UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=8/24/2000
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
TITLE=RUSSIA SUB / MEDIA ROLE
NUMBER=5-46907
BYLINE=LAURIE KASSMAN
DATELINE=MOSCOW
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO:  The Kursk nuclear submarine disaster may have 
highlighted the dangerous deterioration of Russia's 
military machinery.  But it has also widened the gap 
between the government's reliance on secrecy and 
society's push for openness.  What role has the 
Russian media played?  V-O-A Correspondent Laurie 
Kassman explores the Russian media's battle for 
ratings and responsibility in its coverage of the 
Kursk disaster.
TEXT:  Most official information about the Kursk 
nuclear submarine accident has been confused and 
contradictory.  Not surprising, says journalist Masha 
Lipman of the independent magazine, Itogi.  From the 
start, she says the government tried to control and 
manipulate coverage to protect the military's pride 
and to hide its inadequacies.
Only state T-V had access to the accident site and 
President Vladimir Putin's stormy session with angry 
relatives of the Kursk crew, which was carefully 
edited to play down the hostility.
Still, Miss Lipman says the independent media managed 
to break through the barriers.
            /// LIPMAN ACT ONE ///
      The coverage was quite professional, with many 
      publications.  There was reporting, analysis, 
      opinion, everything.  When the authorities would  
      not  give the list of those who were on the 
      Kursk submarine, one of the Russian papers 
      procured the list.
            /// END ACT ///
Editor Mikhail Berger of the newspaper Segodnya 
insists the media's rage over the government's 
handling of the disaster was  not  aimed at President 
Vladimir Putin but at what he represents.
            /// BERGER ACT ONE ///
      It's more than a conflict between Putin and the 
      media.  It's conflict between Soviet style of 
      relations between power and the people and the 
      new feeling and new construction of a semi-open 
      society, which Russia is now.
            /// END ACT ///
Media analyst Alexei Pankin is more skeptical about 
the motivation and impact of the media coverage.  He 
calls it the battle between ratings and 
responsibility.
            /// PANKIN ACT ///
      It's like the press is primarily working for 
      their ratings and I expect that a lot of the 
      public simply switched off television after 
      reading the first or hearing that nobody was 
      rescued.
            /// END ACT ///
All the reports and criticism about the inept handling 
of the disaster still have  not seriously damaged 
President Vladimir Putin's popularity.
Journalist Masha Lipman says that has a lot to do with 
the public's access to information.  She compares the 
impact of a mostly state-controlled television that 
reaches into the Russian heartland with a handful of 
liberal newspapers based in Moscow.
            /// LIPMAN ACT TWO ///
      We're talking about press runs of most 
      newspapers of under 100-thousand copies, which 
      means the impact on public opinion is very 
      limited.  And I think one should  not  be misled 
      to think that because the press is so 
      unanimously bitter, the public also is
            /// END ACT ///
Still, some journalists like Mikhail Berger suggest a 
feisty media forces Russia's new leaders to react in 
ways their predecessors would  not  contemplate.
            /// OPT // BERGER ACT TWO ///
      The media now is trying to play a role 
      representing society and they're trying to force 
      the government to uncover all secrets connected 
      with this tragedy.
            /// END OPT ACT ///
In 1986, Russian leaders tightly controlled 
information and misled the public about the health 
risks of the Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion.  They 
offered  no  explanations,  no  apologies.
In an action more commonly seen in Western 
democracies, President Putin has publicly accepted 
responsibility for the Kursk tragedy and promised a 
full investigation.  Mr. Putin's interview on state T-
V -- although carefully orchestrated -- did sharply 
contrast with his earlier silence.
Political analysts say it could reflect Mr. Putin's 
growing awareness of the power of public opinion and 
an unshackled press.  But independent journalists fear 
Mr. Putin's government will most probably move to curb 
the media and its criticism rather than respond to it.  
(Signed)
NEB/LMK/JWH/JP
24-Aug-2000 12:53 PM LOC (24-Aug-2000 1653 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list