Vulnerability AnalysisThe focus of this field manual is nuclear contamination avoidance. Like most concepts in the Army, contamination avoidance is a process. This process involves:
By identifying and locating nuclear hazards on the battlefield, units will be able to either avoid the hazard or implement the protective procedures outlined in FM 3-4 to minimize the affects. It should be emphasized, at this point, that if threat forces posses nuclear weapons, they also probably possess chemical and/or biological weapons as well. Therefore, US forces must be prepared to operate in an NBC environment. But, for the purpose of this manual, contamination avoidance principles will center only on nuclear operations.
Before we begin the discussion of contamination avoidance, we must first discuss two critical, often overlooked, aspects of successful operations on the contaminated battlefield. These two aspects are nuclear threat assessment and vulnerability analysis. Both are described in this chapter.
With the current trend in nuclear proliferation, the nuclear threat now and in the future will be global. The proliferation of nuclear-capable nations in all contingency regions increases the likelihood of US forces being targets of nuclear attack. The extensive development worldwide of nuclear power plants presents an additional nuclear hazard condition if these facilities are damaged deliberately, inadvertently, or by industrial accident.
As Chapter 1 to FM 3-100 points out, nuclear weapons technology proliferation is increasing. Deploying US forces must be capable of accurately assessing the nuclear threat imposed by the opposing force and be capable of addressing unit vulnerability to attack. Chapter 2 in FM 3-100 describes in detail how nuclear weapons may be used and how their use may shape the battle.
When planning operations, commanders must consider the potential effects of nuclear weapons on personnel and equipment. In conventional operations, concentration of forces increases the chance for success, but this same concentration increases the effects of nuclear attacks and the likelihood of their occurrence. Commanders must decide what size of force to use and when they should be concentrated.
To assess a unit's vulnerability to nuclear attack, the commander determines how well protected the unit is and the type and size of weapon likely to be used against it. The commander then weighs various courses of action and determines which presents an acceptable risk to allow accomplishment of the mission. This whole process starts with the Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB) and an initial assessment of the nuclear threat.
The IPB process is a staff tool that helps identify and answer the commander's priority intelligence requirements (PIR). It's part of the operational planning that is necessary for battle management.
IPB is initiated and coordinated by the S2 and used to predict battlefield events and synchronize courses of action. IPB is designed to reduce the commander's uncertainties concerning weather, enemy, and terrain for a specific geographic area in a graphic format. It enables the commander to see the battlefield: where friendly and enemy forces can move, shoot, and communicate; where critical areas lie; and where enemy forces (and his own) are most vulnerable. IPB guides the S2 in determining where and when to employ collection assets to detect or deny enemy activities. These assets, working collectively, fulfill intelligence requirements and answer the PIR. IPB is the key for preparing for battle. It analyzes the intelligence data base in detail to determine the impact of enemy, weather, and terrain on the operation and presents this information graphically. It is a continuous process which supports planning and execution for all operations. IPB consists of a systematic five-function process:
On the battlefield, units will have incomplete intelligence concerning enemy nuclear capabilities and/or intentions. Commanders must ensure that the IPB becomes an integrated process through which key members of the staff contribute. IPB is a process involving intelligence and operations personnel. It must also be integrated with input from chemical officers.
Chemical officers and NCOs, in coordination with the S2/3, must address nuclear warfare during all phases of the battle. This is accomplished only by direct participation in the IPB process. Working with the S2, the chemical staff accomplishes the following:
Using the IPB process, the chemical officer or NCO provides the commander updates on the nuclear situation.
Based on the time periods of interest, the chemical staff will provide the battle commander the following:
It is important that the chemical officer/NCO be succinct during the commander's briefing or have his information presented by the S3 during his portion of the briefing. Therefore, for input to be addressed, chemical personnel must be players in the IPB process. Although it is developed under the direction of the S2, once completed, the decision support template (DST) becomes an operational document and is briefed to the commander by the S3. If the chemical staff is an active participant in the IPB process, and is determined to serve the commander, then they must work within that process in developing the DST and R& S plan. Through this participation, the chemical staff best serves the commander as special staff warfare experts. The DST must include nuclear concerns and visually present them to the commander.
