UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=10/15/1999
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
TITLE=PAKISTAN'S BURDEN
NUMBER=5-44527
BYLINE=ED WARNER
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO:  Military leaders in Pakistan have once again 
intervened and removed a civilian government, pointing 
up their continuing power in a politically unstable 
country.  V-O-A's Ed Warner asked two analysts of 
Pakistan for their views of the intervention and what 
it may mean for the troubled nation. 
TEXT:  Pakistan had a confused, blood-soaked beginning 
that it has never been able to live down.  How then 
can you expect its military  not  to be powerful? asks 
Khalid bin Sayeed, professor of politics at Queens 
College in Kingston [Ontario], Canada, and author of 
"Western Dominance and Political Islam."
Pakistan was too hastily put together at the time of 
partition, says Professor Sayeed. It lacked the 
opportunity to create a secure foundation and has been 
shaky ever since: 
                /// 1ST SAYEED ACT ///
      The demand for Pakistan was made in 1940, and 
      within seven years they established the state, 
      carving a state out of a larger entity.  And 12- 
      to 13-million people cross[ed] the frontier and 
      [there was] enormous blood [was] shed -- a state 
      which has had  no  precedent in human history, 
      in a way.
                   /// END ACT ///
Since the beginning, then, the military has been the 
principal power in Pakistan, even under civilian 
governments.  When offended by one of these 
governments, the generals have simply returned to 
overt rule.
Samina Ahmed of Harvard's Kennedy Center of Government 
says Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif deeply offended the 
military by blaming it for the failed intervention in 
Kashmir. He then tried to change its leadership:
                 /// 1st AHMED ACT ///
      The military will  not  accept any intervention 
      in its internal affairs by any elected leader.  
      Even though nominally the prime minister was in 
      charge of the military, he was  not  really in 
      charge of internal affairs.  That remains an 
      area of special sensitivity to the armed forces.
                    /// END ACT ///
Samina Ahmed says the prime minister, intent on 
accumulating power, was largely responsible for his 
own downfall:
                 /// 2ND AHMED ACT ///
      Unfortunately, because [Mr.] Sharif had 
      distorted the Constitution, [and] introduced 
      amendments that made in-house change near 
      impossible, this gave the military an 
      opportunity because it deprived the political 
      leadership - the elected Parliament - of a means 
      of changing a very, very unpopular leader. 
                  /// END ACT ///
Professor Sayeed agrees the Sharif government made 
unnecessary trouble for itself.  But, he adds, there 
are other basic problems. In his opinion, Pakistan has 
suffered from too slavishly following Western 
constitutional models that may  not  be suitable for 
other parts of the world:  
               /// 2ND SAYEED ACT ///
The Pakistanis seem to be so trapped by certain 
formulas and phrases that they have borrowed from the 
West and which have  not  yet been absorbed within the 
social and political fabric of their society.  
National unity cannot just be promoted by a 
constitution, by a few phrases.  This has to be worked 
on.  This has to be developed.
                   /// END ACT ///
Professor Sayeed says Pakistan's ruling elites, in 
their rush to westernize, have tried to escape the 
provincialism of their less fortunate countrymen.  But 
that provincialism -- a devotion to a particular 
culture, language or region -- is at the heart of 
Pakistan.  He believes the country is  not  governable 
without including it:
                /// 3RD SAYEED ACT ///
Let us convert this provincialism, which at present 
seems to be an inimical force, a hostile force, into a 
creative and friendly force for the development of the 
country.  We have to persuade people who belong to the 
minority regions to realize that we respect their 
linguistic, cultural consciousness.  We do  not  treat 
it as anti-national.
                   /// END ACT ///
Professor Sayeed says building democracy is a gradual 
process, especially in view of Pakistan's historical 
and current burdens: an exploding population, 
religious conflict, terrorists roaming the land and a 
million refugees from the Afghanistan wars still 
living in the country.   (Signed)
NEB/EW/WTW
15-Oct-1999 16:04 PM EDT (15-Oct-1999 2004 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list