Hutton report leaves many unanswered questions
IRNA - Islamic Republic News Agency
London, Jan 29, IRNA -- The Hutton report into the death of former arms inspector David Kelly received a mixed reception from the British press Thursday, with several dailies describing the failure to criticize the role of the government as a "whitewash." Wednesday`s publication of the long awaited report also failed to prevent critics of the Iraq war from continuing their demands for a separate independent inquiry into the government`s justification for launching military action which Lord Hutton declined to address. The report led to the immediate resignation of BBC chairman Gavyn Davies, after the state-funded broadcaster was castigated over its editorial controls and failure to respond to accusations that it has questioned the government`s integrity. In his resignation speech, Davies asked whether it was possible to "reconcile" the inquiry`s conclusions with evidence presented during the hearings. Questions about the findings exonerating the behavior of the government were also raised by Kelly`s family, who said that the conclusions "differ in part from their submissions" made to the inquiry. In a statement issued through their solicitor, the family also called on the government to ensure that the late arms inspector`s "ordeal will never be repeated." According to the Financial Times, Hutton also did not address evidence that the Ministry of Defense failed to relay to concern expressed by senior intelligence officers about the content of the government`s dossier on Iraq`s arms that was used to justify the war. Former BBC chairman Sir Christopher Bland Friday further questioned the even-handedness of the report which exonerated the Government but "tarred and feathered the BBC." It was right to accept Hutton`s central criticism that there were some errors in the original BBC report last May that suggested that the government exaggerated Iraq`s threat and had been accepted by the state-funded broadcaster, he said. But Bland said there was a "curious imbalance" in the way he treated on the one hand politicians, civil servants and the security services, and on the other hand the standards of conduct he applied to journalists and broadcasters. Speaking for the government on BBC radio`s Today program Thursday, Health Secretary John Reid defended the report and claimed it was Lord wrong to question the balance. Several media commentator have expressed concern about what implications the report may have on stifling investigative journalism and the freedom of the press. HC/213 End
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|