During battle management activities, the chemical staff advisor works with the S2 on the IPB. He or she coordinates with the intelligence officer to analyze and identify nuclear targets based on threat, terrain, and the AO. Potential threat nuclear targets could be key terrain, choke points, command and control facilities, counterattack routes, mobility corridors, troop concentrations and/or rear area assembly points.
A nuclear vulnerability assessment constitutes an important part of battlefield assessment and risk analysis and is a primary means through which the chemical staff advisor participates in the battlefield assessment process. In this assessment, the chemical officer must develop information for integration into the various staff estimates. From the S2, the chemical officer or NCO obtains--
Specific items of interest from the S2 would be--
From the fire support officer (FSO), the chemical officer obtains information on casualty percentages from friendly and threat conventional munitions. Examples of information obtained include casualty percentages based on target size and casualty percentages based on weapon systems.
The chemical staff also should prepare a list, general in nature, of information compiled from various sources (such as news bulletins, spot reports, and intelligence summaries (INSUMs)). This information, when viewed as single events, may appear to be meaningless. However, when added to other pieces of information it may provide the key that connects the information and present the best view of the enemy's intent. Items of general information include, but are not limited to, the following:
Once information is gathered, it will provide input to the formulation of the nuclear threat status.
US forces may not have to carry nuclear defense equipment (radiac equipment) based on the initial threat estimate. If the threat condition changes and indicators suggest the possible use of nuclear weapons by threat forces, this equipment would be deployed forward (to the division support area or to the brigade support area). These weapon stocks may be pre-palletized for immediate deployment by aircraft to the affected unit if required. However, this decision must be made based on available aircraft or other transportation systems. This could be done so that the forces would not have to carry the radiac equipment or dosimeters in their field packs or ruck sacks.
The minimum nuclear threat status is set at division or separate brigade level and is a flexible system determined by the most current enemy situation, as depicted by the continuously updated IPB process. This allows local commanders to increase the threat status if conditions change in their areas of operation. Threat status governs the initial deployment of nuclear defense assets (equipment or units) and the positioning of those assets on the battlefield or in the operational area. The nuclear threat status serial numbers are for planning purposes according to STANAG 2984. These numbers, however, may be substituted for a color code (Serial 0 = white; Serial 1 = green, etc.). It does, however, require chemical personnel at brigade and division level to stay abreast of the intelligence picture. The nuclear threat status is outlined in the following paragraphs:
The opposing force does not possess nuclear defense equipment, is not trained in nuclear defense or employment, and do not possess the capability to employ nuclear weapons or systems. Further, the opposing force is not expected to gain access to such weapons; and if they were able to gain these weapons, it is considered highly unlikely that the weapons would be employed against US forces.
Under this status, a deploying force would not have to carry nuclear defense equipment. However, protective masks should be carried. Chemical personnel should possibly concentrate efforts in chemical or biological operations, smoke, herbicides, flame field expedients (FFE), and monitoring threat communication channels for nuclear threat indicators.
Serial 1 (low).
The opposing force has an offensive nuclear capability, has received training in defense and employment techniques; but, there is no indication of the use of nuclear weapons in the immediate future. This indication may be based on whether nuclear munitions are dispersed or deployed, or the stated objectives and intent of opposing forces.
Given this threat status, all personnel carry their personal defense equipment, or nuclear defense equipment stockpiles are identified and would be readily available for deployment to the operational area if the threat status should increase. NBC reconnaissance systems deploy to the operational area of interest to continue to provide a monitoring capability of the opposing force. Chemical personnel continue to concentrate their efforts in the areas listed under Serial 0.
Serial 2 (medium).
