UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Washington File

13 May 2003

Snow Vows to Help Iraq Develop Economic Policies

(Outlines broader U.S. international economic agenda) (4910)
The U.S. Department of Treasury will assist the emerging leadership of
a free Iraq in the formulation and execution of financial and economic
policies aimed at developing a market-based economy in that country,
Treasury Secretary John Snow says.
In May 13 testimony before the House of Representatives' Financial
Services Committee, he said that urgent reconstruction efforts in Iraq
and Afghanistan are a "primary focus of the administration's
international economic policy."
Snow said that Treasury, working with other U.S. agencies, will start
from the premise that "our role is to help the Iraqi people rather
than to impose changes upon them."
He cited restoring essential operations of the Iraqi finance ministry,
the central bank, commercial banks and the stock market as priorities
in those efforts, and restarting a wage/pension payment process as a
"crucial" near-term challenge.
Shifting to the broader economic agenda, Snow said that while the
United States is "doing its part" in contributing to a healthy global
economy, such an economy needs "multiple engines of growth." He said
he has told U.S. partners that they must "take their own steps" to
stimulate growth and contribute to global prosperity.
Snow said that U.S. economic strategy also includes increasing
economic growth and stability in developing countries and emerging
markets, primarily by providing strong support for policy reforms.
For those reforms to succeed, he said, emerging economic must have
better access to private capital flows, and financial crises affecting
those economies must be kept in check.
To achieve these goals, Snow said, the administration is pursuing
several key policies, including:
-- aiming to prevent financial crises by encouraging countries to take
early corrective actions,
-- taking steps to limit contagion when crises arise,
-- working to ensure that official sector finance does not encourage
excessive risk taking by investors or provide an excuse for
policymakers to avoid difficult choices,
-- seeking to create a more orderly and predictable process for bond
restructuring through introduction of collective action clauses in
sovereign bond contracts.
Emphasizing the central role the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
plays in these areas, Snow praised the multilateral lender of last
resort for becoming "more transparent, more focused on its core
macroeconomic mission, and more intent on anticipating events that
could lead to crisis."
In less developed countries, Snow said, the administration's strategy
focuses on increasing productivity growth. He said that this approach
is exemplified by President Bush's Millennium Challenge Account
initiative that rewards pro-growth policies.
He noted that in 2002 President Bush called for doubling the size of
the world's poorest economies within a decade. Snow said that such a
goal would require the developing countries to take "vital" policy
steps to increase economic growth rates, and the donor community and
the multilateral development institutions to make a "serious"
commitment. He said that achieving that goal could eventually render
bilateral and multilateral development institutions unnecessary.
"While it may seem like a strange measure of success, think about it:
such an achievement would mean that countries are relying on
investment, private capital, and entrepreneurship instead of pledges,
concessions, and debt relief," Snow said.
He said that President Bush has already taken the initiative to push
multilateral development banks (MDBs) in that direction by developing
a new economic growth agenda that focuses these institutions on
productivity growth and measurable results.
However, Snow said he "strongly" believes that U.S. participation in
MDBs is "vital" to achieving the goals of increased growth and
improved living standards in the developing world in the near future.
Consequently, he called on Congress to pass legislation authorizing
U.S. contributions to the most recent MDB replenishments. The lack of
such legislation "will threaten to slow the provision of critical
assistance to the poorest countries," Snow said.
Following is the text of Snow's testimony as prepared for delivery:
(begin text)
Tuesday, May 13, 2003
TESTIMONY OF TREASURY SECRETARY JOHN W. SNOW
BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Chairman Oxley, Representative Frank and Members of the Committee,
thank you for inviting me here today to discuss the Administration's
international economic agenda. I welcome the opportunity to describe
where we are today on advancing that agenda and our priorities for the
future.
These are challenging times for our country and for the world. Yet we
must remain focused on fundamental tasks. The Administration is
working to strengthen our economic recovery, expand growth, create
jobs, and raise living standards for Americans. So too are we
dedicated to promoting stronger global growth and improving the lives
of people throughout the world. There are no easy answers to the
dilemmas posed by the poverty and financial instability that persist
around the globe. Nonetheless, the Administration is determined to
persevere and to work with the international community to accomplish
our shared goals.
Rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan is clearly a key priority for the
United States and the international community, and I want to bring you
up to date on Treasury's role in the Administration's efforts in this
area. I also want to focus today on vital long-standing policy
objectives - promoting global growth, fostering growth and stability
in emerging markets and increasing growth in developing countries. And
I want to underscore the importance that the Administration attaches
to the authorization requests related to the Multilateral Development
Banks (MDBs) that are pending with this Committee.
Promoting Global Growth
Our first international economic priority should be getting economic
policies right at home. By strengthening economic growth in the United
States, we provide a natural impetus for global growth. As the world's
largest economy, when we grow faster we provide a boost to the world
as a whole. That is why President Bush's jobs and growth package is so
critical, not just for the U.S. economy, but for the global economy as
well.
I have emphasized in meetings with my colleagues from the Group of
Seven (G-7) countries how President Bush's economic growth proposals
will build on the proven strengths of the U.S. economy -- generating
jobs, encouraging savings and investment, and promoting
entrepreneurship.
The United States is doing its part in contributing to a healthy
global economy. But a healthy global economy needs multiple engines of
growth. I have underscored that our G-7 partners must immediately take
their own steps, appropriate to their own circumstances, to spur
growth and contribute to global prosperity. When Finance Ministers
convene this weekend in advance of the G-8 Summit, I will continue to
emphasize this point.
Trade liberalization is one of the most fundamental steps that
countries around the world can take together to achieve growth and
reduce poverty. Spreading the benefits of free trade is a key priority
for the Administration. We are pursuing this objective at a global
level in the World Trade Organization, regionally through the Free
Trade Area of the Americas that is being negotiated, and bilaterally
through the recently signed agreement with Singapore, the recently
concluded agreement with Chile, and negotiations with the Southern
Africa Customs Union, Morocco, Australia and several Central American
nations. Treasury is working as a key member of the inter-agency team
to advance this agenda, focusing on financial sector liberalization,
investment, customs issues, trade-related capacity building, and the
revenue implications of tariff reduction.
Rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan
The urgent reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan are a
primary focus of the Administration's international economic policy.
To provide intensive attention to this priority, the Treasury
Department has formed a task force to help address key financial and
economic aspects of Iraq's reconstruction. This task force includes
broad representation from US Government Agencies, including
representatives of the Federal Reserve, OCC [Comptroller of the
Currency], USAID [U.S. Agency for International Development], and the
State Department. In conjunction with State, the Department of
Defense, and others, Treasury will be working closely with Peter
McPherson, who will be the lead advisor on financial matters on the
ground in Iraq. Treasury's Office of Technical Assistance already has
deployed 14 advisors to the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian
Assistance (ORHA), and additional personnel may be deployed as
necessary to help staff ORHA, which is expanding in conjunction with
its move to Baghdad.
Working in concert with USAID, State, and the emerging leadership of a
free Iraq, Treasury will assist in the formulation and execution of
financial and economic policies in post-war Iraq. We start from the
premise that our role is to help the Iraqi people rather than to
impose changes upon them. It will be a priority to restore essential
operations of the Finance Ministry, the Central Bank, commercial banks
and the stock market. Where elements of the existing system are
corrupt, ineffective, or inconsistent with a market-oriented economy,
Treasury will work with the Iraqi people to begin essential reform and
restructuring efforts.
A crucial near-term challenge will be paying civil servants, teachers,
and pensioners in a fair, orderly and prompt manner - and
transitioning to a wage/pension payment process under Interim Iraqi
Authority control. Near-term goals include assisting the Iraqi people
in the development of a fair and transparent federal budget, creation
of a responsible system of regulation and supervision for financial
institutions, reform of the tax and customs regimes, design of a
strategy for the management of domestic and external debt, and
implementation of financial fraud, anti-money laundering and
anti-terrorist financing measures.
