UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

VOICE OF AMERICA
SLUG: 2-319817 Britain / Iraq
DATE:>
NOTE NUMBER:

DATE=10/21/2004

TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT

TITLE=BRITAIN / IRAQ (L-ONLY)

NUMBER=2-319817

BYLINE=MICHAEL DRUDGE

DATELINE=LONDON

CONTENT=

VOICED AT:

HEADLINE: Britain To Move Troops Closer to Baghdad

INTRO: Britain has accepted a U.S. request to move some of its troops in Iraq closer to Baghdad to free up American forces for counter-insurgency operations ahead of Iraqi elections in January. VOA's Michael Drudge has details from London.

TEXT: British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon announced the decision in parliament, saying the government was acting on the advice of British military commanders.

///HOON ACT///

"After careful evaluation, the chiefs of staff have advised me that U.K. forces are able to undertake the proposed operation, that there is a compelling military operational justification for doing so, and that it entails a militarily acceptable level of risk for U.K. forces. Based on this military advice, the government has decided that we should accept the U.S. request for assistance."

///END ACT///

Mr. Hoon provided few details, citing security reasons, but he said an 850-man armored battalion of the Black Watch regiment will undertake the assignment. Despite published reports, Mr. Hoon said there are no plans to send an additional 13-hundred troops to Iraq.

The main opposition party, the Conservatives, said they support the mission. But Britain's third party, the Liberal Democrats, opposed the Iraq war and objects to the new troop deployment.

The defense spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, Paul Keetch, repeated charges that the operation sends a signal of British support for President Bush in his re-election campaign.

///KEETCH ACT///

"It is a political show of support for President Bush and for the United States in Iraq. Now I don't mind that, but I don't want to use British soldiers as pawns in a political game."

///END ACT///

Prime Minister Tony Blair and other government officials flatly deny the move has anything to do with American politics.

The British military chief of staff, General Michael Walker, said the redeployment is necessary to safeguard Iraqi elections planned for January.

///WALKER ACT///

"It is important that the commander of the multi-national force Iraq, operating in concert with the Iraqi authorities, should have the freedom of action to respond to insurgent activities and to set the conditions for the elections in Iraq early next year."

///END ACT///

General Walker says the deployment is planned to last for 30 days. Other military sources say the British troops will fill in for U.S. Marines who have been stationed west of Baghdad.

This will be the first time since the Iraq invasion last year that British troops will take up duties outside of the comparatively tranquil southeastern region around the city of Basra. (Signed).

NEB/MWD/MAR/FC



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list