• Military Menu                       

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Industry
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• WMD
• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

2000 Presidential Election

The presidential election of 2000 stands as one of the most controversial and consequential elections in American history, remembered not for a decisive victory but for an unprecedented constitutional crisis that tested the foundations of American democracy. The Democratic Party nominated Vice President Al Gore to head their ticket in 2000. To oppose him the Republicans chose George W. Bush, the governor of Texas and son of former President George H. W. Bush.

The Candidates and Campaign

The 2000 election pitted Republican Texas Governor George W. Bush, son of former President George H.W. Bush, against Democratic Vice President Al Gore, who served under President Bill Clinton. Bush selected former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney as his running mate, while Gore chose Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman, the first Jewish American on a major party presidential ticket. The campaign took place during a time of relative peace and prosperity, with the economy performing strongly and no major military conflicts engaging American forces. This context shaped the race into a referendum on character, leadership style, and competing visions for using budget surpluses that had emerged during the Clinton years.

Gore ran as a dedicated liberal, intensely concerned with damage to the environment and determined to seek more assistance for the less privileged sectors of society. He seemed to place himself somewhat to the left of President Clinton.

Bush established a position closer to the heritage of Ronald Reagan than to that of his father. He displayed a special interest in education and called himself a “compassionate conservative.” His embrace of evangelical Christianity, which he declared had changed his life after a misspent youth, was of particular note. It underscored an attachment to traditional cultural values that contrasted sharply with Gore’s technocratic modernism.

Bush positioned himself as a compassionate conservative who would restore dignity to the White House following the Monica Lewinsky scandal that had led to President Clinton's impeachment. He emphasized tax cuts, education reform, and a humble foreign policy that would avoid nation-building exercises. Gore campaigned on his experience and policy expertise, pledging to continue the economic policies that had brought prosperity while placing the budget surplus in a "lockbox" to protect Social Security. He also emphasized environmental issues and presented himself as a fighter for working families. The race also featured Green Party candidate Ralph Nader, whose candidacy would later become a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

Beyond the major party candidates and Nader, several other minor party candidates competed for the presidency.The old corporate gadfly Ralph Nader ran well to Gore’s left as the candidate of the Green Party. Conservative Republican Patrick Buchanan mounted an independent candidacy. Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan, a conservative commentator and former Republican who had challenged Bush's father in 1992, ran a campaign focused on populist economic nationalism and opposition to immigration. Libertarian Party candidate Harry Browne advocated for minimal government and individual liberty. Constitution Party candidate Howard Phillips ran on a platform of Christian conservatism and constitutional originalism. Natural Law Party candidate John Hagelin promoted transcendental meditation and natural health approaches as solutions to national problems. While none of these candidates garnered significant vote totals, their presence reflected the diverse political landscape and the various ideological streams flowing through American politics at the turn of the millennium.

Election Night and the Florida Controversy

November 7, 2000, began as a typical election night but would evolve into one of the most dramatic evenings in American political history. As results poured in from across the country, it became clear that the election would be extraordinarily close. Gore won the traditional Democratic strongholds along both coasts, while Bush dominated the South and interior West. The outcome hinged on a handful of swing states, with Florida emerging as the decisive battleground. Television networks initially called Florida for Gore in the early evening, only to retract the projection as more votes were counted. Later that night, they declared Bush the winner in Florida, prompting Gore to call Bush and concede the election. However, as the margin continued to narrow, Gore retracted his concession in a second phone call, and the networks withdrew their call. When the dust settled in the early morning hours, Bush led in Florida by fewer than two thousand votes out of nearly six million cast.

Florida's crucial role was no accident. The state carried twenty-five electoral votes, and without it, neither candidate could reach the two hundred seventy electoral votes needed for victory. Bush's brother Jeb served as Florida's governor, adding a familial dimension to the controversy that would unfold. The razor-thin margin triggered an automatic machine recount under Florida law. As this recount proceeded, reports emerged of irregularities and problems throughout the state. The infamous butterfly ballot in Palm Beach County caused confusion among elderly voters, potentially leading thousands who intended to vote for Gore to accidentally select Buchanan instead. Undervotes, where voting machines detected no presidential choice, and overvotes, where machines detected multiple choices, numbered in the tens of thousands. Predominantly African American precincts reported higher rates of rejected ballots and problems with voting equipment.

