UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Washington File

15 April 2003

Iraqi People Will Determine Their Own Government, Perle Says

(Perle envisions a free, democratic Iraq based on private enterprise)
(670)
By Afzal Khan
Washington File Special Correspondent
Washington -- Richard Perle, an influential voice behind the war
against Iraq, said that the people of Iraq, not the United Nations nor
any external power such as the United States, will determine the
legitimacy of the Iraqi government.
At a briefing at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) April 15,
Perle added that only the United States and its coalition allies had
the right to initially help Iraq establish its democracy. He joked
that the next government of Iraq should be forgiven if it did not
welcome the French and the Germans who were not there to help free
that country from Saddam Hussein.
Perle, a resident scholar at AEI, argued that it was not necessary to
bring in the United Nations and non-coalition countries to aid Iraq in
its recovery. He said Iraq had the resources and that "very little
damage" had been done to its infrastructure in the allied bombing.
Perle said the goal is the "ignition of the Iraqi economy" that was
destroyed by the Ba'athist regime and not the reconstruction of a
country in the aftermath of a war.
"The key is the growth of the private sector," he said.
A role for the United Nations in the reconstruction of Iraq is under
discussion within the Bush administration. President Bush has said
that coalition forces will oversee affairs in Iraq in the near term,
but the United Nations would have a definite role to play at a more
distant time in the future.
Perle emphasized that the war was fought "for the benefit of the
people of Iraq" and that the United States need not apologize for an
interim "stewardship" and management of the country until an
indigenous democracy takes shape.
In the question and answer session that followed, Perle said
"significant pressure" would be applied to Syria if Saddam Hussein's
leadership took refuge there. He said if a war crimes tribunal for
Iraq were set up, Syria and other countries that might be harboring
them would be required to hand them over.
Perle said the new democratic government envisioned in Iraq should not
be required to repay Saddam Hussein's debts owed principally to
Russia, France and Germany. He said that because those transactions
had been made with a totalitarian regime, the people of Iraq should
not be held responsible for them.
On the Israeli-Palestinian peace issue, Perle said any resumption of
the talks should not be taken to be "a compensation" to the Arab world
for the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Thomas Donnelly, AEI's resident fellow for defense and national
security, said the quick victory in Iraq is an implicit message to
other countries in "the axis of evil", Iran and North Korea, which the
United States believes are developing weapons of mass destruction.
However, Donnelly cautioned that U.S. technological superiority in the
battlefield as demonstrated in Iraq could encourage more countries to
acquire nuclear weapons.
Donnelly said that U.S. responsibility in the Middle East has
increased in the aftermath of the Iraq war because the rest of the
world is watching how the United States sets up a democratic
government there. He also said that the U.S. military in some form or
other would be present in Iraq "for decades." He added that Iraq would
not be allowed to build up its own army to any level that could
threaten its neighbors again.
Joshua Muravchik, another AEI resident scholar, stressed the need for
carrying on "a war of ideas" in the Islamic world to address
anti-American feelings there. Muravchik recommended resurrecting the
defunct U.S. Information Agency (USIA) that dealt effectively with
communist propaganda during the Cold War. In a government
reorganization that took place in 1999, U.S.I.A. was integrated into
the State Department. Muravchik said the diplomatic function of the
State Department is at odds with the kind of "ideological warfare"
that USIA used to do.
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International
Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:
http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list