UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

The White House Briefing Room


October 1, 1998

PRESS BRIEFING BY MIKE MCCURRY

                           THE WHITE HOUSE
                    Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                          October 1, 1998     
                         PRESS BRIEFING BY 
                            MIKE MCCURRY 
	     
                        The Briefing Room    			     
1:45 P.M. EDT
..............
            Q    Mike, President Carter was the last U.S. President 
to visit India 20 years ago and, of course, it's well known in the 
world that the U.S. is the most powerful and the richest democracy 
and India is the largest.  But as far as China and India are 
concerned, why is the U.S. treating differently, because President 
Clinton decided to go to China earlier than later, and now he has 
postponed his trip to India?  But he is not going to -- his wife who 
said that he is going to bring him to India -- 
             MR. MCCURRY:  I think I indicated yesterday that the 
President has been anxious for most of the time he's been President 
of the United States to go to South Asia, to visit India, to visit 
Pakistan.  He has enormous personal interest in the subcontinent, and 
his wife and daughter have traveled there and have told him many 
things about it, which has only increased his interest in that.  And 
we recognize that India is the most populated democracy on Earth, 
Pakistan is key to the security interests that we have in the region, 
that a close working relationship with both countries is vital.  
Those two countries jeopardized their working relationship with the 
United States by their decision to conduct nuclear tests.  And we 
have been dealing with the fall-out, so to speak, of that decision 
ever since.
             I indicated to you yesterday we hope that the work that 
we've done with both governments, we hope the work the two 
governments are doing together by exchanging visits between their 
foreign secretaries will lead us to a situation where we can resume 
the kind of constructive working relationship we want to have with 
both countries.
             Q    But Mike, China is a nuclear power.  China has been 
transferring nuclear high technology to Pakistan, Iran, and other 
nations and still --
             MR. MCCURRY:  And is also a member of the U.N. Security 
Council, and we have enormous interests across the broad sweep of 
that bilateral relationship that we conduct with them.  We've been 
able to effectively press our concerns -- whether it's in the 
security area, the economic area, our political interests that we 
share in the region -- by conducting the kind of high level dialogue 
we have been, even though we have differences.  We hope to have that 
kind of working relationship with the government of India.
..............
	     Q	  Mike, Pakistan has said that it would consider 
signing the test ban treaty if the sanctions are lifted.  Next 
weekend, I understand that there's a bill that would waive some of 
those sanctions.  Do you anticipate being able to move on that?
	     MR. MCCURRY:  I don't think that the sanctions in 
question are the ones that the government of Pakistan had in mind.  
The sanctions waiver legislation pending in our Congress is more 
narrowly focused.  It deals with the agricultural sanctions that were 
automatically imposed after the nuclear test by India and Pakistan.  
I believe there would be some relief or the President would be given 
some flexibility under those sanctions.  I believe the ones the two 
governments are concerned about are economic sanctions and 
prohibitions on certain types of military exchanges.  And I'm not 
aware of any proposal in our Congress to change those sanctions.
	     Q	  Are you conditioning a visit on the signing by both 
India and Pakistan on the --
	     MR. MCCURRY:  We have had good, constructive 
presentations to both governments.  I think that they know the type 
of progress we want to see in our discussions related to 
proliferation issues, to the nuclear programs that both countries are 
now operating in.  I think both countries are well aware of our 
concerns could be addressed sufficient for the President to again 
consider a proposed visit.



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list