The Recount Battle

The automatic machine recount reduced Bush's lead to just a few hundred votes, and the Gore campaign requested manual recounts in four heavily Democratic counties: Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade. These counties used punch card ballots, which voters perforated with a stylus to indicate their choices. The manual recount would involve election officials examining each ballot to determine voter intent, particularly looking at dimpled or hanging chads, the small pieces of paper that were supposed to be completely punched out. Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, a Republican who had co-chaired Bush's Florida campaign, announced that she would enforce a statutory deadline for counties to certify their results, effectively limiting the time available for manual recounts. The Gore campaign sued to extend the deadline.

The Florida Supreme Court, composed entirely of Democratic appointees, ruled in Gore's favor, extending the certification deadline and allowing manual recounts to continue. However, the recount process became chaotic and contentious. In Miami-Dade County, the canvassing board decided to discontinue its manual recount after Republican protesters, later described as the Brooks Brothers riot, disrupted the proceedings. Different counties applied different standards for determining voter intent when examining ballots, with some counting dimpled chads and others requiring the chad to be at least partially detached. On November 26, Secretary Harris certified Bush as the winner of Florida's electoral votes by a margin of five hundred thirty-seven votes.

Gore refused to concede and filed a contest of the certification in Florida courts. The case quickly made its way back to the Florida Supreme Court, which on December 8 ordered a statewide manual recount of all undervotes. This decision represented a dramatic turn in Gore's favor, as thousands of additional ballots would be examined across the state. However, the Bush campaign immediately appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which issued a stay halting the recount just hours after it began. The stay itself was controversial, with Justice Antonin Scalia writing that continuing the recount would threaten irreparable harm to Bush by casting doubt on the legitimacy of his election.

The Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on December 11 in the case of Bush v. Gore. The legal issues were complex and unprecedented. The Bush team argued that the lack of uniform standards for manual recounts violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as identical ballots might be counted differently depending on which county examined them. They also contended that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II of the Constitution by essentially rewriting Florida's election laws. The Gore team argued that Florida law clearly contemplated manual recounts to determine voter intent and that stopping the count would disenfranchise thousands of voters whose ballots had not been properly tallied.

On December 12, the Supreme Court issued its decision. In a controversial five-to-four ruling, the Court held that the manual recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court violated the Equal Protection Clause because it was being conducted without uniform standards. The Court's unsigned per curiam opinion acknowledged that manual recounts could be constitutional if proper safeguards were in place, but ruled that there was insufficient time to establish such standards before the December 12 safe harbor deadline, after which Congress could challenge a state's electoral votes. Critically, the Court ruled that no further recounts could be conducted, effectively ending the election.

The decision provoked intense controversy and criticism. The four dissenting justices wrote passionate opinions objecting to the majority's reasoning and outcome. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the Court's decision could undermine public confidence in the judiciary, while Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued that the equal protection argument was novel and unprecedented. Critics noted that the five justices in the majority were all Republican appointees, while the four dissenters were Democratic appointees. The majority opinion included an unusual statement that the decision should not be considered precedent for other cases, further fueling criticism that it was a politically motivated result rather than a principled application of constitutional law. Defenders of the decision argued that it prevented a constitutional crisis and that the Court had little choice given the approaching deadlines and the chaos of the recount process.

The Final Outcome and Popular Vote

On December 13, Al Gore delivered a concession speech, acknowledging Bush as the president-elect and pledging to support a peaceful transition of power. Bush had secured two hundred seventy-one electoral votes to Gore's two hundred sixty-six, with one Democratic elector from the District of Columbia abstaining in protest. However, Gore won the national popular vote by more than half a million ballots, receiving approximately 48.4 percent to Bush's 47.9 percent. This marked only the fourth time in American history that a candidate won the presidency while losing the popular vote, and the first since Benjamin Harrison's victory in 1888.

