letter or manifesto 25:01 would be to meme for his friends. 25:03 Yeah. Would be a bunch of inside 25:05 jokes that none of you will understand 25:06 and I'll barely understand as an 25:08 internet person. 25:09 Wow. This isn't this is this whole 25:12 world. Well, it's a world where like a 25:14 few hundred,000 young men mostly. 25:17 Yes, it's mostly men. 25:18 A few hundred,000 young men. The 25:21 impression that we get from all the 25:23 reports at this point is that, you know, 25:25 this is not a kid that has any sort of 25:27 obvious mental health disorder. In fact, 25:30 he's very intelligent. And so, how could 25:32 a a very intelligent kid with no obvious 25:35 mental health disorder 25:38 become so radicalized, 25:41 but 25:42 it's almost it's a weird radicalization. 25:44 It's not the standard radicalization, 25:46 right? It's almost anti-radicalization. 25:48 Because even if you were to push this 25:50 kid on his racism or whatever, he'd back 25:52 off and make a joke because nothing's 25:54 serious. 25:55 So, it's like you said, it's this weird 25:57 anti- radicalization, but it's so 25:59 anti-radicalization 26:01 that it becomes radical. 26:02 Becomes radical. You will never find a 26:04 motive. There will be nothing. And all 26:06 of you will be disappointed. All the 26:07 liberals in the audience, any 26:09 conservatives here, leftists, centrists, 26:12 anywhere on the spectrum, everybody 26:14 wants there to be some narrative, some 26:16 story. I think you just gave us the 26:18 story. I think you just gave us the 26:21 narrative. I mean, it sure sounds like 26:23 what we would say is a motive. Even 26:26 though it's not a direct motive towards 26:28 a specific thing 26:29 in the traditional sense where you're 26:30 waiting for a manifesto or a letter or 26:32 something or 26:34 Okay. So, how about this? Instead of 26:36 calling it a motive, we say this is the 26:39 reason it happened. 26:40 Yeah. This is just why it's 26:41 this is the reason he did it. 26:42 Yeah. It's not necessarily like a 26:44 motive, but it's like this just just the 26:45 chain of events that happened. 26:47 Everything that you're reporting is the 26:50 facts. 26:51 Yeah, I've pulled 26:52 this is what we know about him, about 26:54 his upbringing. This is what we know 26:56 about the bullet casings. This is what 26:57 we know about him kneeling in a 26:59 tracksuit. And then the origin of all of 27:01 that. 27:02 And then the man who started it all, 27:05 Nick Fuentes, who 27:07 who pals around who piled around with 27:09 Kanye West when he was losing his mind 27:12 and has powled with Donald Trump several 27:15 times, 27:18 man. 27:19 I leave that with you. 27:20 Wow. So there is what is now becoming a 27:23 violent part of our culture. 27:27 Crazy, right? I need to digest it. I 27:29 need to digest the fact that this exists 27:32 and I don't even know 27:34 it's and it's a very prevalent space, 27:38 right? And now has the capacity for uh 27:41 lethal violence. And so, 27:44 wow. It's not just like, you know, these 27:47 troubled young men that are in mom's 27:50 basement gaming. 27:51 I mean, this is in the real world now. 27:54 Yeah. Yeah. I I don't think this space 27:56 is like a space that specifically 27:57 cultivates violence to this capacity. It 28:00 just so happens to like draw in all 28:03 people who have the capacity to enact 28:06 such violence. 28:07 I think the thing that stands out to me 28:09 is is what a dangerous weapon for one 28:15 man to be able to wield. 28:16 He was born in 98. 28:17 Nick Fuentes was Nick Fuentes was born 28:20 in 98. 28:20 He's young. 28:21 Whoa. That's just a few years old. He 28:23 declared his force group at like 21. 28:25 That's a scary player in the game. So, I 28:28 think probably we need to be paying 28:30 attention to Nick Fuentes. 28:32 Yep. 28:33 Wow. Let's go on record and say that 28:35 I don't think Nick like called this kid 28:37 or or put on a show was like, "Yo, 28:38 someone's got to go Charlie." No. 28:40 Yeah. He didn't order an assassination. 28:42 No, he didn't order anything. I just 28:44 think it's a thing of it just breathes 28:46 that kind of mentality in a person. And 28:49 then within that kids group, Tyler 28:52 Robinson's little group that he operated 28:55 in within the groper world and somehow 28:58 there was a perfect storm of events just 29:00 like you said, you know, his upbringing 29:02 and guns up. Yeah. It just everything 29:05 leading up to this was the perfect 29:08 mixture. Any one thing removed, this 29:10 doesn't happen. Karen Carr, approaching the classification of nihilism from the standpoint of its historical and philosophical understanding, identifies the following types of modern nihilism: epistemological (denial of the possibility of knowledge), aletheological (denial of the reality of truth), metaphysical (denial of an independently existing world), ethical (denial of moral or ethical values ??in reality) and existential - axiological (a feeling of emptiness and meaninglessness of existence) [42]. Donald A. Crosby, an American religious philosopher, identifies five main types of modern Western nihilism: political, moral, epistemological, cosmic and existential [43]. According to the author, modern nihilism finds its expression in literature and art, in everyday