Bituminous Design
Bituminous design consists of selecting the bitumen and aggregate gradation, blending the aggregates to conform to the selected gradation, determining the optimum content, and calculating the job-mix formula (JMF). After determining the percentages of materials, calculate the total quantity of materials needed for the project. This chapter details the design of a typical high mix. Low mixes are designed by the same method, although many steps are often omitted because the allowable variations are great enough that accurate measurements are unnecessary.
Bitumen Selection
2-1. The selection of a particular bituminous material depends on the type of pavement, the range of temperatures, the amount of rainfall, the type and volume of traffic, and the type and availability of equipment. In general, hard-penetration grades of AC are used in warm climates and soft-penetration grades are used in cold climates. Heavy grades of asphalt cutback and tar are normally used in warm regions, and light grades are used in cool regions. AC is generally more suitable for high traffic volume than cutback. Asphalt and tar do not necessarily bond to each other; thus, bonding also becomes a consideration in bitumen selection. Tables 2-1 and 2-2 list the characteristics and uses of bituminous materials.
Asphalt Cement
2-2. AC is usually used in hot-mix pavements and is solid at 77°F. To make AC fluid enough for mixing with aggregate or for spraying, heat it to a temperature of 250° to 350°F. A disadvantage of AC is that adequate heating equipment may not always be available. The various penetration grades of AC are suitable for plant mixes, penetration macadams, and surface treatments.
Asphalt Cutback
2-3. Different types and grades of asphalt cutback are used during various climatic conditions. When the cutter stock evaporates, it leaves AC as an active bonding and waterproofing agent. Consider the prevailing atmospheric temperature during construction when selecting the grade of asphalt cutback. Light grades are usually used in cool weather. If the preferred grade and type of asphalt cutback is unavailable, use a comparable grade of another type. For example, using RC-70 instead of MC-70 or using RC-300 instead of MC-300 will not seriously affect the finished structure. In the field, light grades of asphalt cutback can be made by adding solvents to AC or to heavier grades of asphalt cutback. (See Chapter 5 for more information on the field manufacture of asphalt cutbacks.)
Asphalt Emulsion
2-4. The mixing grades of asphalt emulsion can be combined with damp aggregate with little or no heating. The recommended use depends on the setting rate and the mixing ability. Use emulsions for surface treatments, road and plant mixes, and crack and joint fillings.
Tar
2-5. Since tar does not dissolve in petroleum distillates, use it in areas where asphalt is unsuitable, such as refueling aprons at airfields where petroleum distillates are likely to be spilled. Because tar has greater penetrating qualities than asphalt, it is preferred when penetration is critical. Use hot tar for plant mixes, surface treatments, penetration macadams, and crack fillers. Use RTCB for patch mixes, surface treatments, and road mixes. Do not use open flames near storage tanks or drums of RTCB because it is highly flammable. Tar is more susceptible to temperature changes than asphalt, and tar becomes soft at high temperatures and brittle at low temperatures.
Aggregate Selection
2-6. Before including specific aggregate in a mix design, conduct a preliminary investigation of the aggregate and ensure that its physical properties conform to those described in Chapter 1 . In addition, perform a complete analysis of the aggregate as described in FM 5-472 and determine the quantity of aggregate available. Select the gradation specification using the criteria in Table 2-3 .
Mix Gradation
2-7. Aggregates and mineral fillers can be combined to produce a dense-graded or an open-graded mix:
- Dense-graded mix. A dense-graded mix contains a continuous gradation of particle sizes that are coarse to very fine. Fine particles fill the voids between large particles, thereby increasing the mix's weight. A dense-graded mix is more impervious to water and provides more protection to the base and the subgrade. It usually requires less maintenance, and the asphalt life is prolonged. However, a dense-graded mix requires precise determination and control of the bitumen-aggregate ratio.
- Open-graded mix. An open-graded mix also contains coarse and fine particles in a continuous gradation. However, it does not contain enough fine particles to fill the voids between large particles so it is less dense. Because of the increased voids in an open-graded mix, the bitumen-aggregate ratio is less critical.
2-8. The allowable variation in gradation of some low and intermediate mixes is great enough that natural or man-made aggregates can be used without any special preparation. High mixes and some intermediate mixes have such a small allowable variation in gradation that two or more aggregates must be blended to obtain the desired gradation.