The role of Ralph Nader in the election outcome became a subject of heated debate. Nader received over 97,000 votes in Florida, far more than Bush's margin of victory. Exit polls suggested that a majority of Nader voters would have chosen Gore if Nader had not been on the ballot, though some would have voted for Bush or stayed home. In New Hampshire, another closely contested state that Bush won by just over 7,000 votes, Nader received more than 22,000 votes. Had Gore won either Florida or New Hampshire, he would have become president. Many Democrats blamed Nader for costing Gore the election, arguing that his campaign was self-indulgent and that he should have withdrawn from competitive states. Nader and his supporters countered that Gore lost because of his own failures as a candidate and that voters had a right to support the candidate who best represented their views.

Investigations and Aftermath

In the months and years following the election, multiple media organizations and researchers conducted extensive investigations to determine what would have happened under various recount scenarios. The results were complex and contradictory, depending on which ballots were examined and what standards were applied. A comprehensive study by a consortium of news organizations found that if the limited manual recount requested by Gore had been completed, Bush still would have won. However, if all the undervotes and overvotes across Florida had been examined using the most inclusive standards, Gore would have won by a small margin. If strict standards had been applied statewide, Bush would have prevailed. These findings suggested that neither candidate could claim with certainty that a complete and fair count would have resulted in their victory.

The election exposed serious problems with American voting systems and election administration. Punch card voting machines, used by millions of voters, proved unreliable and error-prone. Voter registration systems were outdated and inaccurate. Poll worker training was inadequate. Equipment and resources were distributed inequally across communities, with poorer and predominantly minority neighborhoods often receiving older machines and fewer resources. These revelations led to the passage of the Help America Vote Act in 2002, which provided federal funding to upgrade voting equipment and improve election administration, though debates about voting rights and election integrity would continue for decades.

Congressional Elections

While the presidential race captured the nation's attention, the 2000 elections also featured contests for control of Congress, with results that proved nearly as close as the presidential outcome. In the House of Representatives, Republicans maintained their majority but with a significantly reduced margin. They held 221 seats compared to 212 for Democrats, with two independents. This represented a net loss of two seats for Republicans compared to their standing before the election. The narrow majority meant that Speaker Dennis Hastert would have little room for error in passing legislation, as even a small number of defections could doom Republican priorities. Democrats needed to flip just six seats to regain control of the chamber they had lost in the 1994 Republican Revolution.

The Senate elections produced an even more dramatic outcome. Going into Election Day, Republicans held fifty-four seats to the Democrats' forty-six. Democrats needed to gain at least four seats to take control, or three seats if Gore won the presidency, as the Vice President serves as President of the Senate and can cast tie-breaking votes. Democrats defeated incumbent Republican senators in several key states. They won open seats in Florida and Minnesota, while successfully defending their own vulnerable incumbents. When the dust settled, the Senate was divided fifty to fifty, an extraordinarily rare outcome that had not occurred since the late nineteenth century.

The fifty-fifty Senate split created an unprecedented power-sharing arrangement during the early weeks of Bush's presidency. With Gore still technically serving as Vice President until January 20, Democrats held a narrow organizational advantage and could claim the chairmanship of committees. However, once Cheney was inaugurated as Vice President, Republicans technically controlled the Senate through his tie-breaking vote. The parties negotiated an unusual power-sharing agreement that gave them equal representation on committees, equal staff allocations, and equal office space. This delicate balance proved short-lived when Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party in May 2001 to become an independent who caucused with the Democrats, giving them outright control of the chamber and demonstrating how fragile the Republican position had been.

