UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

14 March 2003

Brookings Scholar Scores Saddam Hussein's Human Rights Record

(Author Pollack also argues for war with Iraq on strategic grounds)
(650)
By David Anthony Denny
Washington File Staff Writer
WASHINGTON -- Those who supported the Clinton administration's armed
interventions in Bosnia, Haiti and Kosovo have even more reason to
support a U.S.-led war with Iraq, according to Brookings scholar
Kenneth Pollack.
During an abbreviated digital video conference (DVC) March 14 with
three State Department posts in India, Pollack argued that the case
for armed intervention in Iraq on humanitarian grounds is as strong or
stronger than those instances when President Clinton ordered U.S.
military intervention during the 1990s. Pollack, who now is director
of research at the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle
East Policy, is the author of "The Threatening Storm: The Case for
Invading Iraq." He was previously director of Gulf affairs at the
National Security Council during the Clinton administration, and
before that was a CIA military analyst for the Persian Gulf. He holds
a doctorate in political science from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
Pollack asserts that Saddam Hussein is one of the worst tyrants of the
past 50 years. He notes that the United Nations' Special Rapporteur
for Human Rights in Iraq says that Saddam Hussein's regime is
comparable to the World War II-era Soviet Union under Stalin and Nazi
Germany under Hitler. Saddam Hussein is reputed to have killed more
than a million Iraqis -- his own people -- a figure which must be
compared with Iraq's population of about 24 million. Pollack also
notes that Saddam Hussein is considered to have attempted genocide
against both Iraqi Kurds and Marsh Arabs, which constitute crimes
against humanity.
In addition to the human rights considerations, of course, Pollack
emphasized the strategic rationale for armed intervention -- Saddam
Hussein's possession of biological and chemical weapons of mass
destruction (WMD), and his ongoing, decades-long quest to develop or
acquire nuclear weapons. Pollack considers Saddam Hussein uniquely
dangerous among contemporary rulers for his view of nuclear weapons
not as a defensive assurance against outside attack, but rather as an
offensive enabling factor allowing him to pursue a foreign policy of
aggression and conquest.
Pollack emphasized to his Indian audience that having nuclear weapons
per se is not the problem. He sees India's possession of nuclear
weapons, or Britain's, as non-threatening, because the governments are
not expansionist or aggressive. But Saddam Hussein, by contrast, wants
nuclear weapons so that Iraq can become a superpower, can control the
Persian Gulf's oil and can destroy Israel. And, Pollack says, with
nuclear weapons in his arsenal, he believes even the United States
would be unable to effectively prevent his accomplishing those goals.
Saddam Hussein's brother is famously noted as saying Iraq needs
nuclear weapons in order to have a strong hand in re-drawing the map
of the Middle East, Pollack said.
A questioner from Calcutta asked why war with Iraq must happen now
since containment was working with U.N. inspectors in Iraq. Pollack
answered that containment was not working, but failing. For instance,
he said, Iraq has increased its smuggling from $300 million a year
several years ago to $3 billion ($3,000 million) in 2002, enabling
Saddam Hussein to acquire almost everything he needs militarily.
Pollack also insisted that containment only seems to be working now
because both the Security Council members and Saddam Hussein himself
recognize the presence of 250,000 U.S. and coalition forces in the
Persian Gulf region ready to force Saddam Hussein's hand if he does
not cooperate.
Moreover, Pollack said, for containment to be effective, it must last
10-20-30 years -- the life of the current regime, including not only
Saddam Hussein but also his sons, who are likely successors. Finally,
the United States is not hearing anything from France or Russia that
would lead it to believe either country is serious about containment,
Pollack said.
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International
Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:
http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list