The opposing force is equipped and trained in nuclear weapons defense and employment techniques. Nuclear weapons and employment systems are readily available. Nuclear weapons have been employed in other areas of the theater. Continued employment of nuclear weapons is considered probable in the immediate future. Indicators would be--
Unit nuclear defense equipment should be either pre-palletized and located forward for easy access or issued to the soldiers responsible for use within the unit. Personnel and equipment should be kept under cover as much as possible to protect them from contamination.
Effective downwind messages (EDMs) should be sent out to subordinate units. Decontamination assets, NBC recon assets and smoke support should be deployed as part of the force structure. Detection and monitoring equipment should be issued to the operators. Unit should improve fighting positions and harden shelters if mission permits.
Serial 3 (high).
The opposing force possesses nuclear weapons and delivery systems. Nuclear defense equipment is available and training status is considered at par or better than that of the United States. Nuclear weapons have already been employed in the theater and attack is considered imminent. Indicators are--
US forces should deploy with nuclear defense equipment in the unit load. This will depend on the nuclear threat to the airfield or port at which they land. Soldiers should ensure radiac equipment is serviceable prior to deployment. Decontamination and nuclear recon assets should be task organized and moved forward. Contingency stocks of nuclear defense equipment may be moved forward to the battalion trains. EDMs are initiated. Place collective protection systems into a state of readiness, including those systems in combat vehicles.
A threat status number can be used to represent a combined status for NBC, or it can be several numbers used to represent each category. It is possible to have a Chemical/Biological (CB) status of three and a nuclear status of zero. This threat status provides the commander with guidance for deployment and operational purposes. It allows the commander to tailor chemical units to fit any situation.
It also must be understood that the threat status can change rapidly. Although a nuclear status of zero may exist during deployment, the opposing force may seize industrial products or obtain nuclear weapons from a sponsoring nation. Therefore, the ground commander must be capable of upgrading the NBC defense posture quickly.
To assist in the formulation of the threat status, the chemical staff, (in conjunction with the S2) must analyze all information received. A tool in this analysis is the Threat Status Matrix in Figure 1-1.
More than one matrix may be necessary to determine the threat status for nuclear, biological, and chemical attack.
To use the matrix, place an "X" in the appropriate block. Add each column; and whichever column has the most X's provides a means to identify what threat status serial number could be used to indicate the enemy force intent. If an overall threat status cannot be determined due to an informational shortfall, collection assets should be reallocated or positioned to gain the needed information.
Once the threat status estimate has been assessed, the chemical staff must analyze the protection level required for friendly forces. This is accomplished by modifying the MOPP analysis process contained in FM 3-4. Key factors include analyzing mission, environment, and soldier factors. These key factotrs are discussed in FM 3-4 and listed below:
Other factors include--
The chemical staff must properly prepare the threat status and identify the protection level required for friendly forces to withstand a nuclear attack. This information is vital to the commander and for the successful accomplishment of the mission. The commander may be required to reallocate or position units on the battlefield to reduce vulnerability to an attack.
A unit's vulnerability to nuclear attack depends on the yield of the warhead likely to be used, the protection available to the unit, and how well dispersed the unit is. Tables 1-1 through 1-3 help estimate the damage caused by a nuclear detonation. This information will help the commander determine unit vulnerability to nuclear attack. These tables are simplified and safesided. They assume that the worst case of a nuclear burst will occur at ground zero (GZ) (see FM 101-31-1) and that all target elements will be dispersed uniformly throughout the target area.
Immediate Permanent Ineffectiveness (IP)--Personnel become ineffective within 3 minutes of exposure and remain ineffective until death. Death usually occurs within one day.
Immediate Transient Ineffectiveness (IT)--Personnel become ineffective for any task within 3 minutes of exposure and remain so for approximately 7 minutes. Personnel recover to greater than 75 percent of their pre- exposure performance levels after about 10 minutes and remain so for about 30 minutes. Then their performance degrades for around 5 hours, for undemanding tasks or 2 hours for demanding tasks, when radiation sickness becomes so sever that they are ineffective. They remain ineffective until death, which usually occurs in 5 to 6 days.
