UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

SECTION IV - NEEDS EMPHASIS TRENDS


COMMAND AND CONTROL BOS (TA.4) (cont)

TREND 4

SUBJECT: Troop-Leading and Discipline

Observation frequency:1-2QFY963-4QFY961-2QFY973-4QFY971-2QFY98
16438

3-4QFY97

OBSERVATION 1: The battalion maintenance officer (BMO) does not use troop-leading procedures (TLP) effectively or establish priorities of work at the unit maintenance collection point (UMCP). (TA.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Timelines are inadequate.

2. Warning orders (WARNOs) and operation orders (OPORDs) are inadequate.

3. Rehearsals are inadequate.

4. Junior leaders are frequently prevented from conducting their own pre-combat checks (PCCs) and pre-combat inspections (PCIs) prior to each mission.

OBSERVATION 2: Maintenance personnel are not maintaining their crew-served and individual weapons to standard. (TA.4.4.4)

DISCUSSION: The weapons are not being cleaned or serviced and most of the weapons observed have no ammunition. Weapons failure is catastrophic when rear areas are attacked.

OBSERVATION 3: Unit discipline is not to standard on the battlefield. (TA.4.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Unit leaders do not routinely monitor or emphasize troop discipline in the following areas:

a. Load plans.

b. Tactical Assembly Area (TAA) procedures.

c. Uniform.

d. Weapon security.

e. Maintenance and personnel accountability.

2. Clear standards are not identified or enforced while at the NTC.

3. Leaders are reluctant to make corrections, assume responsibility, or be held accountable.

4. Unit leaders generally fail to assign responsibility for key actions and do not hold personnel accountable.

1-2QFY98

OBSERVATION 1: (Repeat of Observation 1, 3-4QFY97)

OBSERVATION 2: Bradley Stinger Fighting Vehicle (BSFV) platoon leaders do not use troop-leading procedures (TLP) or establish timelines effectively. (TA.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Situational awareness is lacking.

2. Operation orders (OPORDs) are hasty and inadequate, and do not include five paragraphs or a risk assessment.

3. Rehearsals are ineffective or nonexistent.

4. Graphics are inadequate or missing.

5. Link-ups with company/teams are frequently late.

6. There is little or no face-to-face cross-talk between air defense artillery (ADA) section leaders and the element for which they are providing coverage.

OBSERVATION 3: Task force signal officer and NCOIC troop-leading procedures (TLP) are inadequate. (TA.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Many times the soldiers do not fully understand their mission, their reporting procedures, or their route. This creates confusion during mission execution phases.

2. There is poor situation awareness without TLP at every level. Placing the retransmission system on the wrong slope of a hill will put the lives of the retransmission team at great risk, as well as the lives of the soldiers the commander can no longer reach.

OBSERVATION 4: Troop-leading procedures (TLP) at both company and platoon level are often inadequate and lack the required substance to properly allow the company, platoon, and squad to succeed. (TA.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. TLP are often overlooked or are completed so quickly they have no effect on the mission.

2. Engineer units often develop timelines (from already late maneuver timelines) that do not identify key engineer essential planning and execution tasks.

3. Development of a tentative plan usually falls short because of incomplete application or a misunderstanding by the company XO during the tactical planning process.

4. Generally, engineer company XOs do not identify essential, specified, and implied tasks that are critically important to mission accomplishment.

5. Unit orders lack clarity regarding the unit commander's intent, scheme of engineer operations, and sub-unit tasks.

6. Unit commanders misunderstand the importance of time management.

7. Rehearsals and backbriefs are executed poorly.

a. Most units conduct confirmation briefs and backbriefs at maneuver, TF, and engineer company levels, but engineer company commanders very seldom backbrief the engineer battalion commander or staff.

b. When engineer company commanders conduct a backbrief, it is usually without established formats that prescribe what is to be included.

OBSERVATION 5: Engineer battalion headquarters and headquarters company (HHC) commanders rarely conduct troop-leading procedures (TLP) after receiving engineer battalion or forward support battalion (FSB) operation orders (OPORDs). (TA.4.4)

DISCUSSION: None.

OBSERVATION 6: FA battery level pre-combat checks/pre-combat inspections (PCCs/PCIs), and rehearsals are not conducted to standard. (TA.4.4.1.1)

DISCUSSION:

1. FA batteries generally do not effectively conduct PCCs/PCIs and rehearsals.

a. Battery commanders do not adequately identify their essential field artillery tasks (EFATs) and relate specific PCCs/PCIs and rehearsals to the completion of essential tasks.

b. The battery commanders often designate specific PCCs/PCIs and rehearsals to conduct, but because of the lack of SOP or clear understanding of the desired outcome for their tasks, they lead to incomplete or poor efforts.

2. Batteries normally focus on the FASCAM and do not consider the other PCCs/PCIs that allow them to survive and move on to their next essential task. They rarely add realism to their rehearsals to simulate the fog of war. Instead, they conduct a simple rehearsal in a static environment with tubes simply following along.

OBSERVATION 7: Fire support teams (FISTs) often do not conduct pre-combat checks and pre-combat inspections (PCCs/PCIs) before a combat mission. (TA.4.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Unless PCCs/PCIs are properly conducted, leaders do not identify potential problems prior to execution, and have no time to react to correct them.

