Iraq Threatens Kuwait
Iraq News, MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1999
By Laurie MylroieThe central focus of Iraq News is the tension between the considerable, proscribed WMD capabilities that Iraq is holding on to and its increasing stridency that it has complied with UNSCR 687 and it is time to lift sanctions. If you wish to receive Iraq News by email, a service which includes full-text of news reports not archived here, send your request to Laurie Mylroie .
I. TARIQ AZIZ REITERATES IRAQI CLAIM TO KUWAIT, INA, JAN 10 II. SAHHAF SLAMS SAUDI, KUWAIT ROLE IN US/UK AGGRESSION, REUTERS, JAN 10 III. BELLICOSE DEBATE OF NAT'L ASSEMBLY, RADIO MONTE CARLO, JAN 9 IV. "IRAQI MPS CALL FOR SCRAPPING OF KUWAIT BORDER," AFP, JAN 9 V. NAT'L ASSEMBLY ISSUES RESOLUTION, BBC, JAN 10 In the Jerusalem Post, Dec 24, columnists Uri Dann and Dennis Eisenberg, writing about Israel's relative passivity on Iraq, said, "What our leaders told us during the bombardment [Operation Desert Fox] was restated again and again: 'Iraq does not affect us. It is none of our business. We are not involved.' Not involved? Are our leaders so divorced from reality that they believe Saddam Hussein is not out to avenge the destruction of the Osirak reactor--which, if we had not bombed it in 1981, would have given him atomic weapons by the time he invaded Kuwait? Did they not hear Tariq Aziz last Friday when he coupled Israel and 'the Zionists' with Britain and the US in their 'plot' to attack Iraq, which was followed by a verbal assault on the 'Zionist clique of the Jewish advisers surrounding President Clinton?' Were their ears stuffed with cotton wool as Saddam Hussein, in his 'victory' speech on Sunday saluted the Palestinian Arabs for their firm stand against the Zionist state and for their burning of the US flags they had been waving during Clinton's visit to Gaza only days before? . . . Military and government leaders seem to have forgotten that as recently as six years ago, steps were being taken to handle the Saddam Hussein menace via the Tze'elim-2 guided missile project, although the operation's dress rehearsal went tragically wrong. Foreign newspapers made much of the Tze'elim-2 disaster, maintaining that the operation was part of an Israeli plan to assassinate Saddam. To the West, Saddam Hussein is a threat to the sources of oil. But to Israel he is a deadly enemy--as deadly as any the country has faced since its founding. Today, Iraq has pilotless planes that can carry biological or chemical weapons. If that isn't a deadly threat to all Israel, then what is?" "Iraq News" can only underscore A.M. Rosenthal, Jan 8, "The UN is carpeted in contempt for the US, for failure to use its material power or what remains of its intellectual power to eliminate a minor dictator wirth major plans for mass slaughter. . . The American public, as always, must share responsibility with its elected Government on what it does or does not do. Despite the reports by UN inspectors about Saddam's concealment, despite his decision to force Iraqis to suffer sanctions rather than reveal his weapons of mass destruction, Americans seem entirely relaxed. Yes, there was the World Trade Center bombing. But you don't really think terrorists would also use anthrax over here, actually use it?" During a Jan 8 briefing on the revised US assessment of damage caused by "Operation Desert Fox," Centcom commander, Gen. Anthony Zinni, said, "Probably the most remarkable thing in my mind was the Army day speech by Saddam. I think that was clear evidence of his isolation. The language he used, his attack on all the other leaders in the region I think showed a degree of desperation that we hadn't seen before." Of course, it is impossible to know Saddam's thoughts and he miscalculates. But as "Iraq News," Jan 6, suggested, it is doubtful that Iraq's continued escalation of this confrontation is driven by desperation and/or extreme weakness. It seems part of a plan. Moreover, given Saddam's vengeful and vicious nature and the nature of the proscribed unconventional weapons he retains, it would only be prudent to consider other explanations, besides desperation, of what Iraq might be doing. "Iraq News" invites readers to offer scenarios for what it is that Saddam may have in mind. In Al-Thawrah, Tariq Aziz, in the first of a two-part article, reported by INA, yesterday, reasserted Iraq's claim to Kuwait and accused Kuwait of having committed "treacherous aggression against Iraq," prior to Aug 2, 1990. Aziz said that "certain Arab circles" had called on Iraq to apologize for occupying Kuwait to facilitate Arab reconciliation. Aziz responded, "Those who have been falsifying facts since August 1990 are trying in vain to cover their crime of participation in word and deed in