UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Table 4-35. Comparison of risks from accidents under the no-action alternative and alternative A.

Estimated riska
Receptor
Waste typeb
No-action alternative
Alternative A
Change factorc
Population within Low-level waste 0.0170.017 1.0
80 kilometersMixed waste 0.0170.017 1.0
Transuranic waste 0.0050.015 3.0
High-level waste6.3´10-4 6.3´10-4 1.0
Offsite maximally Low-level waste 3.3´10-7 3.3´10-7 1.0
exposed individualMixed waste 3.3´10-7 3.3´10-7 1.0
Transuranic waste 9.8´10-8 2.9´10-7 3.0
High-level waste1.3´10-8 1.3´10-8 1.0
Uninvolved worker toLow-level waste 1.8´10-5 1.8´10-5 1.0
640 metersMixed waste 1.8´10-5 1.8´10-5 1.0
Transuranic waste 5.5´10-6 1.6´10-5 2.9
High-level waste6.4´10-7 6.4´10-7 1.0
Uninvolved worker toLow-level waste 0.0010.001 1.0
100 metersMixed waste 1.0´10-7 0.0011.0
Transuranic waste 3.1´10-4 9.0´10-4 2.9
High-level waste1.8´10-5 1.8´10-5 1.0

a. Increased risk of latent fatal cancers per year.

b. Waste types are described in Appendix F.

c. Change factors represent the multiplication factor required to equate no-action alternative risks to alternative A risks (e.g., no-action risk times change factor equals alternative A risk). The up arrow () indicates that the alternative A risk is greater.



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list