Pakistan seeks nuclear talks with India
IRNA - Islamic Republic News Agency
Islamabad, April 5, IRNA - Pakistan has proposed to India talks on nuclear confidence-building measures (CBMs) next month, Foreign Office announced in Islamabad on Monday. "In pursuance of the road-map worked out between the foreign secretaries of Pakistan and India on 18th February 2004, for resumption of composite dialogue, Pakistan has today proposed 25-26 May as the dates for hosting expert level talks in nuclear CBMs," a Foreign Office statement said. Pakistan and India agreed in February on an aggressive roadmap for peace talks, with the hope to put their bloodstained modern history ehind them, setting up a series of high-level meetings on flash point issues like Kashmir, terrorism and nuclear weapons. The dialogue will culminate with a summit in August between the two nations` foreign ministers - an unimaginable breakthrough only two years after the troops from the atomic adversaries stood eye-ball to eye-ball on the brink of war. "The proposal was conveyed by director general (South Asia) to the Indian deputy high commissioner in Islamabad, the statement said. A series of mid-level meetings will begin directly after the Indian elections later in April, including in June to discuss ways to combat drug trafficking and smuggling. Pakistan and India have been moving closer together since April last year, restoring ambassador-level diplomatic ties, and resuming bus, rail and plane services. The agenda for talks in the foreign secretaries level talks in February calls for the two countries to set up eight groups to tackle Kashmir, nuclear arms, terrorism, drugs and trade, among other issues. Pakistan and India nearly went to war in 2002, following an attack on India`s parliament that New Delhi blamed on Kashmiri groups. Pakistan denied the charges. A war, which would have been the fourth between nuclear-armed rivals, was averted after intense international mediation. Any nuclear exchange would likely have killed tens of millions of people on both sides, and led to a humanitarian disaster that would have sapped the resources of the world`s collective emergency response capability. TSH/1430/212 End
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|