Development of a system of commercial law, founded on a base of
private property rights, is an essential element of developing a
market-based economy in Iraq. For this reason, we believe there are
several areas in which the Iraqi people will need to focus, ranging
from dealing with real estate and personal property to intellectual
property rights. These will also include establishing the legal
framework for corporations, the banking system, and capital markets.
Given the reach of commercial law, more than just Treasury will be
involved in assisting this effort; it will also include the
Departments of State, Justice, Commerce, and USAID. However, each of
us recognizes the importance of creating a free market economy in the
country, and development of a sound framework of commercial law is key
to this goal.
We also expect the international financial institutions to play an
important role in supporting Iraq's reconstruction. The World Bank is
already forming a team of experts to conduct a needs assessment in
Iraq, which will help focus attention on assistance priorities and lay
the groundwork for economic recovery and growth. The World Bank has
the authority to determine when the time is appropriate to send a
mission to Iraq for a field-based needs assessment. The IMF has
provided general advice on the currency and monetary policy, and has
also signaled that it is prepared to undertake a needs assessment at
the appropriate time.
Shortly after the creation of the Interim Authority in Afghanistan in
December 2001, Treasury's Office of Technical Assistance (OTA) sent an
advisor to Kabul to conduct early assessments of budgetary, financial
and economic conditions. OTA Budget Advisor Larry Seale has since been
in Kabul for over a year working closely with Finance Minister Ashraf
Ghani in establishing modern budget mechanisms in the country.
Treasury consulted with the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and
the UN Development Program during their development of the Needs
Assessment for Afghanistan, which was presented at the Tokyo donors'
conference in January 2002. Treasury provided advice and assistance on
the creation of a new, unified currency, which completely replaced the
old afghani in January of this year. Under Secretary Taylor has also
played a key role in marshaling international financial support for
the Afghan government's day to day expenses through the World
Bank-administered Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund.
The MDBs are providing critical support for economic reform in
Afghanistan. The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (AsDB),
together with UN [United Nations] agencies and international donors,
are working closely with the Afghan government to respond to the
country's urgent reconstruction needs.
Last year, the World Bank extended grants totaling $100 million to
support public administration, infrastructure, education, and public
works and provided a $108 million concessional loan in March this year
to rebuild Kabul airport and a section of the "ring" road. Last year,
the AsDB moved quickly to offer grants assistance on roads, energy,
and capacity building and to date has provided about $40 million in
grant assistance. Additionally, Afghanistan has received an Asian
Development Fund post-conflict concessional loan of $150 million that
is supporting urgent road building and another $150 million in
concessional resources are expected to be approved for post-conflict
reconstruction next month.
Fostering Growth and Stability in Emerging Markets
Financial crises in recent years have threatened the progress made by
many emerging markets in improving living standards for their people.
Successive crises have constrained global capital flows and helped
leave growth well below its potential, hurting both emerging markets
and the global economy.
The Administration's fundamental goal is to increase economic growth
and stability in emerging market economies. Above all, this means
providing strong support for policy reforms. The choice to reform must
be made by countries themselves; ownership is vital to successful
implementation.
It also means reducing the frequency of crises and improving the
access of emerging market economies to private capital flows. To
achieve these goals, the Administration is pursuing several key steps.
First, we aim to prevent crises before they erupt - by better
understanding potential vulnerabilities and taking early action to
encourage countries to correct policies. Second, we aim to reduce the
spread of crises from one country to others. Third, we are working to
make clear that official sector finance is limited - and not available
in large sums to encourage excessive risk taking by investors or to
provide an escape for policy-makers from making difficult choices. And
finally, we are seeking to create a more orderly and predictable
process for debt restructuring through introduction of collective
action clauses in sovereign bonds.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) plays a central role in these
areas, and over the last year, we have sought to ensure that the IMF
is improving its focus on each of the four objectives that I laid out
above. In sum, the IMF is more transparent, more focused on its core
macroeconomic mission, and more intent on anticipating events that
could lead to crisis. (Greater detail on reforms is provided in
Treasury's Report to Congress on Implementation of Legislative
Provisions Relating to the IMF, October 2002.)