the crime of aggression against Iraq and in placing the region under US and Zionist military, political, and economic hegemony by blaming Iraq and its leadership. . . The first question that must be strongly posed forcefully and bluntly is this: Are the rulers of Kuwait a victim, or are they colluding criminals who deliberately harmed Iraq and committed an aggression against it? Are the rulers of Kuwait rulers of an Arab entity, just like other entities? Or are they British and later US tools for besieging and weakening Iraq? The facts of history cannot be concealed by empty propaganda . . . Those facts date back to the 19th century and early 20th century. All these facts confirm beyond any doubt that 'Kuwait' was established as an entity by Britain in order to besiege Iraq and deny it its historical coasts, which had been part of it since the Sumerian era. And so were they under the Ottoman state, which was the last state to rule Iraq and the region before Iraq was established as an entity in 1921. "As the rulers of Kuwait are today committing crimes against Iraq, the start of this behavior began with the crime of Mubarak al-Sabah, the grandfather of the present rulers of Kuwait, who killed his two brothers, Muhammad and Jarrah, in collaboration with the British. His objective was to sign the secret agreement of 1899, in accordance with which he linked the fate of Kuwait with Britain, instead of the Ottoman state, which had tutelage over Kuwait, which was one of the districts of al-Basrah Province. "President Saddam Husayn is not the only Iraqi leader who noted this fact. . . . All those who assumed power in Iraq since 1921 said the same thing. . . . Who amongst all those should apologize to the rulers of Kuwait? Shall we ask those who are dead to come out of their graves to apologize to the grandsons of the killer of his brothers, Mubarak al-Sabah, and to thank them for linking part of the Arab homeland with Britain and for turning it into a British base, and then to a US base, for plotting against Iraq, with the aim of weakening it? Aziz then cited a memo that had served as part of Iraq's justification for invading Kuwait, "On 15 July 1990, I addressed a memorandum to Arab League Secretary General Chedli Klibi on the conspiratorial and aggressive behavior of the Kuwait rulers against Iraq. Here are some excerpts of this memorandum. "With deep regret, we have been noticing that the acts of the Government of Kuwait toward Iraq have deviated from the framework of pan-Arab concepts. In fact, these acts . . . threaten the pillars of inter-Arab relations. . . The Kuwaiti officials have tried--through a continuous and premeditated way--to encroach upon Iraq and to harm it. They intended to weaken it after emerging from the eight-year grinding war [with Iran]. . . . The Government of Kuwait followed this policy, which aims at weakening Iraq, at a time when Iraq is facing a fierce imperialist-Zionist campaign as a result of its pan-Arab stands in defense of Arab rights . . . "In this memorandum, I presented an account of the acts, which the rulers of Kuwait carried out against Iraq at that time. "1. The issue of borders. The memorandum states that the demarcation of borders has been an outstanding issue between Iraq and Kuwait since the epoch of colonialism and the divisions it imposed on the Arab nation. . . . During the long years of war in particular, and while the valiant sons of Iraq were sacrificing their dear blood on the fronts in defense of the Arab land, including the land of Kuwait, . . . the Kuwaiti Government exploited Iraq's preoccupation and its genuine pan-Arab principles and noble approach in dealing with the brothers and the pan-Arab causes in order to implement its scheme through speeding up its gradual and systematic incursion into Iraq's territory. Thus, it started setting up military facilities, police stations, oil facilities and farms on Iraq's territory. . . "2. Economic plotting: The Kuwaiti Government started for months and specifically after Iraq had raised its voice--during the Arab Cooperation Council summit in Amman in February 1990--calling for the restoration of Arab rights in Palestine and warning against the dangers of the US presence in the Gulf, to pursue an unfair policy whose aim was to harm the Arab nation, particularly Iraq. The Kuwaiti Government had implemented a premeditated plan to inundate the oil market with more production in excess of its quota which was specified by OPEC. . . . The Kuwaiti Government further harmed Iraq in particular. Since 1980, particularly during the years of war, it installed oil installations on the southern part of the Iraqi al-Rumaylah oil field to pump oil from it . . . "This is what the grandsons of Mubarak al-Sabah did to Iraq before 2 August 