Latent Lethality (LL)--is the physiological response from a dose of 650 cGy (RADs). For physically undemanding tasks, performance degrades about 3 hours after exposure and remains so for approximately 2 days, when personnel will recover combat effectiveness for 6 days or so. Then they relapse into degraded performance and remain so for 4 weeks after exposure when radiation sickness becomes so severe that they are ineffective. They will remain ineffective until death approximately 6 weeks after exposure. For physically demanding tasks, personnel performance degrades about 2 hours after exposure and remains so for three weeks, when radiation sickness becomes severe enough to render the personnel ineffective. They remain ineffective until death approximately 6 weeks after exposure.
Physically Demanding Tasks--Personnel become less than 25 percent effective within 2 hours of exposure and remain so for 3 weeks, at which time radiation sickness symptoms will be present in sufficient severity to render them ineffective. Personnel will remain ineffective until death in approximately 6 weeks.
Radiation casualties, with these three categories in mind, become performance-based. Recent studies by the Defense Nuclear Agency and the Ballistic Research Laboratory reveal that lethal dosage varies from subject to subject and according to the physical demands of the task to be performed. Thus, dosage is expressed in terms of LD 50/30: the dose that will prove to be lethal to 50 percent of the exposed population within 30 days.
In an active nuclear environment, the more concentrated a unit is, the more lucrative the target becomes. If the unit itself is not the target, but falls within the fallout pattern, unit monitors will be capable of providing the commander with essential information regarding the hazard. Nuclear hazard prediction is covered in more detail in Chapter 3.
Based on vulnerability radius and unit size, commanders may determine the risk to the unit from a nuclear attack and whether or not to adjust unit dispersion. However, personnel may not be the target. Often, a unit's equipment, due to sensitivity and vulnerability, may be the target.
Additional information concerning planning factors and operational exposure guidance may be obtained in Appendix A to this FM. Additional information concerning shielding afforded by particular vehicles and structures, commonly referred to as transmission factors, can be found in Chapter 3 and Appendix B.
A more detailed discussion of nuclear vulnerability analysis can be found in FM 101-31-1. The information presented in Tables 1-2 and 1-3 are for planning purposes only. See FM 101-31-2 (S) for actual vulnerability radii.
When assessing casualties or damage, the coverage tables consider only blast and nuclear radiation effects. The combined coverage of the two effects is listed. Thermal casualty data are included in the effects tables.
Blast, thermal radiation, and nuclear radiation were considered for assessing safety distances, and the largest radius of safety is listed. For calculations, friendly troops are assumed to be in one of three vulnerability categories and exposed to one of three levels of risk.
Unwarned, Exposed--Personnel standing in the open at time of burst, but drop to prone position before the blast wave arrives. They may have areas of bare skin exposed to direct thermal radiation and may suffer temporary loss of vision. This category also applies to civilian personnel in open areas.
Warned, Exposed--Personnel prone on open ground, with all skin areas covered, and with an overall thermal protection at least equal to that provided by a two-layer, summer uniform. Troops have been warned, but do not have time to dig foxholes.
Warned, Protected--Personnel have some protection against heat, blast, and radiation. Protected categories include tanks, armored personnel carriers, foxholes, weapons emplacements, and command posts and shelters.
Negligible Risk--Largest radius corresponding to 1 percent casualties or 2.5 percent nuisance effects.
Moderate Risk--Largest radius corresponding to 2.5 percent casualties or 5 percent nuisance effects.
Emergency Risk--5 percent casualties (nuisance effects not specified).
Negligible Risk--50 cGy for previously unexposed troops.
Moderate Risk--70 cGy for previously unexposed troops.
Emergency Risk--150 cGy for previously unexposed troops.
For personnel primary targets, the combined effects of blast casualties and radiation casualties are considered in coverage and effects tables. For materiel primary targets, only blast is considered.
