UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=3/28/2000
TYPE=U-S OPINION ROUNDUP
TITLE=THE RUSSIAN ELECTION
NUMBER=6-11749
BYLINE=ERIKA EVANS
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
EDITOR=ASSIGNMENTS
TELEPHONE=619-2702
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO:  Boris Yelstin was Russia's first freely 
elected national leader.  Now Vladimir Putin becomes 
the second.  Mr. Putin, who has served as acting 
president since Mr. Yelstin's resignation last year, 
was the victor in Sunday's presidential balloting and 
will be inaugurated in May.  U-S newspaper editorials 
are filled with comment on the new leader and the 
future of Russia.
We get a sampling now from ________________ in today's 
U-S Opinion Roundup.
TEXT:  When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, few 
would have predicted it would be succeeded by a 
Russian government adopting key features of Western-
style democracy.
Vladimir Putin, the 47-year-old former K-G-B 
intelligence agent, rode a high voter turnout to an 
absolute majority in this week's Russian election.  In 
doing so, he avoided a runoff that would have been 
necessary had he gotten less than 50 percent of the 
vote.  In general, U-S newspaper editorials considered 
the Russian election something to cheer about.
We begin with the Press Herald of Portland, Maine, 
which believes the balloting showed shows Russia's 
constitution worked.
      VOICE:  It was the vote itself, and not so much 
      the win by Vladimir Putin, that was the real 
      accomplishment.  For the first time in history, 
      a democratically elected president of Russia has 
      been succeeded by another democratically elected 
      president.  That's no small achievement in a 
      nation still roiled by internal disputes, a 
      badly functioning proto-capitalist economy and 
      crime rates so high they make Al Capone (EDS: 
      American gangster of the 1920s and 1930s) look 
      like a law-and-order fanatic.  ... Still, the 
      constitution that [Mr.] Yelstin created and put 
      into effect has had its first real victory.  Now 
      the world waits to see if it will have more.
TEXT:  Many U-S editorial writers, however, find 
Russia's new leader puzzling and opinion is divided on 
just how effective Mr. Putin will be in leading the 
Russian people.  The Miami Herald in Florida warns 
that if this vote is to mean anything, the new leader 
in Moscow had better devise a precise plan for 
Russia's future.
      VOICE:  The bedeviling question is: Now that he 
      has won the presidency in free and fair 
      elections, can Mr. Putin deliver what the people 
      clearly want?  ... Thus far, Mr. Putin has 
      issued only vague pledges about being committed 
      to the program of economic and democratic 
      reforms of his predecessor and mentor, President 
      Boris Yelstin.  ... Russians have invested their 
      hopes for a better future in him.  If he isn't 
      to let those voters down -- and in so doing, 
      deal a blow to democracy -- the new president 
      had better deliver.
TEXT:  Also in Florida, the Orlando Sentinel argues 
that Mr. Putin should be given a fair chance to put 
his programs into action.
      VOICE:  At the moment, Mr. Putin hasn't had much 
      of a chance to do anything -- good or bad.  He 
      deserves the benefit of the doubt.  Fortunately, 
      he doesn't carry the taint of corruption that 
      accompanies many Russian politicians.  That, 
      along with his religious convictions, gives him 
      some moral authority.  ... That he now, as 
      president-elect, pledges to expand reforms 
      suggests consistency and pragmatism -- as well 
      as the potential to build U-S - Russia ties.
TEXT:  The Tulsa World in Oklahoma says the new 
Russian leader has the potential to lead his country 
into a brighter future.
      VOICE:  Now the questions begin on just what 
      kind of leader Vladimir Putin will be.  He has 
      been a hard-line K-G-B agent and still clings to 
      the old values of order, discipline and a strong 
      central government.  He has been instrumental in 
      the military crackdown in Chechnya.  In fact, 
      his Chechnya policy was instrumental in his 
      election.  But he also has democratic leanings.  
      He has supported the "fundamental rights of 
      human liberties."  He doesn't seem tied to the 
      old communist ideology.  So, [Mr.] Putin begins 
      his tenure with a clean slate -- or at least as 
      clean as any Russian politician's slate can be.  
      ... [Mr.] Putin could take Russia where neither 
      Mikhail Gorbachev nor Boris Yelstin could -- to 
      a stable, successful democracy.  His first step 
      was the election.  Now, the really hard work 
      begins.
TEXT:  And finally, the Oregonian in the Pacific 
Northwest says many challenges lie ahead for Russia's 
new leader, but that his election in free and fair 
balloting should help improve Moscow's relations with 
other nations.
      VOICE:  Yes, big as these intertwined challenges 
      are, the United States and Russia are joined 
      together in a deeper and, we think, more hopeful 
      way as a result of Sunday's Russian elections.  
      Those elections were free and fair by all 
      objective accounts, and this triumph of 
      democracy gives a healthy perspective to the 
      challenges Vladimir Putin faces.  Really now, a 
      corrupt and compromised political establishment, 
      a weak economy, a draining war -- it's not as if 
      incoming American presidents haven't faced 
      similar challenges.
TEXT:  With that comment from the Oregonian, we 
conclude this sampling of comment on Russia's 
presidential election.
NEB/ENE/JP
28-Mar-2000 16:29 PM EDT (28-Mar-2000 2129 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list