UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

19 March 2003

U.S. Has $154 Million in Aid Ready for Iraqi People

(Spokesman discusses humanitarian response during March 19 daily
briefing) (3520)
The United States has been doing a lot of planning on humanitarian
assistance to the Iraqi people "who have been suffering all too long
from the neglect of their own government," State Department Spokesman
Richard Boucher said March 19 during his daily press briefing in
Washington.
"What we've done is we have assembled and trained what is for us the
largest-ever humanitarian rapid response team," he said. "We have a
team composed of 60 experts who are going to be working on areas such
as health, food, water and shelter. We have been prepositioning
stockpiles of emergency supplies and commodities. That includes food,
it includes shelter materials, it includes medicines, water and
sanitation, things like that."
Boucher said the assistance is worth a total of $154 million.
He added that the United States is coordinating its efforts with the
United Nations and international humanitarian organizations, including
U.S. nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and that a fact sheet with
detailed figures would be distributed when ready.
Asked about the United Nations' Oil-for-Food Program, Boucher
explained that the program involves using revenue from Iraqi oil,
which is being kept in an escrow account, to be spent for the needs of
the Iraqi people. "And that's the way it's supposed to have worked for
many years," he said. "Unfortunately, in the areas controlled by the
Iraqi regime, they've repeatedly failed to allocate that money in
sufficient amounts to take care of the Iraqi people."
Boucher said the United States has been talking with other members of
the U.N. Security Council "to present soon" a draft resolution that
would ensure the continuity of the program.
Asked about press reports that Bahrain and Saudi Arabia had offered
asylum to Saddam Hussein, Boucher said the United States would be
willing to work with such proposals, were they to be accepted. "But at
this point we've seen no such acceptance. We've seen continued refusal
by the government of Iraq to take any option that provides for a
peaceful settlement, and all we can do at this point is say let's hope
they take the offer."
The State Department spokesman also discussed aspects of the
"coalition of the willing" that was announced the previous day,
reiterating that there are 45 countries "that are standing with us on
the need to disarm Iraq. That's the way we define this, according to
people who take actions in that regard."
Following are excerpts of the briefing:
(begin excerpt)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2003
BRIEFER:  Richard Boucher, Spokesman
[...]
Could you give us sort of an overview of what the U.S. is doing to
plan for post-Iraq in terms of feeding its people?
MR. BOUCHER: I think there are a number of things that we are doing to
get ready for this and I don't think I have all the details with me
today, but I will try to make sure I do this.
We have been doing a lot of planning, a lot of work on humanitarian
assistance to the Iraqi people who have been suffering all too long
from the neglect of their own government.
What we have done is we have assembled and trained what is, for us,
the largest ever humanitarian rapid-response team and we have a team
composed of 60 experts who are going to be working on areas such as
health, food, water and shelter. We have been pre-positioning
stockpiles of emergency supplies and commodities. That includes food,
it includes shelter materials, it includes medicines, water and
sanitation and things like that.
We have been coordinating with the United Nations and international
humanitarian organizations including U.S. nongovernmental
organizations and we have been funding the efforts of international
organizations and nongovernmental organizations to get prepared for
whatever might happen.
I can give you some rundown of the money involved, but I can't give
you a number on the food and where it is and that sort of thing. We
have positioned $154 million worth of relief food distribution,
reconstruction and transition initiatives -- put forward that money --
have that money available. There's been $35 million for extensive
contingency planning with the World Food Program.
QUESTION: In addition to that?
MR. BOUCHER: In addition to that. And in addition to that, we have
spent $15.6 million pre-positioning supplies by international
organizations, and there is more money in that pipeline.
QUESTION: Is the one that's committed to NGOs, you said, that's among
the money that NGOs can apply for?
MR. BOUCHER: The 154 is for a variety of initiatives to get ready. So
we put the money -- we -- how do you say -- at this point, we've got
the money to do, to fund the projects, the initiatives that will be
taken in the event of need.
QUESTION: Okay.