2. Many units deploy to NTC with adequate checklists in their SOPs, but units seldom follow what is published in their SOPs.

3. At pre-rotation inbriefings, task force FSOs often brief they have no knowledge of the capability of the company/team FIST to execute PCC/PCIs because this was not emphasized during Home Station training.

4. Often during a rotation, company/team FISTs are plagued with discovering problems with their vehicle or equipment after the line of departure (LD). EXAMPLE: FISTs are unable to use the G/VLLD because of missing or broken power cables in the targeting head, or because they have no charged batteries.

OBSERVATION 8: Personnel at the combat trains command post (CTCP) are not effectively utilized. (TA.4.4.4)

DISCUSSION:

1. Staff officers seldom delegate or assign priorities of work. As a result, they often run the command post operation with minimal support provided by NCOs and junior soldiers. For example, S1s and S4s are often observed with two to three hand mikes and a fist full of map board markers.

2. Standard job descriptions are not defined; soldiers do not know what their function is.

a. Battle preparation is ineffective and inefficient at CTCP/combat trains because subordinates do not know what is required.

b. Drivers do not rehearse proper battle drills and do not know what their mission is or for whom they work.

3. Functions normally not accomplished include:

a. Radio logs (DA 1594) are not maintained.

b. Logistics tracking charts are not updated.

c. Information is not disseminated.

d. Attached elements of the combat trains are not integrated.

e. The rest plan for the officers is not followed.

RECOMMENDED TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES
for Troop Leading and Discipline

BATTALION MAINTENANCE OFFICER (BMO) TROOP-LEADING PROCEDURES:

1. The BMO and the UMCP establish a timeline that can support the upcoming missions.

2. The BMO must ensure that the maintenance platoon understands the mission requirements.

3. Maintenance platoons must stay aware of the tactical situation. The main focus is to return combat power to the battle, and maintenance leaders must ensure mission accomplishment.

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL WEAPONS CLEANING:

1. The battalion maintenance officer (BMO) must ensure that his subordinates enforce weapons cleaning and service.

2. The BMO must coordinate with the S4 for ammunition supply.

UNIT DISCIPLINE ON THE BATTLEFIELD:

1. NCOs must be the backbone of unit standards; however, all leaders play a key role in setting and enforcing standards.

2. Senior leaders must assign responsibility for actions and hold personnel accountable.

BSFV PLATOON ROP-LEADING PROCEDURES:

1. Platoon leaders should follow troop-leading procedures, establish a timeline, and be persistent in application.

2. Delegate some tasks to NCOs within the platoon (i.e., graphics).

3. Develop portions of the platoon OPORD parallel with the planning process (i.e., paragraph 3 can be developed during the wargame process and paragraph 2 can be developed during mission analysis while cross-talk is being done with the S2).

4. The key is to find ways to save time and facilitate the 1/3 - 2/3 rule.

TASK FORCE SIGNAL OFFICER AND NCOIC TLP: The SIGO, commo chief, and all the NCOs must exercise the TLP steps. They should be clear and concise when conducting a platoon or section OPORD. Signalers must fully understand the scheme of maneuver or the commander's intent in order to support the mission.

ENGINEER UNIT TROOP-LEADING PROCEDURES:

1. Two elements are absolutely critical to the successful execution of superbly executed TLP--operational guidance and specific timelines. Commanders must command their company. Their focus should be on:

a. Troop-leading procedures.

b. Pre-combat checks/pre-combat inspections (PCCs/PCIs).

c. Rehearsals.

d. Development of realistic timelines that promote unity, clarity, and synchronization within the company on the battlefield.

2. Commanders should train their XOs in the tactical planning process. This does not happen overnight, but rather with months of coaching, mentoring, and repeated, multiple warfighting experiences, coupled with focused candid feedback. The company XO needs to understand that he is a critical member of the combined arms team. He must also understand all aspects of tactical planning in order to effectively integrate and synchronize the mobility and survivability battlefield operating system (BOS).

3. FM 5-100, Engineer Operations, pg. 7-1 to 7-11, and FM 71-123, Tactics and Techniques for Combined Arms Heavy Forces: Armored Brigade, Battalion Task Force, and Company Team, provide excellent cookbook approaches to tactical planning.

ENGINEER BATTALION HHC TROOP-LEADING PROCEDURES:

1. The HHC commander must use TLP with the estimate of the situation, METT-T, IPB products, and risk assessment products to develop a systematic approach to formulating tactical plans. Without using TLP, the commander will have great difficulty commanding and controlling the company.

2. The HHC commander must use TLP and risk assessment worksheets, no matter how abbreviated, to plan, coordinate, prepare, direct, and control the execution of CSS missions for every battalion mission. It is particularly important to issue an OPORD, even if it is given vocally, to focus subordinate's efforts.

FA BATTERY LEVEL PCC/PCI AND REHEARSALS: Battery commanders should place more emphasis on conducting PCCs/PCIs and rehearsals as part of Home Station training. If the battery conducts quality PCCs/PCIs and completes rehearsals, they will validate their plan, prepare for an uncooperative enemy, and be positioned for success on the battlefield.

