UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)


AFPS Article Banner

98275. Estes Advocates Space Partnerships

By Douglas J. Gillert
American Forces Press Service
	COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- U.S. military space programs 
must converge with civil, commercial and allied space 
efforts, DoD's top space commander said here recently.
	Air Force Gen. Howell M. Estes III, commander in chief 
of U.S. Space Command, spoke at the National Space Symposium 
to more than 1,000 representatives of governments, 
organizations and companies that deal with space.  
Partnerships with civil and commercial space agencies, he 
said, will enable DoD to maintain its space programs more 
efficiently and affordably.
	Space is becoming increasingly vital to America's 
economic and military strength, he said, and global 
partnerships are at the core of his command's long-range 
plan. Estes said the benefits of such partnerships include 
sharing technology garnered from large military investments 
in space research and development, merging military 
investments in worldwide space infrastructures, and 
understanding military space trends and future requirements.
	"A significant inducement to partnering is the 
financial incentive of the work itself," Estes said. 
Partners, he said, gain access to far more resources than 
they could afford individually. Sharing resources also will 
help nations and military organizations adjust to the 
Information Age. Transition to information-based weapon 
systems, strategies and doctrines "is and will continue to 
be a traumatic transition for a host of reasons, not the 
least of which is cost," Estes said.
	The success the military is having at developing new 
weapon systems comes at the cost of a significantly reduced 
force structure, the general said. Such cuts will be 
justified, he said, if investments in space-based 
information technology "provide such dramatic increases in 
battle management; command, control, computers and 
communications; and intelligence surveillance and 
reconnaissance, so as to render the smaller force structure 
far more effective than the larger force structure of the 
past."
	But even though DoD is cutting force structure, it 
hasn't come up with the funds necessary to invest in new 
technologies to offset the decreased force, Estes said. 
"There is a large and growing possibility that these gains 
will not be realized unless more funding is made available 
to the military. Therefore, the importance of military space 
partnerships becomes even greater.
	"The smaller military force of the future will require 
information systems -- many of them space-based -- which do 
not yet exist and are not yet funded," Estes said. "One of 
the few avenues the military has to meet these Information 
Age requirements and make the most efficient use of every 
single dollar spent is through partnerships. The military 
and its partners can leverage each other's investments in 
infrastructure, research and development." 
	A common conceptual foundation is required to make 
these partnerships work, the general said. He outlined four 
keys for successful partnering:
	o Ensuring a single operational focal point, presenting 
one voice to the world for U.S. military space;
	o Distinguishing between core and noncore military 
space activities;
	o Developing an integrated systems approach to space 
issues; and 
	o Shaping the space environment.
	Estes said the first concept is key to ensuring a 
streamlined decision-making process across institutional 
boundaries. "A strong military focal point could help break 
the deadlock on strategic issues," Estes said. The general 
announced that he has, in fact, been assigned the bulk of 
space-related responsibilities of regional commanders in 
chief. 
	"CinCSpace has been designated as the single focal 
point for military space," Estes said. "That's a huge change 
in the way we've done business in the past."
	Concerning core and noncore capabilities, Estes said 
the former have to do with operating military space forces 
during crises and war. They aren't likely candidates for 
partnering, he said. On the other hand, many noncore 
capabilities, such as satellite communications and launch 
services, are good candidates for outsourcing and 
privatization, the general said.
	Space Command's principal objective in filling the lead 
military space role and identifying partnering candidates is 
to develop an integrated systems approach, he said. Such an 
approach would result in huge savings, and his command can 
help partners consolidate missions from an integrated 
systems perspective, he said. 
	Systems integration is partially what's happening in 
the future imagery architecture and military satellite 
communications, Estes said. "U.S. Space Command is playing a 
leading role in these efforts to ensure the needs of the war 
fighters and our nation at large are being met."
	To make all these plans work, Estes said, DoD and its 
partners must shape the space environment. This requires 
neutral defenses for all space-faring nations for their 
mutual benefit, he said. "This mutual dependence should 
deter aggression and foster [positive] relationships. 
However, based on historical precedence, development of 
enforcement policies and the means of ensuring enforcement 
may become necessary."
	Like air and sea power of the past, increasing 
dependency on peaceful access to space may require military 
policing, Estes said. "Regardless, the more nations 
cooperate in peaceful sharing of space resources, the less 
chance the world will ever need the means of enforcing the 
use of space. [But] it is likely in the future that the U.S. 
Space Command will need to have options to respond to anyone 
attempting to deny us access to space."
	Estes concluded his talk by comparing partnerships in 
space to marriage. "A great partnership is only the 
beginning," he said. "A relationship will take a lot of 
work."
##END##



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list