Exposed Personnel. Unless otherwise stated, this term refers to personnel in the open, regardless of physical posture or uniform. Radiation casualties are determined based on free-in-air doses sufficient to cause IP (8,000 cGy), IT (3,000 cGy), or LL (650 cGy), as identified in Table 1-1. Blast casualties are determined from overpressures sufficient to cause severe injury from decelerative tumbling or lung damage.
Personnel in Foxholes. This term refers to personnel in 1.8-meter-deep open foxholes, each with a 0.3-meter-firing step. Blast overpressures of 296 kilopascals (kPa) (43 psi) cause lung hemmorage, which is the blast injury mechanism for producing casualties to personnel in foxholes. Nuclear radiation radii is computed, using foxhole transmission factors. Foxhole collapse is no longer considered the governing casualty producing effect.
Personnel in Tanks. Severe damage to tanks was used to find blast radii for casualties to personnel in tanks. Nuclear radiation radii were computed, using transmission factors for medium tanks with radiation liners.
Moderate Damage to Wheeled Vehicles. Although the term "wheeled vehicles" originally referred to 2-1/2-ton trucks and l/4-ton vehicles other than WWII jeeps, it also applies to HMMWV and other vehicles smaller than 2 tons.
Definitions for Structures
Severe Damage (Sev). A degree of structural damage that precludes further use of a structure for the purpose for which it was intended, without essentially complete reconstruction. Generally, collapse of the structure is implied.
Moderate Damage (Mod). A degree of structural damage to principal load-carrying members (trusses, columns, beams) and walls that precludes effective use of a structure for the purpose for which it was intended, until major repairs are made.
Light Damage (Lit). A degree of damage that results in broken windows, slight damage to roofing and siding, blowing down of light interior partitions, and slight cracking of curtain walls in buildings. Generally, structures receiving light damage can be used as intended, with only minor repairs and removal of debris.
Definitions for Vehicles
Severe Damage (Sev). Damaged, nonfunctional, very difficult to repair. At least one subsystem is nonfunctional and not repairable.
Moderate Damage (Mod). Damaged, nonfunctional, repairable with special tools, skills, and parts. At least half of all subsystems (engine, power-train, tracks, etc.) are not functional, but are repairable.
Two techniques to evaluate friendly unit vulnerability to nuclear detonations are (1) a technical approach (unit dispositions are compared with the effects of an expected weapon yield), and (2) an operational approach (unit dispositions are compared with targeting criteria used by the threat target analyst).
The primary tool for analysing friendly dispositions is the radius of vulnerability (RV). RV is the radius of the circle within which friendly troops will be exposed to a risk equal to, or greater than, the emergency risk criterion (5-percent combat ineffectiveness) and/or within which material will be subjected to a 5-percent probability of the specified degree of damage. See Table 1-2 or 1-3 version of the RV table in FM 101-31-2, Chapter 15. The GZ for the RV is always assumed to be the point where detonation will do the greatest damage to the friendly unit or installation. Delivery errors are not considered.
Analyzing the vulnerability of friendly dispositions and installations consists of--
Outline the unit battle position on the tactical map. Using a compass, a piece of plastic with the radius of vulnerability drawn to scale on it, or a circular map scale. Superimpose the radius of vulnerability chosen from Table 1-2 or 1-3 over the target area.
The GZ used for the analysis is the location that would result in the highest fractional coverage of the target.
From this worst-case GZ and the appropriate RV, an estimation of the percentage of casualties or materiel damage that might result from an enemy nuclear strike may be determined.
Using the center point of the compass, template, or circular map scale as the GZ, choose the GZ that would result in the highest fractional coverage of the target area. Visually estimate the percent of the unit covered by the RV.
If this fractional coverage yields unacceptable losses of personnel or equipment, the commander must then make a decision on how to best reduce this casualty rate. This may be done by adding shielding as outlined in Appendix B, erecting the vulnerability reduction measures outlined in FM 3-4, or highlighted later in this chapter. A tactical decision may also be made to reduce vulnerability.