1990. . . In whose favor did they do this other than the United States and Zionism? Those who accuse Iraq of launching an aggression against Kuwait deliberately ignore the defining of the word aggression in international law and relations between states. Aggression has many forms and methods, not only military action. Economic aggression is as harmful as military aggression. The Kuwaiti rulers did not have military power through which they could harm Iraq. So, they used their superior power; namely, the economic power, to launch a mean and treacherous aggression against Iraq. . . Also, yesterday, Foreign Minister Mohammed al-Sahhaf, gave a press conference in which, he assaulted Saudi Arabia and Kuwait for their cooperation with the US and UK, which he branded as "thieves and outlaws." Saudi Arabia has floated some notion of easing sanctions, by allowing Iraq unrestricted, and perhaps unsupervised, import of food and medicine. As Reuters reported, after condemning the US/UK, Sahhaf said, "It created a very odd and dangerous situation because those two aggressors were taking with them two states in the region, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. . . This imposed a real danger for stability in the region." Sahhaf "urged Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to stop cooperating with Washington and London in imposing no-fly zones over Iraq. 'Before they (Saudi Arabia) propose lifting sanctions, first they should stop . . . imposing the no-fly zone and prevent American and British forces who are in their land to commit crimes against Iraq. . . We have informed our brothers in different Arab countries that reasonable and minimum steps which can be taken by the Arab League member states is to lift the sanctions unilaterally." And, over the weekend, Iraq's Nat'l Assembly met in a two-day extraordinary session. The reporting from the first day, Sat, was extremely bellicose. According to Radio Monte Carlo, Jan 9, "Members of the Iraqi National Assembly were today unanimous in their call on the Iraqi leadership to reconsider Iraq's cooperation with all relevant UN Security Council resolutions. . . . Some National Assembly members explicitly demanded that Iraq reconsider its acceptance of Resolution 633, under which Iraq recognizes Kuwait and demarcates its border with it. . . . Iraqi National Assembly Speaker Sa'dun Hammadi said it is likely the Assembly will propose that the Iraqi leadership adopt these recommendations. . . . Observers believe that the recommendations the National Assembly will make concerning Iraq's relationship with the Security Council will usher in a new stage in Iraq's policy on the grounds that Iraq was not rewarded for cooperating with the Security Council . . ." And as AFP, Jan 9, reported, "Dozens of Iraqi MP's on Saturday called for the scrapping of a UN resolution demarcating the sanctions-hit state's border with Kuwait, during the opening of an extraordinary two-day session. The resolution is 'without precedent, unfair and arbitrary . . . (it) is not a prerogative of the Security Council, but should be solved bilaterally or by arbitration,' said MP Ibrahim Yussef Turki Jaddua. 'The Security Council imposed this decision on the basis of a British map never recognised by Iraq. . . Iraq was amputated of territory and oil fields. Why must Iraq continue to accept this unjust situation?' he said." But the Nat'l Assembly resolution, when issued Sun, while defiant enough, was not as bellicose as the previous day's discussion would have suggested. As the BBC, Jan 10, reported, "The Iraqi National Assembly has voted to suspend all co-operation with the United Nations and has declared it holds Saudi Arabia and Kuwait fully responsible for the consequences of last month's air attacks by the United States and the United Kingdom. . . However, it stopped short of demanding that the two countries be punished, as some MPS had urged. . . The result of the special session was not unexpected, but it shows Iraqi resolve is strengthening rather than weakening a month after the wave of strikes." I. TARIQ AZIZ REITERATES IRAQI CLAIM TO KUWAIT Baghdad INA in Arabic 0845 GMT 10 Jan 99 [FBIS Translated Text] Baghdad, 10 Jan (INA)-The newspaper al-Thawrah, mouthpiece of the Arab Socialist Ba'th Party, publishes an article today by Tariq 'Aziz, titled "Who Apologizes for Whom?" The article reads: Within the framework of avoiding any condemnation of the United States and Britain for committing the crime of aggression against Iraq, ignoring the calls of the Arab masses and their nationalist forces and conscientious groups for an Arab decision to break the unjust blockade imposed on Iraq, and within the suspicious campaign aimed at avoiding those substantive subjects and directing unfounded