UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)


05 December 2003

Powell Tells German TV He Hopes Germany Can Aid Iraq Recovery

Dec. 4 interview in Brussels on ARD-TV

Secretary of State Colin Powell told German television December 4 that U.S.-German relations are "excellent and improving" after the disagreement over going to war to remove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and he hopes Germany will be able to do more to help in Iraq's post-war recovery.

In an interview with ARD-TV while he was in Brussels for the NATO foreign ministers meeting, Powell said he would like to see "all of the nations of the world doing more," and that the international community "should feel an obligation to help the people of Iraq who are coming out of three decades of the most terrible kind of leadership."

Germany, he noted, "has made some offers with respect to helping with the training of police and other things that might happen. And as we move into next year, and as we get closer to the transfer of authority from our coalition forces back to the Iraqi people, and as NATO considers whether or not it ought to perform a more expanded role, Germany might find an opportunity then to make a greater contribution than it is able to now."

Powell was asked his opinion about the German-French-Belgian idea for having the command structure of a European defense force separate from that of NATO's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in Mons, Belgium. "There is no other headquarters in Europe that has the capacity of SHAPE, so there's no question about an alternative to SHAPE," he said.

He also emphasized that NATO will have the first call on responding to a crisis. "NATO first," he said, "and that is the judgment of NATO and the judgment of the European Union. There's no disagreement."

Following is a transcript of the interview:

(begin transcript)

Department of State
Washington, D.C.
www.state.gov

SECRETARY COLIN L. POWELL -- INTERVIEW WITH ANNE WILL, GERMAN ARD-TV TAGESTHEMEN [DAILY TOPICS]

Brussels, Belgium
December 4, 2003

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, how would you characterize German-American relations after the strains of the Iraq War?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think they're excellent and improving. We had a major disagreement, and there's no doubt about this, over whether or not we should have gone to war. And it caused quite a disruption. But we have spent a lot of time since the Spring of this year repairing whatever damage might have been caused. The United States and Germany are held together by so many strong bonds -- in my own personal life, I started my military career in Germany, I've lived in Germany for years -- and those bonds will not be broken. We're all coming together now to make sure that Iraq is reconstructed, and the people of Iraq can look forward to a better life, free of the tyrant Saddam Hussein. No more mass graves, no more people being suppressed by the dictatorial regime. We all have the opportunity to come together and build a democracy that we can be proud of.

QUESTION: Are you satisfied with burden sharing in post-war Iraq, or would you like to see Germany doing more?

SECRETARY POWELL: I would like to see all of the nations of the world doing more. I think the international community should feel an obligation to help the people of Iraq who are coming out of three decades of the most terrible kind of leadership. Germany will have to decide what it might be able to do. It has made some offers with respect to helping with the training of police and other things that might happen. And as we move into next year, and as we get closer to the transfer of authority from our coalition forces back to the Iraqi people, and as NATO considers whether or not it ought to perform a more expanded role, Germany might find an opportunity then to make a greater contribution than it is able to now.

QUESTION: Next year?

SECRETARY POWELL: We're almost in next year, and so I've covered myself that way. But I think it will take a few months for people to see things settle down, the security situation get under control, and once for example, NATO, makes sure that it is on top of the situation in Afghanistan, as we discussed here today in Brussels, I think NATO will turn its attention to how it might do more in Iraq. And I hope as part of that discussion, Germany will review what it has been doing and what it might be able to do. But it will take some months, I think. Germany has made clear that it is not going to send any combat troops, and it is unable to make more of a financial contribution than it already had. But I hope that as the needs of the Iraqi people become more clear and as a new government gets going of the Iraqi people -- next year, I hope Germany will review the situation and see if it cannot do more as part of the international community.

QUESTION: Do you wish to comment on Chancellor Schroeder's plans to sell a plutonium factory to China?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm not familiar with this statement on the part of the Chancellor and so I think I will just let that question go by.

QUESTION: Was Washington consulted in advance on this deal?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm not familiar with the deal so I'm afraid I can't comment.

QUESTION: Wasn't it customary in the past for Berlin to consult Washington on nuclear issues?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm not familiar with the particular deal so I don't know what consultation might have taken place with other authorities in the United States, but I can assure you that we closely consult with our German colleagues on a full range of issues to include nuclear issues. I just don't have knowledge of this particular deal.