2-9. The following example shows how to determine specific requirements for a surface course:
Example: You are using an asphalt finisher to place a 2-inch surface course on a main supply route (MSR). The maximum aggregate size available is 1 inch, and a limited supply of limestone dust is available to use as a mineral filler. The bitumen is AC, so an aggregate gradation must be selected.
Aggregate Blending
2-10. Aggregate blending is proportionately mixing several aggregate gradations to obtain one desired aggregate gradation. The normal procedure is to mix three or four aggregates from various sources. Record the results of gradation tests for each source on Department of Defense (DD) Form 1207 ( Figure 2-1 ) or present them in tabular form.
2-11. Use DD Form 1217 ( Figure 2-2 ) as a work sheet to calculate the aggregate blend. There are several methods for determining the correct blend; however, use the test-strip method because other methods require complicated graphs and formulas.
Example of Aggregate Blending
2-12. This example shows how to determine aggregate blending. Use gradation 2A as the specification limit, and refer to Figure 2-1 for the gradations of stockpile samples. Complete a DD Form 1217 ( Figure 2-2 ) for a bituminous mix design.
Gradation of Material
2-13. Complete this section as follows:
- Record the sieve sizes and percents passing for all four aggregates.
- Enter the specified gradation limits across the desired row of the section for reference.
- Enter 100 percent in all the blanks to the left of the 100 percent passing for each aggregate. (When 100 percent passes any given sieve, it will also pass larger sieves.)
Combined Gradation for BlendTrial Number 1
2-14. Complete this section as follows:
- Enter the mean of the specified gradation limits in the desired row. For example, the percentage of the specified gradation limits for a 3/4-inch sieve is 0.5 x (80 + 95) = 87.5 percent.
- Estimate the percent used. The first estimate should be the mineral-filler value. In this example, the mineral filler is limestone dust (LSD). Estimate the percent used by calculating the percent necessary to satisfy the number 200 requirements. For example, 90 percent of the LSD passed the number 200 sieve at the stockpile. The desired amount passing is 5 percent with a low limit of 3 percent, so use 4 percent for trial number 1. The percent used is 0.04 x 90 = 3.6.
- Calculate the percent passing for each sieve size and gradation using the following formula: percent passing = percent used x gradation of material. For example, trial number 1 indicates that the mix design contains 45 percent CA and the gradation test shows that 72 percent of the CA passed the 3/4-inch sieve at the stockpile. Therefore, the percent passing is 0.45 x 72 = 32.4.
- Examine other gradations that contribute to the percent passing. For example, Figure 2-2 shows that only 3 percent of the fine river-bar sand (FRBS) passed the number 200 sieve at the stockpile. Thus, any normal FRBS value would affect the percent passing the number 200 sieve by less than one. Four percent would be somewhat low, so use 5 percent. The percent passing is 0.05 x 90 = 4.5.
- Add the columns for each sieve and compare the totals to the desired gradation range. Ensure that the total of the percent-used column is 100. When blending three aggregates, find the intermediate aggregate percent-used column by subtracting the two predetermined percent-used figures from 100. If you are blending more than three aggregates, subtract the two predetermined percent-used figures from 100 and divide this figure by the number of intermediate aggregates. This yields the trial percent used for each aggregate. For example, if the percent of CA used is 45, the percent of FA used is 5, and the two intermediate aggregates are FA and FRBS, the intermediate aggregate percent is 25 as shown in the following calculation:
Combined Gradation for BlendTrial Number 2
2-15. Complete this block as follows:
- Use a series of calculations to obtain the percents used for the second trial.
- Calculate the average of the specified gradation range for the percent passing the second largest sieve by using the following formula:
T = percent passing at the stockpile
S = mean of the upper and lower limits of the specified gradation range for the percent passing the second largest sieve
C = percent passing the second largest sieve for the original gradation of the aggregate
Example: In Figure 2-2 and the sample DD Form 1219 shown in Figure 2-3 , the gradation range of the CA is 80 to 95 and 72 percent of the CA passed the 3/4-inch sieve at the stockpile.
Succeeding Trials
2-16. Each succeeding trial is a refinement of the results from the preceding trial. Even if the results of the first trial are within the limits of the specified gradation, try to get a blend that is as close as possible to the means of the gradation. This allows for a slightly greater deviation in the blend, which limits the frequency of adjustments to the central plant (see Figure 2-2 ). Conduct succeeding trials as follows:
- Inspect the preceding trial and note the sieve sizes whose blend is not within the specified gradation range.
