Reconnaissance
and Surveillance (R&S)
Planning
and Execution
by
CPT Michael C. Kasales and CPT James H. AdamsEnemy Krasnovian forces have attacked the country of Mojavia to seize key terrain in the vicinity of Fort Irwin Military City. Several hours ago, an American Army squadron successfully defended against the Krasnovian's 171st Motorized Rifle Regiment. As the squadron conducts consolidation and reorganization activities, the squadron commander (SCO) asks the squadron's operation officer,
The S3 looks at the operations map and quickly responds,
SCO:
S3 (gulp):
SCO (jaw clenched):
As soon as the SCO steps out of the tactical operations center (TOC), the S3 frantically reaches for the radio.
The B Troop commander responds:
Meanwhile, Krasnovian reconnaissance forces have already penetrated Phase Line Saddle and are establishing observation posts in depth throughout the squadron sector.
The following definitions are quoted from FM 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics, 30 Sep 97.
THE PROBLEM:
Although the opening example may be slightly exaggerated, it is not far from ground truth. Planning for and executing reconnaissance and surveillance is a deficiency in most units conducting rotations at the National Training Center (NTC). NTC observer/controllers have observed several factors contributing to this deficiency:
S2s are not conducting complete intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB). In particular, S2s are not developing more than one detailed enemy course of action and the associated enemy event template during the threat integration phase of the IPB process.
Task force/squadron commanders and S3s do not emphasize the R&S planning process during the planning and preparation phase of the operation.
R&S forces (cavalry troops, TF scouts, GSR, COLTs) do not understand, nor execute, R&S tasks to standard.
A MORE SIMPLE DEFINITION OF R&S:
The definitions in FM 101-5-1 make R&S seem like an extremely complicated operation. Actually, it is not complicated. The following overview presents it all in a logical sequence of events.
1. The S2 and S3 develop a plan, based on IPB products, that:
2. The reconnaissance forces then deploy into the reconnaissance area of operation, in accordance with the respective tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP), and look for a specific enemy activity at the specified place and specified time.
3. The R&S teams confirm or deny enemy activity and report the information to the commander in a timely manner.
4. Based on the information received from the R&S teams, the commander makes tactical decisions for the employment of his main body forces.
BOTTOM LINE: Reconnaissance and surveillance operations tell commanders what they need to know in time for them to act. The success or failure of an R&S operation directly affects the success or failure of the main body's mission.
TACTICS, TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES:
There are several keys to successful reconnaissance and surveillance planning. They include:
1.
Having a clear commander's intent and well-defined priority intelligence requirements
(PIRs).
2.
Conducting a proper IPB.
3.
Developing good enemy situational templates and event templates.
4.
Issuing a well-planned and coordinated R&S order (overlay and matrix).
5.
Deploying R&S forces early.
6.
Providing continuous coverage throughout the depth of the battlefield.
7.
Using all possible assets.
8.
Providing timely and accurate reports to the commander.
Doctrinally, the task force/squadron develops the R&S plan based on three requirements:
1.
Intelligence acquisition tasks (these task are contained in the higher unit's
collection plan or tasks to subordinate units).
2.
Internally driven PIR.
3.
Requests for information (RFIs) from subordinate units.
The staff then develops the R&S plan and provides a copy back to the higher headquarters for consolidation as part of the higher unit's overall collection plan. Even if no collection plan or acquisition tasks are received from the higher unit, the subordinate commander and staff are not relieved from their responsibility to conduct R&S planning and execution. Commanders at every level need answers to specific questions about the enemy or terrain to successfully employ forces at the decisive place and time on the battlefield. Even without an order from the higher level, the staff can develop a feasible R&S plan to ensure the success of the main body's mission. Staffs should work aggressively to obtain needed information. Regardless how the R&S requirements are established, the plan should be developed very early to deploy the R&S forces as soon as possible.
Task force/squadron commanders and staffs must dedicate more effort to R&S operations. The commander must provide guidance for the R&S mission to focus the staff's efforts. This guidance should include the commander's initial concerns about the enemy and his concept for deploying R&S forces.
Planning and executing R&S operations often takes a back seat to the planning process associated with the main body's mission. In fact, most units develop and issue the R&S plan with or after the unit's main OPORD. When R&S forces deploy late in the operation, critical information needed during the military decision-making process (MDMP) is lost. To overcome this, the R&S planning process must be given early designation on the unit's timeline and must be strictly enforced. Below is a recommended R&S planning timeline.