MR. BOUCHER: $35 million has been spent on World Food Program
planning. In addition, now, the $17.3 million has been spent to
pre-position commodities. No, hang on. Let me go back. $154 [million]
available for initiatives, $35 [million] of that for the World Food
Program, yes, sorry, $15.6 [million] for pre-positioning, okay? Now of
these amounts -- now I'm starting to give you a breakdown, a further
breakdown.
$17.3 million has been spent to pre-position commodities by the U.S.
Agency for International Development. And then there's also $2 million
of that that went to UNICEF, $5 million to the World Food Program, $1
million to the UN's Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs.
[...]
QUESTION: That's U.S. money?
MR. BOUCHER: Yes.  That is all U.S. money there.
QUESTION: What about reports that the U.S. and the UK are working on a
plan so that you actually could use some of the money from oil -- from
Iraqi oil in an escrow account, I guess, is how it would be for
humanitarian relief?
MR. BOUCHER: Well, as you know, the Oil for Food Program exists
already and that involves using revenue from Iraqi oil in an escrow
account to be spent for the needs of the Iraqi people. And that is the
way it was supposed to have worked for many years. Unfortunately, in
the areas controlled by the Iraqi regime, they have repeatedly failed
to allocate that money in sufficient amounts to take care of the Iraqi
people. But we have been talking with other members of the Council to
consider how to go forward with that. We have been working with others
and we are prepared to present soon a draft humanitarian resolution
that would ensure the continuity of the Oil for Food Program. We want
to make sure it is kept running to meet the humanitarian needs of
Iraq.
We have been consulting with the United Nations and other Council
members on adjustments to the current Oil for Food Program, so we can
ensure continued delivery of key humanitarian supplies. And we hope
that progress on that resolution will be swift, in order to minimize
any interruption to the program.
Security Council discussed the issue yesterday. We look forward to
hearing from the UN Secretary General on how to meet the humanitarian
needs of the Iraqi people. As I said, we look for prompt action to
modify the Oil for Food Program.
QUESTION: -- money that used to go to the Iraqi government would now
be able to be used by the allies to divert to humanitarian --
MR. BOUCHER: The exact structure of how to do that needs to be
adjusted and defined through the United Nations. As you know, the
Azores statement that the leaders issued proposed giving the Secretary
General the authority on an interim basis to ensure the humanitarian
needs of the Iraqi people are met. And so in yesterday's discussion
with the Council, they said they looked forward to hearing -- the
Council said -- we look forward to hearing from the Secretary General
about how that could be done.
[...]
QUESTION: Given that this is not a UN operation, that the resolution
-- the second resolution to 1441 did not pass, and there is
considerable bulkiness at the UN over this potential operation, are
you meeting opposition at the UN to try to get this other resolution
through? Are they saying, well, you all are doing this and so it's
entirely your responsibility to --
MR. BOUCHER: Not that I have heard of. And I have seen some statements
by other members of the Council that would indicate that they are
interested in providing for ongoing humanitarian relief efforts. And,
as you know, we have been working for some time with UN agencies, with
international organizations. We have been in touch with the United
Nations, been in touch with the European Union, been in touch with
nongovernmental organizations to try and ensure an uninterrupted flow
of humanitarian goods to the Iraqi people.
QUESTION: Richard, under this draft resolution which you are
proposing, what does it say about who would actually be the party
selling the oil, writing contracts and that type of thing?
MR. BOUCHER: I can't tell you any more at this point because it is
still under consultation, still being discussed.
[...]
QUESTION: Just for clarification, would this wholly take this out of
Iraqi Government hands? It seems implicit in what you're saying.
MR. BOUCHER: It would provide an interim arrangement to continue this
program until there is a renewed Iraqi authority.
QUESTION: Like as soon as possible?
MR. BOUCHER: We think the resolution should be passed as soon as
possible that provides for arrangements that could apply when
necessary.
[...]
QUESTION: Can you say whether the State Department believes that
legally you are liable or responsible to take care of the Iraqi people
after this conflict since it is one of our choosing?
MR. BOUCHER: First of all, the question has an answer that we have
given many times; the Secretary has given it. If there should be
conflict, according to the rules of conflict, the occupying power has
the responsibility for civilians in the areas that we might or
coalition forces might go into. That is well recognized in the
extensive planning to take care of the Iraqi people immediately upon
any conflict. It is being done with that in mind.
