UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

June 3, 1998

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF STATE MADELEINE ALBRIGHT

                           THE WHITE HOUSE
                    Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                             June 3, 1998     
                      REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
              AND SECRETARY OF STATE MADELEINE ALBRIGHT
                           The Rose Garden
10:05 A.M. EDT
	     THE PRESIDENT:  Good morning.  Secretary Albright and 
Mr. Berger and I have just had a meeting before Secretary Albright 
leaves to go to Geneva for tomorrow's meeting of the Permanent Five 
foreign ministers convened at our initiative on the situation in 
South Asia.  Our goal is to forge a common strategy to move India and 
Pakistan back from their nuclear arms race and to begin to build a 
more peaceful, stable region.
	     Secretary Albright will speak to our agenda in Geneva in 
just a moment, and I understand later will be at the State Department 
to answer further questions.  But I would like to take a few moments 
to put this problem in its proper context.  The nuclear tests by 
India and Pakistan stand in stark contrast to the progress the world 
has made over the past several years in reducing stockpiles and 
containing the spread of nuclear weapons.  It is also contrary to the 
ideals of nonviolent democratic freedom and independence at the heart 
of Gandhi's struggle to end colonialism on the Indian subcontinent.
	     Through the START treaties, the United States and Russia 
are on their way to cutting nuclear arsenals by two-thirds from their 
Cold War height.  With our help, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan 
agreed to return to Russia the nuclear weapons left on their land 
when the Soviet Union dissolved.  We secured the indefinite, 
unconditional extension of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.  
Brazil, Argentina and South Africa each voluntarily renounced their 
nuclear programs, choosing to spend their vital resources instead on 
the power of their people.  And to date, 149 nations have signed the 
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty which bans all nuclear explosions, 
making it more difficult for nuclear powers to produce more advanced 
weapons and for non-nuclear states to develop them.
	     Two years ago, I was the first to sign this treaty at 
the United Nations on behalf of the United States.  The present 
situation in South Asia makes it all the more important that the 
Senate debate and vote on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty without 
delay.  The CTBT will strengthen our ability to deter, to detect, and 
to deter testing.  If we are calling on other nations to act 
responsibly, America must set the example.  
	     India and Pakistan are great nations with boundless 
potential, but developing weapons of mass destruction is 
self-defeating, wasteful, and dangerous.  It will make their people 
poorer and less secure.  The international community must now come 
together to move them through a diverse course and to avoid a 
dangerous arms race in Asia.  
	     In just the last week, NATO, the NATO Joint Council with 
Russia, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and, today, the OAS 
condemned the tests.  That is about 80 other nations who want to work 
with us to move the world to a safer place. 
	     And we must do more.  We are determined work with any 
countries who are willing to help us, and we want very much to work 
with both India and Pakistan to help them resolve their differences 
and to restore a future of hope, not fear, to the region.
	     Let me now express my appreciation to China for chairing 
the P5 meeting to which Secretary Albright is going.  This is further 
evidence of the important role China can play in meeting the 
challenges of the 21st Century and the constructive Chinese 
leadership that will be essential to the long-term resolutions of 
issues involving South Asia.
	     This is an important example of how our engagement with 
China serves America's interests:  stability in Asia, preventing the 
spread of weapons of mass destruction, combatting international crime 
and drug-trafficking, protecting the environment.  At the same time, 
we continue to deal forthrightly with China on those issues where we 
disagree -- notably, on human rights; and there have clearly been 
some concrete results as a result of this engagement as well.
	     Trade is also an important part of our relationship with 
China.  Our exports have tripled over the last decade and now support 
over 170,000 American jobs.  But just as important, trade is a force 
for change in China, exposing China to our ideas and our ideals and 
integrating China into the global economy.
	     For these reasons, I intend to renew MFN status with 
China.  This status does not convey any special privilege.  It is 
simply ordinary, natural tariff treatment offered to virtually every 
nation on earth.  Since 1980, when MFN was first extended to China, 