MDMP

R&S Planning
The R&S planning process should be conducted just as any other mission planning process. The S3 or XO should assume responsibility for the R&S plan and ensure the staff is completely integrated into the planning process. Additionally, the staff must have a clear understanding of their responsibilities and actions during the planning and execution of reconnaissance and surveillance operations. R&S planning follows the same course as the MDMP.
Step 1. Conduct intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB). The entire IPB process must be completed, but the most important IPB product needed for successful R&S planning is the enemy event template. This template depicts where the enemy will be, in relationship to friendly forces, in time and space. The enemy event template drives the reconnaissance plan. The likely enemy locations or avenues of approach now become the NAIs/TAIs on which R&S teams focus their reconnaissance and surveillance. An event template must be developed not only for the likely enemy main body avenues of approach (MBAAs), but also for the likely enemy reconnaissance avenues of approach (RAAs).
Step 2. Reconnaissance mission analysis. During this step, the staff must:
Step 3. Mission analysis and reconnaissance course-of-action (COA) development. During this step, the staff must:
Step 4. COA analysis and wargaming. The reconnaissance COAs are analyzed, and wargaming is completed. The commander decides on the reconnaissance COA.
Step 5. R&S order development. The staff develops and prepares the R&S order, consisting of an R&S overlay and matrix. The order must also include a fire support and CSS execution matrix and overlay. After all of this planning has been completed, the R&S order is issued to the reconnaissance force leader.
R&S Preparation
An important point to remember is that there are two distinct phases of R&S operations:
Phase 1 is enemy reconnaissance. During this phase the R&S effort should focus on the enemy reconnaissance avenues of approach and the identification and destruction of those enemy reconnaissance assets (see Figures 1 and 2). It is important to understand that counter-reconnaissance is not a mission; it is an inherent and critical sub-task associated with all reconnaissance and security missions. A force with sufficient combat power to destroy enemy reconnaissance must be placed in the security zone and synchronized with R&S assets to complete this task.
Phase 2 focuses on the identification of enemy main body elements. (See Figures 3 and 4.) R&S forces may be required to reposition when the focus of the R&S operation changes from the identification of the enemy reconnaissance to the identification of the enemy main body.
Step 1. Subordinate R&S leaders complete their plan and issue an OPORD.
The plan should include:
1.
The techniques and routes for movement into the security zone.
2.
NAI responsibility to subordinate R&S teams.
3.
Tentative observation post (OP) locations for teams to observe assigned NAIs.
4.
Primary and alternate observers for each NAI.
5.
Reporting priorities and communications architecture.
6.
Contingency plans for enemy contact.
7.
Follow-on missions.
8.
Fire support target responsibilities.
9.
CSS procedures (medical/maintenance recovery and resupply).
NOTE: Detailed coordination must take place between all R&S forces prior to crossing the line of departure (LD). This coordination ensures that each R&S element has a clear understanding of the task, purpose, routes, and locations of other R&S forces. The coordination includes the exchange of radio frequencies and call signs, internal graphic control measures, routes into and out of the AO, locations for observation posts, NAI/PIR responsibilities, and target handover procedures.
Step 2. Rehearse.
A rehearsal of the R&S operation must be conducted. All R&S forces must participate in the rehearsal so they understand how the collection plan is synchronized between all elements. The rehearsal is not an OPORD briefing. It serves to confirm the actions of the R&S force and provides them a spatial and temporal picture of the operation from start to finish. The rehearsal should address:
1.
The scheme of maneuver.
2.
The scheme of reporting.
3.
Procedures for handing over targets from one element to another.
4.
Contingency plans for elements that become compromised.
5.
Personnel and maintenance casualty evacuation (CASEVAC).
6.
Resupply procedures.
R&S Execution
During the execution of the R&S operation, the R&S force and the main body commander and staff have unique responsibilities, and each must conduct specific actions for the operation to be effective.
R&S Force Responsibilities.
1. The R&S force must move into the security zone or area. Due to the nature and composition of the R&S forces, R&S operations can be categorized as stealthy as opposed to aggressive operations.
