PROPOSED RESPONSE TO USCINCCENT MESSAGE
Filename:0134pgv.00d
PROPOSED RESPONSE TO USCINCCENT MESSAGE
l.[ (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4) ]
B. A radiation dispersal device (RDD) could be
constructed, however, the probability of this happening is
assessed as negligible for the following reasons:
l. The military utility of such a device would be very
low. Other than damage caused by blast or fragments,
effects of an RDD using low-grade products would be minimal
and easily countered by protective equipment.
2. There is no evidence of intent to produce a device. RDD
is a terrorist weapon and Iraq's motives are not the same as
a terrorist.
3. Radioactive material is very expensive and too hard to
come by to waste on an RDD.
4. Public reaction and possible retaliation.
C. [ (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4) ]
D. [ (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4) ]
2. The EUCOM NEST is always on a short (four hour)
availability. If there is a need for their capabilities, they
will be made available. However, considering the negligible
threat of an ROD, their deployment does not appear Justified at
this time. There are concerns over their use. For example:
a. What is their cOncept of operations considering their
detection ability is limited to distances measured in
feet.
b. Team composition is 2 military and 6 civilians
augmented by military Searchers. There would be
limitation on the use of the civilians in a hostile fire
zone.
c. Loss of availability to EinCOff when their threat
might be increased.
3. The Intelligence Task Force is constantly monitoring this
situation and will notify you of any change in the throat
situation. Request you channel your request for DOE support
through the Crisis Action Team. DOE is prepared to assist in
any -way possible.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|
|