To enhance crisis prevention and limit contagion, we have worked with
the IMF to continue to strengthen its surveillance of economic
conditions and performance in member economies. In this context it is
gratifying to see private markets increasingly discriminating on the
basis of the credit quality of individual emerging markets.
We strongly support ongoing work at the IMF to enhance its analyses of
member economies, by focusing on core issues that are vital to
macroeconomic performance and by ensuring that its analysis and advice
are of high quality, objective and useful. This includes: paying
closer attention to key areas of potential vulnerability; more
effectively assessing debt sustainability; and zeroing in on potential
weaknesses in regulatory frameworks and steps needed to strengthen
national financial systems and financial sector performance.
Providing better information to the public is key to crisis
prevention. The IMF cannot contribute in this respect if the results
of its analyses are not widely available. IMF analyses are already
much more widely available to the public, helping countries
differentiate themselves to the community of investors and thus
helping protect against unwarranted contagion. The Administration
continues to press for more routine publication of IMF analyses, and
we strongly support ongoing IMF work with countries to improve
compliance with standards and codes and publish the results, which
will enhance the information available to foreign and domestic
investors.
To further strengthen incentives for strong policies and prudent
risk-taking, the United States has sought to make clear the limits on
official finance, both through our actions in tackling recent crises
and through introduction of new constraints on the financial support
that can be provided in future cases. The Administration has
emphasized and will continue to insist that the IMF must be the key
source of emergency support in the face of financial crises. Where
exceptional, large scale financing is needed from the IMF, it should
be provided on shorter terms and at higher interest rates than normal
IMF lending. Within the IMF, we have worked to strengthen the
requirements for access to exceptional amounts of financing, so that
IMF support in all but the most extreme cases falls below specific,
pre-set levels. The Administration gained the support of other members
for this approach in February, when the IMF approved procedural
changes that, among other things, will require the IMF to prepare a
separate report with detailed justification for any exceptional access
request.
Creating a more orderly and predictable process for debt restructuring
has been a particular priority in recent months. More broadly, there
has been a wide ranging debate in the international community about
the potential for a centralized sovereign debt restructuring mechanism
analogous to a bankruptcy court. Given the reactions of markets and
emerging market countries, however, it is the United States' strong
view that collective action clauses offer a more practical vehicle.
There can at times be "collective action" problems that prevent a
prompt, orderly resolution of a sovereign debt crisis. The source of
these problems lies in the relationships and agreements of debtors and
their creditors. It is these parties, not an international
organization, who must assume responsibility for the solution.
The United States continues to work in the IMF to strengthen the
crisis resolution framework through broad voluntary approaches. We
have seen excellent progress made in developing and incorporating
collective action clauses in external sovereign bond contracts. Mexico
has shown strong leadership in issuing several bonds that include such
clauses and committing to include such clauses in all new external
bond issues. Brazil and South Africa have also had success with a
global bond issue including such clauses. We urge other market
borrowers to follow this example.
We have been working with the IMF on how best to promote more
widespread inclusion of collective action clauses and enhanced
transparency and disclosure. Emerging markets countries that regularly
access international financial markets need to assume rightful
ownership of these issues and help assure a more stable and orderly
international financial system.
Increasing Growth in Developing Countries
The persistence of poverty is one of the most difficult challenges the
world faces. Yet we are committed to tackling it. The Administration's
strategy in developing countries centers on increasing productivity
growth, thereby raising living standards and reducing poverty.
Creating economic opportunities is vital not only to the daily lives
of individuals and the economic development of their countries but
also to stability for all of the world's citizens.
The President's commitment to tackling poverty is exemplified by his
proposed Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), which represents a
tremendous innovation in the delivery of development assistance. The
MCA brings together the lessons we have learned about development over
the past 50 years: 1) Aid is more likely to result in successful
sustainable economic development in countries that are pursuing sound
political, economic and social policies. 2) Development plans
formulated by a broad range of stakeholders engender country ownership
and are more likely to succeed. 3) Integrating monitoring and
evaluation into the design of activities ensures that aid is going
where it's most effective.
