Referendum deserves world support
Taiwan Journal
02/06/2004
Story Type:Commentary;
Byline:Ernesto Hilario
With hundreds of missiles
ranged along mainland China's southern coast casting an ominous shadow
over the lives of his 23 million fellow Taiwanese, President Chen
Shui-bian, as their duly elected leader, is duty-bound to demand that
Beijing dismantle them and renounce the use of military force against the
Republic of China. And as the citizens of a democratic nation, it is
important for the Taiwanese people to make their voices heard loud and
clear across the Taiwan Strait--and around the world--emphasizing that
Beijing must commit itself to settling differences with Taipei
peacefully, through mutually respectful dialogue rather than brute
force.
Such is the purpose of the
referendum to be held March 20 in tandem with the ROC presidential
election.
Beijing leaders, however, have
launched a global PR blitz to warn off anyone from supporting the
referendum. They claim that it is part of a conspiracy by a minority of
Taiwanese "splittists" to change the status quo in the Taiwan
Strait by seeking independence for Taiwan, as well as an
election-campaign gambit on the part of Chen to win votes for a second
term by fanning anti-Chinese sentiment.
Beijing's pressure has
succeeded in eliciting expressions of concern in Washington, Tokyo and
Paris that the referendum is needlessly provocative and serves only to
escalate cross-strait tensions. Such claims are entirely unfounded,
however, and it would appear that Western leaders who have been persuaded
to voice them are motivated more by the desire to placate China for the
sake of their national interests rather than by any concern about
standards of responsible conduct.
Peace, after all, is indeed
the primary objective of the referendum, which is intended to avert
rather than provoke war. In fact, it is Beijing that has been escalating
tensions by beefing up its military deployments on the other side of the
strait, by refusing to negotiate with Taipei about cross-strait relations
unless the latter first acknowledges that it is a local government under
Beijing's sovereignty, and by doing all in its power to isolate Taiwan in
the international community.
Peace is not the only
objective of the referendum, however. It is also a demonstration by the
23 million Taiwanese of their right to exist and determine their own
future free from fear and to consolidate democracy by finally, for the
first time in the history of the Republic of China, exercising the right
of referendum enshrined in the ROC Constitution promulgated in 1947--two
years before the People's Republic of China came into being. This civil
right is also fundamental to the "Three Principles of the
People," formulated by ROC founding father Sun Yat-sen, who worked
tirelessly to realize the ideal of power to the people.
As for worries that the Chen
administration is seeking to change the cross-strait status quo, the
March referendum will not violate the "Five No's" policy
spelled out in Chen's May 2000 inauguration speech: "As long as the
Chinese Communist Party regime has no intention to use military force
against Taiwan, I pledge that during my term in office, I will not
declare independence, I will not change the national title [the Republic
of China], I will not push for the inclusion of the so-called
'state-to-state' description in the Constitution, and I will not promote
a referendum to change the status quo in regard to the question of
independence or unification. Furthermore, there is no question of
abolishing the Guidelines for National Unification and the National
Unification Council." What Chen did not say in the same breath, but
has subsequently reiterated over and over again is that there is no need
for Taiwan to declare independence since Taiwan is the Republic of China,
which has in fact long been a sovereign, independent nation and has never
belonged to the People's Republic of China. He has also stressed that he
is open to discussing the topic of unification, though not willing to
concede that Taiwan is presently a province of the PRC. It is Beijing's
unrelenting demand for such a concession as the precondition for talks
that is the source of the tension in the Taiwan Strait.
More than anything else, the
23 million Taiwanese want to live in peace, free from military threats.
Beijing leaders have stated that they respect Taiwan's democratization
process and wish to promote the welfare of the people of Taiwan. If so,
they should back up their words with deeds, and should welcome the
Taiwanese people's expression of their views through direct
democracy.
The Chen administration has
launched a diplomatic offensive to explain to the international community
that holding of the referendum is meant to prepare the ground for
resolving cross-strait differences through dialogue, lay the foundation
for lasting peace in the region, and promote the cause of democracy and
human dignity. None of these goals are achievable so long as the world
looks on mutely as Beijing refuses to negotiate directly with Taipei as
an equal but only escalates its military threat. Therefore, the
international community should fully support Taiwan's pursuit of
long-lasting peace through such means as the March referendum.
--Ernesto Hilario is a
free-lance writer based in Metro Manila, the Philippines.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|