UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

21 October 2002

Bush: It's Up to U.N., Saddam Hussein Whether Iraq Disarms Peacefully

(U.S. Trying diplomacy one more time, he says) (950)
By Wendy S. Ross
Washington File White House Correspondent
Washington -- It's up to the United Nations and to Saddam Hussein to
decide whether Iraq disarms peacefully, President Bush told reporters
October 21, as he concluded a meeting in the Oval Office with NATO
Secretary General George Robertson.
"We've tried diplomacy. We're trying it one more time," Bush said. "I
believe the free world, if we make up our mind to, can disarm this man
peacefully. But if not, if not, we have the will and the desire, as do
other nations, to disarm Saddam. It's up to him to make that decision;
it's up to the United Nations. And we'll determine here soon whether
the United Nations has got the will, and then it's up to Saddam to
make the decision."
The stated policy of the United States (towards Iraq) is regime
change, Bush said, "because for 11 years Saddam Hussein has ignored
the United Nations and the free world."
"However, if he were to meet all the conditions of the United Nations
... that in itself will signal the regime has changed," Bush said.
Bush said Saddam Hussein is "unique" in that over the last 11 years he
has continued to thumb his nose at the world and refused to disarm.
While calling the news of North Korea's admission that it has an
active nuclear weapons development program "a troubling discovery,"
Bush said he views it as an opportunity to work with friends in the
Asian region to convince North Korea's leader Kim Jong Il that he must
disarm.
North Korea's nuclear weapons program violates the country's 1994
"Agreed Framework" with the United States, under which North Korean
nuclear development programs were to be halted.
Earlier in the day, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said the
United States is consulting now with Japan, South Korea and China
about North Korea's nuclear weapons program.
"And I think it's fair to say that international pressure will come to
bear on North Korea to make them realize the dangers that they are
pursuing in terms of the future for them will be increasingly isolated
if they go down the road that they have indicated they're going down.
So that's the course of action."
"Our path is going to remain a path of consultation with our allies,
and we feel confident we will have a common approach to this problem,"
Fleischer said, noting that State Department Assistant Secretary for
East Asian and Pacific Affairs James Kelly is in the region, and that
President Bush will discuss North Korea with China's President Jiang
Zemin at their October 25 meeting in Texas, prior to both men going to
this year's Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Mexico. At
the APEC meeting Bush will meet with leaders of Japan, South Korea and
Russia among others.
Regarding Iraq, Fleischer said the Permanent 5 members of the United
Nations Security Council (the United States, Britain, France, Russia
and China) began discussions in New York November 21 on a new draft
resolution offered by the United States and Britain.
"Progress is being made on getting an agreement around the language
that has been under discussion for several weeks now. We'll see
exactly what course the United Nations Security Council takes. I can't
predict the exact dates that they will take concrete action, but I
think it's moving forward nicely."
Fleischer, however, said it would be "very risky for anybody to
predict what the United Nations will do in final form."
The proposed resolution, he said, contains "very strong" language. "It
makes clear that the inspection regime of the '90s will be replaced
with a new and much tougher, more effective inspection regime ... and
it also makes clear that there will be serious consequences if Saddam
Hussein fails to honor his obligations."
Based on this new language, Fleischer said, the United States, along
with its allies, will have all the authority they need to use military
force if Saddam does not comply with the inspection regime.
Fleischer said "it's a very important action for the United Nations
Security Council to adopt this resolution. We hope that they will."
Fleischer also responded to news reports that the United States may be
backing away from pressing for regime change in Iraq, saying the
reports are "much ado about nothing." The reports, he indicated,
misinterpreted comments made on weekend television news shows by
Secretary of State Colin Powell.
"Regime change remains Congress's policy, signed by the President,
remains law of the land. It remains the American position and the
position that the president and everybody in his Cabinet strongly
supports," Fleischer said.
"What we're interested in is disarmament," Fleischer said. "What we're
interested in is an end to Saddam Hussein and Iraq using hostility as
a way to treat its neighbors, repression of minorities within Iraq. We
have an objective in mind, and the objective is to secure the peace
through disarmament, through the honoring of the U.N. resolutions."
Asked whether the United States government sees any merit in the fact
that Saddam Hussein has decreed general amnesty for most prisoners in
that country, Fleischer responded:
"Well, as Secretary Powell said yesterday, that can also be read as a
political ploy. Nobody knows how many prisoners there are in Iraq.
Nobody knows if Saddam Hussein has released a tenth of them, a quarter
of them, half of them. So it's very hard to make sense of what Saddam
Hussein has done.
"The other issue that would be important there too is the president,
when he went to the United Nations in September, talked about the need
for Saddam Hussein to account for the 600 people that remain
unaccounted for since the Persian Gulf War. We have no indication that
his actions yesterday have touched on the fate of any of those 600."
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International
Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:
http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list