UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

30 October 2002

U.N. Weapons Inspectors Meet with Bush at White House

(Meeting shows Bush's commitment to inspections, spokesman says) (810)
By Wendy S. Ross
Washington File White House Correspondent
Washington -- President Bush met with the two chief United Nations
weapons inspectors October 30 and told them the United States wants to
work with them to ensure that they are able to implement whatever
decision the U.N. Security Council reaches on disarming the Saddam
Hussein regime in Iraq.
Hans Blix, executive chairman of the U.N. Monitoring, Verification,
and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), and Mohamed ElBaradei, director
general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which
handles the inspections for nuclear weapons, spent two hours in
discussions at the White House.
National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack said the inspectors
first met with Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin
Powell and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and then the
entire group went to the Oval Office to meet with President Bush.
White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer told reporters that Bush
thanked Blix, as head of the inspectors, for his service and told him
he believes in the importance of an effective inspection regime for
Iraq, as he said in his September 12 speech to the U. N. General
Assembly.
"The President was pleased to see him here to stress how the United
States wants to work with the inspectors to make sure they are able to
carry out whatever the ultimate decision of the U.N. is, which is the
disarmament of Saddam Hussein," Fleischer said.
"There's no point in sending the inspectors back into Iraq if the
inspectors themselves don't think they can get their job done,"
Fleischer said.
Talks remain under way at the U.N. on Iraq, he noted. "These are
serious talks and people are approaching them seriously. There still
are some differences that remain and efforts are being made to bridge
those differences, and we will see."
The United States, he added, "is continuing to press the case.
Secretary Powell has made many phone calls today to foreign ministers
of the Security Council nations, pressing the case to resolve some of
the remaining differences among the members of the P-5 and others. So
we'll see ultimately where that outcome is, but it's being worked at
the ministerial level."
"There is no question the United States is willing to work the other
members of the Security Council to get an agreement. We have certain
issues that we feel extraordinarily strongly about that we will not
change, such as the resolution must state that there are consequences,
such as it must state that Iraq is in material breach. But we want to
work out an agreement. ... The purpose of diplomacy is to reach an
agreement," Fleischer said.
The United States resolution, cosponsored by the United Kingdom,
remains under discussion, he said. It calls for a seven-day period in
which the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq would have to indicate whether
or not it was going to comply with the expressed will of the world, as
expressed through the Security Council. "Then, over the next 23 days,
up to a 30-day total time, Iraq would have to produce documentation
about what weapons of mass destruction it possesses, and that way the
inspectors would be able to go in and verify and, therefore, also be
able to disarm," Fleischer said.
The resolution walks through a whole series of steps that would
empower the inspectors to be able to carry out their duties in terms
of people to talk to, rights to visit presidential palaces, rights of
free movement without being hindered by Iraqis, Fleischer explained.
"All in all, it's a series of provisions that give the inspectors the
tools they need to do the job," he said.
"This is the United Nations' chance to get it right and to make
certain that Saddam Hussein does, indeed, disarm, so that peace can be
protected. That's why he (President Bush) went to the U.N., and he
meant it, and he still means it," Fleischer said.
"Whether or not the U.N. means it, we will soon find out. But the
timetable was known; the timetable was clear; and we support moving
forward. We will see ultimately if the United Nations can do it," he
said.
The inspectors, Fleischer said, "don't want to get run around. They
want to be able to go in and do their jobs and disarm Saddam Hussein.
Probably nobody is more committed to peace than the inspectors, and
they know that in order to secure the peace, they have to have the
ability to do their job."
But, whatever tools they are given, he said, fundamentally it "still
comes down to Saddam Hussein and Iraq's willingness to allow the
inspectors to do their jobs, because no matter how strong the United
Nations resolutions are, it still involves Iraqi agreement to let the
inspectors do their jobs for the purpose of disarmament. And that
still remains the ultimate test of Iraq and whether they are willing
to listen to the world, or whether they will again defy the world."
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International
Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:
http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list