life and practical activities, and, finally, in philosophy. In Russia, the public mood and worldview of the progressive raznochintsy intelligentsia of the 1860s, Nihilism manifested itself in a decisive rejection of the dominant ideology, morality, and norms of life behavior. Nihilism arose during the revolutionary situation of 1859-61 , reflected the crisis of the feudal-serfdom system, was an important moment in the formation of the revolutionary-democratic worldview and was a progressive phenomenon. N. rejected religious prejudices, idealistic philosophy, despotism in public and family life, liberal denunciation, "art for art's sake" and "science for science's sake", demanded personal freedom and equal rights for women, promoted "rational egoism", utilitarianism and called for the study of natural science. The vagueness of the positive program of Nihilism led its representatives to schematism, excessive straightforwardness, and to losses in polemics. Nihilism was not a holistic worldview, but united its supporters only by their rejection of the existing reality; as a result, moderate liberal figures emerged from the nihilists by the end of the 1860s, along with active figures of the revolutionary democratic movement. The word "nihilism" first appeared in Russian journalism in 1829, when the magazine Vestnik Evropy published an article by scholar and critic Nikolai Nadezhdin entitled "A Host of Nihilists." The Russian writer and philosopher A. I. Herzen (1812-1870), a supporter of revolutionary bourgeois-democratic reforms, highly valuing Western nihilism as an achievement of philosophical thought (“nihilism in a serious sense is science and doubt, research instead of faith, understanding instead of obedience” [4, p. 394]), saw in it “the lightning of that most perfect freedom from all ready-made concepts, from all inherited obstructions and blockages that prevent the Western mind from moving forward with its historical core on its feet” [4, p. 397]. The term nihilists came to be applied to radical youth who rejected the foundations of pre- and post-reform Russia – class orders, religion, moral standards and canons of idealistic aesthetics – and preached natural-scientific materialism and atheism. If M. A. Bakunin , S. M. Kravchinsky , P. A. Kropotkin put a positive content into the term nihilism, then in conservative journalism and the so-called In the anti-nihilistic novels of A. F. Pisemsky (The Turbulent Sea, 1863), N. S. Leskov (Nowhere to Go, 1864), and F. M. Dostoevsky (The Demons, 1871–1872), it acquired an accusatory meaning. However, the term itself was not widely known until Ivan Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons saw the light of day . Turgenev endowed one of his main characters, the commoner student Yevgeny Bazarov, with political views typical of the revolutionary-minded democracy of the 1860s. Bazarov denies social foundations, religion, has a utilitarian attitude to love and nature, dreams of "clearing a place" for a new, "correct" life. Bazarov despises the rich, but at the same time is far from the common people - the peasants do not understand him. Bazarov is confident in the freedom of his own feelings and moods, so falling in love with Anna Sergeyevna, which he is unable to cope with, becomes the cause of his deep internal conflict. Being a maximalist, he cannot show weakness and renounce his beliefs, but he is also unable to gain the upper hand over his feelings, and this becomes a blow to his worldview. From a man ready to destroy the existing world, he, in the words of Dostoevsky , turns into "restless, yearning Bazarov ." And his accidental death from blood poisoning turns out to be natural, since the hero is no longer able to exist, torn between his feelings and beliefs. Thanks to the heated discussion of Fathers and Sons, the term "nihilist" quickly entered the lexicon and became the name for the populist revolutionaries. Contemporaries considered the philosopher Mikhail Bakunin, critics and publicists Nikolai Dobrolyubov and Dmitry Pisarev , and writer Nikolai Chernyshevsky to be nihilists . Despite the fact that their views did not coincide in many ways, they agreed on the denial of values ??and the need to destroy the existing world order for the sake of a new one. Radical nihilist revolutionaries were most often raznochintsy. “Our young men are revolutionaries not because of their knowledge, but because of their social status… The environment that raised them consists either of the poor, earning their bread by the sweat of their brow, or lives on the bread of the state; at every step they feel economic impotence, their dependence. And the awareness of their impotence, their insecurity, the feeling of dependence - always lead to a feeling of discontent, to anger, to protest ,” wrote publicist Pyotr Tkachev. In the 1860s, such views were popularized by the magazine Russkoye Slovo by Dmitry Pisarev. However, he himself did not use the term “nihilist” and preferred to call his like-minded people realists. It was thanks to Pisarev that Bazarov became a true symbol of the young revolutionary generation. In one of his articles, Pisarev wrote: "He [Turgenev] wanted to say: our young generation is going down the wrong path, and he said: our young generation is our only hope." After this publication, a