UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

FirstPageTable Of ContentsList Of Figures

LIST OF TABLES

  2-1  Comparison of the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives  
  3-1  1993 liquid releases by source                                                      
  3-2  Radioactivity in air at the SRS perimeter and at the 160-kilometer (100-mile) radius during 1993                                                                 
  3-3  Average atmospheric tritium concentrations around the Savannah River Site                                                                                                                    3-12
  3-4  1993 atmospheric releases by operational group                                      
  3-5  Estimated ambient concentrations of criteria air pollutants from SRS sources        
  3-6  Estimated 24-hour average ambient concentrations at the SRS perimeter - toxic air pollutants regulated by South Carolina from SRS sources                         
  3-7  Forecast employment and population data for the SRS region of influence             
  3-8  General racial characteristics of population in the SRS region of analysis          
  3-9  General poverty characteristics of population in the SRS region of analysis         
  3-10 SRS annual individual and collective radiation doses                                
  3-11 Estimated maximum concentrations of OSHA-regulated workplace pollutants             
  4-1 Estimated radiological health effects from normal operations                         
  4-2 Estimated doses from the No-Action Alternative for normal operations                 
  4-3 Estimated doses from the Processing to Plutonium Metal Alternative for normal operations                                                                           
  4-4 Estimated doses from Processing to Plutonium Oxide Alternative for normal operations                                                                           
  4-5 Estimated doses from the Vitrification (Defense Waste Processing Facility) Alternative for normal operations                                                    
  4-6 Estimated doses from the Vitrification (F-Canyon) Alternative for normal
  4-7 Estimated worker nonradiological health summary impacts                              
  4-8 Estimated per capita 10-year dose by identified communities in 80-kilometer region                                                                               
  4-9 Maximum potential impacts from accidents involving plutonium solution alternatives                                                                         
  4-10 Estimated impacts from potential releases of Extremely Hazardous Substances in F-Area resulting from a severe earthquake                                        
  4-11 Estimated radiological doses from airborne releases during normal operation    
  4-12 Estimated maximum incremental air pollutant impacts at the SRS boundary (page 1)
  4-12 Estimated maximum incremental air pollutant impacts at the SRS boundary.a (page 2)
  4-13 Estimated doses received by the public from liquid pathways  
  4-14 Estimated annual utility consumption by alternative (page 1)                                 
  4-14 Estimated annual utility consumption by alternative.a (page 2)
  4-15 Current capacities and usage of utilities and energy at the Savannah River Site     
  4-16 Equivalent DWPF canister generation rates for each alternative                      
  4-17 Waste generation rates for each alternative                                         
  5-1 Estimated maximum annual cumulative radiological doses and resulting health effects to offsite population and facility workers                                    
  5-2 Estimated maximum nonradiological cumulative ground level concentrations of criteria and toxic pollutants at the SRS boundary                                        
  5-3 Estimated annual cumulative radiological doses and resulting health effects to offsite population from airborne releases                                             
  5-4 Estimated annual cumulative radiological doses and resulting health effects to offsite population from liquid releases                                               
  5-5 Maximum estimated cumulative waste generation from SRS operations, 1995 to 2004  
  Table B-1.  Accident frequency categories.a 
  Table B-2.  Hierarchy of established limits and guidelines used 
  Table B-3.  Postulated cumulative radiological impacts in the event of a severe earthquakea in the F-Area for facilities in their current mode of operation.
  Table B-5.  Source term isotopic distribution. 
  Table B-6. Postulated radiological events and accidents involving plutonium solutions for operations at F-Canyon.
  Table B-7. Increased risk of latent fatal cancers from the radiological events and accidents postulated for operations at the F-Canyon.
  Table B-8. Postulated radiological events and accidents associated with processing of plutonium solutions to metal(a) at the FB-Line.
  Table B-9. Increased risk of latent fatal cancers from the radiological events and accidents postulated for processing of plutonium solutions to metal(a) at the FB-Line facility.
  Table B-10. Postulated radiological events and accidents for full operations at the F-Area Outside Facilities.
  Table B-11. Increased risk and latent fatal cancers from the radiological events and accidents postulated for full operations at the F-Outside Facilities.
  Table B-12. Postulated radiological events and accidents for storage operations at the 235-F Facility Storage Vaults.
  Table B-13. Increased risk of latent fatal cancers from the radiological events and accidents postulated for storage operations at the 235-F Storage Vaults.
  Table B-14.  Inventories of Extremely Hazardous Substances(a) in F-Area.
  Table B-15.  Impacts from potential non-seismic-initiated releases of Extremely Hazardous Substances in F-Area.
  Table B-16.  Impacts from potential releases of Extremely Hazardous Substances in F-Area resulting from a severe earthquake.
  Table C-1.  Government agencies commenting on draft environmental impact statement.
  Table C-2.  Elected officials commenting on draft environmental impact statement.
  Table C-3.  Private organizations commenting on draft environmental impact statement.
  Table C-4.  Individuals commenting on draft environmental impact statement.

FirstPageTable Of ContentsList Of Figures



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list