blame at the Iraqi leadership, certain Arab circles have launched suspicious calls, demanding Iraq apologize for its "occupation of Kuwait" and express regret for what has happened. If that takes place, they say, then the path will be opened toward Arab reconciliation. Subsequently, they maintain, the Arab states will call on the UN Security Council to lift the blockade, provided that that be coupled, as they say, with adherence to "international legitimacy" and the implementation of the UN Security Council resolutions. The advocates of such a call -- by whom I mean those who have since 1990 been colluding with the US-Zionist scheme to destroy Iraq and control the region--are circumventing the facts of the near and far history, believing that they can deceive the masses and circumvent the basic facts of the situation and the core of the conflict witnessed by the entire Arab arena against the US-Zionist hegemony, of which the 2 August events were a chapter. The advocates of such a call also try to fool Arab public opinion by saying that there is an "Arab" side who was deeply wounded and that the wound cannot heal unless Iraq declares its regret and apology to those who were wounded. Those who have been falsifying facts since August 1990 are trying in vain to cover their crime of participation in word and deed in the crime of aggression against Iraq and in placing the region under US and Zionist military, political, and economic hegemony by blaming Iraq and its leadership. However, the logic of those people cannot convince Arab public opinion, the conscientious forces in the Arab homeland, and the intellectuals in the Arab homeland and the world. Those of goodwill who are involved in such suspicious calls should be aware of their true reasons and purposes. The first question that must be strongly posed forcefully and bluntly is this: Are the rulers of Kuwait a victim, or are they colluding criminals who deliberately harmed Iraq and committed an aggression against it? Are the rulers of Kuwait rulers of an Arab entity, just like other entities? Or are they British and later US tools for besieging and weakening Iraq? The facts of history cannot be concealed by empty propaganda and suspicious and thoughtless calls. Those facts date back to the 19th century and early 20th century. All these facts confirm beyond any doubt that "Kuwait" was established as an entity by Britain in order to besiege Iraq and deny it its historical coasts, which had been part of it since the Sumerian era. And so were they under the Ottoman state, which was the last state to rule Iraq and the region before Iraq was established as an entity in 1921. As the rulers of Kuwait are today committing crimes against Iraq, the start of this behavior began with the crime of Mubarak al-Sabah, the grandfather of the present rulers of Kuwait, who killed his two brothers Muhammad and Jarrah in collaboration with the British. His objective was to sign the secret agreement of 1899, in accordance with which he linked the fate of Kuwait with Britain, instead of the Ottoman state, which had tutelage over Kuwait, which was one of the districts of al-Basrah Province. President Saddam Husayn is not the only Iraqi leader who noted this fact. And the present leadership in Iraq is not the only one which said that Kuwait was established to besiege Iraq, to turn it into a land- locked state, and consequently to weaken it militarily and economically. All those who assumed power in Iraq since 1921 said the same thing: Faysal I, Ghazi Bin-Faysal, Faysal Bin-Ghazi Bin-Faysal, Nuri Sa'id, Yasin al-Hashimi, Tawfiq al-Suwaydi, and the other prime ministers and ministers who took office until 14 July 1958. The rulers at the time of the monarchy, like some Arab rulers today, were the friends of Britain and then of the United States. Despite this, they could not ignore this fact because it was amply clear. The matter did not stop on 14 July 1958 as the rulers of Iraq afterward maintained this firm Iraqi stand. Who amongst all those should apologize to the rulers of Kuwait? Shall we ask those who are dead to come out of their graves to apologize to the grandsons of the killer of his brothers, Mubarak al-Sabah, and to thank them for linking part of the Arab homeland with Britain and for turning it into a British base, and then to a US base, for plotting against Iraq with the aim of weakening it? On 15 July 1990, I addressed a memorandum to Arab League Secretary General Chedli Klibi on the conspiratorial and aggressive behavior of the Kuwait rulers against Iraq. Here are some excerpts of this memorandum: With deep regret, we have been noticing that the acts of the Government of Kuwait toward Iraq have deviated from the framework of the pan-Arab concepts. In fact, these acts contradict