UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

10 June 1998

HOUSE APPROVES IRAN MISSILE SANCTIONS AIMED AT RUSSIAN FIRMS

(Administration decries action, says veto is certain) (600)
By Ralph Dannheisser
USIA Congressional Correspondent
Washington -- The House of Representatives has followed the Senate's
lead in giving overwhelming approval to a bill designed to force an
end to Russian transfers of missile technology to Iran.
A White House spokesman says that President Clinton is certain to veto
the controversial measure. But the margin of victory in both the House
and Senate suggests the president has his work cut out for him in
trying to shift enough votes to block the two-thirds margin needed to
override the promised veto.
The House's June 9 vote to approve the measure, formally called the
Iran Missile Proliferation Sanctions Act, was 392-22, with three
members voting "present."
The Senate had acted May 22 by a vote of 90-4.
The bill would require the president to submit a report to Congress,
within 30 days of enactment, presenting any credible information which
shows that specified entities transferred missile goods or technology
to Iran after January 22, 1998.
Such entities could face sanctions that include a denial of arms
export licenses and elimination of all U.S. aid for two years. The
president would be able to waive the sanctions for reasons of national
security.
The bill had initially called for sanctions in the case of any
transfers taking place since August 8, 1995. But the Senate modified
it by substituting the January 22, 1998 date -- the date on which the
Russian government issued its own decree restricting exports of
missile technology.
While members of Congress, particularly Republicans, have complained
that Russian companies and other entities have helped speed Iran's
missile development program, the administration has taken the view
that the sanctions measure would impede efforts already in progress to
halt technology transfers to what it considers "rogue nations."
When he was asked by reporters June 10 whether the president would
surely veto the bill, White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry
responded, "There's no doubt of that, correct."
Arguing for the measure on the House floor June 9, Representative
Porter Goss (Republican, Florida) said Congress was challenging the
Russians "fairly and squarely to stop cheating." And, he said, the
Clinton administration must "stop winking" at the alleged violations.
A handful of Democratic leaders tried unsuccessfully to prevent
passage.
Representative Lee Hamilton of Indiana, who chaired the House
International Relations Committee when the Democrats controlled
Congress, warned that sanctions could backfire by discouraging Russia
from cooperating. And Minority (Democratic) Leader Richard Gephardt of
Missouri called the legislation "premature" at a time when efforts are
proceeding to gain Russian cooperation.
Another section of the legislation passed by Congress would implement
the chemical weapons treaty that the Senate approved last year.
Republicans included that provision, ardently supported by the
president, in hopes of warding off a veto of the combined legislation.
The new sanctions legislation is in line with increasing Republican
criticism of the administration's overall policy on technology
transfers, particularly as it has applied to satellite deals between
U.S. companies and China.
At the same time, foreign policy specialists in Congress, including
Hamilton and Senator Richard Lugar (Republican of Indiana), are
seeking to reduce the use of sanctions -- an approach that they view
as frequently counterproductive -- and limit sanctions that are
imposed to a two-year lifespan, unless reauthorized.
Some of them have suggested that the recent decisions by India and
Pakistan to test nuclear weapons, in the face of sure and heavy U.S.
financial sanctions, illustrate the limitations of the approach.




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list