Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova's answer to a media question regarding the designation of the British Council as undesirable organisation in the Russian Federation
5 June 2025 19:56
967-05-06-2025
Question: The Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation has designated the activities of the international organisation British Council as undesirable in our country. How would you comment on this development? What, in your view, led to this decision?
Maria Zakharova: As is known, the British Council has operated in Russia since the early 1990s, establishing its central representative office in Moscow in 1992. In the years that followed, the Council aggressively expanded its presence by setting up numerous regional branches, all without proper legal formalisation. Despite this expansion, the legal status of the organisation remained undefined within our nation. The requisite regulatory framework for the British Council's operations in Russia - which should have encompassed its status, the procedure for opening branches and the conditions governing their work - was intended to be established through a separate bilateral agreement on cultural and information centres. However, the efforts to draft such a document were thwarted by London.
In response to the unfriendly anti-Russian measures taken by the British side in July 2007 concerning the so-called Alexander Litvinenko case, and in light of growing evidence of the Council's destabilising influence on Russian soil, a decision was made to close all regional branches of the British Council in our country as of January 2008.
The sole remaining British Council office continued to operate in Moscow until March 2018. However, as part of retaliatory measures against London's hostile actions in the so-called Skripal case, its operations were also terminated that month.
Following the start of the special military operation, the British Council aligned itself with the unprecedentedly hostile anti-Russian measures of the UK government, joining broader Western efforts to discredit the policies of our country's leadership and undermine Russian influence globally, particularly within the CIS region. The Council employed elements of "soft power" extensively, alongside various grant programmes, systematically gathering information on the situation in Russia's new territories, conditions along the line of contact, and other potentially sensitive data.
Although, as previously noted, the Russian branch of the British Council was forcibly shut down, the parent organisation persisted in its subversive activities from other states' positions, drawing our compatriots into its projects. Moreover, Russian competent authorities have obtained evidence confirming that the British Council has been utilised by British intelligence services in covert operations aimed at undermining the sovereignty of independent states and in clandestine destabilising activities.
Thus, designating the British Council as an undesirable organisation in its entirety was, in essence, a matter of common sense and timing. Until last year, this step was hindered by a legal restriction in Russian legislation, which barred foreign state-founded entities (the British Council being established by the UK government) from being declared undesirable. This loophole has now been rectified.
In light of the aforementioned circumstances, we would like to caution our partners in Russia-friendly states against fostering ties or flirting with the British. Providing favourable conditions for organisations such as the British Council - permitting them access to youth and the implementation of ostensibly harmless cultural and educational projects - poses the risk of losing control over critical social and political processes. The positions of influence gained through such activities are subsequently exploited by London to interfere in the internal affairs of other states, directly threatening their sovereignty and territorial integrity.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
