![[ rfe/rl banner ]](rferl-article.gif)
Hussein Receives Death Sentence
November 5, 2006 -- Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has been sentenced to death by hanging for the mass killings of Iraqi civilians.
The judgement comes after months of stormy proceedings to establish Hussein’s guilt in ordering the executions of 148 men and boys from the village of Dujail in 1982 following a failed assassination attempt against him.
The court read out the death sentence for Hussein today as Baghdad and much of central Iraq was under tight security to prevent revenge attacks.
The judge sentenced Hussein and two of his aides to death by hanging for their roles in the killing of 148 Shi'ite villagers after a failed assassination bid on Hussein in 1982.
As Judge Raouf Abelrahman read out the verdict, Hussein interrupted him with shouts of "Allahu Akbar!" (God is Great) and "Long live the nation."
Other Verdicts
One of Hussein’s two aides who will be executed is Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti. He is Hussein's half-brother and former head of Hussein’s Mukhabarat intelligence service.
The other aide who will be executed is the Ba'athist regime’s former chief judge Awad Hamed al-Bander.
Former Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan was given life in prison for his part in ordering the killings of the villagers.
Three other former Ba'ath party officials were sentenced to 15 years in prison for their roles.
And one former official was freed for lack of evidence.
Hussein's verdict was the last in the series of judgements to be read out today, maintaining suspense to the end over how the former leader would be punished.
Dujail Killings
Throughout the trial Saddam and his lawyers argued that the former leader did not order the killings as part of retaliatory measures against the village of Dujail.
It remains unclear when Hussein’s death sentence will be carried out. The sentencing requires his speedy execution but Hussein has the right to appeal.
At the same time, Hussein remains on trial over a second set of charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. That is over the killings of thousands of Iraqi Kurdish civilians in northern Iraq.
The charged mass killings took place in a series of eight military campaigns – dubbed "Anfal" -- over a six-month period in 1988.
Tight Security In Baghdad
Security in Baghdad and central Iraq was tight for today’s sentencing, with all military leave cancelled.
Hussein’s regime had its base of support in Iraq’s minority Sunni Arab population, which is concentrated in central Iraq. Loyalists of his regime make up one element of the insurgency, which also includes Islamic militants, and self-declared nationalists.
Hussein maintains he is the victim of occupation justice under the U.S.-backed Baghdad government.
He has repeatedly said that he expected to be sentenced to death but that he preferred to face a military firing squad rather than the hangman’s noose.
While security concerns center on central Iraq in the wake of today’s sentencing, celebrations are breaking out in Kurdish areas of northern Iraq and Shi’ite majority areas of southern Iraq -- the regions where Saddam’s rule was most repressive.
Today’s sentencing comes just days before the United States holds congressional elections in which the success or failure of Washington’s Iraq policies has been hotly debated by candidates.
U.S. officials have dismissed any suggestions by Hussein's lawyers that the verdict was timed with the elections in mind.
International Reaction
The United States and Britain -- among others -- have welcomed today ’s verdicts.
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, said they were an "important milestone" and an opportunity for Iraqis to unite.
British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett, in a statement, also welcomed the verdicts.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini, speaking before the verdicts were pronounced, said execution was the "very least" punishment Hussein should get.
But international human rights organizations are criticizing the trial and verdict.
An official with the London-based Amnesty International human rights watchdog said the trial was a "shabby affair". Malcolm Smart, Amnesty director for the Middle East and North Africa, said it had been "marred by serious flaws."
Human Rights Watch said the trial was a "lost opportunity" and that the proceedings were neither fair nor impartial and thus did not serve the cause of justice.
Copyright (c) 2006. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|