UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

The White House Briefing Room


November 24, 1998

PRESS BRIEFING BY JOE LOCKHART

3:14 P.M. EST

                                THE WHITE HOUSE
                         Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                         November 24, 1998     
                               PRESS BRIEFING BY 
                                 JOE LOCKHART 
                              The Briefing Room  	
3:14 P.M. EST
.......
	  Q    What's the deal with Iraq?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I know that the Security Council will be 
meeting later today; Chairman Butler will be reporting to them on 
the request for documents, and we look forward to getting a 
report from the Security Council meeting.
	  Q    Is the President meeting with his advisors on Iraq 
later today?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  No, not that I'm aware of.
	  Q    -- may be a little more specific than my 
colleagues here and ask --
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I kind of like these open-ended 
questions.  (Laughter.)
	  Q    Has the administration decided that the documents 
that the inspectors are looking for are not worth military 
action?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  No, there's a process going on.  As 
we've said before, the response we've had to date is insufficient 
and Chairman Butler has communicated that to the Iraqis.  And 
there's a process now ongoing.  There's been some exchange of 
correspondence.  We look forward later this afternoon to getting 
an update from Chairman Butler at the Security Council.
	  But this isn't just about documents, this is a test 
that Saddam Hussein and the Iraqis have to pass about whether 
UNSCOM can do their job effectively.  So it's about documents, 
it's about access to sensitive sites, it's about access to people 
with knowledge of the program.  And as we, from experience, are 
very skeptical of the Iraqi government and of Saddam Hussein, 
from seven years of experience, the burden of prove and the 
burden of proving that they are cooperating and that they are 
doing what they can to make UNSCOM effective is a very difficult 
one. 
	  Q    Is the refusal to supply documents by the Iraqis 
is a justification for military action?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I'm not going to get into here what 
triggers one reaction or another, or try to put a timetable on 
it, or try to put a scorecard on a day-to-day basis.  I've laid 
out what the policy is, which is that the Iraqis must allow 
UNSCOM to do their job and be effective.
.............
	  Q    Back on Iraq.  But if they continue not to 
cooperate, how are we going to get them to cooperate?  I mean, is 
that part of the thinking that's going on?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  Well, again, I think one of the points I 
just tried to make is I'm not going to try to do a day-to-day 
scorecard of cooperation.  There is a broad test here that they 
have to meet that allows UNSCOM to be effective, because that's 
what is at the root of the policy here.  That's on a wide 
spectrum of issues -- documents are certainly one of them, access 
to sensitive sites, access to key personnel.  They have to prove 
and they have to do it affirmatively because that's the 
obligations they came under by making the agreement of now 10 
days ago in the letters they sent to the Security Council. 
	  And, again, we remain very skeptical of their 
intentions.  And if we do believe that UNSCOM is not able to do 
their job effectively, if they're not cooperating and in 
compliance with U.N. Security Council resolutions, we will employ 
other options.
	  Q    Joe, just to be specific, the Post report today 
about the administration having decided that the document alone 
is not justification -- that's not true, that's not correct?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  As we've said, there's a process 
underway.  The response to date hasn't been sufficient, but there 
is a process underway on the documents, as well as on other 
issues.  We look forward to later on this afternoon seeing what 
Chairman Butler says to the U.N. Security Council.
.................
	  Q    Back on Iraq.  Less than two weeks ago the 
President stood at that podium and said unless there's strict 
compliance there will be consequences.  Well, there hasn't been 
strict compliance and there hasn't been consequence.  How can he 
keep his credibility in the world today if he doesn't act?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  Well, I think that what we have here is 
an ongoing process that we are going to watch very closely and 
remain very vigilant -- on a wide variety, not just documents.  
As I indicated earlier in this briefing, there are a series of 
issues that Iraq is going to have to affirmatively prove that 
they will cooperate with in order to make UNSCOM effective.  And 
if they do not, if they are not able to demonstrate that then we 
certainly will have to make a judgment and it certainly leaves 
open the option of a military strike.
	  Q    Joe, is the White House surprised that Saddam 
Hussein is reneging some bit on his promise to give the U.N. 
weapons inspectors unfettered access?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I don't think there's anything that 
Saddam Hussein can do that would surprise anyone here at the 
White House.  We remain highly skeptical of any promise he makes 
based on his past history.  But what we're doing now is there is 
a broad test that's ongoing to see if the Iraqis can demonstrate 
the ability to let UNSCOM work effectively.  And that's something 
that's ongoing.
	  Q    Joe, did the United States authorize the British 
to give a tip-off to the Iraqis the strike would be Saturday --
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I don't have any reason to believe 
anything in that is accurate.
..................
	  Q    Joe, on Iraq, if there is an attack, what do you 
think of the future world oil supply or how the world oil supply 
will affect --
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I'm not going to speculate on the world 
after an attack.
	  Q    Back on the Iraq situation, is the White House 
paying any attention to Nation of Islam Minister Farrakhan saying 
that Clinton is blood-thirsty and who is he to have a right to 
say if Saddam should live or die?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I can't say that we've put any 
particular importance on Mr. Farrakhan's views.
	  Q    Any importance on the views of Senator Lugar who 
today said that we should strike now?
	  MR. LOCKHART:  I would say that we certainly put a lot 
more credence in Senator Lugar's views and I have not seen them, 
but I think I've tried best I can to answer that overall question 
which has come in five or six different ways.
	  Q    Thank you.
	  MR. LOCKHART:  Thank you.  
             END                      3:40 P.M. EST
#022-11/24



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list