- Consider changing the percent of intermediate aggregate used to yield results that are within the specified limits.
- Consider changing the original CA and FA figures since the original figures were only guides.
2-17. For example, in trial 1, the blend values between the number 4 and the number 200 sieves were high. Reduce the percent-passing value by reducing the amount of the fine material in the blend. Try a trial gradation of 45/30/20/5 (CA/FA/FRBS/LSD) to correct the blend.
Final Trial
2-18. Conduct a final trial when the set of values are well within the specified limits. Evaluation of the percent-used column shows that a relatively large range of values yields results that are within the specification limits. The purpose of a final trial is to obtain a blend as close as possible to the mean of the specification limits. Compute the final trial the same as preceding trials, except ensure that the desired row contains the mean value (average of high and low values) of the specifications. In the sample, trial 2 is close enough to the median that no further trials are necessary.
Reporting
2-19. Allow an independent party to check the calculations completed for the aggregate blending and record the information on the following forms:
- DD Form 1217 ( Figure 2-2 ). This is a reporting and computational form. Record the gradation of material and trial computations. Enter the contents of the final trial in the block following the last numbered trial.
- DD Form 1207 ( Figure 2-1 ). This is a graphical record of the aggregate blend. Plot the upper and lower limits of the specified gradation, the mean of the specified gradation, and the calculated final blend on the same graph (the mean is sometimes omitted).
Optimum Bitumen Content
2-20. The Marshall test method is used to determine the optimum bitumen content (OBC) of hot-mix pavements where stability and durability are required to withstand the action of high-pressure aircraft tires or heavy road traffic. A modified version of the Marshall test is used to determine the OBC for cold mixes. (See FM 5-472 for complete details on the Marshall test method.)
Reporting Test Results
2-21. Report the test results on one of the following forms:
- DD Form 1218 ( Figure 2-4 ). This form is the laboratory work sheet for the Marshall test. If the form is used in lieu of bituminous mix curves, plot the curves to evaluate the data.
- DD Form 1219 ( Figure 2-3 ). This form presents the results of the Marshall test in graphic form. Ensure that the curves are smooth and without deviations, including extraneous values.
Evaluating Test Results
2-22. Use the information in Table 2-4 to evaluate the results of the Marshall test and to obtain an OBC.
2-23. Obtain the percent of bitumen for stability, the unit weight, the percent of voids in the total mix, and the percent of voids filled with bitumen from Table 2-3 and Figure 2-3 . Average the bitumen-content percentages and note the result as the trial OBC.
Example: The bituminous mix curves shown in Figure 2-3 are for an airfield AC surface course (high-pressure tires). Determine the trial OBC.
- Unit weight: 4.5.
- Stability: 4.3.
- Percent of voids in the total mix: 4.9.
- Percent of voids filled with bitumen: 5.
- Total: 18.7.
- Average: 18.7 4 = 4.7 percent AC (trial OBC).
2-24. Evaluate the curves for stability, flow, percent of voids in the total mix, and percent of voids filled with bitumen at the trial OBC. Compare these values with the criteria in Table 2-36 . If all the values meet the criteria, the trial OBC becomes the final OBC. If one or more of the criteria fails to meet the specifications
- Recheck computations.
- Determine if any of the curves yields a bitumen that is out of line with the others. If so, rerun the Marshall test.
- Recheck the aggregate for conformance to the specified blend.
- Rerun the Marshall test (check apparatus first).
- Change the aggregate blend.
2-25. The test properties of the sample mix ( Table 2-5 ) are within the specification limits, so designate the trial OBC as the final OBC.
Job-Mix Formula
2-26. After establishing the OBC and the aggregate blend, determine the actual percentages, by weight, of the components in the final mix. The following example shows how to determine the job-mix formula:
Example: The OBC is set at 5.5 percent, and the aggregate blend is 40/30/25/5 (CA/FA/FRBS/LSD). Determine the job-mix formula (see Table 2-6 ).
2-27. In the field, check the mix for conformance to specifications using one of the following methods.
- Mix-percentage check. Compare the percentage of bitumen in the completed mix with the percentage set up in the design. Perform this check daily (minimum) at the plant or the construction site. (See FM 5-472 for further details on this procedure.)
- Density check. Perform a density check on samples from the compacted, cooled, and completed pavement. This test checks the mix and the construction methods used in placing and compacting the mix. (See Chapter 4 for further details on the density test.)
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|