UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

26 March 2003

Powell Says U.S. Determined to Bring War to Rapid End

(Interview with Egyptian television March 26) (2030)
Secretary of State Colin Powell says the Bush administration is
determined to bring the conflict with Iraq to an end quickly with
minimal damage and loss of life.
In an interview with Egyptian television March 26, Powell said the
military campaign is progressing well, with coalition forces advancing
to the region of Baghdad. The secretary said the campaign against Iraq
has public international backing from 47 countries.
Once Iraq is liberated from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi
people will see their lives improve and the Middle East will benefit
from greater prosperity and stability, Powell said.
Powell said the United States and the international community will
unveil a "roadmap" designed to settle the conflict between Israel and
the Palestinians after the Palestinian legislature confirms a
Palestinian prime minister and cabinet.
"And then we all have to work together to implement that road map, and
start down the road to peace, ending all violence, and Israelis having
to release control of places in the territory, so that commerce can
begin again. And we have to take on all of the difficult obligations
that are set out before both sides doing something about ending
settlement activity and making sure we have ended violence, once and
for all," Powell said.
Following is the transcript of Powell's interview with Egyptian
television:
(begin transcript)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
March 26, 2003
INTERVIEW
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell on Egyptian TV
March 26, 2003
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, we thank you very much for joining us. And I
know this is an incredibly busy time for you here. Thank you for
joining us again.
SECRETARY POWELL: It is a great pleasure to be with you, and have a
chance to speak to the people of Egypt and others in the Arab world.
QUESTION:  Thank you, sir.
The war in Iraq got bloody; the human cost is adding; markets are
tanking. And were people's expectations raised to high, as how short
and how easy this war would be, talking about the military prowess?
How do you view this, not as a Secretary of State, but as a long time
military planner?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, both, as a former general, and as now
Secretary of State, let's keep in mind that the war has only been
going on for seven days. Nobody should have expected that it would
suddenly all be over on day one or day two. Unfortunately, that kind
of hype is created within the media but it is going rather well. We
have penetrated several hundred miles inside of Iraq. We are getting
closer to Baghdad.
There is not organized resistance from the Iraqi armed forces and
irregulars, but spot resistance. So I am quite confident that it will
be a successful campaign. We want to bring it to an end, as quickly as
possible. Casualties, frankly, have been relatively light on both
sides for a conflict of this kind. But we regret any loss of life. But
it is Saddam Hussein, and his regime, and his failure to act over the
years that has brought this conflict to the world, and we want to get
it over with as quickly as possible. But we will have to do it right,
and not be in a hurry. We have to do it right, so it will take some
time.
QUESTION: So this Iraqi resistance that you are encountering, is it
pretty much what you expected?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, people expected different things. I always
expected that it would not simply be a march up to Baghdad, but there
would be resistance. But we have taken over 4,000 prisoners. We have
seen some units that have said, we don't want to fight. There are
others who do want to fight. And just consider the progress we have
made over this period of time, and I think you will see that we sent
in a force that was expecting that they would have to fight. They have
fought well, and they have moved very far. And I think in the very
nearest future, we will see additional success.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you said you are closer now to Baghdad.
Although the U.S. has sought to convince the Iraqis that this war is
to liberate their country, a lot of them, a lot of Arabs hold this
view that this invasion by the U.S. troops is an old fashioned
invasion of U.S. troops. Journalists down back in Baghdad are telling
us about how the explosions shook the earth beneath their feet.
So do you believe that this is the right way to win over the hearts
and minds of the Iraqis?
SECRETARY POWELL: What we need to do right now is to defeat this
regime and its military apparatus. We need to take down their command
and control centers. We need to destroy facilities that might have
weapons of mass destruction. And we need to fight those units that are
coming out to fight us, and the command and control system that gives
them their orders. And when that has been done, when this battle is
over and these units have been taken out of the war, and when this
regime has been brought down, people will see that we have not done
that much damage either to Baghdad or Basra or any of the other cities
which could have been, you know, really damaged. We chose not to.
We chose to be very careful, bypass populated areas, try not to have
to go into these areas where there would be a high loss of civilian
life, or we would have to use firepower that would destroy civilian
facilities. So I think when this battle is over, people will see that
we have waged it in a very careful way, minimizing loss of life and
damage, and that we have come to help to put in place a more
responsive democratic regime.
And we will be bringing in support; we will be bringing in supplies;
we will be bringing in food; we will be bringing in health care for