If a mechanized battalion occupies a battle position 5 km wide, and 2.5 km deep, it could be positioned as in Figure 1-2. Target elements are uniformly dispersed in the area. In this example, the RV or personnel in APCs to a 5-kt weapon is shown with GZ at worst case. Since 50 percent of the battalion is covered by the RV of the 5-kt weapon, then up to 50 percent of the battalion's personnel in APCs could become casualties. Obviously, the risk to a unit in this particular battle position is extreamly high.
When the same battalion deploys in three company or team battle positions in depth, the distances between positions significantly reduce the damage, even assuming the weapon detorates at the optimum GZ. In Figure 1-3 although one company is 100 percent vulnerable, the battalion is only 33 percent vulnerable. Thus, one company may have up to 100 percent casualties, but the battalion may only have 33 percent casualties.
When the estimated fractional coverage exceeds acceptable loss criteria, develop alternate courses of action (COAs) to reduce the nuclear vulnerability of the friendly unit or facilities by--
When mitigation actions are taken, reanalyze, using adjusted data.
Active measures prevent the enemy from using nuclear weapons. Passive measures increase survivability. Individual and unit collective measures are only discussed briefly here. See FM 3-4 for detailed information.
Active measures are those taken to find and destroy either the munitions or the delivery systems. Destruction of delivery systems and munitions is the best method of reducing the chances of being attacked.
The destruction of stockpiles of nuclear munitions and production facilities is usually beyond the capabilities of lower level commanders. Echelons above corps (EAC) have the responsibility and sufficient assets for finding and destroying these targets.
Corps and divisions do not have the capability to locate and destroy stockpiles or production facilities; but they do have the capability to find and destroy delivery systems. Recon flights, counterbattery radar, and other intelligence collection assets are used to find delivery systems, such as long-range cannons and missile systems.
It is not possible to destroy all threat nuclear munitions and/or delivery systems. Units must always take precautions to avoid being targeted or to reduce the effects of an attack if one does occur. These are passive measures. All units must use passive measures as part of normal operations to reduce the effects of operating under nuclear conditions. These measures include--
H Seek protection.
Tasks take longer to perform in a nuclear environment. Again, FM 3-4 contains tables to help commanders estimate how long it takes to accomplish missions in a nuclear environment. Commanders must take time to carefully think out courses of action and allow for the additional time requirement. This is commonly referred to as wargaming. A bad decision could cause the unit to become needlessly contaminated or suffer casualties. Use the nuclear threat status for planning and stocking nuclear defense equipment. Units must prepare to continue the mission after a nuclear attack. Following an enemy nuclear strike, commanders must quickly assess the damage and reconstitute lost or weakened units.
Avoiding detection is the best way to prevent nuclear attacks. Do this by employing good OPSEC measures. These include camouflage, light discipline, and especially, signal security. Both active and passive measures must be used to prevent the enemy from gaining target information. Use defensive electronic warfare; electronic countermeasures (ECM) and electronic counter--countermeasures (ECCM) to reduce the chances of identification and location. In the nuclear environment, it is even more important that commanders consider displacing if detection and/or identification is suspected.
If the unit is unable to avoid a nuclear attack, early warning of battlefield hazards is very important. The NBCWRS notifies units that adjacent units have been attacked or that a downwind hazard is present. When no NBCWRS warning is received, periodic monitoring, discussed later in this manual, is essential. Troops must be able to identify nuclear attacks and take appropriate actions. NBC recon teams, using the NBC Reconnaissance System (NBCRS), alert moving units before they enter contaminated areas.
The unit must maintain discipline and confidence in its ability to survive and operate if it is to overcome the shock of a nuclear attack and continue the mission. Commanders must be able to rely on their troops not to give up hope or lose the sense of duty. Again, plan ahead. Use these plans whenever possible during unit training. Use the information contained in FM 3-4 to assist in developing unit plans.
Natural terrain may provide shelter from the effects of nuclear weapons. Ditches, ravines, and natural depressions reduce initial nuclear effects.
