Blair accused of exaggerating arms finds in Iraq
IRNA
London, Dec 17, IRNA - Prime Minister Tony Blair was accused Wednesda of exaggerating the findings of investigators looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. "We are back to what happened last year, where the Prime Minister uses language in order to create a particular impression and hopes that when he is challenged, he can say he didn`t actually mean that," the Conservative`s shadow foreign secretary Michael Ancram said. Former chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix accused Blair of using "innuendo" in his radio address to UK troops on Tuesday, when he suggested laboratories found by the US-led Iraq Survey Group (ISG) were weapons of mass destruction. Speaking on British Forces Broadcasting Service, the British premier claimed that the ISG report in October had uncovered "massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories, workings by scientists, plans to develop long range ballistic missiles." Referring to previous accusations that Blair had exaggerated Iraq`s arms threat to justify the war, Ancram said that he was once again "using language and playing fast and loose with language. "I went and looked up what the ISG actually said, and what it actually said was that a clandestine network of laboratories and safe houses had been found, suitable for continuing chemical and biological weapons research," he said. "There was nothing about `massive` and certainly nothing giving the indication that was given yesterday," the shadow foreign secretary said in an interview with BBC radio`s Today programme. He suggested that Blair was "back into this old spin again" and referred to evidence given to the inquiry into the death of former Iraq arms inspector David Kelly about "over-egging the information." "A Prime Minister should use language in relation to intelligence material with great care. This Prime Minister does not and I think he hasn`t learnt the lesson that he can`t live by spin," Ancram said. Speaking in Sweden at the launch of a new independent commission on WMD, Blix said it was "increasingly clear" that Saddam had not had any when he was ousted by US and British forces. "My guess is that there are no weapons of mass destruction left," he said. HC/211 End
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|