UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

15 March 2003

Bush Notes 15th Anniversary of Chemical Attack on Iraqi Kurds

(President says Halabja attack demonstrates threat from Saddam
Hussein) (730)
President Bush spoke to the nation via radio March 15, noting the 15th
anniversary of the Iraqi regime's chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi
Kurdish village of Halabja. He said the world's free nations need to
show "whether their stated commitments to liberty and security are
words alone -- or convictions they're prepared to act upon." The text
of the radio address follows:
(begin text)THE WHITE HOUSEOffice of the Press Secretary
March 15, 2003
RADIO ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT TO THE NATION
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This weekend marks a bitter anniversary
for the people of Iraq. Fifteen years ago, Saddam Hussein's regime
ordered a chemical weapons attack on a village in Iraq called Halabja.
With that single order, the regime killed thousands of Iraq's Kurdish
citizens. Whole families died while trying to flee clouds of nerve and
mustard agents descending from the sky. Many who managed to survive
still suffer from cancer, blindness, respiratory diseases,
miscarriages, and severe birth defects among their children.
The chemical attack on Halabja -- just one of 40 targeted at Iraq's
own people -- provided a glimpse of the crimes Saddam Hussein is
willing to commit, and the kind of threat he now presents to the
entire world. He is among history's cruelest dictators, and he is
arming himself with the world's most terrible weapons.
Recognizing this threat, the United Nations Security Council demanded
that Saddam Hussein give up all his weapons of mass destruction as a
condition for ending the Gulf War 12 years ago. The Security Council
has repeated this demand numerous times and warned that Iraq faces
serious consequences if it fails to comply. Iraq has responded with
defiance, delay and deception.
The United States, Great Britain and Spain continue to work with
fellow members of the U.N. Security Council to confront this common
danger. We have seen far too many instances in the past decade -- from
Bosnia, to Rwanda, to Kosovo -- where the failure of the Security
Council to act decisively has led to tragedy. And we must recognize
that some threats are so grave -- and their potential consequences so
terrible -- that they must be removed, even if it requires military
force.
As diplomatic efforts continue, we must never lose sight of the basic
facts about the regime of Baghdad.
We know from recent history that Saddam Hussein is a reckless dictator
who has twice invaded his neighbors without provocation -- wars that
led to death and suffering on a massive scale. We know from human
rights groups that dissidents in Iraq are tortured, imprisoned and
sometimes just disappear; their hands, feet and tongues are cut off;
their eyes are gouged out; and female relatives are raped in their
presence.
As the Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, said this
week, "We have a moral obligation to intervene where evil is in
control. Today, that place is Iraq."
We know from prior weapons inspections that Saddam has failed to
account for vast quantities of biological and chemical agents,
including mustard agent, botulinum toxin and sarin, capable of killing
millions of people. We know the Iraqi regime finances and sponsors
terror. And we know the regime has plans to place innocent people
around military installations to act as human shields.
There is little reason to hope that Saddam Hussein will disarm. If
force is required to disarm him, the American people can know that our
armed forces have been given every tool and every resource to achieve
victory. The people of Iraq can know that every effort will be made to
spare innocent life, and to help Iraq recover from three decades of
totalitarian rule. And plans are in place to provide Iraqis with
massive amounts of food, as well as medicine and other essential
supplies, in the event of hostilities.
Crucial days lie ahead for the free nations of the world. Governments
are now showing whether their stated commitments to liberty and
security are words alone -- or convictions they're prepared to act
upon. And for the government of the United States and the coalition we
lead, there is no doubt: we will confront a growing danger, to protect
ourselves, to remove a patron and protector of terror, and to keep the
peace of the world.
Thank you for listening.(end text)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list