Foxholes with solid overhead cover and shelters offer good protection against nuclear weapons. However, any overhead cover such as tents, tarpaulins, and ponchos offer at least some protection from fallout. Use NBC protective covers (NBC-PCs) to protect equipment whenever possible.
Combat service support (CSS) installations and troops in compact assembly areas are vulnerable to nuclear weapons. Commanders must determine how much dispersion is needed. Dispersion must reduce vulnerability but not hinder operations or prevent the unit from concentrating when necessary. Supplies, especially food, POL, and ammunition, must be dispersed so they will not all be destroyed at once. The more dispersed a unit is, the longer it will take to do even routine tasks. The degree of acceptable dispersion depends upon mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time available (METT-T).
Tactical mobility gives the commander the best chance for avoidance. Constant movement prevents the enemy from pinpointing locations and accurately employing nuclear weapons. However, the battlefield will be a difficult place in which to maneuver. Contaminated areas, tree blowdown, urban rubble, fires, flooding, fallout, and craters are obstacles that must be dealt with. NBC recon teams and the serving S2/G2 can provide useful information. The best source of information on mobility routes, however, is the movement control center (MCC).
Store supplies and equipment under cover to prevent contamination. Buildings offer excellent protection from fallout. Field expedient methods are abundant.
NBC protective covers, tarpaulins, pallets, packing materials, dunnage, and plastic (sheets, bags, and rolls) all can be used. Field expedient covers, especially canvas and cardboard, provide protection from fallout for a short period. Contamination seeps through all such covers; however, NBC-PCs provide protection for up to 24 hours. Units must replace covers as soon as possible after heavy contamination. Although these covers may provide protection against fallout, a contact hazard will remain until the dust on the ground and on the protective cover has decayed.
All plans should include postattack procedures for limiting exposure to radiological hazards. Amount of exposure is important. Every minute spent in a radiologically contaminated environment increases a person's total radiation dose. Only personnel required to accomplish a mission are sent into a contaminated area.
Limit exposure with time. By waiting to enter a contaminated area, the contamination level will decay and with it the chance of exposure. Exposure can also be accidental. Personnel may not know that equipment is contaminated. Usually, this can be prevented by always marking contaminated equipment. But there are places where nuclear contamination hazards can accumulate, such as air filters. All engines have air filters that trap nuclear contaminants. These contaminants accumulate. So even if the hazard area is small, it can be deadly. Persons working around equipment should be aware of hidden hazards. Always dispose of contaminated collectors, such as air filters, as contaminated waste.
Limiting the number of personnel and amount of equipment in the area helps prevent the spread of contamination. Make every effort to confine nuclear contamination to as small an area as possible. This begins with monitoring to determine the amount and extent of contamination. It also reduces the amount of decon required. Units moving from a contaminated area into a clean area should decontaminate at or near the edge of contamination. Mark all contaminated areas, and report them to other units to keep them from entering the contaminated area unknowingly.
Contaminated material presents additional problems to limiting the spread of contamination. If the situation permits, material can be left and allowed to decay. If the equipment is mission essential, it must be decontaminated on the spot or brought back to the rear and decontaminated.
If the situation permits, decontaminate as far forward as possible. If this is not possible, then material may have to be transported to the rear for decontamination. If contaminated material must be moved, keep in mind that the amount of contamination transferred to the road network or ground surface is directly proportional to the amount of contamination on the material, location of the contamination, and type of surface on which the contamination is present. Precautions or safety measures to take, when moving this equipment are--
There may be instances in which contaminated material or waste material must be disposed of or destroyed. Bury the contaminated material. Burial is effective for all types of contamination. Mark and avoid the area where contaminated waste is buried. Procedures for marking contaminated waste burial sites is outlined in FM 3-5. This consists of submitting an NBC 5 nuclear report, outlining the contaminated waste burial site. However, this report must be sent by the NBCC, so that line item Alpha, (strike serial number) may be assigned. The unit, therefore, that closes the decontamination site must notify the NBCC.
|Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list|