UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

15 August 2002

U.S. Seeks to Provide Iraqi National Congress With $8 Million

(Funds would go to media, administration and humanitarian relief.)
(1640)
The United States will offer the Iraqi National Congress (INC) an
additional $8 million as part of a new cooperative agreement, said
State Department Deputy Spokesman Philip Reeker.
The State Department notified the U.S. Congress of its intent to
provide the funds on May 23, and now awaits a formal response from the
INC to the offer, said Reeker, speaking at the August 14 State
Department briefing in Washington.
"We're anxious to continue our support for the Iraqi National
Congress, their newspaper, their TV station, regional offices, the
office of humanitarian relief. So we believe they can continue to play
a very productive and useful role through the activities proposed in
that new agreement," said Reeker.
The funds will cover the period of June 2002 through December 2002, he
said.
Reeker also said the United States understands the concerns of the
Iraqi opposition due to Saddam Hussein's history of oppressing and
murdering political opponents on a large scale, and his past use of
chemical weapons against civilians.
"[W]e fully recognize that free Iraqis run risks," said Reeker,
repeating that the United States would respond to threats or actions
taken by Saddam Hussein against his neighbors or the Kurdish
population in northern Iraq.
"That's why we have in place Operation Northern Watch and Operation
Southern Watch, the no-fly zones that we continue to observe with the
British, and why we have made consistently clear that we have a
credible force in the region and would respond. And so that continues
to be our position," said Reeker.
Following is an excerpt from the August 14 State Department briefing
containing Deputy Spokesman Reeker's comments on Iraq:
(begin excerpt)
QUESTION: Something that Mr. Chalabi said yesterday after meeting with
Assistant Secretary Burns: "We asked for protection not only for Kurds
but also for all of the Iraq population from Saddam's heavy weapons
and weapons of mass destruction through UN Security Council
resolutions." Do you have a response to that request?
MR. REEKER: I think I responded to a similar quotation, perhaps from a
different member -- representative of the Iraqi opposition yesterday.
But I would repeat again that we fully recognize that free Iraqis run
risks. The record of Saddam Hussein's regime in terms of oppressing
and murdering its own people is all too clear. I'll remind you of the
1988 Anfal campaign against the Kurds, the use of chemical weapons
against the civilian population of Halabja, suppression of Shi'a in
the south.
So we're very conscious of the nature of Saddam Hussein's regime and
the risks to those who oppose the regime. That's why we have in place
Operation Northern Watch and Operation Southern watch, the no-fly
zones that we continue to observe with the British, and why we have
made consistently clear that we have a credible force in the region
and would respond. And so that continues to be our position.
QUESTION: Yesterday I think you responded in the context of the
Kurdish section of Iraq.
MR. REEKER:  Yes.
QUESTION:  Now it's all-inclusive?
MR. REEKER: Happy to say that as well. As we have been saying for some
time, should Saddam Hussein reconstitute his weapons of mass
destruction, threaten his neighbors or US forces, or move against the
Kurds, we would respond.
Yes, Eli.
QUESTION: That position has been, in effect, I think in an agreement
that was reached last year at this time with the Kurds, but it does
not get specific in terms of would you respond in terms of people
attacking or would you respond as the US has responded in 1996, in
attacking in the south, and there was an attack in the north.
MR. REEKER: I don't think I can predict any particular operational
responses for you, Eli.
QUESTION: Well, I'm not asking for operational, but it's well known
that the Kurds have asked for a very specific security guarantee --
MR. REEKER: I don't have anything further for you on that. We wouldn't
be sharing specifics in terms of that.
QUESTION:  Can you talk about the funding a little bit more?
MR. REEKER:  Which funding?
QUESTION: With the INC? Chalabi said yesterday, I believe separately
from, George, but that this -- you know, that everything should move
forward now, that all the disagreements had been ironed out, and that
money should --
MR. REEKER:  You're talking about the $8 million?
QUESTION:  Yes.
MR. REEKER: Right. Just to refresh everybody's memory on that, on May
23rd, the State Department notified Congress of our intent to award
the Iraqi National Congress a new cooperative agreement offering the
organization another $8 million for the June through December 2002
period. We did further discuss this offer with the Iraqi National
Congress leadership during the course of the last week while they've
been in town, along with other Iraqi opposition representatives, and
we are still awaiting a formal response from the INC to that offer. So
we do need to get a formal response to them on that.
We're anxious to continue our support for the Iraqi National Congress
-- their newspaper, their TV station, regional offices, the Office of
Humanitarian Relief. So we believe they can continue to play a very
productive and useful role through the activities proposed in that new
agreement.
QUESTION: Can I just clarify? I mean, he's the leader of the INC. Are
you saying that in this meeting yesterday he didn't say formally we're
ready for this money --
MR. REEKER: I certainly saw it said on television. We need to get a
formal response from them.
QUESTION:  But he was here personally and he did --
MR. REEKER: Yes, he had meetings. No, we have not received yet the
formal response from the INC to that.
QUESTION: Would that require some kind of paperwork other than a
verbal --
MR. REEKER: Yes. These cooperative agreements require a certain amount
of cooperation, of exchange of documents. So we'll be looking for that
formal response.
QUESTION:  Can you say what the obstacles are?
MR. REEKER: I'm not suggesting there necessarily is an obstacle. We
need to get the formal response from the INC, and we don't have that
yet.
QUESTION: Phil, do you have to expect that such a formal response is
imminent?
MR. REEKER: I certainly saw the remarks that Mr. Chalabi made publicly
--
QUESTION: Right, but here he gave you guys -- he didn't give you guys
any indication that a, you know, a formal, you know, paper or --
MR. REEKER: I couldn't tell you exactly what indication he may or may
not have given, but we'll be looking for the formal response to that.
QUESTION: So right now, pending the arrival, if and when it ever
comes, of their formal response, that money is still not being
disbursed?
MR. REEKER: Exactly. It's on the table, an $8 million cooperative
agreement.
Yes, Eli.
QUESTION: Aren't you guys, though, like giving them just a little bit
of money to keep going? You know what I mean? Like, I mean you've had
these budget disputes for some time.
MR. REEKER: Eli, I would have to go back and check. I don't know what
-- this is -- we notified Congress --
QUESTION:  (Inaudible.)
QUESTION:  What?
QUESTION:  You mean, like a tip?
QUESTION: Not like a tip. I mean, that there was a formal agreement
dispute, and my understanding is that you nonetheless don't want to
see them shut down all their offices in Damascus and Prague and Tehran
and whatnot, so you sort of just give them enough to get by.
MR. REEKER: I don't know, Eli. I'll check. We're awaiting a formal
response to the cooperative agreement for the period May through
December of this year.
(end excerpt)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list