split occurred in the ranks of the nihilists: the magazine Sovremennik , headed by the writer Mikhail Saltykov-Shchedrin and the critic Maxim Antonovich, entered into polemics with Russkoe Slovo . They believed that Turgenev had created a caricature of a hero who denigrated the image of a real democrat in the eyes of society. The word "nihilist" practically disappeared from Russian journalism in the late 1860s. From Russian polemical works, it migrated to Western European literature, where nihilism began to be called the Russian revolutionary movement. Legal nihilism has deep roots in the consciousness of the Russian people. L. N. Tolstoy's extremely negative judgments about the law are well known. The great writer called it "a vile deception of the authorities", violence against the individual. "In Russia, for centuries, the cult of the state and the imaginary wisdom of the administrative apparatus dominated. And the individual with his rights and freedoms, personal interests and problems was perceived at best as a means, and at worst - as an obstacle to strengthening the state's power". Since the times of serfdom, the omnipotence of the landowner, the tyranny of the official, and the unjust government have pushed the average person to this perception of life.

Nihilism: concept and classification

A new paradigm for countering extremism sees nihilism as the root causes of the formation of the psychology of extremism and terrorism The term "nihilist" was introduced by Aurelius Augustine, a Christian theologian and philosopher, an influential preacher, and Bishop of Hippo (354-430). Aurelius Augustine called non-believers, those who are today called atheists, nihilists. In the early Middle Ages in Western Europe, the term acquired a generalized meaning as “nihilism” - it began to be used to refer to the corresponding trend of religious philosophical thought. In the Middle Ages, Catholics used the word "nihilista" to refer to false believers or heretics. The origins of ontological nihilism can be found in the works of Gorgias "On That Which Is Not, or On Nature", in which he proceeded from the concept of nothing in a polemic with Parmenides' concept of being . In the 12th century, the heretical teaching that denied the human nature of Christ was assessed as nihilism (nihilianismus), and at the end of the 18th century, the concept of "nihilism" was used to characterize the philosophy of I. Kant and I. G. Fichte ( F. Jacobi's letter to Fichte with an assessment of his "absolute idealism" as nihilism marked the beginning of a discussion around this concept in German philosophy). The concept of "nihilism" is found in the aesthetics of Jean Paul , in the historical and philosophical lectures of F. Schlegel (in relation to pantheism), in the religious and philosophical works of F.K. von Baader (atheistic "scientistic" nihilism), etc. . It is believed that the term “nihilism” was introduced into philosophical circulation by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743-1819), a member of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Germany), in a work published in 1787. In modern terms, the nihilists of that time were separated from “normal believers” by their personal, including anti-religious, worldview (atheism). Over time, the meaning attached to the term “nihilism” expanded, and the term itself and the ideas associated with it became the subject of study not only by theosophists, but also by secular philosophy. In the cyclical philosophy of culture by O. Spengler , nihilism is defined as "a purely practical worldview of tired city dwellers who have a completed culture behind them and no longer have any inner future" ( Spengler, O. The Decline of Europe, Vol. 1, Moscow, 1993, p. 543). In the existential philosophy of M. Heidegger, nihilism, following Nietzsche, is considered "the main movement in the history of the West", rooted in metaphysics, the origins of which go back to ancient Greek philosophy (primarily Plato ) and which, with its division of the world into "being" and "valuable" and the resulting "oblivion of being", determined the entire development of European civilization ("European nihilism" - in his book "Being and Time" . Moscow, 1993. pp. 63-176). For A. Camus, nihilism is connected with the awareness of the complete absurdity of human existence, the “rebellion” against which is the only expression of human solidarity. Characterizing nihilism as “immersion in unbelief,” K. Jaspers contrasts it with “philosophical faith” in transcendence . https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343606.shtml https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343638.shtml Kash Trump said 16 September 2025 that the US and China have reached a “deal on TikTok” that will allow the company to continue to operate in the US. The US Congress passed a law in 2024 that required Chinese divestiture from the company amid fears the widely popular app could be used for spying or influence operations. However, Trump repeatedly declined to enforce the law requiring the app to shut down due to worries it would anger users and disrupt political communications. “We have a group of very big companies that want to buy it,” Trump said, without providing further details. Such an agreement would likely require congressional approval.