with and threaten the pillars of inter-Arab relations. Despite our faithful fraternal stands in dealing with them at all times, the Kuwaiti officials have tried -- through a continuous and premeditated way -- to encroach upon Iraq and to harm it. They intended to weaken it after emerging from the eight-year grinding war. All honest Arabs, including leaders, thinkers, and citizens, as well as the leaders of the Gulf states, asserted that in this war Iraq was defending the sovereignty of the entire Arab nation and the Gulf states, particularly Kuwait. The Government of Kuwait followed this policy, which aims at weakening Iraq, at a time when Iraq is facing a fierce imperialist-Zionist campaign as a result of its pan-Arab stands in defense of the Arab rights. In doing so, the Government of Kuwait, regrettably, is motivated by selfish motives, narrow views, and objectives that can only be viewed as suspicious and serious. In this memorandum, I presented an account of the acts, which the rulers of Kuwait carried out against Iraq at that time. 1. The issue of borders: The memorandum states that the demarcation of borders has been an outstanding issue between Iraq and Kuwait since the epoch of colonialism and the divisions it imposed on the Arab nation. The contacts which were held in the 1960's and 1970's failed to reach a settlement to this issue between the two sides until the eruption of war between Iraq and Iran. During the long years of war in particular, and while the valiant sons of Iraq were sacrificing their dear blood on the fronts in defense of the Arab land, including the land of Kuwait, and Arab sovereignty and dignity, including those of Kuwait, the Kuwaiti Government exploited Iraq's preoccupation [with the war] and its genuine pan-Arab principles and noble approach in dealing with the brothers and the pan-Arab causes in order to implement its scheme through speeding up its gradual and systematic incursion into Iraq's territory. Thus, it started setting up military facilities, police stations, oil facilities, and farms on Iraq's territory. We remained silent on all of that. We only hinted at these actions, thinking that this was enough within the framework of the principles of brotherhood which we thought everybody believed in. However, these measures continued through deceitful methods and determination on escalation. After the liberation of al-Faw and specifically during Algiers summit in 1988, we informed the Kuwaiti side of our genuine desire to settle this issue within the framework of fraternal relations and the higher pan-Arab interest. However, we found ourselves facing an extremely odd situation. According to logic, the Kuwaiti officials should have been pleased with this kind fraternal initiative of ours, and should have sought to settle this issue speedily. Nevertheless, we noticed a deliberate hesitance and procrastination on their part through prolonging the talks and contacts. They also raised fabricated obstacles, while continuing to violate and set up oil and military facilities, police stations, and farms on the Iraqi territory. 2. Economic plotting: The Kuwaiti Government started for months and specifically after Iraq had raised its voice--during the Arab Cooperation Council summit in Amman in February 1990--calling for the restoration of Arab rights in Palestine and warning against the dangers of the US presence in the Gulf, to pursue an unfair policy whose aim was to harm the Arab nation, particularly Iraq. The Kuwaiti Government had implemented a premeditated plan to inundate the oil market with more production in excess of its quota which was specified by OPEC. This was done under feeble pretexts that were not based on any foundations of logic or justice. These pretexts were not shared by any other fraternal OPEC member. This devastating policy led to a serious drop in oil prices. After the drop that took place a few years ago from 24, 29, and 28 dollars per barrel, the Kuwaiti Government's actions led to the collapse of the minimum price, which was recently agreed upon in the OPEC; namely, $18, to 11-13 dollars per barrel. So, a simple calculation will show the heavy losses the Arab oil-producing countries have sustained. In its memorandum, Iraq said that the drop of every dollar in the oil price makes Iraq lose a billion dollars per year. This meant that Iraq would lose several billions of dollars from its revenues for that year at a time when Iraq was suffering a monetary crunch due to the costs of the legitimate defense of its land, security, and holy places, and of the land of the Arabs, their security, and holy places throughout the past eight years. These losses also affected all the Arab oil-producing countries. The memorandum also reads: In addition to its premeditated