2. The R&S force must understand and adhere to the fundamentals of reconnaissance:
3. As R&S teams move forward they begin looking for enemy activity. Teams must be proficient in, and utilize all of, the doctrinal search techniques, to include ground search (rapid scan, slow scan, and detailed search) and air search (horizontal search and scan, and vertical search and scan).
- movement.
- dust signatures.
- track or engine noises.
- angular/unnatural shapes or silhouettes.
- obstacles.
- spoil from fighting positions.
- voices or radio noise from dismounted or stationary vehicle elements.
- movement.
4. Observation posts (OPs) should be planned throughout the depth of the security zone. This ensures redundant coverage of critical NAIs and provides R&S teams the ability to hand over targets throughout the depth of the zone.
5. Once R&S teams gain visual contact with an enemy element, the initial OP must maintain contact until a subsequent OP has identified and assumed responsibility for tracking the enemy force. This may require the initial OP to physically follow the enemy element. The team must ensure that subsequent OPs in depth are alerted to the enemy presence, know the composition of the element, and the direction of travel.
6. R&S teams cannot become decisively engaged with the enemy. This includes both direct and indirect fire. A team quickly loses its ability to maneuver and cover assigned NAIs if direct or indirect fire contact is made with the enemy. If a team becomes engaged, it must quickly work to break contact while ensuring the enemy element has been reported.
7. OPs cannot become fixated on one enemy acquisition. Enemy reconnaissance forces may work in pairs and the OP may not identify the second enemy element if they remain fixated on the first contact. This requires continuous surveillance of the primary NAI while tracking an already acquired enemy element. This is not an easy task to accomplish and the OP should quickly work to pass the initial contact over to a subsequent OP.
8. Depending on enemy activity or lack of activity in the security zone, the S2 may need to adjust NAIs and SIR. If this occurs, a FRAGO is issued to the R&S forces to adjust the R&S "set." R&S forces must be able to respond to FRAGOs and move to new OP locations without losing the integrity of the security zone. This may require slight adjustments in certain OPs to cover new NAIs or it may require a major shift in R&S team locations. Whichever occurs, the R&S commander must move elements in a manner that maintains surveillance in the zone.
Commander and Staff Responsibilities.
1. As the R&S force moves to establish the security zone, the commander and staff must track their employment. The staff must update the operations map in the TOC as teams report their locations, in accordance with established graphic control measures. This serves two purposes:
2. The staff must inform the R&S forces of any intelligence information received from adjacent units. This keeps the R&S forces abreast of the enemy situation outside the reconnaissance AO and may indicate the entry and presence of enemy forces in the security zone. This information should be passed to the R&S force leader, in the form of a SITREP, as soon as the staff receives it.
3. Once R&S teams are set, the staff should begin receiving intelligence information reports. Post the intelligence information recieved on the S2s map and the operations map. The staff must ensure that the information answers the commander's PIR provide the commander and the S2 with a clear enemy "picture." If the information received does not answer the commander's PIR, the staff must pass guidance to the R&S forces so they can collect the relevant intelligence information. This requires TOC shift personnel to fully understand the requirements, mission, and critical intelligence information to be collected by the R&S force.
4. When the S2 receives reported information, he must update his enemy SITEMP and event template. By conducting this continuous IPB, the S2 further develops and refines the enemy "picture" for the commander. This allows the staff to develop and recommend COAs to the commander for both the R&S effort and the main body's mission. Based on answered PIR, intelligence information collected, and staff recommendations, the commander is better able to make tactical decisions that will result in the overall success of the unit.
CONCLUSION
If S2s become more proficient in developing the enemy courses of action and the associated enemy event templates.and If commanders and S3s put more emphasis on the R&S planning process.and If R&S forces become more proficient in executing R&S tasks.Then more units would be able to conduct effective R&S operations.
In the future, as our Army gets smaller, there will be a higher demand for accurate and timely intelligence reports on the enemy's size, location, and disposition. R&S forces will provide commanders the critical intelligence information needed to employ a smaller force over a larger area. This makes it even more important for commanders, staffs, and R&S forces to be proficient in planning and executing R&S operations. This article outlined some of the common, observed deficiencies associated with R&S operations and provided several doctrinal and TTP solutions that can allow the force to successfully conduct R&S operations.
Train the Force!



NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|