UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

22 October 2002

Powell Says U.S. Wants to Eliminate Iraqi Weapons without War

(But warns U.S. will use military force if necessary) (740)
Secretary of State Colin Powell said the United States is trying to
find a peaceful response to Iraq's continued development of weapons of
mass destruction.
Speaking on ABC's "Oprah," a popular U.S. television show with host
Oprah Winfrey, Powell said October 22 that the U.S. will use force if
necessary to remove such weapons.
"Nobody wants war. President Bush does not war. I do not want war. But
do we want Saddam Hussein to have nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons that he can use, as he has used these kinds of weapons in the
past against his neighbors, against his own people, or perhaps against
us someday?" asked Powell.
"We will fight a conflict, if it comes to a conflict, with
sophisticated weapons, with precision weapons, in a way that minimizes
loss of civilian life," Powell said.
"One thing you can be sure of: He isn't going to disarm, he is not
going to let the inspectors in, unless he is fearful of a conflict
that would remove him from power. He has demonstrated for 11 years
that he will ignore, stiff and laugh at the world's opinion. That
laughter has to stop," said Powell.
Following is a transcript of Secretary Powell on ABC's Oprah:
(begin transcript)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
October 22, 2002
Interview
Secretary Of State Colin L. Powell On ABC's Oprah
October 22, 2002
(Aired 4:15 p.m. EDT)
MS. WINFREY: We also went to Secretary of State Colin Powell to answer
some of those questions. As a four-star general, Colin Powell oversaw
the Persian Gulf War. As Secretary of State, he's trying to convince
our allies that now is the time to stop Saddam Hussein.
SECRETARY POWELL: Right now we're not talking about war. Right now
we're talking about finding a peaceful solution to this. Nobody wants
war. President Bush does not war. I do not want war. But do we want
Saddam Hussein to have nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that
he can use, as he has used these kinds of weapons in the past against
his neighbors, against his own people, or perhaps against us someday?
This is the time to stop him. He has been told to stop by the
international community.
It's not the United States who is at fault here; it is Saddam Hussein
and Iraq that is at fault. And it is a problem he is wholly
responsible for, and he cannot be allowed to get away with it.
There has been a containment policy in effect, but we have seen that
during the period of this containment policy Iraq has continued to try
to develop weapons of mass destruction. They have chemical weapons;
they have biological weapons; they're trying to acquire nuclear
weapons. They've been in violation of all of these containment
resolutions for the last 11 years.
He has shown previously that he is not that inhibited. What we don't
want him to be able to do is to achieve greater capability because
then he would be even less inhibited.
One thing you can be sure of: He isn't going to disarm, he is not
going to let the inspectors in, unless he is fearful of a conflict
that would remove him from power. He has demonstrated for 11 years
that he will ignore, stiff and laugh at the world's opinion. That
laughter has to stop.
If peace can be maintained while disarming Saddam Hussein and
disarming the Iraqi regime, fine. But if it takes conflict, we must
keep the prospect of conflict there or else he will not cooperate.
The concern we should have is that Saddam Hussein might blow up his
infrastructure, his own oil wells, as he goes down to defeat. If we
are going in if we have to go in, and we hope we don't have to go in,
we will go in to remove a dictatorial regime and take away his weapons
of mass destruction.
And as we have demonstrated repeatedly in recent years, we will fight
a conflict, if it comes to a conflict, with sophisticated weapons,
with precision weapons, in a way that minimizes loss of civilian life.
Will there be some loss? Of course, there always is. That's why war
should be avoided.
But forestalling action is forestalling the inevitability, rather. I
mean, it just leads to the inevitability of Saddam becoming more
dangerous, the Iraqi regime becoming more dangerous, in the months and
years ahead.
Oprah:  Thank you, Secretary of State Colin Powell.
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list