The congressional results reflected the same themes visible in the presidential race. The country was closely divided along partisan, geographic, and demographic lines. Republicans dominated rural areas, the South, and the Mountain West, while Democrats won in urban areas, the coasts, and among minority voters. Neither party could claim a clear mandate from the electorate. This polarization and competitive balance would characterize American politics for the next two decades, with control of Congress frequently shifting and slim majorities becoming the norm rather than the exception. The 2000 elections marked not an aberration but the beginning of a new era of closely divided government.

Legacy and Historical Significance

The 2000 election left profound and lasting marks on American politics and democracy. It demonstrated the crucial importance of voting procedures and election administration, issues that had previously received little public attention. The Florida controversy raised questions about the role of the judiciary in resolving electoral disputes and whether the Supreme Court had overstepped its bounds. The fact that the election was decided by five unelected justices rather than by voters troubled many Americans across the political spectrum, though others saw the Court's intervention as necessary to prevent an even greater constitutional crisis.

The election also highlighted the ongoing debate about the Electoral College. Gore's victory in the popular vote while losing the Electoral College intensified calls for either abolishing the system or reforming it through measures like the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Defenders of the Electoral College argued that it protected the interests of smaller states and prevented candidates from focusing exclusively on heavily populated urban areas. Critics countered that it was undemocratic and gave disproportionate power to voters in swing states while rendering millions of voters in safe states essentially irrelevant to the outcome.

The razor-thin margin of victory and the contested nature of the result raised questions about the legitimacy of Bush's presidency. Some Democrats never fully accepted Bush as the legitimate winner, referring to him as selected rather than elected. However, Gore's gracious concession speech and his refusal to further contest the result helped ensure a peaceful transfer of power. Bush sought to govern as a uniter rather than a divider, his campaign slogan, though the events of September 11, 2001, would fundamentally transform his presidency in ways no one could have anticipated on that contested election night.

The 2000 election demonstrated both the resilience and the fragility of American democracy. The constitutional system held together through an unprecedented crisis, with both parties ultimately respecting the outcome even as they disagreed profoundly about its fairness. Yet the election also exposed weaknesses in the mechanics of democracy and deep divisions in American society. It served as a reminder that elections could be won or lost by the smallest of margins and that every vote truly could matter. The phrase too close to call entered the American lexicon, symbolizing not just the 2000 election but an era of closely divided politics that would characterize the early twenty-first century. The election's legacy continues to influence debates about voting rights, election security, and democratic legitimacy more than two decades later.

The final vote was nearly evenly divided nationally; so were the electoral votes. The pivotal state was Florida; there, only a razor-thin margin separated the candidates and thousands of ballots were disputed. After a series of state and federal court challenges over the laws and procedures governing recounts, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a narrow decision that effectively gave the election to Bush. The Republicans maintained control of both houses of Congress by a small margin.

The final totals underscored the tightness of the election: Bush won 271 electoral votes to Gore’s 266, but Gore led him in the national popular vote 48.4 percent to 47.9 percent. Nader polled 2.7 percent and Buchanan 0.4 percent. Gore, his states colored blue in media graphics, swept the Northeast and the West Coast; he also ran well in the Midwestern industrial heartland. Bush, whose states were colored red, rolled over his opponent in the South, the rest of the Midwest, and the mountain states. Commentators everywhere dwelled on the vast gap between “red” and “blue” America, a divide they characterized by cultural and social rather than economic differences, and all the more emotional for that reason. George Bush took office in a climate of extreme partisan bitterness.

Bush expected to be a president primarily concerned with domestic policy. He wanted to reform education. He had talked during his campaign about an overhaul of the social security system. He wanted to follow Reagan’s example as a tax cutter.

The president quickly discovered that he had to deal with an economy that was beginning to slip back from its lofty peak of the late 1990s. This helped him secure passage of a tax cut in May 2001. At the end of the year, he also obtained the “No Child Left Behind” Act, which required public schools to test reading and mathematical proficiency on an annual basis; it prescribed penalties for those institutions unable to achieve a specified standard. Projected deficits in the social security trust fund remained unaddressed.