UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

24 February 2003

Negroponte Urges Prompt Adoption of New Iraq Resolution

(Ambassador Negroponte's U.N. Security Council remarks) (1240)
Co-sponsoring a new resolution on Iraq, U.S. Ambassador John
Negroponte said February 24 that "we now believe that it is abundantly
clear that Iraq has refused to disarm and has no intention of doing
so."
The United States believes, Negroponte said, that because of Iraq's
refusals to comply with the tests of truthfulness, cooperation and
disarmament set by resolution 1441, the U.N. Security Council must
work toward the prompt adoption of a draft resolution the United
States is co-sponsoring with the United Kingdom and Spain.
According to a text of the ambassador's statement released by the U.S.
Mission to the U.N., the ambassador cited examples of Iraq's failure
to comply with resolution 1441 passed in November 2002 and recalled
issues brought to the Security Council by U.S. Secretary of State
Colin Powell in January and early February.
"We cannot allow ourselves to return to business-as-usual on Iraq,"
Negroponte said. "Over the past 13 years, a pattern has emerged. Each
time that there is a renewed acknowledgement that a non-compliant Iraq
poses a threat, political or military pressure mounts. The council
then calls on Iraq to disarm. Iraq offers minimal signs of cooperation
on process until the political pressure subsides and then returns to
its standard operating procedures of non-compliance and
non-cooperation."
Following is the text of the ambassador's remarks:
(begin transcript)
Statement by Ambassador Negroponte
Informal Consultations of the Security Council
February 24, 2003
Nearly 12 years ago, the Security Council passed Resolution 687. This
resolution stated that Iraq continued to pose a threat to
international peace and security at the close of the Gulf War and laid
out a number of conditions intended to ensure that Iraq could no
longer pose such a threat.
Among its other provisions, Resolution 687 laid down a 45-day timeline
for Iraq to disarm. Iraqi disarmament is now 4225 days overdue. Last
November, this Council passed Resolution 1441, giving Iraq a final
opportunity to comply. Regrettably, today, the story is still the
same: No truth, no real cooperation, and most importantly, no
disarmament.
We cannot allow ourselves to return to business-as-usual on Iraq. Over
the past 13 years, a pattern has emerged. Each time that there is a
renewed acknowledgement that a non-compliant Iraq poses a threat,
political or military pressure mounts. The Council then calls on Iraq
to disarm. Iraq offers minimal signs of cooperation on process until
the political pressure subsides and then returns to its standard
operating procedures of non-compliance and non-cooperation.
Unfortunately, to anyone familiar with the Security Council debates of
the 1990s on Iraq, the discussions we have had over the past several
weeks sound terribly familiar.
As Secretary Powell reminded us two weeks ago, the purpose of
Resolution 1441 is disarmament. It is not about inspections.
Inspections are a means to verifying and achieving disarmament when a
country has determined that it will voluntarily disarm. To measure
Iraqi willingness to voluntarily disarm, the Resolution contains two
principal tests:
1. Would Iraq submit a "currently accurate, full and complete"
declaration of all aspects of its WMD programs and delivery systems
and
2. Would Iraq "cooperate immediately, unconditionally and actively"
with UNMOVIC and the IAEA in meeting its disarmament obligations?
Iraq has failed both tests.
As Dr. Blix said, "The declaration does not clarify and submit
supporting evidence regarding the many open disarmament issues...the
12,000-page declaration, most of which is a reprint of earlier
documents, does not seem to contain any new evidence that would
eliminate the questions or reduce their numbers." No one on this
Council has defended the Iraqi declaration. It was a transparent
effort to delay and deceive. It was a further material breach of
Iraq's obligations under 1441 and previous resolutions.
Iraq has also failed to cooperate fully and actively with the
inspectors. Iraq has not accounted for biological and chemical
materials that we know they had. And it declined to cooperate
adequately or fully on interviews. It never showed the kind of active
cooperation this Council demanded in 1441 - the kind that is
absolutely necessary to verify disarmament. We concluded, therefore,
that Iraq was yet in further material breach of resolution 1441.
There has been a lot of talk recently about "bench marks". Resolution
1441 is the benchmark. Here is another one: as Secretary Powell said
last week, "If we were getting the kind of cooperation that we
expected when 1441 was passed, documents would be flooding out of
homes, flooding out of factories. There would be no question about
access. There would be no question about interviews. If Iraq were
serious in this matter, interviewees would be standing up outside of
UNMOVIC and IAEA offices in Baghdad and elsewhere, waiting to be
interviewed, because Iraq would be determined to prove to the world,
to give the world, all the evidence needed that these weapons of mass
destruction are gone."
Knowing as we do that what we have seen from Iraq is not active
cooperation or compliance, let me cite just a few examples of Iraq's
failures to comply with operative paragraphs of Resolution 1441:
-- OP3 - Iraq's December 7 Declaration was not currently accurate,
full, or complete.
-- OP5 - Iraq has failed to allow all persons to be interviewed in the
mode of UNMOVIC or the IAEA's choice.
-- OP7 - Iraq has failed to provide adequate lists of names of all
personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq's WMD programs.
-- OP9 - Iraq has failed to cooperate actively with UNMOVIC and the
IAEA.
Over the past three months, we have a clear record of Iraq's failure
to make the most of Resolution 1441's "final opportunity:"
Resolution 1441 is not about inspections. It is not about the
inspectors proving that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Rather,
it is about Iraq proving that it does not possess such weapons. And we
have not seen what this Council insisted on seeing - a strategic
decision to disarm. That is the bar set by Resolution 1441. Iraq is
far from reaching that bar, and we all know it.
We have listened carefully to the many voices calling for more time.
But 11 years, 10 months and 23 days is more than enough time for
Saddam Hussein to prove that he has disarmed.
We gave Iraq a "final opportunity" to disarm precisely because we
wanted to be sure of ourselves. We gave Iraq more time after the
briefing on January 27, now almost a month ago.
We now believe that it is abundantly clear that Iraq has refused to
disarm and has no intention of doing so. We believe, therefore, that
because of the failures that I have outlined here, Iraq has failed to
comply with the tests of truthfulness, cooperation and disarmament set
by Resolution 1441. It is truly regrettable that Iraq has failed to
take the final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations
under relevant Security Council resolutions.
Under the circumstances and given Iraq's continued disregard for its
obligations, we fully support the draft resolution put forward by
Ambassador Greenstock. In the days ahead, we look forward to working
with Council colleagues towards the prompt adoption of this very
straightforward draft. Iraq itself must bear the consequences of its
continued disregard for the Council's decisions.
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list