the whole population; and we will find a way through putting in place
a new Iraqi authority, and working with the international community,
to use the oil of Iraq to help the people of Iraq, and not to develop
weapons of mass destruction.
QUESTION: But most of the casualties that we have seen on television
were those of civilian casualties, and they were not military
personnel, Iraqi personnel.
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, we have seen a combination of both. We have
seen hundreds of Iraqi people, prisoners of war, soldiers who have
been taken. Soldiers have been killed and injured. Regrettably, some
civilians have been injured, but we are doing everything we can to
minimize civilian loss of life.
QUESTION: Now the Arabs are concerned. They are rather skeptical about
the U.S. leaving Iraq in disarray.
SECRETARY POWELL: No, we have no intention of leaving Iraq in
disarray. We have made it clear from the very beginning that if this
war came and could not be avoided because Saddam Hussein would not
take his last chance to stop oppressing his people, to stop murdering
his people, to stop developing weapons of mass destruction -- if this
war came, and it did, once we prevailed we had an obligation and
responsibility to stabilize the country, make sure the country stayed
intact, and to put in place a new Iraqi authority that would work with
the international community to provide a better life for the people of
Iraq and allow all the people of Iraq to participate in their
government; and to use that opportunity also to jump-start the Middle
East peace process. The President has announced that the road map will
go down as soon as Mr. Abu Mazen has been confirmed by the Palestinian
legislature.
QUESTION: And talking about the Middle East, when do you expect the
road map to be implemented rather than just published?
SECRETARY POWELL: It will be published, and then it is up to all of
the parties to implement it. And so, the first step is to get the
Prime Minister confirmed. And I hope that will happen in the
not-too-distant future. And the President has said the road maps will
be presented to both sides and to the world at that time. And then we
all have to work together to implement that road map, and start down
the road to peace, ending all violence, and Israelis having to release
control of places in the territory, so that commerce can begin again.
And we have to take on all of the difficult obligations that are set
out before both sides doing something about ending settlement activity
and making sure we have ended violence, once and for all.
QUESTION: Well, I want to go back to the Iraqi issue. Economy seems to
be the first casualty of this war.
Have you considered the harm incurred on your friends economically out
of this war?
SECRETARY POWELL: Yes, we know that tourism is down. We know that
trade has been disrupted. There have been some disruptions in the oil
market. But I think those things are starting to stabilize. And that
is why we want to get this conflict over with as quickly as possible.
Just imagine, once this conflict is over and the Iraqi regime is gone
and people no longer have to worry about Saddam Hussein and his
actions, people no longer have to worry about these weapons of mass
destruction, and stability comes to the Persian Gulf area, I think
that will be reflected in oil prices, it will be reflected in tourism,
it will be reflected in economic activity throughout that part of the
world.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, critics in the administration and your
colleagues were unfavorably comparing your performance in this war to
garner support and to build up a coalition to that of James Baker back
in 1991. The U.S. is now leading a coalition only of the willing, and
bypassed the United Nations, and left a divided Security Council.
How would you respond to these critics?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, one, we didn't put together just the coalition
of the willing. A coalition is always a coalition of the willing. And
this particular coalition of the willing now has 47 nations; 47
nations are openly members of the coalition, and have asked to be
identified with this effort. And there are many other nations that for
a variety of reasons don't want to be publicly identified, but are
also a part of the coalition of the willing. And we did not bypass the
Security Council. We took this to the Security Council, debated it for
seven weeks, and got a Resolution 1441 that was unanimously approved
by the Security Council, 15-0, no abstentions. That was a major
diplomatic achievement.
Now the second resolution that we did not succeed in getting just a
short while ago, what was that resolution about? It was a second
resolution that said Saddam Hussein has failed. He has lost his last
chance. So that resolution was also leading to serious consequences
and war. The reason we wanted that resolution was to give additional
political support to members of the coalition, but we couldn't get
that resolution because some permanent members of the Security Council
said they would veto it.
But, even in the absence of that second resolution, coalition members
went to their Parliament and said, "Nevertheless, we have sufficient
authority in 1441, so that we should participate in this coalition."
And the British Parliament, Spanish Parliament, Italian Parliament,
the Australian Parliament all agreed and supported this conflict, our
participation in this conflict. And they supported it on the basis of
1441; 1441, a diplomatic achievement that got a 15-0 vote from the
Security Council.
QUESTION: So, Secretary of State, Colin Powell, we thank you very much
--
SECRETARY POWELL:  Thank you.
QUESTION:  -- for your time in that busy day.
SECRETARY POWELL:  Thank you very much.
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list