But even more important than that, it is being done with the fact that
the United States over many years has demonstrated concern for the
Iraqi people. We were the ones that originally proposed the
oil-for-food program. We are the ones that have consistently tried to
make it work. We have been the ones who have made sure it does work
in, for example, the North where nutrition levels and health levels
are considerably higher than in the areas controlled by Saddam
Hussein.
So we have a continuing humanitarian interest in the welfare of the
people of Iraq and the President restated that in his speech Monday
night I think very, very clearly.
QUESTION: Do you have any comment on Crown Prince Abdallah on offering
Saddam Hussein an asylum in his country in Saudi Arabia?
QUESTION: What about Bahrain?
MR. BOUCHER: Both.  Of course -- there we go.
No, there have been a couple statements to this effect and we have
seen the press reports of the Saudi offer. We have seen the press
reports of the Bahraini Government's offer. I just repeat what
President Bush said on Monday. In recent days, some governments in the
Middle East have delivered messages urging the dictator to leave Iraq
so that disarmament can proceed peacefully. Saddam Hussein and his
sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours -- that's from Monday night.
Their refusal to do so would result in military conflict.
So this is an option that we have supported in past, we have said we
would be willing to work with such proposals were they to be accepted.
But at this point, we see no such acceptance. We have seen continued
refusal by the Government of Iraq to take any option that provides for
a peaceful settlement. And all we can do at this point is say let's
hope they take the offer.
QUESTION: If he -- I mean -- accepted the last-minute exile in Saudi
Arabia, will he be persecuted for his crimes? Or --
MR. BOUCHER: If there was a proposal to that effect, I suppose that is
a question we would be exploring. But at this point, I haven't seen
any serious proposals or discussion from the Iraqi side.
QUESTION: Richard, do you think that he would say that he would be
accepting it until he receives some public assurances --
MR. BOUCHER: As I said, he has said nothing whatsoever to indicate he
is even interested, so it is really a moot point at this point. Let's
hope he accepts, let's hope he indicates interest, let's hope he says
he -- you know, they realize what is good for Iraq and accept the
offers and explore how that might work. But at this point, they don't
appear to be doing that.
QUESTION: On assistance, you've given us American figures, you've
spoken of an American and British initiative on the oil program. Can
you give us any idea, if even briefly, whether other countries are
being approached to contribute to the humanitarian cause? And, if so,
have you heard any -- you know, any echoes of the U.S.'s charitable
ways?
MR. BOUCHER: I don't think I am going to have any numbers for other
countries; I am not sure if they have. But I think the fact is, as we
have stated many times, we have been in discussion with a variety of
UN agencies about the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people in a
post-conflict scenario. We have been in touch with the European Union,
which has a considerable assistance budget. We have been in touch with
other governments, including European governments. Japan, I think, has
indicated already that they would want to be involved in helping the
Iraqi people after a conflict. So there is considerable interest and
support in the international community to do that.
What the total figures might be, what might in the end be required on
a specific basis, I am not sure anyone can estimate at this point. But
we have been certainly doing a lot of planning, especially for the
immediate need to feed people who have been relying on the Oil for
Food Program.
[...]
QUESTION: So could you just clarify what makes Turkey part of the
coalition of the willing, whereas Germany is not part of the coalition
of the willing, since they seem to be providing the same sort of
assistance in the military end?
MR. BOUCHER: Who is to say they are not?
QUESTION: Who is to say that Germany is not part of the coalition?
MR. BOUCHER: Did Germany say they are not?
QUESTION: I don't see them on your list.  Are they part of  -- 
MR. BOUCHER: We have said there are 45 or more countries. I think we
named 30 yesterday. There are probably another three that -- two or
three that want to be named today. There is Bulgaria, there is -- I
guess I'm not sure if I named Bulgaria yesterday. There is Singapore,
there is Portugal, all of whom said in the last 24 hours it is okay to
name them. So some countries are named, some are not. I am not going
to go into who the unnamed might be. We certainly appreciate support
from named or unnamed countries, or countries not on the list, anybody
who we think is an ally or a friend or just an interested party who is
prepared to cooperate and support in this effort. We think that is an
important statement.