every Republican and Democratic president who has faced this issue 
has extended it.  Not to renew would be to sever our economic and, to 
a large measure, our strategic relationship with China, turning our 
back on a fourth of the world at a time when our cooperation for 
world peace and security is especially important, in light of the 
recent events in South Asia.
	     This policy clearly is in our nation's interest and I 
urge Congress to support it.  Now, I'd like to ask Secretary Albright 
to say a few words about our objectives in Geneva in the days and 
weeks ahead.  
	     Madame Secretary.
	     SECRETARY ALBRIGHT:  Thank you very much, Mr. President.  
Let me add to your comments to explain why our meeting in Geneva and 
what we wish to do there.  As the President has pointed out, the 
nuclear tests pose an immediate threat to international peace and 
security, and as permanent members of the Security Council, the 
United States, Russia, France, China and the United Kingdom have a 
responsibility to forge a coordinated strategy for responding to that 
threat.  
	     As the NPT nuclear weapon states, we also have a special 
responsibility to protect the viability of the nonproliferation 
regime and a responsibility which we must reaffirm in Geneva to 
reduce further the level of our nuclear arsenals and the likelihood 
of nuclear war.
	     Unlike the United States and the former Soviet Union 
during the Cold War, India and Pakistan do not have the benefit of a 
vast ocean between them.  They are next door neighbors with a past of 
conflict and a present of bitter mistrust.  Under the circumstances, 
the citizens of each nation should understand what is obvious to the 
world -- that both Indians and Pakistanis are far less secure today 
than they were three weeks ago.
	     Right now, the most important thing both sides can do is 
to cool it and take a deep breath and to begin to climb out of the 
hole they have dug themselves into.  This, then, is the first of the 
three goals we have set for ourselves in Geneva and the days ahead.  
We must do all we can as outside powers to prevent the currently very 
bad situation from growing worse.  
	     Our message to India and Pakistan must be that there 
should be no further nuclear testing, no deployment or testing of 
missiles, no more inflammatory rhetoric and no more provocative 
military activity.  Our second, longer-term goal is to avert a 
regional arms race and to reexamine options for easing the underlying 
political problems between India and Pakistan, including Kashmir. 
	     We will also be urging India and Pakistan to sign the 
CTBT now and without conditions to stop producing fissile material 
and to agree on a process for regional arms control.  The NPT will 
not be amended to accommodate either country.  We will, however, 
consider measures to help them maintain peace, and we will stand 
ready to help them resolve their differences through dialogue.
	     Finally, we will affirm our resolve to bolster the 
global nonproliferation regime.  And this means taking steps to 
discourage other countries from following the disastrous examples set 
by India and Pakistan.  And in addition, as President Clinton has 
just indicated, for the United States, this means urging the Senate 
very strongly to approve the CTBT.  If we want India and Pakistan to 
stop testing and keep others from starting, this is the most basic, 
minimal, obvious step we can take on this critical issue at this 
perilous time, American leadership should be unambiguous, decisive 
and clear. 
	     The meeting in Geneva is far from the beginning of our 
efforts to make the world safe from dangers of nuclear war, and it 
will certainly not be the end of those efforts.  Technology dictates 
that this will always be a work in progress.  We seek to reduce risks 
knowing we can not eliminate them, but we can not make progress even 
in this effort without the cooperation and assistance of others.
	     As the President pointed out, for example, we need to 
maintain a constructive relationship with China.  We need a 
relationship that allows us to speak honestly when we disagree, but 
also to cooperate when our interests coincide, as they clearly do in 
this effort and with respect to MFN.    It is very clear that the 
better the relations are between the United States and China and the 
United States and Russia, the better we can protect and serve the 
American people. 
	     Our mission to Geneva is important, and I will do my 
very best for the President and the American people.  But do not make 
a mistake:  The risks of the moment are high and, for the moment, the 
key choices will be made in New Delhi and Islamabad.  We must all 
hope and pray those choices are the right ones.
	     Thank you very much, Mr. President.
	     	                END                   10:25 A.M. EDT

Return to the main page
Return to the Briefing Room
The White House Help Desk


To comment on this service: feedback@www.whitehouse.gov



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list