QUESTION: Yesterday afternoon in Rouns, a six-day joint military maneuver began. Are you really concerned about European efforts to set up independent military command structures?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think that we are satisfied that between the NATO authorities and the European Union authorities, we have a common understanding of how we should move forward with respect to dealing with future crises. And we call it Berlin Plus. It essentially means that when a crisis comes along, NATO will have the first call on whether or not the Alliance as a whole should respond to that crisis.

QUESTION: But NATO first?

SECRETARY POWELL: But NATO first. Everybody agrees. There's no longer a debate on this subject, there wasn't much of a debate after it was agreed to earlier this year. NATO first, and that is the judgment of NATO and the judgment of the European Union. There's no disagreement.

If NATO for one reason or another decides that it should not participate or not take this mission on, then the European Union can make a judgment if it wishes to, calling upon NATO assets to help it. And if that is not appropriate, for one reason or another, and if the size of the operation and the nature of the operation is of a nature that the EU can do it alone -- humanitarian or peacekeeping operation using its forces -- then the EU will do so, using either a national headquarters and whatever other assistance may be required, calling upon the assets of the European Union nations.

What we don't want to see is a duplication of effort. We don't want to see the EU doing things that it's better for NATO to do. We really don't want to see that kind of duplication. We do want to see full transparency. With respect to joint exercises and training and the creation of those kinds of units that might be useful in these kinds of operations, there's no reason not to encourage that.

QUESTION: But what you don't want is that what France, Germany and Belgium are thinking out loud is a European alternative to SHAPE.

SECRETARY POWELL: There is no alternative to SHAPE. There is no other headquarters in Europe that has the capacity of SHAPE, so there's no question about an alternative to SHAPE.

What we are looking at -- and the debate that we have been having in recent weeks with our German, French, and British colleagues -- is if the European Union is going to act autonomously, as we say, on a third level of involvement, how best for the European Union to have a planning function, a planning cell, to prepare it for such missions? One alternative is perhaps to have a small cell inside of SHAPE. Others have suggested something that perhaps is directly related to an EU organization. This is a reasonable debate that we're having and we did not resolve it today, but I'm sure that it will be resolved to the satisfaction of all in the near future.

QUESTION: Lord Robertson criticizes the embarrassing -- as he said -- lack of military equipment in Afghanistan. Will you soon be approaching Berlin with a request for more?

SECRETARY POWELL: This is up to Lord Robertson or his successor, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. We are very pleased with what Germany has done in Afghanistan, putting in a Provincial Reconstruction Team, the other support, troops that Germany has sent. Germany has made an enormous contribution to our peacekeeping efforts in Afghanistan. Whether there is a need for more German forces or German capability, I will let George Robertson work that out with --

QUESTION: And the other countries?

SECRETARY POWELL: All countries, I think, that have the capacity to support the NATO deployment to Afghanistan should do everything that they can. What George Robertson was speaking about earlier was he had a need for additional resources, helicopters and other things, and the Alliance members were a little slow coming forward. What he was saying, if we have the political will to do something, if we make a political decision to do something, then we must be prepared to provide the capability necessary for the successful accomplishment of the mission. That's a very reasonable statement. And all of us sitting in the room today with George Robertson agreed with him. Now we have to make sure that our governments are prepared to put the capability where the political will is.

QUESTION: A last question. How close are you to getting Saddam Hussein?

SECRETARY POWELL: I have no idea. I don't know where he is. I don't know if he's dead or alive. What I do know is that he's not in power and he will never be in power again.

And although there's been a great deal of criticism of our actions, and Germany and the United States had a major disagreement over this, I hope that all of your viewers in Germany will recognize that a very terrible person is no longer in charge in Baghdad -- somebody who abused human rights in an outrageous way, somebody who filled mass graves, somebody who used chemical weapons against his own people, used chemical weapons against his neighbors, invaded his neighbors, and who took the wealth of his people and used that wealth for his own palaces, for weapons and for terrorizing the region. He's gone and he's not coming back.

And the United States and its coalition partners are proud that we have removed this threat from the region and from the world, and now we are hopeful that the entire international community will come together to help the Iraqi people build a better nation, one that is founded in democracy and human rights. And I'm pleased frankly, that the international community is coming together. Germany has supported us in a number of resolutions since the war in the United Nations. And I look forward to cooperating with my German colleague Joschka Fischer as we move forward.

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, thank you very much.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you, Anne.

(end transcript)

(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



This page printed from: http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2003&m=December&x=20031205150030osnhojac0.1031458&t=usinfo/wf-latest.html



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list