[...]
QUESTION: I know you keep telling us that you're against unilateral
action, but let me put it this way, and it would be nice if you could
give us an answer.
Has the United States made any arrangements with Turkey for a
coordinated entrance of Turkish forces into northern Iraq?
MR. BOUCHER: I am not going to get into speaking for the Turkish
Government or talking about future actions. I think I have made clear
what our position is. We have been in close conversations with the
Turkish Government. We have been working with Turkey to make sure that
we keep tensions on its northern border, on Iraq's northern border, at
the lowest possible levels, and we expect the Turkish Government, as
well as the Iraqi parties, to be responsive to our concerns. For the
moment, that is as far as I can go for you.
[...]
[H]ow many of the countries that you have put on your list yesterday,
and the unnamed, or do you consider the unnamed 15, or if there are
more now, whatever, to be part of the coalition?
I'm just trying out why there seems to be a discrepancy between some
people saying that there's 30 members of the coalition and other
people saying there's 45. How many do you think -- how many do you
believe --
MR. BOUCHER: I would say that there are 45 countries who, in one way
or the other, are standing with us, cooperating in the effort to
disarm Iraq, and who are ready to see that done, whether it is by
allowing overflights or actually providing military forces or
providing emergency units, such as nuclear, biological, and chemical
units.
There may be others outside of this who are not counted, but as allies
or friends providing certain facilities, even though they may not
agree with the purpose. But I think there are 45 countries that are
standing with us on the need to disarm Iraq. That is the way we have
defined this, according to people who take actions in that regard.
QUESTION: Do you consider those 45 to be members of your coalition?
MR. BOUCHER: Yes.
QUESTION: Yes. Okay. And then one other thing. With your adding
Portugal and Singapore and Bulgaria today. Does this mean -- were they
-- can you say, now that you're naming them, were they part of the 15
--
MR. BOUCHER: I am moving them from one column to another, I am not
adding three to the total.
[...]
QUESTION: Does that mean that now there are only 12 in that unnamed
category?
MR. BOUCHER: Approximately, yes.
[...]
QUESTION: Richard, with respect to tonight, 8:00 p.m., which is the 48
hours, are there any last-minute attempts, for instance, to fly a UN
plane into Baghdad to request Saddam Hussein and his sons to be flown
to Cyprus?
Number two, when does the Iraqi opposition kick in?
And thirdly, is the Ba'ath party then considered null and void at that
hour?
MR. BOUCHER: One, I haven't heard of any such plans to ask the UN.
Number two, the Iraqi opposition has been opposed to Saddam Hussein
for a long time, and I think that will continue after 8:00 p.m.
tonight as well. I don't know what you mean by "kick in." If you are
asking me when military action starts, there is no way I would know
that, nor am I going to tell you if I do. ...
I am not going to make a judgment of the existence or not of the
Ba'ath party. I think that will depend on the outcome of the conflict
and the actions of individuals in that party who may or may not
further the crimes of the regime.
[...]
QUESTION: Just to follow up on that point about the oil money, I think
you've said before or maybe others in the Administration have said it
but just to make clear, there is no intention to use any Iraqi oil
money to pay for the cost of a war, is there?
MR. BOUCHER: I think the Secretary has said that the Iraqi -- this is
a natural resource that belongs in hand to the Iraqi people that
appropriately would be spent on the needs of the Iraqi people for
relief, for welfare, for future development. It wouldn't be
appropriate to take that for military purposes.
[...]
QUESTION: Can I follow up? Would you consider military expenses, not
economic development or any kind of institutional development which
didn't exist before Saddam, but the repairing of buildings and any
type of damage to infrastructure that was done during the bombing? Who
would be paying for that?
MR. BOUCHER: The Oil for Food Program is one to take care of the
humanitarian and civilian needs of Iraqi civilians. That is what is
has always been designed for. It has been a humanitarian program. It
has been an education and welfare program. It has been an
infrastructure program.
I don't know if it would be redefined in any manner in the new -- in a
new resolution that would provide for its continuation, but certainly
the intent and purposes of the resolution would remain.
(end excerpt)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list