1. PCCs/PCIs ensure the sections are prepared for their essential tasks.

a. PCCs are clearly laid out in a checklist fashion in FM 6-50, the battalion playbook, and the battery TACSOP. These checklists are very easy to follow and they ensure the sections will be able to execute the EFATs.

b. Once PCCs are complete, leaders must conduct PCIs. PCIs give the senior leader a chance to instill confidence in the section that it will accomplish its mission by making sure the section chiefs understand and meet the standard.

2. Rehearsals clarify the commander's intent, synchronize the plan, and ensure everyone understands their role.

a. A detailed plan for rehearsals at the battery level must be incorporated into battery-level SOPs.

b. Time is the most precious resource available to commanders and, as such, they cannot afford to waste it. Rehearsals take time and can frequently be very complex. Commanders must realize this and ensure they have a method for conducting a good detailed rehearsal in the time available.

c. Some critical rehearsal concepts to consider are:
- Prioritize tasks and events.
- Develop a detailed SOP.
- Determine the level of participation for each rehearsal.
- Tie essential tasks to a task, purpose, method, and end state which are clearly stated.
- Establish high standards and ensure that they are met.
- Use the most complete method possible given the time available.
- Make the rehearsal realistic.

EXAMPLE using the essential field artillery task (EFAT) of "firing FASCAM":

  • During mission analysis, the commander develops PCCs/PCIs that relate to the EFAT. In this case, the commander determines that PCCs/PCIs need to be conducted for FASCAM, react to indirect fire, and CASEVAC.

    • Each section has critical tasks that must occur for the unit to be successful.

    • Each section conducts PCCs based on the unit SOP.

    • A senior leader follows up each PCC with a PCI to validate the standard. Inability to complete a good PCI causes confusion at the section level and may result in the lack of success in the overall plan.

  • Here are some examples of typical questions that might be asked for the above PCIs:

    • FASCAM: How many RAAMs and ADAMs will you fire? Or for the FDC, how many aimpoints do you have, and how many RAAMs and ADAMs will you fire at each aimpoint?

    • React to Indirect Fire: What is our trigger to move? Where is your alternate position, or where is the rally point?

    • CASEVAC: Where is the unit CCP? Where are the current AXPs, FAS, and MAS? What is the travel time? Which vehicles will be used for CASEVAC, and what are the back-up vehicles?

  • Each one of these PCCs/PCIs requires a rehearsal to validate that the battery can perform the task. In this case, let us combine all three rehearsals and add realism the way events might occur once we are in battle.

    • Begin by going through the FASCAM mission the way it will be fired.

    • As the unit completes the mission, use your code word for indirect fire or simulate indirect fire and have the battery react and assess casualties as this is done. Make the number of casualties realistic, not 1 or 2, but 10 or 11 soldiers.

    • Treat all of the casualties to standard and actually load them on the evacuation vehicles. (Be sure to validate the evacuation plan.) Once the soldiers are treated and loaded on the vehicles, unload them, but then drive to the point you plan to evacuate the soldiers. This type of rehearsal allows you to verify all three of your critical PCCs/PCIs and does it realistically, the way it might occur in battle.

    • The battery SOP must present the details for each step of the rehearsal. As the unit improves, the rehearsal can be made gradually more difficult by causing a howitzer to go "degraded" in the middle of the mission, by calling a howitzer out of the mission, or conducting the incoming in the middle of the mission and seeing how the unit will react. By preparing at Home Station and developing a detailed SOP for exactly how they will conduct rehearsals, a unit becomes much more efficient at rehearsals and much more successful in battle.

FIRE SUPPORT TEAM PCC/PCI:

1. The task force fire support element needs to have a standard set of mission-specific PCC/PCI checklists in the unit SOP. Once specific PCC/PCIs are identified, leaders must supervise and ensure they are conducted, and that they are conducted to standard.

2. Leaders must also ensure proper actions are taken to correct identified deficiencies.

3. Conduct of PCC/PCIs needs to be trained and supervised at Home Station and incorporated into FIST certification.

UTILIZATION OF PERSONNEL AT THE CTCP:

1. Develop a SOP that clearly defines the responsibilities of each member of the CTCP, both in the CP proper and outside of the CP in the combat trains.

2. Train and authorize NCOs and junior soldiers to operate the CP without the officers and to make appropriate logistics decisions in the absence of the officer in charge (OIC).

3. Get the OIC off the radio and the map so he can look at the big picture.

4. Assign enlisted soldiers as radio telephone operators (RTOs) and make them responsible for logs and updating information on charts and disseminating it to the rest of the CP personnel.

5. Put a NCO in charge of external operations for the purpose of integrating, briefing, and ensuring security to attached elements (See CALL Newsletter No. 95-07, Tactical Operations Center).


btn_tabl.gif 1.21 K
btn_prev.gif 1.18 KSection IV - Needs Emphasis Trends: Command and Control BOS, Part 3
btn_next.gif 1.17 KSection IV - Needs Emphasis Trends: Command and Control BOS, Part 5



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list