President Bush's vision of the MCA recognizes the importance of each
of these lessons. First, it rewards pro-growth policies. President
Bush categorizes these policies as ruling justly, investing in people
and encouraging economic freedom. These policies benefit developing
countries by increasing growth, creating an environment conducive to
foreign and domestic investment, and making development assistance
more effective. The MCA provides a strong incentive for countries to
adopt these good policies. Second, the MCA establishes a true
partnership in which the developing country, with full participation
of its citizens, proposes its own priorities and plans. Finally, the
MCA will place a clear focus on results. Funds will only go to well
designed programs that have clear objectives, measure baseline data,
and set benchmarks for both intermediate outputs and final outcome
goals.
The MCA's targeted mission reaffirms our development objectives and
contributes to an integrated strategy for achieving them. The MCA will
focus on spurring growth in the subset of developing countries that
have policies in place to use such assistance most effectively to
achieve lasting results. USAID, State, and other agencies will
continue to deliver humanitarian and regional assistance, to address
complex emergencies, and to work with failed and failing states, all
issues critical to U.S. national interests. USAID will also work with
countries that are MCA "near misses" to encourage them to achieve the
development-readiness essential for receiving assistance under the
MCA.
Over the past few years, the international community has worked at
creating a set of development goals. These goals include such
ambitious targets as halving by the year 2015 the proportion of people
whose income is less than one dollar a day. Last year, President Bush
added another ambitious goal -- "we ought to double the size of the
world's poorest economies within a decade." Such goals will require
developing countries to take vital policy steps to increase economic
growth rates. They will also require a serious commitment by the donor
community and the multilateral development institutions. If these
ambitious goals are met, we can add another target that we should all
want to achieve, and that is for the development institutions -
bilateral and multilateral -- to start working themselves out of
business. While it may seem like a strange measure of success - think
about it - such an achievement would mean that countries are relying
on investment, private capital, and entrepreneurship instead of
pledges, concessions, and debt relief. It would mean that the people
of developing countries will have governments that deliver basic
services and provide for the rule of law; it will mean that they will
have a chance to better their lives and see their children educated;
and it will mean that they will know freedom and human dignity.
This is a very ambitious and forward-looking goal. But President Bush
has already taken the initiative to begin working toward it. He set
out a new economic growth agenda for the multilateral development
banks that focuses these institutions on raising productivity growth
and measurable results by channeling more funds to countries that
follow pro-growth policies, and by structuring our contributions to
create incentives for specific outcomes. He called on the development
banks to increase the use of grants, rather than loans, to the poorest
countries, and the banks are already responding to this call.
Raising productivity growth depends on developing the private sector
in individual countries, including by expanding small businesses'
access to credit. The MDBs can play a useful role in advancing this
goal. In particular, the U.S. has proposed that the International
Finance Corporation (IFC) -- the private-sector arm of the World Bank
Group -- work with the International Development Association (IDA) to
promote lending by financial sector institutions to small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Africa. This is intended to build
on a number of successful programs already in place in some of the
MDBs for SMEs, including those at the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development (EBRD) for Russia and Eastern Europe. The IFC and IDA
are now developing this program for African SMEs.
Producing measurable results requires fundamental changes in operating
style. As a first step, systems must be put in place to measure
outcomes and facilitate accountability. To drive this change, the U.S.
will make results-based contributions to the most recent replenishment
of IDA, the flagship of development assistance institutions. The U.S.
has proposed to provide an additional $300 million in contributions if
IDA produces a results measurement system, expands essential
diagnostics and achieves progress toward concrete health, education
and private sector goals. A similar results-based mechanism was
established for the Global Environment Facility (GEF), with the final
$70 million of our contribution tied to the GEF's achieving specified,
quantifiable program goals.