harm, the Kuwaiti Government further harmed Iraq in particular. Since 1980, particularly during the years of war, it installed oil installations on the southern part of the Iraqi al-Rumaylah oil field to pump oil from it. It was clear that it used to flood the international market with oil, plus, it stole oil from the Iraqi al-Rumaylah oil field, thus, premeditatedly harming Iraq twice; once by weakening its economy at a time when it was in dire need of its revenues, and again by stealing its resources. The oil the Kuwaiti Government pumped from al-Rumaylah oil fields in this way, which conflicts with fraternal relations, based on 1980-1990 prices, totals $2.4 billion. This is what the grandsons of Mubarak al-Sabah did to Iraq before 2 August 1990, although it had emerged from a bloody war in which it sacrificed the blood of its sons in defense of the eastern flank of the Arab homeland, the Arab Gulf, and the Arabian Peninsula, including Kuwait. This is what they did with the Arab wealth. In whose favor did they do this other than the United States and Zionism? Those who accuse Iraq of launching an aggression against Kuwait deliberately ignore the definition of the word aggression in international law and relations between states. Aggression has many forms and methods, not only military action. Economic aggression is as harmful as the military aggression. The Kuwaiti rulers did not have military power through which they could harm Iraq. So, they used their superior power; namely, the economic power, to launch a mean and treacherous aggression against Iraq. So, who should apologize? [end of article] The newspaper al-Thawrah will publish the second part of Tariq 'Aziz' article tomorrow [Monday, 11 January] III. BELLICOSE DEBATE OF NAT'L ASSEMBLY Iraq's Hammadi: UN Resolutions 'Unfair', 'Illegal' Paris Radio Monte Carlo in Arabic 1600 GMT 9 Jan 99 [Dispatch by Ahmad Sabri in Baghdad--recorded] [FBIS Translated Text] Members of the Iraqi National Assembly were today unanimous in their call on the Iraqi leadership to reconsider Iraq's cooperation with all relevant UN Security Council resolutions. They said these resolution are unfair and will not lead to the lifting of sanctions on their country. They also held Kuwait and Saudi Arabia responsible for the recent attack against Iraq and the damage it caused. In an extraordinary session devoted to discussing national and pan-Arab requirements to confront US and British threats, some National Assembly members explicitly demanded that Iraq reconsider its acceptance of Resolution 633, under which Iraq recognizes Kuwait and demarcates its border with it. Answering a question by our radio, Iraqi National Assembly Speaker Sa'dun Hammadi said it is likely the Assembly will propose that the Iraqi leadership adopt these recommendations: [Begin Hammadi recording] Members of the Assembly discussed all Security Council resolutions, not only in this session but also in previous sessions. I cannot predict what decisions the Assembly will make, but, through previous meetings and decisions, I sense that the National Assembly believes that the Security Council resolutions were politically motivated and passed under the influence of an influential Security Council member. The resolutions harmed and wronged Iraq. At any rate, the sanctions should have been lifted because Iraq implemented those resolutions. But the sanctions were not removed, and the implementation of those resolutions was accompanied by a spying operation that is now well known to the world and the international media. The National Assembly finds the Security Council resolutions unjust, unfair, and illegal because they were passed under the political influence of the influential members of the Security Council. We will wait to see what results the Assembly will produce. [end recording] Political observers see in the timing of the extraordinary National Assembly meeting--in the middle of the confrontation between Iraq and both the United States and Britain--a sign that the Iraqi leadership, based on President Saddam Husayn's recent speech, is about to make decisions concerning the future of Iraq's relations with the Security Council and its resolutions. Observers believe that the recommendations the National Assembly will make concerning Iraq's relationship with the Security Council will usher in a new stage in Iraq's policy on the grounds that Iraq was not rewarded for cooperating with the Security Council, as the Council failed to implement Paragraph 22, which explicitly calls for the lifting of the oil embargo against Iraq. The Iraqi National Assembly is expected to issue its recommendations tomorrow, Sunday, after completing the discussion of all aspects of the subject.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|