The U.S. has also persuaded the MDBs to begin increasing the use of
grants, instead of loans, to fund priority development activities in
the poorest and least creditworthy countries. Grants help poor
countries make productive investments without saddling them with ever
larger debt burdens. Recipients perceive grants to be more valuable
than loans, permitting higher performance hurdles and thus enhancing
development effectiveness and results. With strong U.S. urging, both
the World Bank's concessional window -- IDA -- and the African
Development Fund have agreed to increase sharply the share of
resources provided in the form of grants to the poorest countries, so
that 18-21 percent of total assistance over the next three years will
be provided in grant form. The poorest countries are eligible for 100
percent grant financing for efforts to counter HIV/AIDS. Donors
likewise committed to increase grants in the International Fund for
Agricultural Development to 10 percent of total assistance. This year
we will seek to expand the use of grants at other MDBs, particularly
the Asian Development Bank through its facility for the poorest
countries, the Asian Development Fund.
I strongly believe that U.S. participation in the MDBs is vital to
achieving the goals of increased growth and improved living standards
in the developing world. I look forward to working with this Committee
and the Congress, to help make the MDBs strong and effective
institutions. In this context, I want to underscore the importance we
attach to transparency in the operations of the MDBs. The United
States has long been a leading force for increased openness in these
institutions, and the Administration will continue to press strongly
for greater openness. For example, we are working to ensure that all
the MDBs put in place transparent systems for allocating resources to
countries that can use them effectively.
Authorization Requests
As part of this year's budget, the Administration is seeking
authorization for additional commitments to the HIPC [heavily indebted
poor countries] Trust Fund. The HIPC authorization request supports
the U.S. contribution for its share of additional HIPC financing
agreed to by the President and other G-7 leaders. We appreciate recent
passage by the House of Representatives of legislation (HR 254) to
help implement the President's proposals to reform the North American
Development Bank and Border Environment Cooperation Commission, and
are working with the Senate to achieve enactment as soon as possible.
In addition, Treasury has resubmitted requests for Congressional
authorization for U.S. contributions to most recent replenishments of
IDA, the African Development Fund, and the Asian Development Fund.
Each of these funds provides critical development assistance to the
poorest and most vulnerable peoples of the world. In early 2001,
President Bush requested the authorization for the seventh
replenishment of the Asian Development Fund (ADF-8). In early 2002, he
further requested the authorization for the thirteenth replenishments
of IDA and the ninth replenishment of the African Development Fund
(AfDF-9). Most recently, the FY 2003 Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution appropriated related funds but did not include
authorization legislation for U.S. participation in these
replenishments. This situation is undermining United States
reform-minded institutional leadership.
If it continues, it also will threaten to slow the provision of
critical assistance to the poorest countries and peoples in Africa,
Asia and Latin America. Without the U.S. contribution to IDA-13, IDA
will not have enough resources to make its normal lending and grant
targets for its 2004 fiscal year, which begins on July 1, 2003.
As Treasury Secretary, I believe that it is critical that the Congress
pass authorization legislation for U.S. participation in these
replenishments as soon as possible. I look forward to working with you
and other members of Congress in achieving this end.
Legislative Mandates and Reports
Finally, I would like to raise, as I did with your colleagues on the
Appropriations Committee two weeks ago, the issue of legislative
mandates. Currently, Treasury carries out an extremely large number of
specific legislative mandates relating to U.S. participation in the
international financial institutions that have built-up over time.
Some mandates go back 50 years. Some provisions overlap, or are
inconsistent. There are 37 directed vote mandates and over 100 policy
mandates, plus numerous reporting, certification and modification
mandates. The proliferation of these legislative mandates can be
confusing and counterproductive to U.S. efforts to develop
international economic policy and to implement it effectively in these
institutions. The U.S. Government's ability to influence other
shareholders and the institutions themselves could be enhanced by
consolidation of these mandates. I would like to work with you to
rationalize and focus our mandated reports and requirements, so that
Treasury can work as effectively as possible in pursuit of U.S. policy
goals.
Conclusion
I appreciate this opportunity to review the Administration's
international economic agenda - our recent achievements and our
ambitions going forward. I look forward to continuing to work with
this Committee and the rest of the Congress on the important goals of
promoting growth and improving lives both in the United States and
beyond.
Thank you.  I welcome your questions.
(end text)
(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list